TSTP Solution File: SWW959+1 by Vampire---4.8
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Vampire---4.8
% Problem : SWW959+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v7.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 07:15:39 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.42s 0.62s
% Output : Refutation 0.42s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 8
% Number of leaves : 12
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 55 ( 14 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 132 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 7 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 146 ( 69 ~; 53 |; 10 &)
% ( 4 <=>; 10 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 12 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 7 ( 6 usr; 5 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 15 ( 15 usr; 5 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 57 ( 57 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f802,plain,
$false,
inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[],[f505,f625,f713,f716,f801]) ).
fof(f801,plain,
~ spl0_1,
inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f721]) ).
fof(f721,plain,
( $false
| ~ spl0_1 ),
inference(resolution,[],[f719,f467]) ).
fof(f467,plain,
pred_attacker(constr_CONST_0x30),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f144]) ).
fof(f144,axiom,
pred_attacker(constr_CONST_0x30),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax143) ).
fof(f719,plain,
( ! [X0] : ~ pred_attacker(X0)
| ~ spl0_1 ),
inference(resolution,[],[f718,f410]) ).
fof(f410,plain,
! [X0,X1] : pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(X0,X1),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f178]) ).
fof(f178,plain,
! [X0,X1] : pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(X0,X1),
inference(rectify,[],[f87]) ).
fof(f87,axiom,
! [X16,X17] : pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(X16,X17),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax86) ).
fof(f718,plain,
( ! [X0,X1] :
( ~ pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(name_Nb(X0),constr_adec(X1,name_skB))
| ~ pred_attacker(X1) )
| ~ spl0_1 ),
inference(resolution,[],[f494,f443]) ).
fof(f443,plain,
! [X0] :
( pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_5(X0))
| ~ pred_attacker(X0) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f280]) ).
fof(f280,plain,
! [X0] :
( pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_5(X0))
| ~ pred_attacker(X0) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f209]) ).
fof(f209,plain,
! [X0] :
( pred_attacker(X0)
=> pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_5(X0)) ),
inference(rectify,[],[f120]) ).
fof(f120,axiom,
! [X60] :
( pred_attacker(X60)
=> pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_5(X60)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax119) ).
fof(f494,plain,
( ! [X2,X0] :
( ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_5(X2))
| ~ pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(name_Nb(X0),constr_adec(X2,name_skB)) )
| ~ spl0_1 ),
inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f493]) ).
fof(f493,plain,
( spl0_1
<=> ! [X2,X0] :
( ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_5(X2))
| ~ pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(name_Nb(X0),constr_adec(X2,name_skB)) ) ),
introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_1])]) ).
fof(f716,plain,
~ spl0_4,
inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f715]) ).
fof(f715,plain,
( $false
| ~ spl0_4 ),
inference(resolution,[],[f714,f491]) ).
fof(f491,plain,
~ pred_attacker(name_objective),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f242]) ).
fof(f242,plain,
~ pred_attacker(name_objective),
inference(flattening,[],[f170]) ).
fof(f170,negated_conjecture,
~ pred_attacker(name_objective),
inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f169]) ).
fof(f169,conjecture,
pred_attacker(name_objective),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co0) ).
fof(f714,plain,
( pred_attacker(name_objective)
| ~ spl0_4 ),
inference(resolution,[],[f504,f437]) ).
fof(f437,plain,
! [X0] :
( ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_out_6(X0))
| pred_attacker(X0) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f273]) ).
fof(f273,plain,
! [X0] :
( pred_attacker(X0)
| ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_out_6(X0)) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f203]) ).
fof(f203,plain,
! [X0] :
( pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_out_6(X0))
=> pred_attacker(X0) ),
inference(rectify,[],[f114]) ).
fof(f114,axiom,
! [X51] :
( pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_out_6(X51))
=> pred_attacker(X51) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax113) ).
fof(f504,plain,
( pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_out_6(name_objective))
| ~ spl0_4 ),
inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f502]) ).
fof(f502,plain,
( spl0_4
<=> pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_out_6(name_objective)) ),
introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_4])]) ).
fof(f713,plain,
~ spl0_3,
inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f633]) ).
fof(f633,plain,
( $false
| ~ spl0_3 ),
inference(resolution,[],[f631,f467]) ).
fof(f631,plain,
( ! [X0] : ~ pred_attacker(X0)
| ~ spl0_3 ),
inference(resolution,[],[f630,f410]) ).
fof(f630,plain,
( ! [X0] :
( ~ pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(name_A,constr_tuple_2_get_0x30(constr_checksign(X0,constr_pkey(name_skS))))
| ~ pred_attacker(X0) )
| ~ spl0_3 ),
inference(resolution,[],[f500,f447]) ).
fof(f447,plain,
! [X0] :
( pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_2(X0))
| ~ pred_attacker(X0) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f284]) ).
fof(f284,plain,
! [X0] :
( pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_2(X0))
| ~ pred_attacker(X0) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f213]) ).
fof(f213,plain,
! [X0] :
( pred_attacker(X0)
=> pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_2(X0)) ),
inference(rectify,[],[f124]) ).
fof(f124,axiom,
! [X64] :
( pred_attacker(X64)
=> pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_2(X64)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax123) ).
fof(f500,plain,
( ! [X3] :
( ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_2(X3))
| ~ pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(name_A,constr_tuple_2_get_0x30(constr_checksign(X3,constr_pkey(name_skS)))) )
| ~ spl0_3 ),
inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f499]) ).
fof(f499,plain,
( spl0_3
<=> ! [X3] :
( ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_2(X3))
| ~ pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(name_A,constr_tuple_2_get_0x30(constr_checksign(X3,constr_pkey(name_skS)))) ) ),
introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_3])]) ).
fof(f625,plain,
~ spl0_2,
inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f549]) ).
fof(f549,plain,
( $false
| ~ spl0_2 ),
inference(resolution,[],[f547,f467]) ).
fof(f547,plain,
( ! [X0] : ~ pred_attacker(X0)
| ~ spl0_2 ),
inference(resolution,[],[f540,f410]) ).
fof(f540,plain,
( ! [X0] :
( ~ pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(name_A,constr_tuple_2_get_1(constr_adec(X0,name_skB)))
| ~ pred_attacker(X0) )
| ~ spl0_2 ),
inference(resolution,[],[f497,f445]) ).
fof(f445,plain,
! [X0] :
( pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_3(X0))
| ~ pred_attacker(X0) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f282]) ).
fof(f282,plain,
! [X0] :
( pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_3(X0))
| ~ pred_attacker(X0) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f211]) ).
fof(f211,plain,
! [X0] :
( pred_attacker(X0)
=> pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_3(X0)) ),
inference(rectify,[],[f122]) ).
fof(f122,axiom,
! [X62] :
( pred_attacker(X62)
=> pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_3(X62)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax121) ).
fof(f497,plain,
( ! [X1] :
( ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_3(X1))
| ~ pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(name_A,constr_tuple_2_get_1(constr_adec(X1,name_skB))) )
| ~ spl0_2 ),
inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f496]) ).
fof(f496,plain,
( spl0_2
<=> ! [X1] :
( ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_3(X1))
| ~ pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(name_A,constr_tuple_2_get_1(constr_adec(X1,name_skB))) ) ),
introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_2])]) ).
fof(f505,plain,
( spl0_1
| spl0_2
| spl0_3
| spl0_4 ),
inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f488,f502,f499,f496,f493]) ).
fof(f488,plain,
! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
( pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_out_6(name_objective))
| ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_2(X3))
| ~ pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(name_A,constr_tuple_2_get_0x30(constr_checksign(X3,constr_pkey(name_skS))))
| ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_3(X1))
| ~ pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(name_A,constr_tuple_2_get_1(constr_adec(X1,name_skB)))
| ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_5(X2))
| ~ pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(name_Nb(X0),constr_adec(X2,name_skB)) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f319]) ).
fof(f319,plain,
! [X0,X1,X2,X3] :
( pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_out_6(name_objective))
| ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_2(X3))
| ~ pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(name_A,constr_tuple_2_get_0x30(constr_checksign(X3,constr_pkey(name_skS))))
| ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_3(X1))
| ~ pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(name_A,constr_tuple_2_get_1(constr_adec(X1,name_skB)))
| ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_5(X2))
| ~ pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(name_Nb(X0),constr_adec(X2,name_skB)) ),
inference(flattening,[],[f318]) ).
fof(f318,plain,
! [X0,X1,X2,X3] :
( pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_out_6(name_objective))
| ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_2(X3))
| ~ pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(name_A,constr_tuple_2_get_0x30(constr_checksign(X3,constr_pkey(name_skS))))
| ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_3(X1))
| ~ pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(name_A,constr_tuple_2_get_1(constr_adec(X1,name_skB)))
| ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_5(X2))
| ~ pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(name_Nb(X0),constr_adec(X2,name_skB)) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f239]) ).
fof(f239,plain,
! [X0,X1,X2,X3] :
( ( pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_2(X3))
& pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(name_A,constr_tuple_2_get_0x30(constr_checksign(X3,constr_pkey(name_skS))))
& pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_3(X1))
& pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(name_A,constr_tuple_2_get_1(constr_adec(X1,name_skB)))
& pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_5(X2))
& pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(name_Nb(X0),constr_adec(X2,name_skB)) )
=> pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_out_6(name_objective)) ),
inference(rectify,[],[f166]) ).
fof(f166,axiom,
! [X106,X107,X108,X109] :
( ( pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_2(X109))
& pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(name_A,constr_tuple_2_get_0x30(constr_checksign(X109,constr_pkey(name_skS))))
& pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_3(X107))
& pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(name_A,constr_tuple_2_get_1(constr_adec(X107,name_skB)))
& pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_5(X108))
& pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(name_Nb(X106),constr_adec(X108,name_skB)) )
=> pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_out_6(name_objective)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax165) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.11 % Problem : SWW959+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v7.4.0.
% 0.11/0.13 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Sat May 18 20:16:08 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.34 This is a FOF_THM_RFO_SEQ problem
% 0.13/0.34 Running vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.42/0.61 % (29102)lrs-21_1:1_to=lpo:sil=2000:sp=frequency:sos=on:lma=on:i=56:sd=2:ss=axioms:ep=R_0 on theBenchmark for (2997ds/56Mi)
% 0.42/0.61 % (29100)lrs+1002_1:16_to=lpo:sil=32000:sp=unary_frequency:sos=on:i=45:bd=off:ss=axioms_0 on theBenchmark for (2997ds/45Mi)
% 0.42/0.61 % (29102)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (29102)------------------------------
% 0.42/0.61 % (29102)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.42/0.61 % (29102)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.42/0.61
% 0.42/0.61 % (29102)Memory used [KB]: 1053
% 0.42/0.61 % (29102)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 0.42/0.61 % (29102)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.42/0.61 % (29102)------------------------------
% 0.42/0.61 % (29102)------------------------------
% 0.42/0.61 % (29097)lrs+1011_1:1_sil=8000:sp=occurrence:nwc=10.0:i=78:ss=axioms:sgt=8_0 on theBenchmark for (2997ds/78Mi)
% 0.42/0.61 % (29095)dis-1011_2:1_sil=2000:lsd=20:nwc=5.0:flr=on:mep=off:st=3.0:i=34:sd=1:ep=RS:ss=axioms_0 on theBenchmark for (2997ds/34Mi)
% 0.42/0.61 % (29100)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (29100)------------------------------
% 0.42/0.61 % (29100)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.42/0.61 % (29100)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.42/0.61
% 0.42/0.61 % (29100)Memory used [KB]: 1049
% 0.42/0.61 % (29100)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.42/0.61 % (29100)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.42/0.61 % (29100)------------------------------
% 0.42/0.61 % (29100)------------------------------
% 0.42/0.61 % (29096)lrs+1011_461:32768_sil=16000:irw=on:sp=frequency:lsd=20:fd=preordered:nwc=10.0:s2agt=32:alpa=false:cond=fast:s2a=on:i=51:s2at=3.0:awrs=decay:awrsf=691:bd=off:nm=20:fsr=off:amm=sco:uhcvi=on:rawr=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2997ds/51Mi)
% 0.42/0.61 % (29097)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (29097)------------------------------
% 0.42/0.61 % (29097)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.42/0.61 % (29097)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.42/0.61
% 0.42/0.61 % (29097)Memory used [KB]: 1051
% 0.42/0.61 % (29097)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.42/0.61 % (29097)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 0.42/0.61 % (29095)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (29095)------------------------------
% 0.42/0.61 % (29095)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.42/0.61 % (29095)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.42/0.61
% 0.42/0.61 % (29095)Memory used [KB]: 1082
% 0.42/0.61 % (29095)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.42/0.61 % (29095)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 0.42/0.61 % (29098)ott+1011_1:1_sil=2000:urr=on:i=33:sd=1:kws=inv_frequency:ss=axioms:sup=off_0 on theBenchmark for (2997ds/33Mi)
% 0.42/0.61 % (29099)lrs+2_1:1_sil=16000:fde=none:sos=all:nwc=5.0:i=34:ep=RS:s2pl=on:lma=on:afp=100000_0 on theBenchmark for (2997ds/34Mi)
% 0.42/0.61 % (29097)------------------------------
% 0.42/0.61 % (29097)------------------------------
% 0.42/0.61 % (29101)lrs+21_1:5_sil=2000:sos=on:urr=on:newcnf=on:slsq=on:i=83:slsql=off:bd=off:nm=2:ss=axioms:st=1.5:sp=const_min:gsp=on:rawr=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2997ds/83Mi)
% 0.42/0.61 % (29095)------------------------------
% 0.42/0.61 % (29095)------------------------------
% 0.42/0.61 % (29098)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (29098)------------------------------
% 0.42/0.61 % (29098)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.42/0.61 % (29098)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.42/0.61
% 0.42/0.61 % (29098)Memory used [KB]: 1050
% 0.42/0.61 % (29098)Time elapsed: 0.005 s
% 0.42/0.61 % (29098)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.42/0.61 % (29104)dis+3_25:4_sil=16000:sos=all:erd=off:i=50:s2at=4.0:bd=off:nm=60:sup=off:cond=on:av=off:ins=2:nwc=10.0:etr=on:to=lpo:s2agt=20:fd=off:bsr=unit_only:slsq=on:slsqr=28,19:awrs=converge:awrsf=500:tgt=ground:bs=unit_only_0 on theBenchmark for (2997ds/50Mi)
% 0.42/0.61 % (29098)------------------------------
% 0.42/0.61 % (29098)------------------------------
% 0.42/0.61 % (29105)lrs+1010_1:2_sil=4000:tgt=ground:nwc=10.0:st=2.0:i=208:sd=1:bd=off:ss=axioms_0 on theBenchmark for (2997ds/208Mi)
% 0.42/0.61 % (29105)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (29105)------------------------------
% 0.42/0.61 % (29105)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.42/0.61 % (29105)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.42/0.61
% 0.42/0.61 % (29105)Memory used [KB]: 1066
% 0.42/0.61 % (29105)Time elapsed: 0.001 s
% 0.42/0.61 % (29105)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 0.42/0.61 % (29105)------------------------------
% 0.42/0.61 % (29105)------------------------------
% 0.42/0.61 % (29101)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (29101)------------------------------
% 0.42/0.61 % (29101)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.42/0.61 % (29101)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.42/0.61
% 0.42/0.61 % (29101)Memory used [KB]: 1121
% 0.42/0.61 % (29101)Time elapsed: 0.007 s
% 0.42/0.61 % (29101)Instructions burned: 5 (million)
% 0.42/0.61 % (29103)lrs+21_1:16_sil=2000:sp=occurrence:urr=on:flr=on:i=55:sd=1:nm=0:ins=3:ss=included:rawr=on:br=off_0 on theBenchmark for (2997ds/55Mi)
% 0.42/0.61 % (29101)------------------------------
% 0.42/0.61 % (29101)------------------------------
% 0.42/0.61 % (29106)lrs-1011_1:1_sil=4000:plsq=on:plsqr=32,1:sp=frequency:plsql=on:nwc=10.0:i=52:aac=none:afr=on:ss=axioms:er=filter:sgt=16:rawr=on:etr=on:lma=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2997ds/52Mi)
% 0.42/0.61 % (29099)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (29099)------------------------------
% 0.42/0.61 % (29099)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.42/0.61 % (29099)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.42/0.61
% 0.42/0.61 % (29099)Memory used [KB]: 1172
% 0.42/0.61 % (29099)Time elapsed: 0.007 s
% 0.42/0.61 % (29099)Instructions burned: 7 (million)
% 0.42/0.62 % (29099)------------------------------
% 0.42/0.62 % (29099)------------------------------
% 0.42/0.62 % (29096)First to succeed.
% 0.42/0.62 % (29110)lrs+1011_2:9_sil=2000:lsd=10:newcnf=on:i=117:sd=2:awrs=decay:ss=included:amm=off:ep=R_0 on theBenchmark for (2997ds/117Mi)
% 0.42/0.62 % (29107)lrs-1010_1:1_to=lpo:sil=2000:sp=reverse_arity:sos=on:urr=ec_only:i=518:sd=2:bd=off:ss=axioms:sgt=16_0 on theBenchmark for (2997ds/518Mi)
% 0.42/0.62 % (29103)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.42/0.62 % (29096)Solution written to "/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/vampire-proof-29093"
% 0.42/0.62 % (29109)dis+1011_1258907:1048576_bsr=unit_only:to=lpo:drc=off:sil=2000:tgt=full:fde=none:sp=frequency:spb=goal:rnwc=on:nwc=6.70083:sac=on:newcnf=on:st=2:i=243:bs=unit_only:sd=3:afp=300:awrs=decay:awrsf=218:nm=16:ins=3:afq=3.76821:afr=on:ss=axioms:sgt=5:rawr=on:add=off:bsd=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2997ds/243Mi)
% 0.42/0.62 % (29096)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.42/0.62 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.42/0.62 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.42/0.62 % (29096)------------------------------
% 0.42/0.62 % (29096)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.42/0.62 % (29096)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.42/0.62
% 0.42/0.62 % (29096)Memory used [KB]: 1228
% 0.42/0.62 % (29096)Time elapsed: 0.012 s
% 0.42/0.62 % (29096)Instructions burned: 14 (million)
% 0.42/0.62 % (29093)Success in time 0.264 s
% 0.42/0.62 % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------