TSTP Solution File: SWW232+1 by SATCoP---0.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SATCoP---0.1
% Problem : SWW232+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : satcop --statistics %s
% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 01:23:03 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.23s 0.47s
% Output : Proof 0.23s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (MakeTreeStats fails)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(g0,plain,
~ v_thesis____,
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',conj_1)]) ).
cnf(g1,plain,
( ~ c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_RealDef_Oreal,v_da____,c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,v_aa____)),c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,hAPP(c_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,c_Polynomial_OpCons(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,v_c____,v_cs____)),sK37(sK1(v_c____,c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_RealDef_Oreal,v_da____,c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,v_aa____)))))))
| v_thesis____ ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',conj_0)]) ).
cnf(g2,plain,
( ~ c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,sK1(v_c____,c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_RealDef_Oreal,v_da____,c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,v_aa____))),c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,sK37(sK1(v_c____,c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_RealDef_Oreal,v_da____,c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,v_aa____))))))
| sPE(v_cs____,c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)))
| c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_RealDef_Oreal,v_da____,c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,v_aa____)),c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,hAPP(c_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,c_Polynomial_OpCons(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,v_c____,v_cs____)),sK37(sK1(v_c____,c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_RealDef_Oreal,v_da____,c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,v_aa____))))))) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_pCons_Ohyps)]) ).
cnf(g3,plain,
( c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,sK1(v_c____,c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_RealDef_Oreal,v_da____,c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,v_aa____))),c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,sK37(sK1(v_c____,c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_RealDef_Oreal,v_da____,c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,v_aa____))))))
| v_thesis____ ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',conj_0)]) ).
cnf(g4,plain,
~ sPE(v_cs____,c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex))),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_H)]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.13/0.14 % Problem : SWW232+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.13/0.14 % Command : satcop --statistics %s
% 0.15/0.36 % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.15/0.36 % DateTime : Sat Jun 4 13:46:37 EDT 2022
% 0.15/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.23/0.47 % symbols: 159
% 0.23/0.47 % clauses: 1784
% 0.23/0.47 % start clauses: 1
% 0.23/0.47 % iterative deepening steps: 117
% 0.23/0.47 % maximum path limit: 3
% 0.23/0.47 % literal attempts: 37514
% 0.23/0.47 % depth failures: 33078
% 0.23/0.47 % regularity failures: 888
% 0.23/0.47 % tautology failures: 223
% 0.23/0.47 % reductions: 2779
% 0.23/0.47 % extensions: 34693
% 0.23/0.47 % SAT variables: 13198
% 0.23/0.47 % SAT clauses: 16302
% 0.23/0.47 % WalkSAT solutions: 16299
% 0.23/0.47 % CDCL solutions: 0
% 0.23/0.47 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.23/0.47 % SZS output start ListOfCNF for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------