TSTP Solution File: SWW297+1 by leanCoP---2.2
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : leanCoP---2.2
% Problem : SWW297+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : leancop_casc.sh %s %d
% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 00:47:13 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 30.78s 30.48s
% Output : Proof 30.78s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : SWW297+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.03/0.12 % Command : leancop_casc.sh %s %d
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Sun Jun 5 02:14:52 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 30.78/30.48 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 30.78/30.49 % SZS output start Proof for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 30.78/30.49
% 30.78/30.49 %-----------------------------------------------------
% 30.78/30.49 fof(conj_0, conjecture, ! [_1741080, _1741083] : (v_fun1(_1741080, _1741083) => ! [_1741101] : (c_Natural_Oevaln(v_com, _1741083, hAPP(c_Nat_OSuc, v_n), _1741101) => v_fun2(_1741080, _1741101))) => ! [_1741080, _1741083] : (v_fun1(_1741080, _1741083) => ! [_1741101] : (c_Natural_Oevaln(v_com, _1741083, v_n, _1741101) => v_fun2(_1741080, _1741101))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', conj_0)).
% 30.78/30.49 fof(fact_evaln__Suc, axiom, ! [_1741989, _1741992, _1741995, _1741998] : (c_Natural_Oevaln(_1741998, _1741995, _1741992, _1741989) => c_Natural_Oevaln(_1741998, _1741995, hAPP(c_Nat_OSuc, _1741992), _1741989)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', fact_evaln__Suc)).
% 30.78/30.49
% 30.78/30.49 cnf(1, plain, [-(v_fun1(1860 ^ [], 1861 ^ []))], clausify(conj_0)).
% 30.78/30.49 cnf(2, plain, [-(c_Natural_Oevaln(v_com, 1861 ^ [], v_n, 1862 ^ []))], clausify(conj_0)).
% 30.78/30.49 cnf(3, plain, [v_fun2(1860 ^ [], 1862 ^ [])], clausify(conj_0)).
% 30.78/30.49 cnf(4, plain, [v_fun1(_841844, _841845), c_Natural_Oevaln(v_com, _841845, hAPP(c_Nat_OSuc, v_n), _841849), -(v_fun2(_841844, _841849))], clausify(conj_0)).
% 30.78/30.49 cnf(5, plain, [c_Natural_Oevaln(_449797, _449796, _449795, _449794), -(c_Natural_Oevaln(_449797, _449796, hAPP(c_Nat_OSuc, _449795), _449794))], clausify(fact_evaln__Suc)).
% 30.78/30.49
% 30.78/30.49 cnf('1',plain,[v_fun1(1860 ^ [], 1861 ^ []), c_Natural_Oevaln(v_com, 1861 ^ [], hAPP(c_Nat_OSuc, v_n), 1862 ^ []), -(v_fun2(1860 ^ [], 1862 ^ []))],start(4,bind([[_841845, _841844, _841849], [1861 ^ [], 1860 ^ [], 1862 ^ []]]))).
% 30.78/30.49 cnf('1.1',plain,[-(v_fun1(1860 ^ [], 1861 ^ []))],extension(1)).
% 30.78/30.49 cnf('1.2',plain,[-(c_Natural_Oevaln(v_com, 1861 ^ [], hAPP(c_Nat_OSuc, v_n), 1862 ^ [])), c_Natural_Oevaln(v_com, 1861 ^ [], v_n, 1862 ^ [])],extension(5,bind([[_449797, _449796, _449795, _449794], [v_com, 1861 ^ [], v_n, 1862 ^ []]]))).
% 30.78/30.49 cnf('1.2.1',plain,[-(c_Natural_Oevaln(v_com, 1861 ^ [], v_n, 1862 ^ []))],extension(2)).
% 30.78/30.49 cnf('1.3',plain,[v_fun2(1860 ^ [], 1862 ^ [])],extension(3)).
% 30.78/30.49 %-----------------------------------------------------
% 30.78/30.50
% 30.78/30.50 % SZS output end Proof for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------