TSTP Solution File: SWW963+1 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : SWW963+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 00:11:46 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.23s 1.41s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.23s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 10
% Number of leaves : 8
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 33 ( 12 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 78 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 7 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 83 ( 38 ~; 35 |; 5 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 5 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 12 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 16 ( 16 usr; 4 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 48 ( 19 sgn 22 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(ax192,axiom,
! [X193,X194,X195,X196] :
( ( pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(name_Nb(X193),constr_ecb_dec_1(X195,name_skB))
& pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_5(X195))
& pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(name_A,constr_tuple_2_get_1(constr_ecb_dec_2(X194,name_skB)))
& pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_3(X194))
& pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(name_A,constr_tuple_2_get_0x30(constr_checksign(X196,constr_pkey(name_skS))))
& pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_2(X196)) )
=> pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_out_6(name_objective)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',ax192) ).
fof(ax95,axiom,
! [X50,X51] : pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(X50,X51),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',ax95) ).
fof(ax139,axiom,
! [X119] :
( pred_attacker(X119)
=> pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_5(X119)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',ax139) ).
fof(ax141,axiom,
! [X121] :
( pred_attacker(X121)
=> pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_3(X121)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',ax141) ).
fof(ax143,axiom,
! [X123] :
( pred_attacker(X123)
=> pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_2(X123)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',ax143) ).
fof(ax181,axiom,
! [X184] : pred_attacker(name_new0x2Dname(X184)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',ax181) ).
fof(co0,conjecture,
pred_attacker(name_objective),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',co0) ).
fof(ax133,axiom,
! [X110] :
( pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_out_6(X110))
=> pred_attacker(X110) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',ax133) ).
fof(c_0_8,plain,
! [X197,X198,X199,X200] :
( ~ pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(name_Nb(X197),constr_ecb_dec_1(X199,name_skB))
| ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_5(X199))
| ~ pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(name_A,constr_tuple_2_get_1(constr_ecb_dec_2(X198,name_skB)))
| ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_3(X198))
| ~ pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(name_A,constr_tuple_2_get_0x30(constr_checksign(X200,constr_pkey(name_skS))))
| ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_2(X200))
| pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_out_6(name_objective)) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax192])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_9,plain,
! [X52,X53] : pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(X52,X53),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[ax95]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_out_6(name_objective))
| ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_2(X1))
| ~ pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(name_A,constr_tuple_2_get_0x30(constr_checksign(X1,constr_pkey(name_skS))))
| ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_3(X2))
| ~ pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(name_A,constr_tuple_2_get_1(constr_ecb_dec_2(X2,name_skB)))
| ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_5(X3))
| ~ pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(name_Nb(X4),constr_ecb_dec_1(X3,name_skB)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(X1,X2),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
fof(c_0_12,plain,
! [X120] :
( ~ pred_attacker(X120)
| pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_5(X120)) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax139])]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_out_6(name_objective))
| ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_5(X3))
| ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_3(X2))
| ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_2(X1)) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]),c_0_11]),c_0_11])]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
( pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_5(X1))
| ~ pred_attacker(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).
fof(c_0_15,plain,
! [X122] :
( ~ pred_attacker(X122)
| pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_3(X122)) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax141])]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
( pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_out_6(name_objective))
| ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_3(X1))
| ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_2(X2))
| ~ pred_attacker(X3) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
( pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_3(X1))
| ~ pred_attacker(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).
fof(c_0_18,plain,
! [X124] :
( ~ pred_attacker(X124)
| pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_2(X124)) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax143])]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
( pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_out_6(name_objective))
| ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_2(X1))
| ~ pred_attacker(X2)
| ~ pred_attacker(X3) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
( pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_2(X1))
| ~ pred_attacker(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]) ).
fof(c_0_21,plain,
! [X185] : pred_attacker(name_new0x2Dname(X185)),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[ax181]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
( pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_out_6(name_objective))
| ~ pred_attacker(X1)
| ~ pred_attacker(X2)
| ~ pred_attacker(X3) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
pred_attacker(name_new0x2Dname(X1)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_21]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
( pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_out_6(name_objective))
| ~ pred_attacker(X1)
| ~ pred_attacker(X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]) ).
fof(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
~ pred_attacker(name_objective),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[co0]) ).
fof(c_0_26,plain,
! [X111] :
( ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_out_6(X111))
| pred_attacker(X111) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax133])]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,plain,
( pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_out_6(name_objective))
| ~ pred_attacker(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_23]) ).
fof(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
~ pred_attacker(name_objective),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_25]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,plain,
( pred_attacker(X1)
| ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_out_6(X1)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_26]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,plain,
pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_out_6(name_objective)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_23]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
~ pred_attacker(name_objective),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_28]) ).
cnf(c_0_32,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30]),c_0_31]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : SWW963+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.4.0.
% 0.03/0.12 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Sat Jun 4 08:20:51 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.23/1.41 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.23/1.41 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.23/1.41 # Preprocessing time : 0.017 s
% 0.23/1.41
% 0.23/1.41 # Failure: Out of unprocessed clauses!
% 0.23/1.41 # OLD status GaveUp
% 0.23/1.41 # Parsed axioms : 196
% 0.23/1.41 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 108
% 0.23/1.41 # Initial clauses : 88
% 0.23/1.41 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Initial clauses in saturation : 88
% 0.23/1.41 # Processed clauses : 88
% 0.23/1.41 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # ...remaining for further processing : 88
% 0.23/1.41 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Generated clauses : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Paramodulations : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Current number of processed clauses : 88
% 0.23/1.41 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 9
% 0.23/1.41 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Negative unit clauses : 79
% 0.23/1.41 # Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.23/1.41 # ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 3
% 0.23/1.41 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Termbank termtop insertions : 1923
% 0.23/1.41
% 0.23/1.41 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.23/1.41 # User time : 0.017 s
% 0.23/1.41 # System time : 0.001 s
% 0.23/1.41 # Total time : 0.018 s
% 0.23/1.41 # Maximum resident set size: 3076 pages
% 0.23/1.41 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_f171197f65f27d1ba69648a20c844832c84a5dd7 for 23 seconds:
% 0.23/1.41 # Preprocessing time : 0.021 s
% 0.23/1.41
% 0.23/1.41 # Proof found!
% 0.23/1.41 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.23/1.41 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.23/1.41 # Proof object total steps : 33
% 0.23/1.41 # Proof object clause steps : 16
% 0.23/1.41 # Proof object formula steps : 17
% 0.23/1.41 # Proof object conjectures : 4
% 0.23/1.41 # Proof object clause conjectures : 1
% 0.23/1.41 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 0.23/1.41 # Proof object initial clauses used : 8
% 0.23/1.41 # Proof object initial formulas used : 8
% 0.23/1.41 # Proof object generating inferences : 7
% 0.23/1.41 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 5
% 0.23/1.41 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.23/1.41 # Parsed axioms : 196
% 0.23/1.41 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Initial clauses : 196
% 0.23/1.41 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 4
% 0.23/1.41 # Initial clauses in saturation : 192
% 0.23/1.41 # Processed clauses : 203
% 0.23/1.41 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # ...subsumed : 1
% 0.23/1.41 # ...remaining for further processing : 202
% 0.23/1.41 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Backward-subsumed : 5
% 0.23/1.41 # Backward-rewritten : 1
% 0.23/1.41 # Generated clauses : 270
% 0.23/1.41 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 233
% 0.23/1.41 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Paramodulations : 270
% 0.23/1.41 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Current number of processed clauses : 196
% 0.23/1.41 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 38
% 0.23/1.41 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Negative unit clauses : 79
% 0.23/1.41 # Non-unit-clauses : 79
% 0.23/1.41 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 33
% 0.23/1.41 # ...number of literals in the above : 111
% 0.23/1.41 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Current number of archived clauses : 10
% 0.23/1.41 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 4847
% 0.23/1.41 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 3775
% 0.23/1.41 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 6
% 0.23/1.41 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1214
% 0.23/1.41 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # BW rewrite match attempts : 1
% 0.23/1.41 # BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 0.23/1.41 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Termbank termtop insertions : 10703
% 0.23/1.41
% 0.23/1.41 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.23/1.41 # User time : 0.026 s
% 0.23/1.41 # System time : 0.003 s
% 0.23/1.41 # Total time : 0.029 s
% 0.23/1.41 # Maximum resident set size: 3876 pages
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------