TSTP Solution File: SWW407-1 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : SWW407-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 01:26:47 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 30.32s 30.56s
% Output : Refutation 30.32s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : SWW407-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.03/0.12 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Sun Jun 5 19:11:25 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/0.35 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.12/0.35 The process was started by sandbox on n019.cluster.edu,
% 0.12/0.35 Sun Jun 5 19:11:25 2022
% 0.12/0.35 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 19770.
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.12/0.35 set(auto).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.12/0.35 clear(print_given).
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 list(usable).
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=3.
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 This ia a non-Horn set with equality. The strategy will be
% 0.12/0.35 Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.12/0.35 unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.12/0.35 clauses in usable.
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 ------------> process usable:
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 ------------> process sos:
% 0.12/0.35 Following clause subsumed by 26 during input processing: 0 [copy,26,flip.1] {-} sep(A,sep(B,C))=sep(B,sep(A,C)).
% 0.12/0.35 Following clause subsumed by 30 during input processing: 0 [copy,30,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.19/0.37
% 0.19/0.37 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.19/0.37
% 0.19/0.37 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.19/0.37
% 0.19/0.37
% 0.19/0.37 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.19/0.37
% 0.19/0.37 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.19/0.37 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.19/0.37 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.19/0.37 number of clauses in intial UL: 19
% 0.19/0.37 number of clauses initially in problem: 24
% 0.19/0.37 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 79
% 0.19/0.37 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 100
% 0.19/0.37 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.19/0.37 absolute distinct symbol count: 11
% 0.19/0.37 distinct predicate count: 2
% 0.19/0.37 distinct function count: 3
% 0.19/0.37 distinct constant count: 6
% 0.19/0.37
% 0.19/0.37 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.19/0.37
% 0.19/0.37
% 0.19/0.37
% 0.19/0.37 =========== start of search ===========
% 3.31/3.52
% 3.31/3.52
% 3.31/3.52 Changing weight limit from 60 to 59.
% 3.31/3.52
% 3.31/3.52 Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 3.31/3.52
% 3.31/3.52 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 3.31/3.52
% 3.31/3.52 Resetting weight limit to 59 after 40 givens.
% 3.31/3.52
% 7.69/7.93
% 7.69/7.93
% 7.69/7.93 Changing weight limit from 59 to 51.
% 7.69/7.93
% 7.69/7.93 Resetting weight limit to 51 after 60 givens.
% 7.69/7.93
% 9.67/9.86
% 9.67/9.86
% 9.67/9.86 Changing weight limit from 51 to 42.
% 9.67/9.86
% 9.67/9.86 Resetting weight limit to 42 after 65 givens.
% 9.67/9.86
% 10.47/10.66
% 10.47/10.66
% 10.47/10.66 Changing weight limit from 42 to 41.
% 10.47/10.66
% 10.47/10.66 Resetting weight limit to 41 after 70 givens.
% 10.47/10.66
% 11.77/11.97
% 11.77/11.97
% 11.77/11.97 Changing weight limit from 41 to 39.
% 11.77/11.97
% 11.77/11.97 Resetting weight limit to 39 after 75 givens.
% 11.77/11.97
% 12.31/12.54
% 12.31/12.54
% 12.31/12.54 Changing weight limit from 39 to 38.
% 12.31/12.54
% 12.31/12.54 Resetting weight limit to 38 after 80 givens.
% 12.31/12.54
% 12.79/12.99
% 12.79/12.99
% 12.79/12.99 Changing weight limit from 38 to 37.
% 12.79/12.99
% 12.79/12.99 Resetting weight limit to 37 after 85 givens.
% 12.79/12.99
% 13.38/13.59
% 13.38/13.59
% 13.38/13.59 Changing weight limit from 37 to 36.
% 13.38/13.59
% 13.38/13.59 Resetting weight limit to 36 after 95 givens.
% 13.38/13.59
% 14.59/14.82
% 14.59/14.82
% 14.59/14.82 Changing weight limit from 36 to 34.
% 14.59/14.82
% 14.59/14.82 Resetting weight limit to 34 after 100 givens.
% 14.59/14.82
% 14.89/15.10
% 14.89/15.10
% 14.89/15.10 Changing weight limit from 34 to 33.
% 14.89/15.10
% 14.89/15.10 Resetting weight limit to 33 after 105 givens.
% 14.89/15.10
% 15.21/15.41
% 15.21/15.41
% 15.21/15.41 Changing weight limit from 33 to 32.
% 15.21/15.41
% 15.21/15.41 Resetting weight limit to 32 after 110 givens.
% 15.21/15.41
% 16.02/16.22
% 16.02/16.22
% 16.02/16.22 Changing weight limit from 32 to 31.
% 16.02/16.22
% 16.02/16.22 Resetting weight limit to 31 after 125 givens.
% 16.02/16.22
% 17.08/17.28
% 17.08/17.28
% 17.08/17.28 Changing weight limit from 31 to 30.
% 17.08/17.28
% 17.08/17.28 Resetting weight limit to 30 after 150 givens.
% 17.08/17.28
% 19.61/19.81
% 19.61/19.81
% 19.61/19.81 Changing weight limit from 30 to 28.
% 19.61/19.81
% 19.61/19.81 Resetting weight limit to 28 after 180 givens.
% 19.61/19.81
% 23.66/23.85
% 23.66/23.85
% 23.66/23.85 Changing weight limit from 28 to 27.
% 23.66/23.85
% 23.66/23.85 Resetting weight limit to 27 after 240 givens.
% 23.66/23.85
% 25.36/25.53
% 25.36/25.53
% 25.36/25.53 Changing weight limit from 27 to 26.
% 25.36/25.53
% 25.36/25.53 Resetting weight limit to 26 after 250 givens.
% 25.36/25.53
% 29.94/30.14
% 29.94/30.14
% 29.94/30.14 Changing weight limit from 26 to 25.
% 29.94/30.14
% 29.94/30.14 Resetting weight limit to 25 after 325 givens.
% 29.94/30.14
% 30.32/30.56
% 30.32/30.56
% 30.32/30.56 Changing weight limit from 25 to 24.
% 30.32/30.56
% 30.32/30.56 Resetting weight limit to 24 after 335 givens.
% 30.32/30.56
% 30.32/30.56
% 30.32/30.56 -- HEY sandbox, WE HAVE A PROOF!! --
% 30.32/30.56
% 30.32/30.56 ----> UNIT CONFLICT at 30.16 sec ----> 31351 [binary,31350.1,13616.1] {+} $F.
% 30.32/30.56
% 30.32/30.56 Length of proof is 9. Level of proof is 3.
% 30.32/30.56
% 30.32/30.56 ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 30.32/30.56 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 30.32/30.56 % SZS output start Refutation
% 30.32/30.56
% 30.32/30.56 6 [] {+} -heap(sep(next(A,B),sep(lseg(B,C),D)))|A=B|heap(sep(lseg(A,C),D)).
% 30.32/30.56 8 [] {+} -heap(sep(lseg(A,B),sep(lseg(B,C),sep(next(C,D),E))))|heap(sep(lseg(A,C),sep(next(C,D),E))).
% 30.32/30.56 18 [] {-} x1!=x2.
% 30.32/30.56 19 [copy,18,flip.1] {+} x2!=x1.
% 30.32/30.56 24 [] {+} -heap(sep(lseg(x4,nil),sep(next(x2,x4),sep(lseg(x3,x2),emp)))).
% 30.32/30.56 26 [] {-} sep(A,sep(B,C))=sep(B,sep(A,C)).
% 30.32/30.56 27 [] {+} sep(lseg(A,A),B)=B.
% 30.32/30.56 29 [] {-} heap(sep(next(x1,x2),sep(lseg(x3,x1),sep(lseg(x4,nil),sep(next(x2,x4),emp))))).
% 30.32/30.56 31 [para_into,26.1.1.2,26.1.1] {+} sep(A,sep(B,sep(C,D)))=sep(C,sep(A,sep(B,D))).
% 30.32/30.56 50 [para_from,26.1.1,24.1.1] {+} -heap(sep(next(x2,x4),sep(lseg(x4,nil),sep(lseg(x3,x2),emp)))).
% 30.32/30.56 58 [para_from,26.1.1,8.1.1] {+} -heap(sep(lseg(A,B),sep(lseg(C,A),sep(next(B,D),E))))|heap(sep(lseg(C,B),sep(next(B,D),E))).
% 30.32/30.56 91 [para_from,27.1.1,6.1.1.2] {+} -heap(sep(next(A,B),C))|A=B|heap(sep(lseg(A,B),C)).
% 30.32/30.56 185 [para_into,29.1.1.2.2,26.1.1] {-} heap(sep(next(x1,x2),sep(lseg(x3,x1),sep(next(x2,x4),sep(lseg(x4,nil),emp))))).
% 30.32/30.56 13616 [para_into,50.1.1,31.1.1] {+} -heap(sep(lseg(x3,x2),sep(next(x2,x4),sep(lseg(x4,nil),emp)))).
% 30.32/30.56 26235 [hyper,91,185,unit_del,19] {-} heap(sep(lseg(x1,x2),sep(lseg(x3,x1),sep(next(x2,x4),sep(lseg(x4,nil),emp))))).
% 30.32/30.56 31350 [hyper,26235,58] {-} heap(sep(lseg(x3,x2),sep(next(x2,x4),sep(lseg(x4,nil),emp)))).
% 30.32/30.56 31351 [binary,31350.1,13616.1] {+} $F.
% 30.32/30.56
% 30.32/30.56 % SZS output end Refutation
% 30.32/30.56 ------------ end of proof -------------
% 30.32/30.56
% 30.32/30.56
% 30.32/30.56 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 30.32/30.56
% 30.32/30.56
% 30.32/30.56 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 30.32/30.56
% 30.32/30.56 ============ end of search ============
% 30.32/30.56
% 30.32/30.56 ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 30.32/30.56
% 30.32/30.56 true clauses given 127 (37.9%)
% 30.32/30.56 false clauses given 208
% 30.32/30.56
% 30.32/30.56 FALSE TRUE
% 30.32/30.56 12 0 62
% 30.32/30.56 13 0 60
% 30.32/30.56 14 0 156
% 30.32/30.56 15 0 61
% 30.32/30.56 16 0 475
% 30.32/30.56 17 0 97
% 30.32/30.56 18 39 565
% 30.32/30.56 19 16 178
% 30.32/30.56 20 459 846
% 30.32/30.56 21 24 0
% 30.32/30.56 22 468 0
% 30.32/30.56 23 156 0
% 30.32/30.56 24 1338 0
% 30.32/30.56 tot: 2500 2500 (50.0% true)
% 30.32/30.56
% 30.32/30.56
% 30.32/30.56 Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 30.32/30.56
% 30.32/30.56 That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 30.32/30.56
% 30.32/30.56 Process 19770 finished Sun Jun 5 19:11:55 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------