TSTP Solution File: SYN000_1 by Vampire---4.8

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire---4.8
% Problem  : SYN000_1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v5.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s

% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 08:20:16 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.57s 0.74s
% Output   : Refutation 0.57s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   11 (   7 unt;   4 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :    7 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :    3 (   3   ~;   0   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    3 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    3 (   1 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    4 (   2   >;   2   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    3 (   3 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    4 (   2   !;   2   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(type_def_5,type,
    new: $tType ).

tff(func_def_8,type,
    newc: new ).

tff(func_def_9,type,
    newf: ( new * $i ) > new ).

tff(pred_def_11,type,
    newp: ( new * $i ) > $o ).

fof(f19,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolution,[],[f16,f17]) ).

fof(f17,plain,
    ! [X0] : ~ p(X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f15]) ).

fof(f15,plain,
    ! [X0] : ~ p(X0),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f11]) ).

fof(f11,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ? [X0] : p(X0),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f10]) ).

fof(f10,conjecture,
    ? [X0] : p(X0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',role_conjecture) ).

fof(f16,plain,
    p(h),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f9]) ).

fof(f9,axiom,
    p(h),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',role_hypothesis) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem    : SYN000_1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v5.0.0.
% 0.07/0.14  % Command    : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime   : Mon May 20 15:51:22 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.13/0.35  This is a TF0_THM_EQU_NAR problem
% 0.13/0.35  Running vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.52/0.74  % (27594)lrs+21_1:5_sil=2000:sos=on:urr=on:newcnf=on:slsq=on:i=83:slsql=off:bd=off:nm=2:ss=axioms:st=1.5:sp=const_min:gsp=on:rawr=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/83Mi)
% 0.52/0.74  % (27588)dis-1011_2:1_sil=2000:lsd=20:nwc=5.0:flr=on:mep=off:st=3.0:i=34:sd=1:ep=RS:ss=axioms_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/34Mi)
% 0.52/0.74  % (27591)ott+1011_1:1_sil=2000:urr=on:i=33:sd=1:kws=inv_frequency:ss=axioms:sup=off_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/33Mi)
% 0.52/0.74  % (27590)lrs+1011_1:1_sil=8000:sp=occurrence:nwc=10.0:i=78:ss=axioms:sgt=8_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/78Mi)
% 0.52/0.74  % (27589)lrs+1011_461:32768_sil=16000:irw=on:sp=frequency:lsd=20:fd=preordered:nwc=10.0:s2agt=32:alpa=false:cond=fast:s2a=on:i=51:s2at=3.0:awrs=decay:awrsf=691:bd=off:nm=20:fsr=off:amm=sco:uhcvi=on:rawr=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/51Mi)
% 0.52/0.74  % (27593)lrs+1002_1:16_to=lpo:sil=32000:sp=unary_frequency:sos=on:i=45:bd=off:ss=axioms_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/45Mi)
% 0.52/0.74  % (27592)lrs+2_1:1_sil=16000:fde=none:sos=all:nwc=5.0:i=34:ep=RS:s2pl=on:lma=on:afp=100000_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/34Mi)
% 0.52/0.74  % (27595)lrs-21_1:1_to=lpo:sil=2000:sp=frequency:sos=on:lma=on:i=56:sd=2:ss=axioms:ep=R_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/56Mi)
% 0.52/0.74  % (27594)First to succeed.
% 0.52/0.74  % (27594)Solution written to "/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/vampire-proof-27587"
% 0.52/0.74  % (27591)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.52/0.74  % (27593)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.52/0.74  % (27595)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.57/0.74  % (27594)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.57/0.74  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.57/0.74  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.57/0.74  % (27594)------------------------------
% 0.57/0.74  % (27594)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.57/0.74  % (27594)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.57/0.74  
% 0.57/0.74  % (27594)Memory used [KB]: 976
% 0.57/0.74  % (27594)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 0.57/0.74  % (27594)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.57/0.74  % (27587)Success in time 0.383 s
% 0.57/0.74  % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------