TSTP Solution File: SWW342+1 by Zipperpin---2.1.9999

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem  : SWW342+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm  : NO INFORMATION
% Format   : NO INFORMATION
% Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.6jRz4TUfvU true

% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep  1 01:41:38 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 4.44s 1.33s
% Output   : Refutation 4.44s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :    9
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   16 (   5 unt;   7 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   15 (   3 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   41 (   3   ~;   1   |;   0   &;  32   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   5  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   11 (   6 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    6 (   6   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :    9 (   7 usr;   6 con; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   12 (   0   ^;  12   !;   0   ?;  12   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(sk__9_type,type,
    sk__9: $i ).

thf(v_n_type,type,
    v_n: $i ).

thf(v_P_type,type,
    v_P: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(c_Com_Ocom_OSKIP_type,type,
    c_Com_Ocom_OSKIP: $i ).

thf(c_Natural_Oevaln_type,type,
    c_Natural_Oevaln: $i > $i > $i > $i > $o ).

thf(sk__7_type,type,
    sk__7: $i ).

thf(sk__8_type,type,
    sk__8: $i ).

thf(conj_1,conjecture,
    ! [B_Z: $i,B_s: $i] :
      ( ( v_P @ B_Z @ B_s )
     => ! [B_s_H: $i] :
          ( ( c_Natural_Oevaln @ c_Com_Ocom_OSKIP @ B_s @ v_n @ B_s_H )
         => ( v_P @ B_Z @ B_s_H ) ) ) ).

thf(zf_stmt_0,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [B_Z: $i,B_s: $i] :
        ( ( v_P @ B_Z @ B_s )
       => ! [B_s_H: $i] :
            ( ( c_Natural_Oevaln @ c_Com_Ocom_OSKIP @ B_s @ v_n @ B_s_H )
           => ( v_P @ B_Z @ B_s_H ) ) ),
    inference('cnf.neg',[status(esa)],[conj_1]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl80,plain,
    v_P @ sk__7 @ sk__8,
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[zf_stmt_0]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl82,plain,
    c_Natural_Oevaln @ c_Com_Ocom_OSKIP @ sk__8 @ v_n @ sk__9,
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[zf_stmt_0]) ).

thf(fact_evaln__elim__cases_I1_J,axiom,
    ! [V_t: $i,V_n: $i,V_s: $i] :
      ( ( c_Natural_Oevaln @ c_Com_Ocom_OSKIP @ V_s @ V_n @ V_t )
     => ( V_t = V_s ) ) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl1,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( ( X1 = X0 )
      | ~ ( c_Natural_Oevaln @ c_Com_Ocom_OSKIP @ X0 @ X2 @ X1 ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[fact_evaln__elim__cases_I1_J]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl84,plain,
    sk__9 = sk__8,
    inference('sup-',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl82,zip_derived_cl1]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl81,plain,
    ~ ( v_P @ sk__7 @ sk__9 ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[zf_stmt_0]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl85,plain,
    $false,
    inference(demod,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl80,zip_derived_cl84,zip_derived_cl81]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13  % Problem  : SWW342+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.00/0.14  % Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.6jRz4TUfvU true
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.20/0.35  % DateTime : Sun Aug 27 23:05:47 EDT 2023
% 0.20/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.35  % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.20/0.35  % File         : /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.35  % Number of cores: 8
% 0.20/0.36  % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.20/0.36  % Running in FO mode
% 0.20/0.63  % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.20/0.63  % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.20/0.63  % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.20/0.77  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.20/0.77  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.20/0.77  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo5.sh running for 50s
% 0.20/0.77  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo7.sh running for 63s
% 0.20/0.77  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo1_av.sh running for 75s
% 0.20/0.77  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo13.sh running for 50s
% 0.20/0.83  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo4.sh running for 50s
% 4.44/1.33  % Solved by fo/fo4.sh.
% 4.44/1.33  % done 22 iterations in 0.467s
% 4.44/1.33  % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 4.44/1.33  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 4.44/1.33  
% 4.44/1.33  
% 4.44/1.33  % Terminating...
% 4.44/1.41  % Runner terminated.
% 4.44/1.42  % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------