TSTP Solution File: SWW469_10 by E-SAT---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1.00
% Problem : SWW469_10 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v8.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 06:45:42 EDT 2024
% Result : Satisfiable 0.18s 0.46s
% Output : Saturation 0.18s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named c_0_7)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_0_8,hypothesis,
hoare_1310879719gleton,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[conj_0]),
[final] ).
tcf(c_0_10,plain,
esk1_0 != esk2_0,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8])]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
~ induct_false,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
induct_true,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[fact_2_induct__trueI]),
[final] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.11 % Problem : SWW469_10 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v8.2.0.
% 0.03/0.12 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Sat May 18 21:08:08 EDT 2024
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.45 Running first-order model finding
% 0.18/0.45 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/0.46 # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.18/0.46 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSLSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.18/0.46 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.18/0.46 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.18/0.46 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.46 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.46 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.46 # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 21865 completed with status 1
% 0.18/0.46 # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.18/0.46 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSLSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.18/0.46 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.18/0.46 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.18/0.46 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.18/0.46 # Search class: FGHSF-FFSS00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.18/0.46 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.18/0.46 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 901s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.46 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 151s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.46 # Starting new_bool_3 with 151s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.46 # Starting new_bool_1 with 151s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.46 # Starting sh5l with 146s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.46 # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 21870 completed with status 1
% 0.18/0.46 # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.18/0.46 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSLSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.18/0.46 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.18/0.46 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.18/0.46 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.18/0.46 # Search class: FGHSF-FFSS00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.18/0.46 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.18/0.46 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 901s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.46 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.18/0.46 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.18/0.46
% 0.18/0.46 # No proof found!
% 0.18/0.46 # SZS status Satisfiable
% 0.18/0.46 # SZS output start Saturation
% See solution above
% 0.18/0.46 # Parsed axioms : 9
% 0.18/0.46 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.18/0.46 # Initial clauses : 10
% 0.18/0.46 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 4
% 0.18/0.46 # Initial clauses in saturation : 6
% 0.18/0.46 # Processed clauses : 10
% 0.18/0.46 # ...of these trivial : 2
% 0.18/0.46 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.18/0.46 # ...remaining for further processing : 8
% 0.18/0.46 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.18/0.46 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.18/0.46 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.18/0.46 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.18/0.46 # Generated clauses : 0
% 0.18/0.46 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.18/0.46 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.18/0.46 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.18/0.46 # Paramodulations : 0
% 0.18/0.46 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.18/0.46 # NegExts : 0
% 0.18/0.46 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.18/0.46 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.18/0.46 # Total rewrite steps : 3
% 0.18/0.46 # ...of those cached : 1
% 0.18/0.46 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.18/0.46 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.18/0.46 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.18/0.46 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.18/0.46 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.18/0.46 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.18/0.46 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.18/0.46 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.18/0.46 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.18/0.46 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.18/0.46 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.18/0.46 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.18/0.46 # Current number of processed clauses : 4
% 0.18/0.46 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 2
% 0.18/0.46 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.18/0.46 # Negative unit clauses : 2
% 0.18/0.46 # Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.18/0.46 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.18/0.46 # ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.18/0.46 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.18/0.46 # Current number of archived clauses : 4
% 0.18/0.46 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.18/0.46 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.18/0.46 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.18/0.46 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.18/0.46 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.18/0.46 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.18/0.46 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.18/0.46 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.18/0.46 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.18/0.46 # Termbank termtop insertions : 170
% 0.18/0.46 # Search garbage collected termcells : 37
% 0.18/0.46
% 0.18/0.46 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.18/0.46 # User time : 0.002 s
% 0.18/0.46 # System time : 0.001 s
% 0.18/0.46 # Total time : 0.003 s
% 0.18/0.46 # Maximum resident set size: 1668 pages
% 0.18/0.46
% 0.18/0.46 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.18/0.46 # User time : 0.006 s
% 0.18/0.46 # System time : 0.005 s
% 0.18/0.46 # Total time : 0.011 s
% 0.18/0.46 # Maximum resident set size: 1700 pages
% 0.18/0.46 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------