TSTP Solution File: SWW232+1 by SATCoP---0.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SATCoP---0.1
% Problem  : SWW232+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : satcop --statistics %s

% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 01:23:03 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.23s 0.47s
% Output   : Proof 0.23s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (MakeTreeStats fails)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(g0,plain,
    ~ v_thesis____,
    inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',conj_1)]) ).

cnf(g1,plain,
    ( ~ c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_RealDef_Oreal,v_da____,c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,v_aa____)),c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,hAPP(c_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,c_Polynomial_OpCons(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,v_c____,v_cs____)),sK37(sK1(v_c____,c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_RealDef_Oreal,v_da____,c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,v_aa____)))))))
    | v_thesis____ ),
    inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',conj_0)]) ).

cnf(g2,plain,
    ( ~ c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,sK1(v_c____,c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_RealDef_Oreal,v_da____,c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,v_aa____))),c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,sK37(sK1(v_c____,c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_RealDef_Oreal,v_da____,c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,v_aa____))))))
    | sPE(v_cs____,c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)))
    | c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_RealDef_Oreal,v_da____,c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,v_aa____)),c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,hAPP(c_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,c_Polynomial_OpCons(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,v_c____,v_cs____)),sK37(sK1(v_c____,c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_RealDef_Oreal,v_da____,c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,v_aa____))))))) ),
    inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_pCons_Ohyps)]) ).

cnf(g3,plain,
    ( c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,sK1(v_c____,c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_RealDef_Oreal,v_da____,c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,v_aa____))),c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,sK37(sK1(v_c____,c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_RealDef_Oreal,v_da____,c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,v_aa____))))))
    | v_thesis____ ),
    inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',conj_0)]) ).

cnf(g4,plain,
    ~ sPE(v_cs____,c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex))),
    inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_H)]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.13/0.14  % Problem  : SWW232+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.13/0.14  % Command  : satcop --statistics %s
% 0.15/0.36  % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.15/0.36  % DateTime : Sat Jun  4 13:46:37 EDT 2022
% 0.15/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.23/0.47  % symbols: 159
% 0.23/0.47  % clauses: 1784
% 0.23/0.47  % start clauses: 1
% 0.23/0.47  % iterative deepening steps: 117
% 0.23/0.47  % maximum path limit: 3
% 0.23/0.47  % literal attempts: 37514
% 0.23/0.47  % depth failures: 33078
% 0.23/0.47  % regularity failures: 888
% 0.23/0.47  % tautology failures: 223
% 0.23/0.47  % reductions: 2779
% 0.23/0.47  % extensions: 34693
% 0.23/0.47  % SAT variables: 13198
% 0.23/0.47  % SAT clauses: 16302
% 0.23/0.47  % WalkSAT solutions: 16299
% 0.23/0.47  % CDCL solutions: 0
% 0.23/0.47  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.23/0.47  % SZS output start ListOfCNF for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------