TSTP Solution File: SWW619_2 by SPASS+T---2.2.22
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SPASS+T---2.2.22
% Problem : SWW619_2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v6.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : spasst-tptp-script %s %d
% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 01:30:33 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 1.42s 1.68s
% Output : Refutation 1.42s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : SWW619_2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v6.1.0.
% 0.03/0.13 % Command : spasst-tptp-script %s %d
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Sun Jun 5 21:39:51 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.48 % Using integer theory
% 1.42/1.68
% 1.42/1.68
% 1.42/1.68 % SZS status Theorem for /tmp/SPASST_32323_n022.cluster.edu
% 1.42/1.68
% 1.42/1.68 SPASS V 2.2.22 in combination with yices.
% 1.42/1.68 SPASS beiseite: Proof found by SPASS and SMT.
% 1.42/1.68 Problem: /tmp/SPASST_32323_n022.cluster.edu
% 1.42/1.68 SPASS derived 76 clauses, backtracked 25 clauses and kept 310 clauses.
% 1.42/1.68 SPASS backtracked 3 times (1 times due to theory inconsistency).
% 1.42/1.68 SPASS allocated 7147 KBytes.
% 1.42/1.68 SPASS spent 0:00:00.14 on the problem.
% 1.42/1.68 0:00:00.01 for the input.
% 1.42/1.68 0:00:00.04 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 1.42/1.68 0:00:00.00 for inferences.
% 1.42/1.68 0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 1.42/1.68 0:00:00.06 for the reduction.
% 1.42/1.68 0:00:00.01 for interacting with the SMT procedure.
% 1.42/1.68
% 1.42/1.68
% 1.42/1.68 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /tmp/SPASST_32323_n022.cluster.edu
% 1.42/1.68
% 1.42/1.68 % Here is a proof with depth 0, length 5 :
% 1.42/1.68 43[0:Inp] || -> lesseq(0,times(skc18,skc17))*.
% 1.42/1.68 44[0:Inp] || -> less(times(skc18,skc17),skc14)*.
% 1.42/1.68 132[0:Inp] || sorted_sub3(tb2t8(mk_array1(elt5,skc14,t2tb9(skc16))),times(skc18,skc17),min(skc14,plus(times(skc18,skc17),skc17)))* -> .
% 1.42/1.68 179[0:Inp] || equal(U,plus(times(V,skc17),skc17))* equal(W,times(V,skc17))* less(times(V,skc17),skc14)* lesseq(0,times(V,skc17)) -> sorted_sub3(tb2t8(mk_array1(elt5,skc14,t2tb9(skc16))),W,min(skc14,U))*.
% 1.42/1.68 455(e)[0:ThR:179,132,44,43] || -> .
% 1.42/1.68
% 1.42/1.68 % SZS output end CNFRefutation for /tmp/SPASST_32323_n022.cluster.edu
% 1.42/1.68
% 1.42/1.68 Formulae used in the proof : fof_bridgeL fof_wP_parameter_bottom_up_mergesort fof_match_bool fof_permut_sub_def
% 1.49/1.68
% 1.49/1.68 SPASS+T ended
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------