TSTP Solution File: SWW929+1 by SOS---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : SWW929+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 01:27:43 EDT 2022

% Result   : Timeout 300.04s 300.26s
% Output   : None 
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : SWW929+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.3.0.
% 0.12/0.13  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.13/0.33  % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.33  % DateTime : Sun Jun  5 08:31:03 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 247.00/247.23  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 247.00/247.23  The process was started by sandbox2 on n029.cluster.edu,
% 247.00/247.23  Sun Jun  5 08:31:03 2022
% 247.00/247.23  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 5212.
% 247.00/247.23  
% 247.00/247.23  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 247.00/247.23  set(auto).
% 247.00/247.23     dependent: set(auto1).
% 247.00/247.23     dependent: set(process_input).
% 247.00/247.23     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 247.00/247.23     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 247.00/247.23     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 247.00/247.23     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 247.00/247.23     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 247.00/247.23     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 247.00/247.23     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 247.00/247.23     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 247.00/247.23     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 247.00/247.23     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 247.00/247.23     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 247.00/247.23  clear(print_given).
% 247.00/247.23  
% 247.00/247.23  formula_list(usable).
% 247.00/247.23  
% 247.00/247.23  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=1, max_lits=34.
% 247.00/247.23  
% 247.00/247.23  This ia a non-Horn set with equality.  The strategy will be
% 247.00/247.23  Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 247.00/247.23  unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 247.00/247.23  clauses in usable.
% 247.00/247.23  
% 247.00/247.23     dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 247.00/247.23     dependent: set(para_from).
% 247.00/247.23     dependent: set(para_into).
% 247.00/247.23     dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 247.00/247.23     dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 247.00/247.23     dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 247.00/247.23     dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 247.00/247.23     dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 247.00/247.23     dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 247.00/247.23     dependent: set(order_eq).
% 247.00/247.23     dependent: set(back_demod).
% 247.00/247.23     dependent: set(lrpo).
% 247.00/247.23     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 247.00/247.23     dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 247.00/247.23     dependent: set(factor).
% 247.00/247.23  
% 247.00/247.23  There is a clause for symmetry of equality, so it is
% 247.00/247.23  assumed that equality is fully axiomatized; therefore,
% 247.00/247.23  paramodulation is disabled.
% 247.00/247.23  
% 247.00/247.23     dependent: clear(para_from).
% 247.00/247.23     dependent: clear(para_into).
% 247.00/247.23  
% 247.00/247.23  ------------> process usable:
% 247.00/247.23    Following clause subsumed by 1 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -p__01(s__02(cbool__00,cF__00))|p__01(s__02(cbool__00,A)).
% 247.00/247.23    Following clause subsumed by 1 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -p__01(s__02(cbool__00,cT__00))| -p__01(s__02(cbool__00,cF__00)).
% 247.00/247.23    Following clause subsumed by 6 during input processing: 0 [] {-} s__02(A,B)=s__02(A,C)|s__02(A,C)!=s__02(A,B).
% 247.00/247.23    Following clause subsumed by 14 during input processing: 0 [] {-} s__02(cbool__00,A)!=s__02(cbool__00,B)|s__02(cbool__00,C)!=s__02(cbool__00,D)| -p__01(s__02(cbool__00,C))| -p__01(s__02(cbool__00,B))|p__01(s__02(cbool__00,D)).
% 247.00/247.23  
% 247.00/247.23  ------------> process sos:
% 247.00/247.23    Following clause subsumed by 5033 during input processing: 0 [] {-} p__01(s__02(cbool__00,cT__00)).
% 247.00/247.23    Following clause subsumed by 5033 during input processing: 0 [unit_del,1] {-} p__01(s__02(cbool__00,cT__00)).
% 247.00/247.23    Following clause subsumed by 5049 during input processing: 0 [demod,5045] {-} s__02(A,C)=s__02(A,C).
% 247.00/247.23  5033 back subsumes 4.
% 247.00/247.23    Following clause subsumed by 5060 during input processing: 0 [copy,5035,flip.1,demod,5039,5039] {-} s__02(A,c_27const_2ebool_2eLET_27__02(s__02(cfun__02(B,A),C),s__02(B,D)))=s__02(A,c_27const_2ebool_2eLET_27__02(s__02(cfun__02(B,A),C),s__02(B,D))).
% 247.00/247.23    Following clause subsumed by 5060 during input processing: 0 [copy,5049,flip.1] {-} s__02(A,B)=s__02(A,B).
% 247.00/247.23  5049 back subsumes 5024.
% 247.00/247.23  5049 back subsumes 5.
% 247.00/247.23    Following clause subsumed by 5060 during input processing: 0 [copy,5060,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 247.00/247.23  5060 back subsumes 5049.
% 247.00/247.23    Following clause subsumed by 5059 during input processing: 0 [copy,5066,flip.1] {-} s__02(c_27type_2enum_2enum_27__00,c_27const_2ebool_2eLET_27__02(s__02(cfun__02(c_27type_2enum_2enum_27__00,c_27type_2enum_2enum_27__00),c_27const_2ebool_2eLET_27__02(s__02(cfun__02(c_27type_2elist_2elist_27__01(c_27type_2ebvl_2eexp_27__00),cfun__02(c_27type_2enum_2enum_27__00,c_27type_2enum_2enum_27__00)),$c4),s__02(c_27type_2elist_2elist_27__01(c_27type_2ebvl_2eexp_27__00),A))),s__02(c_27type_2enum_2enum_27__00,B)))=s__02(c_27type_2enum_2enum_27__00,c_27const_2ebool_2eCOND_27__03(s__02(cbool__00,$f68(A,B)),s__02(c_27type_2enum_2enum_27__00,B),s__02(c_27type_2enum_2enum_27__00,c_27const_2ebvl__inline_2eis__small__aux_27__02(s__02(c_27type_2enum_2enum_27__00,B),s__02(c_27type_2elist_2elist_27__01(c_27type_2ebvl_2eexp_27__00),A))))).
% 247.00/247.23  
% 247.00/247.23  ======= end of input processing =======
% 247.10/247.37  
% 247.10/247.37  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 247.10/247.37  
% 247.10/247.37  
% 247.10/247.37  Failed to model usable list: disabling FINDER
% 247.10/247.37  
% 247.10/247.37  
% 247.10/247.37  
% 247.10/247.37  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 247.10/247.37  
% 247.10/247.37  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 247.10/247.37  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 247.10/247.37  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 247.10/247.37  number of clauses in intial UL: 27
% 247.10/247.37  number of clauses initially in problem: 54
% 247.10/247.37  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 50
% 247.10/247.37  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 21
% 247.10/247.37  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 98
% 247.10/247.37  absolute distinct symbol count: 55
% 247.10/247.37     distinct predicate count: 2
% 247.10/247.37     distinct function count: 43
% 247.10/247.37     distinct constant count: 10
% 247.10/247.37  
% 247.10/247.37  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 247.10/247.37  
% 247.10/247.37  
% 247.10/247.37  
% 247.10/247.37  =========== start of search ===========
% 247.10/247.37  
% 247.10/247.37  
% 247.10/247.37  Changing weight limit from 60 to 101.
% 247.10/247.37  
% 247.10/247.37  Resetting weight limit to 101 after 5 givens.
% 247.10/247.37  
% 300.04/300.26  Wow, sos-wrapper got a signal XCPU
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------