TSTP Solution File: SYN002-1.007.008 by iProver---3.9
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : iProver---3.9
% Problem : SYN002-1.007.008 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri May 3 03:28:33 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 2.17s 1.16s
% Output : CNFRefutation 2.17s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 13
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 27 ( 5 unt; 7 nHn; 18 RR)
% Number of literals : 49 ( 0 equ; 25 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 9 ( 3 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-1 aty)
% Number of functors : 1 ( 1 usr; 0 con; 1-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 26 ( 4 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_49,negated_conjecture,
( p(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(X0))))))))
| p(X0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',positive) ).
cnf(c_50,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(X0)))))))))
| ~ p(X0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',negative) ).
cnf(c_61,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(X0)))))))))
| ~ p(X0) ),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_50]) ).
cnf(c_62,negated_conjecture,
( p(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(X0))))))))
| p(X0) ),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_49]) ).
cnf(c_110,plain,
( ~ p(X0)
| p(f(X0)) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_62,c_61]) ).
cnf(c_118,plain,
( ~ p(X0)
| p(f(X0)) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_62,c_61]) ).
cnf(c_144,plain,
( ~ p(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(X0))))))))
| ~ p(X0) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_110,c_61]) ).
cnf(c_152,plain,
( ~ p(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(X0))))))))
| ~ p(X0) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_118,c_61]) ).
cnf(c_212,plain,
( ~ p(f(f(f(f(f(f(X0)))))))
| ~ p(X0) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_110,c_144]) ).
cnf(c_221,plain,
( ~ p(f(f(f(f(f(f(X0)))))))
| ~ p(X0) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_118,c_152]) ).
cnf(c_321,plain,
( ~ p(f(X0))
| p(X0) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_62,c_212]) ).
cnf(c_322,plain,
( ~ p(f(f(f(f(f(X0))))))
| ~ p(X0) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_110,c_212]) ).
cnf(c_333,plain,
( ~ p(f(X0))
| p(X0) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_62,c_221]) ).
cnf(c_334,plain,
( ~ p(f(f(f(f(f(X0))))))
| ~ p(X0) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_118,c_221]) ).
cnf(c_736,plain,
( p(f(f(f(f(f(f(X0)))))))
| p(X0) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_62,c_321]) ).
cnf(c_745,plain,
( p(f(f(f(f(f(f(X0)))))))
| p(X0) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_62,c_333]) ).
cnf(c_2389,plain,
( ~ p(f(f(X0)))
| p(X0) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_62,c_322]) ).
cnf(c_2403,plain,
( ~ p(f(f(X0)))
| p(X0) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_62,c_334]) ).
cnf(c_3201,plain,
( p(f(f(f(f(X0)))))
| p(X0) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_736,c_2389]) ).
cnf(c_3212,plain,
( p(f(f(f(f(X0)))))
| p(X0) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_745,c_2403]) ).
cnf(c_4133,plain,
( ~ p(X0)
| p(f(f(f(X0)))) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_3201,c_144]) ).
cnf(c_4135,plain,
( p(f(f(f(X0))))
| p(X0) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_3201,c_321]) ).
cnf(c_4145,plain,
p(f(f(f(X0)))),
inference(backward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_4135,c_4133]) ).
cnf(c_4146,plain,
~ p(X0),
inference(backward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_322,c_4145]) ).
cnf(c_4152,plain,
p(f(f(f(f(X0))))),
inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_3212,c_3201,c_4146]) ).
cnf(c_4158,plain,
~ p(X0),
inference(backward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_61,c_4152]) ).
cnf(c_4159,plain,
$false,
inference(backward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_4152,c_4158]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : SYN002-1.007.008 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Thu May 2 20:51:31 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.47 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.19/0.47 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/run_problem --schedule fof_schedule --heuristic_context casc_unsat --no_cores 8 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 2.17/1.16 % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 2.17/1.16 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 2.17/1.16
% 2.17/1.16 %---------------- iProver v3.9 (pre CASC 2024/SMT-COMP 2024) ----------------%
% 2.17/1.16
% 2.17/1.16 ------ iProver source info
% 2.17/1.16
% 2.17/1.16 git: date: 2024-05-02 19:28:25 +0000
% 2.17/1.16 git: sha1: a33b5eb135c74074ba803943bb12f2ebd971352f
% 2.17/1.16 git: non_committed_changes: false
% 2.17/1.16
% 2.17/1.16 ------ Parsing...successful
% 2.17/1.16
% 2.17/1.16
% 2.17/1.16
% 2.17/1.16 ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e pe_s pe_e
% 2.17/1.16
% 2.17/1.16 ------ Preprocessing... gs_s sp: 0 0s gs_e snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e
% 2.17/1.16 ------ Proving...
% 2.17/1.16 ------ Problem Properties
% 2.17/1.16
% 2.17/1.16
% 2.17/1.16 clauses 2
% 2.17/1.16 conjectures 2
% 2.17/1.16 EPR 0
% 2.17/1.16 Horn 1
% 2.17/1.16 unary 0
% 2.17/1.16 binary 2
% 2.17/1.16 lits 4
% 2.17/1.16 lits eq 0
% 2.17/1.16 fd_pure 0
% 2.17/1.16 fd_pseudo 0
% 2.17/1.16 fd_cond 0
% 2.17/1.16 fd_pseudo_cond 0
% 2.17/1.16 AC symbols 0
% 2.17/1.16
% 2.17/1.16 ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on
% 2.17/1.16
% 2.17/1.16 ------ no equalities: superposition off
% 2.17/1.16
% 2.17/1.16 ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 2.17/1.16
% 2.17/1.16
% 2.17/1.16 ------
% 2.17/1.16 Current options:
% 2.17/1.16 ------
% 2.17/1.16
% 2.17/1.16
% 2.17/1.16
% 2.17/1.16
% 2.17/1.16 ------ Proving...
% 2.17/1.16
% 2.17/1.16
% 2.17/1.16 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 2.17/1.16
% 2.17/1.16 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 2.17/1.16
% 2.17/1.16
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------