TSTP Solution File: SWW315+1 by E---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1.00
% Problem : SWW315+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sat May 4 10:00:44 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 2.47s 2.66s
% Output : CNFRefutation 2.47s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 17 ( 10 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 27 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 20 ( 10 ~; 7 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 3 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 8 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 6 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 9 ( 9 usr; 5 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 22 ( 0 sgn 14 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(conj_4,conjecture,
c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(t_a,v_Ga,v_ts),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.rLpX4Ba643/E---3.1_12590.p',conj_4) ).
fof(fact_cut,axiom,
! [X4,X5,X8,X6] :
( c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(X6,X8,X5)
=> ( c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(X6,X4,X8)
=> c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(X6,X4,X5) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.rLpX4Ba643/E---3.1_12590.p',fact_cut) ).
fof(fact_asm,axiom,
! [X4,X5,X6] :
( hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(X6),tc_HOL_Obool)),X5),X4))
=> c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(X6,X4,X5) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.rLpX4Ba643/E---3.1_12590.p',fact_asm) ).
fof(conj_3,hypothesis,
c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(t_a,v_Ga,v_ts_H),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.rLpX4Ba643/E---3.1_12590.p',conj_3) ).
fof(conj_1,hypothesis,
hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a),tc_HOL_Obool)),v_ts),v_ts_H)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.rLpX4Ba643/E---3.1_12590.p',conj_1) ).
fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(t_a,v_Ga,v_ts),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conj_4])]) ).
fof(c_0_6,plain,
! [X290,X291,X292,X293] :
( ~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(X293,X292,X291)
| ~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(X293,X290,X292)
| c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(X293,X290,X291) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[fact_cut])])]) ).
fof(c_0_7,plain,
! [X283,X284,X285] :
( ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(X285),tc_HOL_Obool)),X284),X283))
| c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(X285,X283,X284) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[fact_asm])])]) ).
fof(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(t_a,v_Ga,v_ts),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(X1,X4,X3)
| ~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(X1,X2,X3)
| ~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(X1,X4,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,hypothesis,
c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(t_a,v_Ga,v_ts_H),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[conj_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(X1,X3,X2)
| ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(X1),tc_HOL_Obool)),X2),X3)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,hypothesis,
hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a),tc_HOL_Obool)),v_ts),v_ts_H)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[conj_1]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(t_a,v_Ga,v_ts),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,hypothesis,
( c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(t_a,v_Ga,X1)
| ~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(t_a,v_ts_H,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,hypothesis,
c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(t_a,v_ts_H,v_ts),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]),c_0_15])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.84/0.86 % Problem : SWW315+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.84/0.87 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.90/1.08 % Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% 0.90/1.08 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.90/1.08 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.90/1.08 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.90/1.08 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.90/1.08 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.90/1.08 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.90/1.08 % DateTime : Fri May 3 13:26:13 EDT 2024
% 0.90/1.09 % CPUTime :
% 1.89/2.11 Running first-order theorem proving
% 1.89/2.11 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.rLpX4Ba643/E---3.1_12590.p
% 2.47/2.66 # Version: 3.1.0
% 2.47/2.66 # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 2.47/2.66 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 2.47/2.66 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 2.47/2.66 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 2.47/2.66 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 2.47/2.66 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 2.47/2.66 # new_bool_1 with pid 12671 completed with status 0
% 2.47/2.66 # Result found by new_bool_1
% 2.47/2.66 # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 2.47/2.66 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 2.47/2.66 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 2.47/2.66 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 2.47/2.66 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 2.47/2.66 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 2.47/2.66 # Search class: FGHSM-FSLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 2.47/2.66 # Scheduled 13 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 2.47/2.66 # Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_S0Y with 23s (1) cores
% 2.47/2.66 # G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_S0Y with pid 12673 completed with status 0
% 2.47/2.66 # Result found by G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_S0Y
% 2.47/2.66 # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 2.47/2.66 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 2.47/2.66 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 2.47/2.66 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 2.47/2.66 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 2.47/2.66 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 2.47/2.66 # Search class: FGHSM-FSLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 2.47/2.66 # Scheduled 13 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 2.47/2.66 # Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_S0Y with 23s (1) cores
% 2.47/2.66 # Preprocessing time : 0.025 s
% 2.47/2.66
% 2.47/2.66 # Proof found!
% 2.47/2.66 # SZS status Theorem
% 2.47/2.66 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 2.47/2.66 # Parsed axioms : 5230
% 2.47/2.66 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 4781
% 2.47/2.66 # Initial clauses : 665
% 2.47/2.66 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 31
% 2.47/2.66 # Initial clauses in saturation : 634
% 2.47/2.66 # Processed clauses : 639
% 2.47/2.66 # ...of these trivial : 5
% 2.47/2.66 # ...subsumed : 116
% 2.47/2.66 # ...remaining for further processing : 517
% 2.47/2.66 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 93
% 2.47/2.66 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 2.47/2.66 # Backward-subsumed : 5
% 2.47/2.66 # Backward-rewritten : 6
% 2.47/2.66 # Generated clauses : 10381
% 2.47/2.66 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 9158
% 2.47/2.66 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 2.47/2.66 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 4
% 2.47/2.66 # Paramodulations : 10261
% 2.47/2.66 # Factorizations : 8
% 2.47/2.66 # NegExts : 0
% 2.47/2.66 # Equation resolutions : 113
% 2.47/2.66 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 2.47/2.66 # Total rewrite steps : 3098
% 2.47/2.66 # ...of those cached : 2158
% 2.47/2.66 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 2.47/2.66 # Propositional check models : 0
% 2.47/2.66 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 2.47/2.66 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 2.47/2.66 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 2.47/2.66 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 2.47/2.66 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 2.47/2.66 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 2.47/2.66 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 2.47/2.66 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 2.47/2.66 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 2.47/2.66 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 2.47/2.66 # Current number of processed clauses : 483
% 2.47/2.66 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 109
% 2.47/2.66 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 17
% 2.47/2.66 # Negative unit clauses : 10
% 2.47/2.66 # Non-unit-clauses : 347
% 2.47/2.66 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 9153
% 2.47/2.66 # ...number of literals in the above : 25698
% 2.47/2.66 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 2.47/2.66 # Current number of archived clauses : 11
% 2.47/2.66 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 20445
% 2.47/2.66 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 16434
% 2.47/2.66 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 112
% 2.47/2.66 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 439
% 2.47/2.66 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 29
% 2.47/2.66 # BW rewrite match attempts : 1618
% 2.47/2.66 # BW rewrite match successes : 78
% 2.47/2.66 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 2.47/2.66 # Condensation successes : 0
% 2.47/2.66 # Termbank termtop insertions : 526055
% 2.47/2.66 # Search garbage collected termcells : 54280
% 2.47/2.66
% 2.47/2.66 # -------------------------------------------------
% 2.47/2.66 # User time : 0.301 s
% 2.47/2.66 # System time : 0.029 s
% 2.47/2.66 # Total time : 0.330 s
% 2.47/2.66 # Maximum resident set size: 11180 pages
% 2.47/2.66
% 2.47/2.66 # -------------------------------------------------
% 2.47/2.66 # User time : 0.498 s
% 2.47/2.66 # System time : 0.040 s
% 2.47/2.66 # Total time : 0.538 s
% 2.47/2.66 # Maximum resident set size: 9512 pages
% 2.47/2.66 % E---3.1 exiting
% 2.47/2.66 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------