TSTP Solution File: SWW407-1 by iProver---3.9
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : iProver---3.9
% Problem : SWW407-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% Computer : n031.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri May 3 03:24:55 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 9.96s 2.14s
% Output : CNFRefutation 9.96s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 10
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 24 ( 13 unt; 6 nHn; 21 RR)
% Number of literals : 40 ( 10 equ; 13 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 6 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 9 ( 9 usr; 6 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 59 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_53,plain,
x1 != x2,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',premise_5) ).
cnf(c_57,plain,
heap(sep(next(x1,x2),sep(lseg(x3,x1),sep(lseg(x4,nil),sep(next(x2,x4),emp))))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',premise_9) ).
cnf(c_58,negated_conjecture,
~ heap(sep(lseg(x4,nil),sep(next(x2,x4),sep(lseg(x3,x2),emp)))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',conclusion_1) ).
cnf(c_59,plain,
sep(X0,sep(X1,X2)) = sep(X1,sep(X0,X2)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWV013-0.ax',associative_commutative) ).
cnf(c_60,plain,
sep(lseg(X0,X0),X1) = X1,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWV013-0.ax',normalization) ).
cnf(c_66,plain,
( ~ heap(sep(next(X0,X1),sep(lseg(X1,X2),X3)))
| X0 = X1
| heap(sep(lseg(X0,X2),X3)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWV013-0.ax',unfolding_2) ).
cnf(c_68,plain,
( ~ heap(sep(lseg(X0,X1),sep(lseg(X1,X2),sep(next(X2,X3),X4))))
| heap(sep(lseg(X0,X2),sep(next(X2,X3),X4))) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWV013-0.ax',unfolding_4) ).
cnf(c_148,plain,
~ heap(sep(lseg(x4,nil),sep(lseg(x3,x2),sep(next(x2,x4),emp)))),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_58,c_59]) ).
cnf(c_153,plain,
heap(sep(lseg(x4,nil),sep(lseg(x3,x1),sep(next(x2,x4),sep(next(x1,x2),emp))))),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_57,c_59]) ).
cnf(c_403,plain,
sep(X0,sep(X1,sep(X2,X3))) = sep(X1,sep(X2,sep(X0,X3))),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_59,c_59]) ).
cnf(c_555,plain,
( ~ heap(sep(next(X0,X1),X2))
| X0 = X1
| heap(sep(lseg(X0,X1),X2)) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_60,c_66]) ).
cnf(c_569,plain,
( ~ heap(sep(lseg(X0,X1),sep(lseg(X2,X0),sep(next(X1,X3),X4))))
| heap(sep(lseg(X2,X1),sep(next(X1,X3),X4))) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_59,c_68]) ).
cnf(c_722,plain,
( ~ heap(sep(X0,sep(next(X1,X2),X3)))
| X1 = X2
| heap(sep(lseg(X1,X2),sep(X0,X3))) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_59,c_555]) ).
cnf(c_1004,plain,
( ~ heap(sep(lseg(X0,X1),sep(lseg(X2,X0),sep(X3,sep(next(X1,X4),X5)))))
| heap(sep(lseg(X2,X1),sep(next(X1,X4),sep(X3,X5)))) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_59,c_569]) ).
cnf(c_1343,plain,
( ~ heap(sep(X0,sep(X1,sep(next(X2,X3),X4))))
| X2 = X3
| heap(sep(lseg(X2,X3),sep(X0,sep(X1,X4)))) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_59,c_722]) ).
cnf(c_2185,plain,
( ~ heap(sep(lseg(X0,X1),sep(X2,sep(lseg(X3,X0),sep(next(X1,X4),X5)))))
| heap(sep(lseg(X3,X1),sep(next(X1,X4),sep(X2,X5)))) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_59,c_1004]) ).
cnf(c_3782,plain,
( ~ heap(sep(X0,sep(X1,sep(X2,sep(next(X3,X4),X5)))))
| X3 = X4
| heap(sep(lseg(X3,X4),sep(X0,sep(X1,sep(X2,X5))))) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_59,c_1343]) ).
cnf(c_6117,plain,
( ~ heap(sep(X0,sep(lseg(X1,X2),sep(lseg(X3,X1),sep(next(X2,X4),X5)))))
| heap(sep(lseg(X3,X2),sep(next(X2,X4),sep(X0,X5)))) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_59,c_2185]) ).
cnf(c_11102,plain,
( x1 = x2
| heap(sep(lseg(x1,x2),sep(lseg(x4,nil),sep(lseg(x3,x1),sep(next(x2,x4),emp))))) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_153,c_3782]) ).
cnf(c_11116,plain,
heap(sep(lseg(x1,x2),sep(lseg(x4,nil),sep(lseg(x3,x1),sep(next(x2,x4),emp))))),
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_11102,c_53]) ).
cnf(c_11197,plain,
heap(sep(lseg(x4,nil),sep(lseg(x1,x2),sep(lseg(x3,x1),sep(next(x2,x4),emp))))),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_11116,c_59,c_403]) ).
cnf(c_12750,plain,
heap(sep(lseg(x3,x2),sep(next(x2,x4),sep(lseg(x4,nil),emp)))),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_11197,c_6117]) ).
cnf(c_12793,plain,
heap(sep(lseg(x4,nil),sep(lseg(x3,x2),sep(next(x2,x4),emp)))),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_12750,c_403]) ).
cnf(c_12794,plain,
$false,
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_12793,c_148]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.11 % Problem : SWW407-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.00/0.12 % Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% 0.11/0.32 % Computer : n031.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.32 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.32 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.32 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.32 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.32 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.32 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.32 % DateTime : Thu May 2 22:57:31 EDT 2024
% 0.11/0.32 % CPUTime :
% 0.17/0.44 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.17/0.44 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/run_problem --schedule fof_schedule --heuristic_context casc_unsat --no_cores 8 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 9.96/2.14 % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 9.96/2.14 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 9.96/2.14
% 9.96/2.14 %---------------- iProver v3.9 (pre CASC 2024/SMT-COMP 2024) ----------------%
% 9.96/2.14
% 9.96/2.14 ------ iProver source info
% 9.96/2.14
% 9.96/2.14 git: date: 2024-05-02 19:28:25 +0000
% 9.96/2.14 git: sha1: a33b5eb135c74074ba803943bb12f2ebd971352f
% 9.96/2.14 git: non_committed_changes: false
% 9.96/2.14
% 9.96/2.14 ------ Parsing...successful
% 9.96/2.14
% 9.96/2.14
% 9.96/2.14
% 9.96/2.14 ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 2 sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e pe_s pe_e
% 9.96/2.14
% 9.96/2.14 ------ Preprocessing... gs_s sp: 0 0s gs_e snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e
% 9.96/2.14
% 9.96/2.14 ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e
% 9.96/2.14 ------ Proving...
% 9.96/2.14 ------ Problem Properties
% 9.96/2.14
% 9.96/2.14
% 9.96/2.14 clauses 21
% 9.96/2.14 conjectures 0
% 9.96/2.14 EPR 8
% 9.96/2.14 Horn 18
% 9.96/2.14 unary 14
% 9.96/2.14 binary 4
% 9.96/2.14 lits 31
% 9.96/2.14 lits eq 16
% 9.96/2.14 fd_pure 0
% 9.96/2.14 fd_pseudo 0
% 9.96/2.14 fd_cond 1
% 9.96/2.14 fd_pseudo_cond 4
% 9.96/2.14 AC symbols 0
% 9.96/2.14
% 9.96/2.14 ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on
% 9.96/2.14
% 9.96/2.14 ------ no conjectures: strip conj schedule
% 9.96/2.14
% 9.96/2.14 ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" stripped conjectures Time Limit: 10.
% 9.96/2.14
% 9.96/2.14
% 9.96/2.14 ------
% 9.96/2.14 Current options:
% 9.96/2.14 ------
% 9.96/2.14
% 9.96/2.14
% 9.96/2.14
% 9.96/2.14
% 9.96/2.14 ------ Proving...
% 9.96/2.14
% 9.96/2.14
% 9.96/2.14 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 9.96/2.14
% 9.96/2.14 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 9.96/2.14
% 9.96/2.14
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------