TSTP Solution File: SWW297+1 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : SWW297+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 00:10:30 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.94s 2.12s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.94s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 13 ( 4 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 36 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 6 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 35 ( 12 ~; 9 |; 3 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 11 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 8 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-4 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 6 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 34 ( 0 sgn 23 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(conj_0,conjecture,
( ! [X298,X299] :
( v_fun1(X298,X299)
=> ! [X300] :
( c_Natural_Oevaln(v_com,X299,hAPP(c_Nat_OSuc,v_n),X300)
=> v_fun2(X298,X300) ) )
=> ! [X298,X299] :
( v_fun1(X298,X299)
=> ! [X300] :
( c_Natural_Oevaln(v_com,X299,v_n,X300)
=> v_fun2(X298,X300) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',conj_0) ).
fof(fact_evaln__Suc,axiom,
! [X4,X5,X6,X7] :
( c_Natural_Oevaln(X7,X6,X5,X4)
=> c_Natural_Oevaln(X7,X6,hAPP(c_Nat_OSuc,X5),X4) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',fact_evaln__Suc) ).
fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
~ ( ! [X298,X299] :
( v_fun1(X298,X299)
=> ! [X300] :
( c_Natural_Oevaln(v_com,X299,hAPP(c_Nat_OSuc,v_n),X300)
=> v_fun2(X298,X300) ) )
=> ! [X298,X299] :
( v_fun1(X298,X299)
=> ! [X300] :
( c_Natural_Oevaln(v_com,X299,v_n,X300)
=> v_fun2(X298,X300) ) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conj_0]) ).
fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
! [X301,X302,X303] :
( ( ~ v_fun1(X301,X302)
| ~ c_Natural_Oevaln(v_com,X302,hAPP(c_Nat_OSuc,v_n),X303)
| v_fun2(X301,X303) )
& v_fun1(esk1_0,esk2_0)
& c_Natural_Oevaln(v_com,esk2_0,v_n,esk3_0)
& ~ v_fun2(esk1_0,esk3_0) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_4,plain,
! [X8,X9,X10,X11] :
( ~ c_Natural_Oevaln(X11,X10,X9,X8)
| c_Natural_Oevaln(X11,X10,hAPP(c_Nat_OSuc,X9),X8) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[fact_evaln__Suc])]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
( v_fun2(X1,X2)
| ~ c_Natural_Oevaln(v_com,X3,hAPP(c_Nat_OSuc,v_n),X2)
| ~ v_fun1(X1,X3) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,plain,
( c_Natural_Oevaln(X1,X2,hAPP(c_Nat_OSuc,X3),X4)
| ~ c_Natural_Oevaln(X1,X2,X3,X4) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
( v_fun2(X1,X2)
| ~ v_fun1(X1,X3)
| ~ c_Natural_Oevaln(v_com,X3,v_n,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
c_Natural_Oevaln(v_com,esk2_0,v_n,esk3_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
~ v_fun2(esk1_0,esk3_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
( v_fun2(X1,esk3_0)
| ~ v_fun1(X1,esk2_0) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
v_fun1(esk1_0,esk2_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]),c_0_11])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13 % Problem : SWW297+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.07/0.14 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Sun Jun 5 02:09:33 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.94/2.12 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.94/2.12 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.94/2.12 # Preprocessing time : 0.231 s
% 0.94/2.12
% 0.94/2.12 # Proof found!
% 0.94/2.12 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.94/2.12 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.94/2.12 # Proof object total steps : 13
% 0.94/2.12 # Proof object clause steps : 8
% 0.94/2.12 # Proof object formula steps : 5
% 0.94/2.12 # Proof object conjectures : 10
% 0.94/2.12 # Proof object clause conjectures : 7
% 0.94/2.12 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 0.94/2.12 # Proof object initial clauses used : 5
% 0.94/2.12 # Proof object initial formulas used : 2
% 0.94/2.12 # Proof object generating inferences : 3
% 0.94/2.12 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 2
% 0.94/2.12 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.94/2.12 # Parsed axioms : 5225
% 0.94/2.12 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 5124
% 0.94/2.12 # Initial clauses : 175
% 0.94/2.12 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 7
% 0.94/2.12 # Initial clauses in saturation : 168
% 0.94/2.12 # Processed clauses : 174
% 0.94/2.12 # ...of these trivial : 6
% 0.94/2.12 # ...subsumed : 44
% 0.94/2.12 # ...remaining for further processing : 124
% 0.94/2.12 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 17
% 0.94/2.12 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.94/2.12 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.94/2.12 # Backward-rewritten : 4
% 0.94/2.12 # Generated clauses : 915
% 0.94/2.12 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 840
% 0.94/2.12 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.94/2.12 # Paramodulations : 893
% 0.94/2.12 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.94/2.12 # Equation resolutions : 22
% 0.94/2.12 # Current number of processed clauses : 116
% 0.94/2.12 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 16
% 0.94/2.12 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 1
% 0.94/2.12 # Negative unit clauses : 5
% 0.94/2.12 # Non-unit-clauses : 94
% 0.94/2.12 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 829
% 0.94/2.12 # ...number of literals in the above : 2346
% 0.94/2.12 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.94/2.12 # Current number of archived clauses : 4
% 0.94/2.12 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 846
% 0.94/2.12 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 800
% 0.94/2.12 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 37
% 0.94/2.12 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 7
% 0.94/2.12 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.94/2.12 # BW rewrite match attempts : 34
% 0.94/2.12 # BW rewrite match successes : 6
% 0.94/2.12 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.94/2.12 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.94/2.12 # Termbank termtop insertions : 161289
% 0.94/2.12
% 0.94/2.12 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.94/2.12 # User time : 0.240 s
% 0.94/2.12 # System time : 0.012 s
% 0.94/2.12 # Total time : 0.252 s
% 0.94/2.12 # Maximum resident set size: 13892 pages
% 0.94/24.11 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.94/24.13 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.94/24.13 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.94/24.13 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.94/24.13 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.94/24.14 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.94/24.14 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.94/24.14 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.94/24.14 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.94/24.15 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.94/24.15 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.94/24.16 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.94/24.16 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.94/24.16 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.94/24.16 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.94/24.17 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.94/24.17 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.94/24.17 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.94/24.17 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.94/24.18 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.94/24.18 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.94/24.18 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.94/24.18 eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------