TSTP Solution File: SWW407-1 by iProver---3.9

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9
% Problem  : SWW407-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover %s %d THM

% Computer : n031.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri May  3 03:24:55 EDT 2024

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 9.96s 2.14s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 9.96s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   10
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   24 (  13 unt;   6 nHn;  21 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   40 (  10 equ;  13 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    9 (   9 usr;   6 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   59 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_53,plain,
    x1 != x2,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',premise_5) ).

cnf(c_57,plain,
    heap(sep(next(x1,x2),sep(lseg(x3,x1),sep(lseg(x4,nil),sep(next(x2,x4),emp))))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',premise_9) ).

cnf(c_58,negated_conjecture,
    ~ heap(sep(lseg(x4,nil),sep(next(x2,x4),sep(lseg(x3,x2),emp)))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',conclusion_1) ).

cnf(c_59,plain,
    sep(X0,sep(X1,X2)) = sep(X1,sep(X0,X2)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWV013-0.ax',associative_commutative) ).

cnf(c_60,plain,
    sep(lseg(X0,X0),X1) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWV013-0.ax',normalization) ).

cnf(c_66,plain,
    ( ~ heap(sep(next(X0,X1),sep(lseg(X1,X2),X3)))
    | X0 = X1
    | heap(sep(lseg(X0,X2),X3)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWV013-0.ax',unfolding_2) ).

cnf(c_68,plain,
    ( ~ heap(sep(lseg(X0,X1),sep(lseg(X1,X2),sep(next(X2,X3),X4))))
    | heap(sep(lseg(X0,X2),sep(next(X2,X3),X4))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWV013-0.ax',unfolding_4) ).

cnf(c_148,plain,
    ~ heap(sep(lseg(x4,nil),sep(lseg(x3,x2),sep(next(x2,x4),emp)))),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_58,c_59]) ).

cnf(c_153,plain,
    heap(sep(lseg(x4,nil),sep(lseg(x3,x1),sep(next(x2,x4),sep(next(x1,x2),emp))))),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_57,c_59]) ).

cnf(c_403,plain,
    sep(X0,sep(X1,sep(X2,X3))) = sep(X1,sep(X2,sep(X0,X3))),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_59,c_59]) ).

cnf(c_555,plain,
    ( ~ heap(sep(next(X0,X1),X2))
    | X0 = X1
    | heap(sep(lseg(X0,X1),X2)) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_60,c_66]) ).

cnf(c_569,plain,
    ( ~ heap(sep(lseg(X0,X1),sep(lseg(X2,X0),sep(next(X1,X3),X4))))
    | heap(sep(lseg(X2,X1),sep(next(X1,X3),X4))) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_59,c_68]) ).

cnf(c_722,plain,
    ( ~ heap(sep(X0,sep(next(X1,X2),X3)))
    | X1 = X2
    | heap(sep(lseg(X1,X2),sep(X0,X3))) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_59,c_555]) ).

cnf(c_1004,plain,
    ( ~ heap(sep(lseg(X0,X1),sep(lseg(X2,X0),sep(X3,sep(next(X1,X4),X5)))))
    | heap(sep(lseg(X2,X1),sep(next(X1,X4),sep(X3,X5)))) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_59,c_569]) ).

cnf(c_1343,plain,
    ( ~ heap(sep(X0,sep(X1,sep(next(X2,X3),X4))))
    | X2 = X3
    | heap(sep(lseg(X2,X3),sep(X0,sep(X1,X4)))) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_59,c_722]) ).

cnf(c_2185,plain,
    ( ~ heap(sep(lseg(X0,X1),sep(X2,sep(lseg(X3,X0),sep(next(X1,X4),X5)))))
    | heap(sep(lseg(X3,X1),sep(next(X1,X4),sep(X2,X5)))) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_59,c_1004]) ).

cnf(c_3782,plain,
    ( ~ heap(sep(X0,sep(X1,sep(X2,sep(next(X3,X4),X5)))))
    | X3 = X4
    | heap(sep(lseg(X3,X4),sep(X0,sep(X1,sep(X2,X5))))) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_59,c_1343]) ).

cnf(c_6117,plain,
    ( ~ heap(sep(X0,sep(lseg(X1,X2),sep(lseg(X3,X1),sep(next(X2,X4),X5)))))
    | heap(sep(lseg(X3,X2),sep(next(X2,X4),sep(X0,X5)))) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_59,c_2185]) ).

cnf(c_11102,plain,
    ( x1 = x2
    | heap(sep(lseg(x1,x2),sep(lseg(x4,nil),sep(lseg(x3,x1),sep(next(x2,x4),emp))))) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_153,c_3782]) ).

cnf(c_11116,plain,
    heap(sep(lseg(x1,x2),sep(lseg(x4,nil),sep(lseg(x3,x1),sep(next(x2,x4),emp))))),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_11102,c_53]) ).

cnf(c_11197,plain,
    heap(sep(lseg(x4,nil),sep(lseg(x1,x2),sep(lseg(x3,x1),sep(next(x2,x4),emp))))),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_11116,c_59,c_403]) ).

cnf(c_12750,plain,
    heap(sep(lseg(x3,x2),sep(next(x2,x4),sep(lseg(x4,nil),emp)))),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_11197,c_6117]) ).

cnf(c_12793,plain,
    heap(sep(lseg(x4,nil),sep(lseg(x3,x2),sep(next(x2,x4),emp)))),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_12750,c_403]) ).

cnf(c_12794,plain,
    $false,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_12793,c_148]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.11  % Problem  : SWW407-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.00/0.12  % Command  : run_iprover %s %d THM
% 0.11/0.32  % Computer : n031.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.32  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.32  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.32  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.32  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.32  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.32  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/0.32  % DateTime : Thu May  2 22:57:31 EDT 2024
% 0.11/0.32  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.17/0.44  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.17/0.44  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/run_problem --schedule fof_schedule --heuristic_context casc_unsat --no_cores 8 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 9.96/2.14  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 9.96/2.14  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 9.96/2.14  
% 9.96/2.14  %---------------- iProver v3.9 (pre CASC 2024/SMT-COMP 2024) ----------------%
% 9.96/2.14  
% 9.96/2.14  ------  iProver source info
% 9.96/2.14  
% 9.96/2.14  git: date: 2024-05-02 19:28:25 +0000
% 9.96/2.14  git: sha1: a33b5eb135c74074ba803943bb12f2ebd971352f
% 9.96/2.14  git: non_committed_changes: false
% 9.96/2.14  
% 9.96/2.14  ------ Parsing...successful
% 9.96/2.14  
% 9.96/2.14  
% 9.96/2.14  
% 9.96/2.14  ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 2  sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e 
% 9.96/2.14  
% 9.96/2.14  ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e 
% 9.96/2.14  
% 9.96/2.14  ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 9.96/2.14  ------ Proving...
% 9.96/2.14  ------ Problem Properties 
% 9.96/2.14  
% 9.96/2.14  
% 9.96/2.14  clauses                                 21
% 9.96/2.14  conjectures                             0
% 9.96/2.14  EPR                                     8
% 9.96/2.14  Horn                                    18
% 9.96/2.14  unary                                   14
% 9.96/2.14  binary                                  4
% 9.96/2.14  lits                                    31
% 9.96/2.14  lits eq                                 16
% 9.96/2.14  fd_pure                                 0
% 9.96/2.14  fd_pseudo                               0
% 9.96/2.14  fd_cond                                 1
% 9.96/2.14  fd_pseudo_cond                          4
% 9.96/2.14  AC symbols                              0
% 9.96/2.14  
% 9.96/2.14  ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on 
% 9.96/2.14  
% 9.96/2.14  ------ no conjectures: strip conj schedule 
% 9.96/2.14  
% 9.96/2.14  ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" stripped conjectures Time Limit: 10.
% 9.96/2.14  
% 9.96/2.14  
% 9.96/2.14  ------ 
% 9.96/2.14  Current options:
% 9.96/2.14  ------ 
% 9.96/2.14  
% 9.96/2.14  
% 9.96/2.14  
% 9.96/2.14  
% 9.96/2.14  ------ Proving...
% 9.96/2.14  
% 9.96/2.14  
% 9.96/2.14  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 9.96/2.14  
% 9.96/2.14  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 9.96/2.14  
% 9.96/2.14  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------