TSTP Solution File: SWW437-1 by iProver---3.9

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9
% Problem  : SWW437-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover %s %d THM

% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri May  3 03:24:59 EDT 2024

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 7.84s 1.65s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 7.84s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   12
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   30 (  17 unt;   6 nHn;  26 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   46 (  21 equ;  13 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :   13 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   16 (  16 usr;  14 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   50 (   5 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_54,plain,
    x3 != x8,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',premise_6) ).

cnf(c_58,plain,
    x7 != x16,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',premise_10) ).

cnf(c_75,plain,
    heap(sep(lseg(x5,x1),sep(lseg(x12,x8),sep(lseg(x2,x6),sep(lseg(x16,x7),sep(lseg(x16,x3),sep(lseg(x10,x15),sep(lseg(x10,x5),sep(lseg(x7,x1),sep(lseg(x3,x12),sep(lseg(x3,x16),sep(lseg(x11,x8),emp)))))))))))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',premise_27) ).

cnf(c_77,plain,
    sep(X0,sep(X1,X2)) = sep(X1,sep(X0,X2)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWV013-0.ax',associative_commutative) ).

cnf(c_78,plain,
    sep(lseg(X0,X0),X1) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWV013-0.ax',normalization) ).

cnf(c_83,plain,
    ( ~ heap(sep(lseg(X0,X1),sep(lseg(X0,X2),X3)))
    | X0 = X1
    | X0 = X2 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWV013-0.ax',wellformedness_5) ).

cnf(c_85,plain,
    ( ~ heap(sep(lseg(X0,X1),sep(lseg(X1,nil),X2)))
    | heap(sep(lseg(X0,nil),X2)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWV013-0.ax',unfolding_3) ).

cnf(c_226,plain,
    heap(sep(lseg(x7,x1),sep(lseg(x16,x7),sep(lseg(x16,x3),sep(lseg(x3,x16),sep(lseg(x3,x12),sep(lseg(x11,x8),sep(lseg(x12,x8),sep(lseg(x10,x5),sep(lseg(x10,x15),sep(lseg(x2,x6),sep(lseg(x5,x1),emp)))))))))))),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_75,c_77]) ).

cnf(c_653,plain,
    sep(X0,sep(X1,sep(X2,X3))) = sep(X1,sep(X2,sep(X0,X3))),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_77,c_77]) ).

cnf(c_655,plain,
    sep(X0,sep(lseg(X1,X1),X2)) = sep(X0,X2),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_77,c_78]) ).

cnf(c_766,plain,
    ( ~ heap(sep(lseg(X0,X1),sep(X2,sep(lseg(X1,nil),X3))))
    | heap(sep(lseg(X0,nil),sep(X2,X3))) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_77,c_85]) ).

cnf(c_784,plain,
    ( ~ heap(sep(lseg(X0,X1),sep(X2,sep(lseg(X0,X3),X4))))
    | X0 = X1
    | X0 = X3 ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_77,c_83]) ).

cnf(c_992,plain,
    ( ~ heap(sep(X0,sep(lseg(X1,nil),X2)))
    | heap(sep(lseg(X1,nil),sep(X0,X2))) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_78,c_766]) ).

cnf(c_1152,plain,
    ( ~ heap(sep(X0,sep(X1,sep(lseg(X2,nil),X3))))
    | heap(sep(lseg(X2,nil),sep(X0,sep(X1,X3)))) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_77,c_992]) ).

cnf(c_1261,plain,
    ( ~ heap(sep(X0,sep(lseg(X1,X2),sep(lseg(X1,X3),X4))))
    | X1 = X2
    | X1 = X3 ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_77,c_784]) ).

cnf(c_1621,plain,
    ( ~ heap(sep(X0,sep(X1,sep(lseg(X2,nil),X3))))
    | heap(sep(lseg(X2,nil),sep(X1,sep(X0,X3)))) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_77,c_1152]) ).

cnf(c_1724,plain,
    ( x7 = x16
    | x16 = x3 ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_226,c_1261]) ).

cnf(c_1734,plain,
    x16 = x3,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_1724,c_58]) ).

cnf(c_1738,plain,
    heap(sep(lseg(x7,x1),sep(lseg(x16,x7),sep(lseg(x16,x16),sep(lseg(x16,x16),sep(lseg(x16,x12),sep(lseg(x11,x8),sep(lseg(x12,x8),sep(lseg(x10,x5),sep(lseg(x10,x15),sep(lseg(x2,x6),sep(lseg(x5,x1),emp)))))))))))),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_226,c_1734]) ).

cnf(c_1741,plain,
    x16 != x8,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_54,c_1734]) ).

cnf(c_2008,plain,
    ( ~ heap(sep(X0,sep(X1,X2)))
    | heap(sep(lseg(nil,nil),sep(X1,sep(X0,X2)))) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_78,c_1621]) ).

cnf(c_2036,plain,
    ( ~ heap(sep(X0,sep(X1,X2)))
    | heap(sep(X1,sep(X0,X2))) ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_2008,c_78]) ).

cnf(c_4105,plain,
    heap(sep(lseg(x7,x1),sep(lseg(x16,x7),sep(lseg(x16,x12),sep(lseg(x11,x8),sep(lseg(x12,x8),sep(lseg(x10,x5),sep(lseg(x10,x15),sep(lseg(x2,x6),sep(lseg(x5,x1),emp)))))))))),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_1738,c_655]) ).

cnf(c_4106,plain,
    heap(sep(lseg(x16,x7),sep(lseg(x7,x1),sep(lseg(x16,x12),sep(lseg(x11,x8),sep(lseg(x12,x8),sep(lseg(x10,x5),sep(lseg(x10,x15),sep(lseg(x2,x6),sep(lseg(x5,x1),emp)))))))))),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_4105,c_2036]) ).

cnf(c_4129,plain,
    ( x7 = x16
    | x16 = x12 ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_4105,c_1261]) ).

cnf(c_4133,plain,
    x16 = x12,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_4129,c_58]) ).

cnf(c_11322,plain,
    heap(sep(lseg(x16,x7),sep(lseg(x7,x1),sep(lseg(x16,x16),sep(lseg(x11,x8),sep(lseg(x16,x8),sep(lseg(x10,x5),sep(lseg(x10,x15),sep(lseg(x2,x6),sep(lseg(x5,x1),emp)))))))))),
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_4106,c_4133]) ).

cnf(c_11323,plain,
    heap(sep(lseg(x7,x1),sep(lseg(x16,x7),sep(lseg(x16,x8),sep(lseg(x11,x8),sep(lseg(x10,x5),sep(lseg(x10,x15),sep(lseg(x2,x6),sep(lseg(x5,x1),emp))))))))),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_11322,c_77,c_655,c_653]) ).

cnf(c_11347,plain,
    ( x7 = x16
    | x16 = x8 ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_11323,c_1261]) ).

cnf(c_11451,plain,
    $false,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_11347,c_1741,c_58]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : SWW437-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.12/0.12  % Command  : run_iprover %s %d THM
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Thu May  2 22:14:44 EDT 2024
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.18/0.46  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.18/0.46  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/run_problem --schedule fof_schedule --heuristic_context casc_unsat --no_cores 8 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 7.84/1.65  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 7.84/1.65  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 7.84/1.65  
% 7.84/1.65  %---------------- iProver v3.9 (pre CASC 2024/SMT-COMP 2024) ----------------%
% 7.84/1.65  
% 7.84/1.65  ------  iProver source info
% 7.84/1.65  
% 7.84/1.65  git: date: 2024-05-02 19:28:25 +0000
% 7.84/1.65  git: sha1: a33b5eb135c74074ba803943bb12f2ebd971352f
% 7.84/1.65  git: non_committed_changes: false
% 7.84/1.65  
% 7.84/1.65  ------ Parsing...successful
% 7.84/1.65  
% 7.84/1.65  
% 7.84/1.65  
% 7.84/1.65  ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 1  sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e  sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e 
% 7.84/1.65  
% 7.84/1.65  ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e 
% 7.84/1.65  
% 7.84/1.65  ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 7.84/1.65  ------ Proving...
% 7.84/1.65  ------ Problem Properties 
% 7.84/1.65  
% 7.84/1.65  
% 7.84/1.65  clauses                                 38
% 7.84/1.65  conjectures                             0
% 7.84/1.65  EPR                                     26
% 7.84/1.65  Horn                                    35
% 7.84/1.65  unary                                   31
% 7.84/1.65  binary                                  4
% 7.84/1.65  lits                                    48
% 7.84/1.65  lits eq                                 34
% 7.84/1.65  fd_pure                                 0
% 7.84/1.65  fd_pseudo                               0
% 7.84/1.65  fd_cond                                 1
% 7.84/1.65  fd_pseudo_cond                          4
% 7.84/1.65  AC symbols                              0
% 7.84/1.65  
% 7.84/1.65  ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on 
% 7.84/1.65  
% 7.84/1.65  ------ no conjectures: strip conj schedule 
% 7.84/1.65  
% 7.84/1.65  ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" stripped conjectures Time Limit: 10.
% 7.84/1.65  
% 7.84/1.65  
% 7.84/1.65  ------ 
% 7.84/1.65  Current options:
% 7.84/1.65  ------ 
% 7.84/1.65  
% 7.84/1.65  
% 7.84/1.65  
% 7.84/1.65  
% 7.84/1.65  ------ Proving...
% 7.84/1.65  
% 7.84/1.65  
% 7.84/1.65  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 7.84/1.65  
% 7.84/1.65  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 7.84/1.65  
% 7.84/1.65  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------