TSTP Solution File: SWW425-1 by iProver---3.9
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : iProver---3.9
% Problem : SWW425-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri May 3 03:24:58 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 3.96s 1.19s
% Output : CNFRefutation 3.96s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 17
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 23 ( 15 unt; 7 nHn; 21 RR)
% Number of literals : 32 ( 22 equ; 5 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 10 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 11 ( 11 usr; 9 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 9 ( 1 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_51,plain,
x1 != x10,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',premise_3) ).
cnf(c_59,plain,
x7 != x2,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',premise_11) ).
cnf(c_60,plain,
heap(sep(lseg(x5,x7),sep(lseg(x2,x5),sep(lseg(x2,x10),sep(lseg(x2,x1),sep(lseg(x9,x1),sep(lseg(x7,x6),sep(lseg(x3,x10),sep(lseg(x6,x9),emp))))))))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',premise_12) ).
cnf(c_62,plain,
sep(X0,sep(X1,X2)) = sep(X1,sep(X0,X2)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWV013-0.ax',associative_commutative) ).
cnf(c_63,plain,
sep(lseg(X0,X0),X1) = X1,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWV013-0.ax',normalization) ).
cnf(c_68,plain,
( ~ heap(sep(lseg(X0,X1),sep(lseg(X0,X2),X3)))
| X0 = X1
| X0 = X2 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWV013-0.ax',wellformedness_5) ).
cnf(c_435,plain,
heap(sep(lseg(x2,x5),sep(lseg(x2,x1),sep(lseg(x2,x10),sep(lseg(x9,x1),sep(lseg(x6,x9),sep(lseg(x5,x7),sep(lseg(x3,x10),sep(lseg(x7,x6),emp))))))))),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_60,c_62]) ).
cnf(c_436,plain,
( x1 = x2
| x2 = x5 ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_435,c_68]) ).
cnf(c_441,plain,
( x2 = x5
| heap(sep(lseg(x2,x5),sep(lseg(x2,x2),sep(lseg(x2,x10),sep(lseg(x9,x2),sep(lseg(x6,x9),sep(lseg(x5,x7),sep(lseg(x3,x10),sep(lseg(x7,x6),emp))))))))) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_436,c_435]) ).
cnf(c_450,plain,
( x2 = x5
| heap(sep(lseg(x2,x5),sep(lseg(x2,x10),sep(lseg(x9,x2),sep(lseg(x6,x9),sep(lseg(x5,x7),sep(lseg(x3,x10),sep(lseg(x7,x6),emp)))))))) ),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_441,c_62,c_63]) ).
cnf(c_455,plain,
( x10 = x2
| x2 = x5 ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_450,c_68]) ).
cnf(c_462,plain,
( x1 != x2
| x2 = x5 ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_455,c_51]) ).
cnf(c_463,plain,
x2 = x5,
inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_462,c_436,c_462]) ).
cnf(c_469,plain,
heap(sep(lseg(x2,x2),sep(lseg(x2,x1),sep(lseg(x2,x10),sep(lseg(x9,x1),sep(lseg(x6,x9),sep(lseg(x2,x7),sep(lseg(x3,x10),sep(lseg(x7,x6),emp))))))))),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_463,c_435]) ).
cnf(c_470,plain,
heap(sep(lseg(x2,x7),sep(lseg(x2,x1),sep(lseg(x2,x10),sep(lseg(x9,x1),sep(lseg(x6,x9),sep(lseg(x3,x10),sep(lseg(x7,x6),emp)))))))),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_469,c_62,c_63]) ).
cnf(c_471,plain,
( x1 = x2
| x7 = x2 ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_470,c_68]) ).
cnf(c_472,plain,
x1 = x2,
inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_471,c_59,c_471]) ).
cnf(c_474,plain,
heap(sep(lseg(x2,x7),sep(lseg(x2,x2),sep(lseg(x2,x10),sep(lseg(x9,x2),sep(lseg(x6,x9),sep(lseg(x3,x10),sep(lseg(x7,x6),emp)))))))),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_472,c_470]) ).
cnf(c_478,plain,
heap(sep(lseg(x2,x7),sep(lseg(x2,x10),sep(lseg(x9,x2),sep(lseg(x6,x9),sep(lseg(x3,x10),sep(lseg(x7,x6),emp))))))),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_474,c_62,c_63]) ).
cnf(c_481,plain,
( x7 = x2
| x10 = x2 ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_478,c_68]) ).
cnf(c_482,plain,
x10 = x2,
inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_481,c_59,c_481]) ).
cnf(c_487,plain,
x1 != x2,
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_482,c_51]) ).
cnf(c_488,plain,
$false,
inference(prop_impl_just,[status(thm)],[c_487,c_471,c_59]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.13 % Problem : SWW425-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.12/0.13 % Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% 0.14/0.34 % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34 % DateTime : Thu May 2 22:22:13 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.48 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.21/0.48 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_problem --schedule fof_schedule --heuristic_context casc_unsat --no_cores 8 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 3.96/1.19 % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 3.96/1.19 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 3.96/1.19
% 3.96/1.19 %---------------- iProver v3.9 (pre CASC 2024/SMT-COMP 2024) ----------------%
% 3.96/1.19
% 3.96/1.19 ------ iProver source info
% 3.96/1.19
% 3.96/1.19 git: date: 2024-05-02 19:28:25 +0000
% 3.96/1.19 git: sha1: a33b5eb135c74074ba803943bb12f2ebd971352f
% 3.96/1.19 git: non_committed_changes: false
% 3.96/1.19
% 3.96/1.19 ------ Parsing...successful
% 3.96/1.19
% 3.96/1.19
% 3.96/1.19
% 3.96/1.19 ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 0 sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e pe_s pe_e sup_sim: 0 sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e pe_s pe_e
% 3.96/1.19
% 3.96/1.19 ------ Preprocessing... gs_s sp: 0 0s gs_e snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e
% 3.96/1.19
% 3.96/1.19 ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e
% 3.96/1.19 ------ Proving...
% 3.96/1.19 ------ Problem Properties
% 3.96/1.19
% 3.96/1.19
% 3.96/1.19 clauses 23
% 3.96/1.19 conjectures 0
% 3.96/1.19 EPR 11
% 3.96/1.19 Horn 20
% 3.96/1.19 unary 16
% 3.96/1.19 binary 4
% 3.96/1.19 lits 33
% 3.96/1.19 lits eq 19
% 3.96/1.19 fd_pure 0
% 3.96/1.19 fd_pseudo 0
% 3.96/1.19 fd_cond 1
% 3.96/1.19 fd_pseudo_cond 4
% 3.96/1.19 AC symbols 0
% 3.96/1.19
% 3.96/1.19 ------ Input Options Time Limit: Unbounded
% 3.96/1.19
% 3.96/1.19
% 3.96/1.19 ------
% 3.96/1.19 Current options:
% 3.96/1.19 ------
% 3.96/1.19
% 3.96/1.19
% 3.96/1.19
% 3.96/1.19
% 3.96/1.19 ------ Proving...
% 3.96/1.19
% 3.96/1.19
% 3.96/1.19 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 3.96/1.19
% 3.96/1.19 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.96/1.19
% 3.96/1.19
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------