TSTP Solution File: SWW272+1 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : SWW272+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 00:01:53 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 10.06s 2.95s
% Output : CNFRefutation 10.06s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 19 ( 15 unt; 0 nHn; 16 RR)
% Number of literals : 23 ( 14 equ; 7 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 9 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 13 ( 13 usr; 4 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 7 ( 3 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_1376,plain,
hAPP(hAPP(c_Groups_Otimes__class_Otimes(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)),hAPP(hAPP(c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)),c_Polynomial_OpCons(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,c_Groups_Ouminus__class_Ouminus(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,v_a____),c_Polynomial_OpCons(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,c_Groups_Oone__class_Oone(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex))))),c_Polynomial_Oorder(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,v_a____,v_pa____))),v_s____) = v_pa____,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-0m_upass/lgb.p',i_0_1376) ).
cnf(i_0_209,negated_conjecture,
c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)) = v_s____,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-0m_upass/lgb.p',i_0_209) ).
cnf(i_0_1146,plain,
( c_Polynomial_OpCons(X1,c_Groups_Oone__class_Oone(X1),c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X1))) = c_Groups_Oone__class_Oone(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X1))
| ~ class_Rings_Ocomm__semiring__1(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-0m_upass/lgb.p',i_0_1146) ).
cnf(i_0_24,plain,
class_Rings_Ocomm__semiring__1(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-0m_upass/lgb.p',i_0_24) ).
cnf(i_0_954,plain,
( hAPP(hAPP(c_Groups_Otimes__class_Otimes(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X1)),X2),c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X1))) = c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X1))
| ~ class_Rings_Ocomm__semiring__0(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-0m_upass/lgb.p',i_0_954) ).
cnf(i_0_23,plain,
class_Rings_Ocomm__semiring__0(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-0m_upass/lgb.p',i_0_23) ).
cnf(i_0_1226,plain,
c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)) != v_pa____,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-0m_upass/lgb.p',i_0_1226) ).
cnf(c_0_1384,plain,
hAPP(hAPP(c_Groups_Otimes__class_Otimes(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)),hAPP(hAPP(c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)),c_Polynomial_OpCons(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,c_Groups_Ouminus__class_Ouminus(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,v_a____),c_Polynomial_OpCons(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,c_Groups_Oone__class_Oone(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex))))),c_Polynomial_Oorder(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,v_a____,v_pa____))),v_s____) = v_pa____,
i_0_1376 ).
cnf(c_0_1385,negated_conjecture,
c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)) = v_s____,
i_0_209 ).
cnf(c_0_1386,plain,
( c_Polynomial_OpCons(X1,c_Groups_Oone__class_Oone(X1),c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X1))) = c_Groups_Oone__class_Oone(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X1))
| ~ class_Rings_Ocomm__semiring__1(X1) ),
i_0_1146 ).
cnf(c_0_1387,plain,
class_Rings_Ocomm__semiring__1(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
i_0_24 ).
cnf(c_0_1388,plain,
( hAPP(hAPP(c_Groups_Otimes__class_Otimes(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X1)),X2),c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X1))) = c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X1))
| ~ class_Rings_Ocomm__semiring__0(X1) ),
i_0_954 ).
cnf(c_0_1389,plain,
class_Rings_Ocomm__semiring__0(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
i_0_23 ).
cnf(c_0_1390,plain,
c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)) != v_pa____,
i_0_1226 ).
cnf(c_0_1391,plain,
hAPP(hAPP(c_Groups_Otimes__class_Otimes(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)),hAPP(hAPP(c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)),c_Polynomial_OpCons(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,c_Groups_Ouminus__class_Ouminus(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,v_a____),c_Polynomial_OpCons(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,c_Groups_Oone__class_Oone(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_s____))),c_Polynomial_Oorder(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,v_a____,v_pa____))),v_s____) = v_pa____,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_1384,c_0_1385]) ).
cnf(c_0_1392,negated_conjecture,
c_Polynomial_OpCons(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,c_Groups_Oone__class_Oone(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_s____) = c_Groups_Oone__class_Oone(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_1386,c_0_1385]),c_0_1387])]) ).
cnf(c_0_1393,negated_conjecture,
hAPP(hAPP(c_Groups_Otimes__class_Otimes(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)),X1),v_s____) = v_s____,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_1388,c_0_1385]),c_0_1389])]) ).
cnf(c_0_1394,plain,
v_s____ != v_pa____,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_1390,c_0_1385]) ).
cnf(c_0_1395,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_1391,c_0_1392]),c_0_1393]),c_0_1394]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : SWW272+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Mon Jun 6 07:00:26 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.46 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.34/0.52 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.34/0.52 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 0.34/0.52 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 0.34/0.52 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 10.06/2.95 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 10.06/2.95 # No SInE strategy applied
% 10.06/2.95 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 10.06/2.95 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 10.06/2.95 # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 10.06/2.95 #
% 10.06/2.95 # Preprocessing time : 0.027 s
% 10.06/2.95 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 10.06/2.95
% 10.06/2.95 # Proof found!
% 10.06/2.95 # SZS status Theorem
% 10.06/2.95 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 10.06/2.95 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 10.06/2.95
% 10.06/2.95 # -------------------------------------------------
% 10.06/2.95 # User time : 0.048 s
% 10.06/2.95 # System time : 0.010 s
% 10.06/2.95 # Total time : 0.058 s
% 10.06/2.95 # Maximum resident set size: 7376 pages
% 10.06/2.95
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------