TSTP Solution File: SWW950+1 by Zipperpin---2.1.9999
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem : SWW950+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v7.4.0.
% Transfm : NO INFORMATION
% Format : NO INFORMATION
% Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.W078ic7qlq true
% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 1 01:43:30 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 1.41s 0.99s
% Output : Refutation 1.41s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 18
% Number of leaves : 25
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 89 ( 33 unt; 12 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 151 ( 28 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 5 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 483 ( 25 ~; 23 |; 10 &; 384 @)
% ( 0 <=>; 20 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 13 ( 5 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 9 ( 9 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 15 ( 12 usr; 7 con; 0-2 aty)
% ( 21 !!; 0 ??; 0 @@+; 0 @@-)
% Number of variables : 100 ( 21 ^; 79 !; 0 ?; 100 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(tuple_T_in_1_type,type,
tuple_T_in_1: $i > $i ).
thf(tuple_T_out_4_type,type,
tuple_T_out_4: $i > $i ).
thf(constr_ZERO_type,type,
constr_ZERO: $i ).
thf(name_k0x30_type,type,
name_k0x30: $i ).
thf(name_objective_type,type,
name_objective: $i ).
thf(constr_h_type,type,
constr_h: $i > $i ).
thf(tuple_T_out_2_type,type,
tuple_T_out_2: $i > $i ).
thf(constr_CONST_0x30_type,type,
constr_CONST_0x30: $i ).
thf(pred_attacker_type,type,
pred_attacker: $i > $o ).
thf(tuple_T_in_3_type,type,
tuple_T_in_3: $i > $i > $i ).
thf(constr_xor_type,type,
constr_xor: $i > $i > $i ).
thf(name_ki_type,type,
name_ki: $i ).
thf(co0,conjecture,
pred_attacker @ name_objective ).
thf(zf_stmt_0,negated_conjecture,
~ ( pred_attacker @ name_objective ),
inference('cnf.neg',[status(esa)],[co0]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl75,plain,
~ ( pred_attacker @ name_objective ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[zf_stmt_0]) ).
thf(ax67,axiom,
pred_attacker @ constr_CONST_0x30 ).
thf(zip_derived_cl67,plain,
pred_attacker @ constr_CONST_0x30,
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[ax67]) ).
thf(ax61,axiom,
! [VAR_V_63: $i] :
( ( pred_attacker @ VAR_V_63 )
=> ( pred_attacker @ ( tuple_T_in_1 @ VAR_V_63 ) ) ) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl61,plain,
( !!
@ ^ [Y0: $i] :
( ( pred_attacker @ Y0 )
=> ( pred_attacker @ ( tuple_T_in_1 @ Y0 ) ) ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[ax61]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl96,plain,
! [X2: $i] :
( ( pred_attacker @ X2 )
=> ( pred_attacker @ ( tuple_T_in_1 @ X2 ) ) ),
inference(lazy_cnf_forall,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl61]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl97,plain,
! [X2: $i] :
( ~ ( pred_attacker @ X2 )
| ( pred_attacker @ ( tuple_T_in_1 @ X2 ) ) ),
inference(lazy_cnf_imply,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl96]) ).
thf(ax47,axiom,
! [VAR_X_7: $i,VAR_Y_8: $i] :
( ( constr_xor @ VAR_X_7 @ VAR_Y_8 )
= ( constr_xor @ VAR_Y_8 @ VAR_X_7 ) ) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl47,plain,
( !!
@ ^ [Y0: $i] :
( !!
@ ^ [Y1: $i] :
( ( constr_xor @ Y0 @ Y1 )
= ( constr_xor @ Y1 @ Y0 ) ) ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[ax47]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl108,plain,
! [X2: $i] :
( !!
@ ^ [Y0: $i] :
( ( constr_xor @ X2 @ Y0 )
= ( constr_xor @ Y0 @ X2 ) ) ),
inference(lazy_cnf_forall,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl47]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl109,plain,
! [X2: $i,X4: $i] :
( ( constr_xor @ X2 @ X4 )
= ( constr_xor @ X4 @ X2 ) ),
inference(lazy_cnf_forall,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl108]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl110,plain,
! [X2: $i,X4: $i] :
( ( constr_xor @ X2 @ X4 )
= ( constr_xor @ X4 @ X2 ) ),
inference('simplify nested equalities',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl109]) ).
thf(ax46,axiom,
! [VAR_X_9: $i] :
( ( constr_xor @ VAR_X_9 @ constr_ZERO )
= VAR_X_9 ) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl46,plain,
( !!
@ ^ [Y0: $i] :
( ( constr_xor @ Y0 @ constr_ZERO )
= Y0 ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[ax46]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl88,plain,
! [X2: $i] :
( ( constr_xor @ X2 @ constr_ZERO )
= X2 ),
inference(lazy_cnf_forall,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl46]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl89,plain,
! [X2: $i] :
( ( constr_xor @ X2 @ constr_ZERO )
= X2 ),
inference('simplify nested equalities',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl88]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl112,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( ( constr_xor @ constr_ZERO @ X0 )
= X0 ),
inference('s_sup+',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl110,zip_derived_cl89]) ).
thf(ax58,axiom,
! [VAR_V_48: $i,VAR_V_49: $i] :
( ( ( pred_attacker @ VAR_V_49 )
& ( pred_attacker @ VAR_V_48 ) )
=> ( pred_attacker @ ( tuple_T_in_3 @ VAR_V_48 @ VAR_V_49 ) ) ) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl58,plain,
( !!
@ ^ [Y0: $i] :
( !!
@ ^ [Y1: $i] :
( ( ( pred_attacker @ Y1 )
& ( pred_attacker @ Y0 ) )
=> ( pred_attacker @ ( tuple_T_in_3 @ Y0 @ Y1 ) ) ) ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[ax58]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl160,plain,
! [X2: $i] :
( !!
@ ^ [Y0: $i] :
( ( ( pred_attacker @ Y0 )
& ( pred_attacker @ X2 ) )
=> ( pred_attacker @ ( tuple_T_in_3 @ X2 @ Y0 ) ) ) ),
inference(lazy_cnf_forall,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl58]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl161,plain,
! [X2: $i,X4: $i] :
( ( ( pred_attacker @ X4 )
& ( pred_attacker @ X2 ) )
=> ( pred_attacker @ ( tuple_T_in_3 @ X2 @ X4 ) ) ),
inference(lazy_cnf_forall,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl160]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl162,plain,
! [X2: $i,X4: $i] :
( ~ ( ( pred_attacker @ X4 )
& ( pred_attacker @ X2 ) )
| ( pred_attacker @ ( tuple_T_in_3 @ X2 @ X4 ) ) ),
inference(lazy_cnf_imply,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl161]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl163,plain,
! [X2: $i,X4: $i] :
( ~ ( pred_attacker @ X4 )
| ~ ( pred_attacker @ X2 )
| ( pred_attacker @ ( tuple_T_in_3 @ X2 @ X4 ) ) ),
inference(lazy_cnf_and,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl162]) ).
thf(ax74,axiom,
! [VAR_A_143: $i,VAR_R_144: $i] :
( ( ( pred_attacker @ ( tuple_T_in_1 @ VAR_R_144 ) )
& ( pred_attacker @ ( tuple_T_in_3 @ VAR_A_143 @ ( constr_h @ ( constr_xor @ VAR_A_143 @ ( constr_xor @ name_k0x30 @ name_ki ) ) ) ) ) )
=> ( pred_attacker @ ( tuple_T_out_4 @ name_objective ) ) ) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl74,plain,
( !!
@ ^ [Y0: $i] :
( !!
@ ^ [Y1: $i] :
( ( ( pred_attacker @ ( tuple_T_in_1 @ Y1 ) )
& ( pred_attacker @ ( tuple_T_in_3 @ Y0 @ ( constr_h @ ( constr_xor @ Y0 @ ( constr_xor @ name_k0x30 @ name_ki ) ) ) ) ) )
=> ( pred_attacker @ ( tuple_T_out_4 @ name_objective ) ) ) ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[ax74]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl177,plain,
! [X2: $i] :
( !!
@ ^ [Y0: $i] :
( ( ( pred_attacker @ ( tuple_T_in_1 @ Y0 ) )
& ( pred_attacker @ ( tuple_T_in_3 @ X2 @ ( constr_h @ ( constr_xor @ X2 @ ( constr_xor @ name_k0x30 @ name_ki ) ) ) ) ) )
=> ( pred_attacker @ ( tuple_T_out_4 @ name_objective ) ) ) ),
inference(lazy_cnf_forall,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl74]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl178,plain,
! [X2: $i,X4: $i] :
( ( ( pred_attacker @ ( tuple_T_in_1 @ X4 ) )
& ( pred_attacker @ ( tuple_T_in_3 @ X2 @ ( constr_h @ ( constr_xor @ X2 @ ( constr_xor @ name_k0x30 @ name_ki ) ) ) ) ) )
=> ( pred_attacker @ ( tuple_T_out_4 @ name_objective ) ) ),
inference(lazy_cnf_forall,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl177]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl179,plain,
! [X2: $i,X4: $i] :
( ~ ( ( pred_attacker @ ( tuple_T_in_1 @ X4 ) )
& ( pred_attacker @ ( tuple_T_in_3 @ X2 @ ( constr_h @ ( constr_xor @ X2 @ ( constr_xor @ name_k0x30 @ name_ki ) ) ) ) ) )
| ( pred_attacker @ ( tuple_T_out_4 @ name_objective ) ) ),
inference(lazy_cnf_imply,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl178]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl180,plain,
! [X2: $i,X4: $i] :
( ~ ( pred_attacker @ ( tuple_T_in_1 @ X4 ) )
| ~ ( pred_attacker @ ( tuple_T_in_3 @ X2 @ ( constr_h @ ( constr_xor @ X2 @ ( constr_xor @ name_k0x30 @ name_ki ) ) ) ) )
| ( pred_attacker @ ( tuple_T_out_4 @ name_objective ) ) ),
inference(lazy_cnf_and,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl179]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl181,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( ~ ( pred_attacker @ X0 )
| ~ ( pred_attacker @ ( constr_h @ ( constr_xor @ X0 @ ( constr_xor @ name_k0x30 @ name_ki ) ) ) )
| ~ ( pred_attacker @ ( tuple_T_in_1 @ X1 ) )
| ( pred_attacker @ ( tuple_T_out_4 @ name_objective ) ) ),
inference('s_sup-',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl163,zip_derived_cl180]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl708,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( ~ ( pred_attacker @ constr_ZERO )
| ~ ( pred_attacker @ ( constr_h @ ( constr_xor @ name_k0x30 @ name_ki ) ) )
| ~ ( pred_attacker @ ( tuple_T_in_1 @ X0 ) )
| ( pred_attacker @ ( tuple_T_out_4 @ name_objective ) ) ),
inference('s_sup-',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl112,zip_derived_cl181]) ).
thf(ax53,axiom,
pred_attacker @ constr_ZERO ).
thf(zip_derived_cl53,plain,
pred_attacker @ constr_ZERO,
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[ax53]) ).
thf(ax45,axiom,
! [VAR_X_10X30: $i] :
( ( constr_xor @ VAR_X_10X30 @ VAR_X_10X30 )
= constr_ZERO ) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl45,plain,
( !!
@ ^ [Y0: $i] :
( ( constr_xor @ Y0 @ Y0 )
= constr_ZERO ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[ax45]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl86,plain,
! [X2: $i] :
( ( constr_xor @ X2 @ X2 )
= constr_ZERO ),
inference(lazy_cnf_forall,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl45]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl87,plain,
! [X2: $i] :
( ( constr_xor @ X2 @ X2 )
= constr_ZERO ),
inference('simplify nested equalities',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl86]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl87_001,plain,
! [X2: $i] :
( ( constr_xor @ X2 @ X2 )
= constr_ZERO ),
inference('simplify nested equalities',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl86]) ).
thf(ax48,axiom,
! [VAR_X_0X30: $i,VAR_Y_0X30: $i,VAR_Z_0X30: $i] :
( ( constr_xor @ VAR_X_0X30 @ ( constr_xor @ VAR_Y_0X30 @ VAR_Z_0X30 ) )
= ( constr_xor @ ( constr_xor @ VAR_X_0X30 @ VAR_Y_0X30 ) @ VAR_Z_0X30 ) ) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl48,plain,
( !!
@ ^ [Y0: $i] :
( !!
@ ^ [Y1: $i] :
( !!
@ ^ [Y2: $i] :
( ( constr_xor @ Y0 @ ( constr_xor @ Y1 @ Y2 ) )
= ( constr_xor @ ( constr_xor @ Y0 @ Y1 ) @ Y2 ) ) ) ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[ax48]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl117,plain,
! [X2: $i] :
( !!
@ ^ [Y0: $i] :
( !!
@ ^ [Y1: $i] :
( ( constr_xor @ X2 @ ( constr_xor @ Y0 @ Y1 ) )
= ( constr_xor @ ( constr_xor @ X2 @ Y0 ) @ Y1 ) ) ) ),
inference(lazy_cnf_forall,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl48]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl118,plain,
! [X2: $i,X4: $i] :
( !!
@ ^ [Y0: $i] :
( ( constr_xor @ X2 @ ( constr_xor @ X4 @ Y0 ) )
= ( constr_xor @ ( constr_xor @ X2 @ X4 ) @ Y0 ) ) ),
inference(lazy_cnf_forall,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl117]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl119,plain,
! [X2: $i,X4: $i,X6: $i] :
( ( constr_xor @ X2 @ ( constr_xor @ X4 @ X6 ) )
= ( constr_xor @ ( constr_xor @ X2 @ X4 ) @ X6 ) ),
inference(lazy_cnf_forall,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl118]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl120,plain,
! [X2: $i,X4: $i,X6: $i] :
( ( constr_xor @ X2 @ ( constr_xor @ X4 @ X6 ) )
= ( constr_xor @ ( constr_xor @ X2 @ X4 ) @ X6 ) ),
inference('simplify nested equalities',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl119]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl126,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( ( constr_xor @ X1 @ ( constr_xor @ X1 @ X0 ) )
= ( constr_xor @ constr_ZERO @ X0 ) ),
inference('s_sup+',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl87,zip_derived_cl120]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl112_002,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( ( constr_xor @ constr_ZERO @ X0 )
= X0 ),
inference('s_sup+',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl110,zip_derived_cl89]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl132,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( ( constr_xor @ X1 @ ( constr_xor @ X1 @ X0 ) )
= X0 ),
inference(demod,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl126,zip_derived_cl112]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl110_003,plain,
! [X2: $i,X4: $i] :
( ( constr_xor @ X2 @ X4 )
= ( constr_xor @ X4 @ X2 ) ),
inference('simplify nested equalities',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl109]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl132_004,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( ( constr_xor @ X1 @ ( constr_xor @ X1 @ X0 ) )
= X0 ),
inference(demod,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl126,zip_derived_cl112]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl197,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( ( constr_xor @ X0 @ ( constr_xor @ X1 @ X0 ) )
= X1 ),
inference('s_sup+',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl110,zip_derived_cl132]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl218,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( ( constr_xor @ ( constr_xor @ X1 @ X0 ) @ X0 )
= X1 ),
inference('s_sup+',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl132,zip_derived_cl197]) ).
thf(ax73,axiom,
! [VAR_R_10X308: $i] :
( ( pred_attacker @ ( tuple_T_in_1 @ VAR_R_10X308 ) )
=> ( pred_attacker @ ( tuple_T_out_2 @ ( constr_h @ ( constr_xor @ VAR_R_10X308 @ ( constr_xor @ name_k0x30 @ name_ki ) ) ) ) ) ) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl73,plain,
( !!
@ ^ [Y0: $i] :
( ( pred_attacker @ ( tuple_T_in_1 @ Y0 ) )
=> ( pred_attacker @ ( tuple_T_out_2 @ ( constr_h @ ( constr_xor @ Y0 @ ( constr_xor @ name_k0x30 @ name_ki ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[ax73]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl166,plain,
! [X2: $i] :
( ( pred_attacker @ ( tuple_T_in_1 @ X2 ) )
=> ( pred_attacker @ ( tuple_T_out_2 @ ( constr_h @ ( constr_xor @ X2 @ ( constr_xor @ name_k0x30 @ name_ki ) ) ) ) ) ),
inference(lazy_cnf_forall,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl73]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl167,plain,
! [X2: $i] :
( ~ ( pred_attacker @ ( tuple_T_in_1 @ X2 ) )
| ( pred_attacker @ ( tuple_T_out_2 @ ( constr_h @ ( constr_xor @ X2 @ ( constr_xor @ name_k0x30 @ name_ki ) ) ) ) ) ),
inference(lazy_cnf_imply,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl166]) ).
thf(ax57,axiom,
! [VAR_V_44: $i] :
( ( pred_attacker @ ( tuple_T_out_2 @ VAR_V_44 ) )
=> ( pred_attacker @ VAR_V_44 ) ) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl57,plain,
( !!
@ ^ [Y0: $i] :
( ( pred_attacker @ ( tuple_T_out_2 @ Y0 ) )
=> ( pred_attacker @ Y0 ) ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[ax57]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl92,plain,
! [X2: $i] :
( ( pred_attacker @ ( tuple_T_out_2 @ X2 ) )
=> ( pred_attacker @ X2 ) ),
inference(lazy_cnf_forall,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl57]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl93,plain,
! [X2: $i] :
( ~ ( pred_attacker @ ( tuple_T_out_2 @ X2 ) )
| ( pred_attacker @ X2 ) ),
inference(lazy_cnf_imply,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl92]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl168,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( ~ ( pred_attacker @ ( tuple_T_in_1 @ X0 ) )
| ( pred_attacker @ ( constr_h @ ( constr_xor @ X0 @ ( constr_xor @ name_k0x30 @ name_ki ) ) ) ) ),
inference('s_sup-',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl167,zip_derived_cl93]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl506,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( ~ ( pred_attacker @ ( tuple_T_in_1 @ ( constr_xor @ X0 @ ( constr_xor @ name_k0x30 @ name_ki ) ) ) )
| ( pred_attacker @ ( constr_h @ X0 ) ) ),
inference('s_sup+',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl218,zip_derived_cl168]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl97_005,plain,
! [X2: $i] :
( ~ ( pred_attacker @ X2 )
| ( pred_attacker @ ( tuple_T_in_1 @ X2 ) ) ),
inference(lazy_cnf_imply,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl96]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl571,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( ( pred_attacker @ ( constr_h @ X0 ) )
| ~ ( pred_attacker @ ( constr_xor @ X0 @ ( constr_xor @ name_k0x30 @ name_ki ) ) ) ),
inference('s_sup+',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl506,zip_derived_cl97]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl636,plain,
( ( pred_attacker @ ( constr_h @ ( constr_xor @ name_k0x30 @ name_ki ) ) )
| ~ ( pred_attacker @ constr_ZERO ) ),
inference('s_sup-',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl87,zip_derived_cl571]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl53_006,plain,
pred_attacker @ constr_ZERO,
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[ax53]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl648,plain,
pred_attacker @ ( constr_h @ ( constr_xor @ name_k0x30 @ name_ki ) ),
inference(demod,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl636,zip_derived_cl53]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl716,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( ~ ( pred_attacker @ ( tuple_T_in_1 @ X0 ) )
| ( pred_attacker @ ( tuple_T_out_4 @ name_objective ) ) ),
inference(demod,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl708,zip_derived_cl53,zip_derived_cl648]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl718,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( ~ ( pred_attacker @ X0 )
| ( pred_attacker @ ( tuple_T_out_4 @ name_objective ) ) ),
inference('s_sup-',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl97,zip_derived_cl716]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl719,plain,
pred_attacker @ ( tuple_T_out_4 @ name_objective ),
inference('s_sup-',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl67,zip_derived_cl718]) ).
thf(ax55,axiom,
! [VAR_V_38: $i] :
( ( pred_attacker @ ( tuple_T_out_4 @ VAR_V_38 ) )
=> ( pred_attacker @ VAR_V_38 ) ) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl55,plain,
( !!
@ ^ [Y0: $i] :
( ( pred_attacker @ ( tuple_T_out_4 @ Y0 ) )
=> ( pred_attacker @ Y0 ) ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[ax55]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl82,plain,
! [X2: $i] :
( ( pred_attacker @ ( tuple_T_out_4 @ X2 ) )
=> ( pred_attacker @ X2 ) ),
inference(lazy_cnf_forall,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl55]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl83,plain,
! [X2: $i] :
( ~ ( pred_attacker @ ( tuple_T_out_4 @ X2 ) )
| ( pred_attacker @ X2 ) ),
inference(lazy_cnf_imply,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl82]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl751,plain,
pred_attacker @ name_objective,
inference('s_sup-',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl719,zip_derived_cl83]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl752,plain,
$false,
inference(demod,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl75,zip_derived_cl751]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.15 % Problem : SWW950+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v7.4.0.
% 0.08/0.16 % Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.W078ic7qlq true
% 0.16/0.37 % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.37 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.16/0.37 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.16/0.37 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.16/0.37 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.16/0.37 % DateTime : Sun Aug 27 18:08:42 EDT 2023
% 0.16/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.16/0.37 % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.16/0.37 % File : /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.16/0.38 % Number of cores: 8
% 0.16/0.38 % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.16/0.38 % Running in FO mode
% 0.24/0.66 % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.24/0.66 % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.24/0.66 % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 1.02/0.74 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 1.02/0.76 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 1.02/0.78 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo1_av.sh running for 75s
% 1.02/0.79 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo7.sh running for 63s
% 1.02/0.79 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo13.sh running for 50s
% 1.38/0.79 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo5.sh running for 50s
% 1.38/0.79 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo4.sh running for 50s
% 1.38/0.82 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo1_lcnf.sh running for 50s
% 1.41/0.99 % Solved by fo/fo1_lcnf.sh.
% 1.41/0.99 % done 243 iterations in 0.144s
% 1.41/0.99 % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 1.41/0.99 % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 1.41/0.99
% 1.41/0.99
% 1.41/0.99 % Terminating...
% 1.58/1.08 % Runner terminated.
% 1.58/1.09 % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------