TSTP Solution File: SWW961+1 by Vampire---4.8
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Vampire---4.8
% Problem : SWW961+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v7.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 07:15:39 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.69s 0.90s
% Output : Refutation 0.69s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 8
% Number of leaves : 12
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 55 ( 14 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 131 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 7 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 144 ( 68 ~; 52 |; 10 &)
% ( 4 <=>; 10 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 12 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 7 ( 6 usr; 5 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 15 ( 15 usr; 5 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 57 ( 57 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f804,plain,
$false,
inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[],[f535,f578,f711,f714,f803]) ).
fof(f803,plain,
~ spl0_1,
inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f719]) ).
fof(f719,plain,
( $false
| ~ spl0_1 ),
inference(resolution,[],[f717,f497]) ).
fof(f497,plain,
pred_attacker(constr_CONST_0x30),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f152]) ).
fof(f152,axiom,
pred_attacker(constr_CONST_0x30),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax151) ).
fof(f717,plain,
( ! [X0] : ~ pred_attacker(X0)
| ~ spl0_1 ),
inference(resolution,[],[f716,f435]) ).
fof(f435,plain,
! [X0,X1] : pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(X0,X1),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f189]) ).
fof(f189,plain,
! [X0,X1] : pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(X0,X1),
inference(rectify,[],[f90]) ).
fof(f90,axiom,
! [X23,X24] : pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(X23,X24),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax89) ).
fof(f716,plain,
( ! [X0,X1] :
( ~ pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(name_Nb(X0),constr_adec(X1,name_skB))
| ~ pred_attacker(X1) )
| ~ spl0_1 ),
inference(resolution,[],[f524,f466]) ).
fof(f466,plain,
! [X0] :
( pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_5(X0))
| ~ pred_attacker(X0) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f294]) ).
fof(f294,plain,
! [X0] :
( pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_5(X0))
| ~ pred_attacker(X0) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f218]) ).
fof(f218,plain,
! [X0] :
( pred_attacker(X0)
=> pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_5(X0)) ),
inference(rectify,[],[f121]) ).
fof(f121,axiom,
! [X65] :
( pred_attacker(X65)
=> pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_5(X65)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax120) ).
fof(f524,plain,
( ! [X2,X0] :
( ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_5(X2))
| ~ pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(name_Nb(X0),constr_adec(X2,name_skB)) )
| ~ spl0_1 ),
inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f523]) ).
fof(f523,plain,
( spl0_1
<=> ! [X2,X0] :
( ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_5(X2))
| ~ pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(name_Nb(X0),constr_adec(X2,name_skB)) ) ),
introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_1])]) ).
fof(f714,plain,
~ spl0_4,
inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f713]) ).
fof(f713,plain,
( $false
| ~ spl0_4 ),
inference(resolution,[],[f712,f521]) ).
fof(f521,plain,
~ pred_attacker(name_objective),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f258]) ).
fof(f258,plain,
~ pred_attacker(name_objective),
inference(flattening,[],[f178]) ).
fof(f178,negated_conjecture,
~ pred_attacker(name_objective),
inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f177]) ).
fof(f177,conjecture,
pred_attacker(name_objective),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co0) ).
fof(f712,plain,
( pred_attacker(name_objective)
| ~ spl0_4 ),
inference(resolution,[],[f534,f460]) ).
fof(f460,plain,
! [X0] :
( ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_out_6(X0))
| pred_attacker(X0) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f287]) ).
fof(f287,plain,
! [X0] :
( pred_attacker(X0)
| ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_out_6(X0)) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f212]) ).
fof(f212,plain,
! [X0] :
( pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_out_6(X0))
=> pred_attacker(X0) ),
inference(rectify,[],[f115]) ).
fof(f115,axiom,
! [X56] :
( pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_out_6(X56))
=> pred_attacker(X56) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax114) ).
fof(f534,plain,
( pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_out_6(name_objective))
| ~ spl0_4 ),
inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f532]) ).
fof(f532,plain,
( spl0_4
<=> pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_out_6(name_objective)) ),
introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_4])]) ).
fof(f711,plain,
~ spl0_3,
inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f627]) ).
fof(f627,plain,
( $false
| ~ spl0_3 ),
inference(resolution,[],[f625,f497]) ).
fof(f625,plain,
( ! [X0] : ~ pred_attacker(X0)
| ~ spl0_3 ),
inference(resolution,[],[f590,f435]) ).
fof(f590,plain,
( ! [X0] :
( ~ pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(name_A,constr_tuple_2_get_0x30(constr_checksign(X0,constr_pkey(name_skS))))
| ~ pred_attacker(X0) )
| ~ spl0_3 ),
inference(resolution,[],[f530,f470]) ).
fof(f470,plain,
! [X0] :
( pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_2(X0))
| ~ pred_attacker(X0) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f298]) ).
fof(f298,plain,
! [X0] :
( pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_2(X0))
| ~ pred_attacker(X0) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f222]) ).
fof(f222,plain,
! [X0] :
( pred_attacker(X0)
=> pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_2(X0)) ),
inference(rectify,[],[f125]) ).
fof(f125,axiom,
! [X69] :
( pred_attacker(X69)
=> pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_2(X69)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax124) ).
fof(f530,plain,
( ! [X3] :
( ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_2(X3))
| ~ pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(name_A,constr_tuple_2_get_0x30(constr_checksign(X3,constr_pkey(name_skS)))) )
| ~ spl0_3 ),
inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f529]) ).
fof(f529,plain,
( spl0_3
<=> ! [X3] :
( ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_2(X3))
| ~ pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(name_A,constr_tuple_2_get_0x30(constr_checksign(X3,constr_pkey(name_skS)))) ) ),
introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_3])]) ).
fof(f578,plain,
~ spl0_2,
inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f540]) ).
fof(f540,plain,
( $false
| ~ spl0_2 ),
inference(resolution,[],[f539,f497]) ).
fof(f539,plain,
( ! [X0] : ~ pred_attacker(X0)
| ~ spl0_2 ),
inference(resolution,[],[f468,f536]) ).
fof(f536,plain,
( ! [X0] : ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_3(X0))
| ~ spl0_2 ),
inference(resolution,[],[f435,f527]) ).
fof(f527,plain,
( ! [X1] :
( ~ pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(name_A,constr_assoc_pair_2_get_1(constr_adec(X1,name_skB)))
| ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_3(X1)) )
| ~ spl0_2 ),
inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f526]) ).
fof(f526,plain,
( spl0_2
<=> ! [X1] :
( ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_3(X1))
| ~ pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(name_A,constr_assoc_pair_2_get_1(constr_adec(X1,name_skB))) ) ),
introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_2])]) ).
fof(f468,plain,
! [X0] :
( pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_3(X0))
| ~ pred_attacker(X0) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f296]) ).
fof(f296,plain,
! [X0] :
( pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_3(X0))
| ~ pred_attacker(X0) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f220]) ).
fof(f220,plain,
! [X0] :
( pred_attacker(X0)
=> pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_3(X0)) ),
inference(rectify,[],[f123]) ).
fof(f123,axiom,
! [X67] :
( pred_attacker(X67)
=> pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_3(X67)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax122) ).
fof(f535,plain,
( spl0_1
| spl0_2
| spl0_3
| spl0_4 ),
inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f518,f532,f529,f526,f523]) ).
fof(f518,plain,
! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
( pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_out_6(name_objective))
| ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_2(X3))
| ~ pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(name_A,constr_tuple_2_get_0x30(constr_checksign(X3,constr_pkey(name_skS))))
| ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_3(X1))
| ~ pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(name_A,constr_assoc_pair_2_get_1(constr_adec(X1,name_skB)))
| ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_5(X2))
| ~ pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(name_Nb(X0),constr_adec(X2,name_skB)) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f341]) ).
fof(f341,plain,
! [X0,X1,X2,X3] :
( pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_out_6(name_objective))
| ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_2(X3))
| ~ pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(name_A,constr_tuple_2_get_0x30(constr_checksign(X3,constr_pkey(name_skS))))
| ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_3(X1))
| ~ pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(name_A,constr_assoc_pair_2_get_1(constr_adec(X1,name_skB)))
| ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_5(X2))
| ~ pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(name_Nb(X0),constr_adec(X2,name_skB)) ),
inference(flattening,[],[f340]) ).
fof(f340,plain,
! [X0,X1,X2,X3] :
( pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_out_6(name_objective))
| ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_2(X3))
| ~ pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(name_A,constr_tuple_2_get_0x30(constr_checksign(X3,constr_pkey(name_skS))))
| ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_3(X1))
| ~ pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(name_A,constr_assoc_pair_2_get_1(constr_adec(X1,name_skB)))
| ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_5(X2))
| ~ pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(name_Nb(X0),constr_adec(X2,name_skB)) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f255]) ).
fof(f255,plain,
! [X0,X1,X2,X3] :
( ( pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_2(X3))
& pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(name_A,constr_tuple_2_get_0x30(constr_checksign(X3,constr_pkey(name_skS))))
& pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_3(X1))
& pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(name_A,constr_assoc_pair_2_get_1(constr_adec(X1,name_skB)))
& pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_5(X2))
& pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(name_Nb(X0),constr_adec(X2,name_skB)) )
=> pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_out_6(name_objective)) ),
inference(rectify,[],[f174]) ).
fof(f174,axiom,
! [X121,X122,X123,X124] :
( ( pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_2(X124))
& pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(name_A,constr_tuple_2_get_0x30(constr_checksign(X124,constr_pkey(name_skS))))
& pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_3(X122))
& pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(name_A,constr_assoc_pair_2_get_1(constr_adec(X122,name_skB)))
& pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_5(X123))
& pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(name_Nb(X121),constr_adec(X123,name_skB)) )
=> pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_out_6(name_objective)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax173) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : SWW961+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v7.4.0.
% 0.07/0.14 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.14/0.37 % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.37 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.37 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.37 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.37 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.37 % DateTime : Sat May 18 19:18:38 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.14/0.37 This is a FOF_THM_RFO_SEQ problem
% 0.14/0.37 Running vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.69/0.89 % (18326)lrs+2_1:1_sil=16000:fde=none:sos=all:nwc=5.0:i=34:ep=RS:s2pl=on:lma=on:afp=100000_0 on theBenchmark for (2994ds/34Mi)
% 0.69/0.89 % (18323)lrs+1011_461:32768_sil=16000:irw=on:sp=frequency:lsd=20:fd=preordered:nwc=10.0:s2agt=32:alpa=false:cond=fast:s2a=on:i=51:s2at=3.0:awrs=decay:awrsf=691:bd=off:nm=20:fsr=off:amm=sco:uhcvi=on:rawr=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2994ds/51Mi)
% 0.69/0.89 % (18322)dis-1011_2:1_sil=2000:lsd=20:nwc=5.0:flr=on:mep=off:st=3.0:i=34:sd=1:ep=RS:ss=axioms_0 on theBenchmark for (2994ds/34Mi)
% 0.69/0.89 % (18325)ott+1011_1:1_sil=2000:urr=on:i=33:sd=1:kws=inv_frequency:ss=axioms:sup=off_0 on theBenchmark for (2994ds/33Mi)
% 0.69/0.89 % (18327)lrs+1002_1:16_to=lpo:sil=32000:sp=unary_frequency:sos=on:i=45:bd=off:ss=axioms_0 on theBenchmark for (2994ds/45Mi)
% 0.69/0.89 % (18324)lrs+1011_1:1_sil=8000:sp=occurrence:nwc=10.0:i=78:ss=axioms:sgt=8_0 on theBenchmark for (2994ds/78Mi)
% 0.69/0.89 % (18328)lrs+21_1:5_sil=2000:sos=on:urr=on:newcnf=on:slsq=on:i=83:slsql=off:bd=off:nm=2:ss=axioms:st=1.5:sp=const_min:gsp=on:rawr=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2994ds/83Mi)
% 0.69/0.89 % (18329)lrs-21_1:1_to=lpo:sil=2000:sp=frequency:sos=on:lma=on:i=56:sd=2:ss=axioms:ep=R_0 on theBenchmark for (2994ds/56Mi)
% 0.69/0.89 % (18325)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (18325)------------------------------
% 0.69/0.89 % (18325)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.69/0.89 % (18327)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (18327)------------------------------
% 0.69/0.89 % (18327)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.69/0.89 % (18327)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.69/0.89
% 0.69/0.89 % (18327)Memory used [KB]: 1063
% 0.69/0.89 % (18327)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.69/0.89 % (18327)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.69/0.89 % (18325)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.69/0.89
% 0.69/0.89 % (18325)Memory used [KB]: 1064
% 0.69/0.89 % (18325)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.69/0.89 % (18325)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.69/0.89 % (18329)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (18329)------------------------------
% 0.69/0.89 % (18329)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.69/0.89 % (18329)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.69/0.89
% 0.69/0.89 % (18324)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (18324)------------------------------
% 0.69/0.89 % (18324)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.69/0.89 % (18324)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.69/0.89 % (18322)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (18322)------------------------------
% 0.69/0.89 % (18322)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.69/0.89
% 0.69/0.89 % (18324)Memory used [KB]: 1081
% 0.69/0.89 % (18322)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.69/0.89
% 0.69/0.89 % (18324)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.69/0.89 % (18322)Memory used [KB]: 1096
% 0.69/0.89 % (18322)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 0.69/0.89 % (18324)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 0.69/0.89 % (18322)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 0.69/0.89 % (18327)------------------------------
% 0.69/0.89 % (18327)------------------------------
% 0.69/0.89 % (18329)Memory used [KB]: 1066
% 0.69/0.89 % (18329)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.69/0.89 % (18329)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.69/0.89 % (18325)------------------------------
% 0.69/0.89 % (18325)------------------------------
% 0.69/0.89 % (18322)------------------------------
% 0.69/0.89 % (18322)------------------------------
% 0.69/0.89 % (18324)------------------------------
% 0.69/0.89 % (18324)------------------------------
% 0.69/0.89 % (18329)------------------------------
% 0.69/0.89 % (18329)------------------------------
% 0.69/0.90 % (18328)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (18328)------------------------------
% 0.69/0.90 % (18328)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.69/0.90 % (18328)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.69/0.90
% 0.69/0.90 % (18328)Memory used [KB]: 1135
% 0.69/0.90 % (18328)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.69/0.90 % (18328)Instructions burned: 5 (million)
% 0.69/0.90 % (18328)------------------------------
% 0.69/0.90 % (18328)------------------------------
% 0.69/0.90 % (18326)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (18326)------------------------------
% 0.69/0.90 % (18326)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.69/0.90 % (18326)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.69/0.90
% 0.69/0.90 % (18326)Memory used [KB]: 1188
% 0.69/0.90 % (18326)Time elapsed: 0.005 s
% 0.69/0.90 % (18326)Instructions burned: 7 (million)
% 0.69/0.90 % (18326)------------------------------
% 0.69/0.90 % (18326)------------------------------
% 0.69/0.90 % (18332)lrs+1010_1:2_sil=4000:tgt=ground:nwc=10.0:st=2.0:i=208:sd=1:bd=off:ss=axioms_0 on theBenchmark for (2994ds/208Mi)
% 0.69/0.90 % (18330)lrs+21_1:16_sil=2000:sp=occurrence:urr=on:flr=on:i=55:sd=1:nm=0:ins=3:ss=included:rawr=on:br=off_0 on theBenchmark for (2994ds/55Mi)
% 0.69/0.90 % (18333)lrs-1011_1:1_sil=4000:plsq=on:plsqr=32,1:sp=frequency:plsql=on:nwc=10.0:i=52:aac=none:afr=on:ss=axioms:er=filter:sgt=16:rawr=on:etr=on:lma=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2994ds/52Mi)
% 0.69/0.90 % (18331)dis+3_25:4_sil=16000:sos=all:erd=off:i=50:s2at=4.0:bd=off:nm=60:sup=off:cond=on:av=off:ins=2:nwc=10.0:etr=on:to=lpo:s2agt=20:fd=off:bsr=unit_only:slsq=on:slsqr=28,19:awrs=converge:awrsf=500:tgt=ground:bs=unit_only_0 on theBenchmark for (2994ds/50Mi)
% 0.69/0.90 % (18334)lrs-1010_1:1_to=lpo:sil=2000:sp=reverse_arity:sos=on:urr=ec_only:i=518:sd=2:bd=off:ss=axioms:sgt=16_0 on theBenchmark for (2994ds/518Mi)
% 0.69/0.90 % (18335)lrs+1011_87677:1048576_sil=8000:sos=on:spb=non_intro:nwc=10.0:kmz=on:i=42:ep=RS:nm=0:ins=1:uhcvi=on:rawr=on:fde=unused:afp=2000:afq=1.444:plsq=on:nicw=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2994ds/42Mi)
% 0.69/0.90 % (18332)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (18332)------------------------------
% 0.69/0.90 % (18332)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.69/0.90 % (18332)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.69/0.90
% 0.69/0.90 % (18332)Memory used [KB]: 1080
% 0.69/0.90 % (18332)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.69/0.90 % (18332)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 0.69/0.90 % (18332)------------------------------
% 0.69/0.90 % (18332)------------------------------
% 0.69/0.90 % (18323)First to succeed.
% 0.69/0.90 % (18336)dis+1011_1258907:1048576_bsr=unit_only:to=lpo:drc=off:sil=2000:tgt=full:fde=none:sp=frequency:spb=goal:rnwc=on:nwc=6.70083:sac=on:newcnf=on:st=2:i=243:bs=unit_only:sd=3:afp=300:awrs=decay:awrsf=218:nm=16:ins=3:afq=3.76821:afr=on:ss=axioms:sgt=5:rawr=on:add=off:bsd=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2994ds/243Mi)
% 0.69/0.90 % (18334)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (18334)------------------------------
% 0.69/0.90 % (18334)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.69/0.90 % (18334)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.69/0.90
% 0.69/0.90 % (18334)Memory used [KB]: 1151
% 0.69/0.90 % (18334)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.69/0.90 % (18334)Instructions burned: 5 (million)
% 0.69/0.90 % (18323)Solution written to "/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/vampire-proof-18321"
% 0.69/0.90 % (18334)------------------------------
% 0.69/0.90 % (18334)------------------------------
% 0.69/0.90 % (18323)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.69/0.90 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.69/0.90 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.69/0.90 % (18323)------------------------------
% 0.69/0.90 % (18323)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.69/0.90 % (18323)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.69/0.90
% 0.69/0.90 % (18323)Memory used [KB]: 1244
% 0.69/0.90 % (18323)Time elapsed: 0.010 s
% 0.69/0.90 % (18323)Instructions burned: 15 (million)
% 0.69/0.90 % (18321)Success in time 0.522 s
% 0.69/0.90 % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------