TSTP Solution File: SWW206+1 by E---3.1.00

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.1.00
% Problem  : SWW206+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 06:41:48 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 29.46s 4.28s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 29.46s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   23 (  20 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   33 (   8 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    6 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   19 (   9   ~;   6   |;   1   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   3  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :   12 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   17 (  17 usr;   9 con; 0-5 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   40 (   7 sgn  25   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(conj_0,conjecture,
    c_SEQ_OBseq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,c_COMBB(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,tc_RealDef_Oreal,tc_Nat_Onat,c_Complex_OIm,c_COMBB(tc_Nat_Onat,tc_Complex_Ocomplex,tc_Nat_Onat,v_s,c_COMBB(tc_Nat_Onat,tc_Nat_Onat,tc_Nat_Onat,v_f____,v_ga____)))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',conj_0) ).

fof(fact_BseqI2_H,axiom,
    ! [X45,X8,X46,X9] :
      ( class_RealVector_Oreal__normed__vector(X9)
     => ( ! [X5] :
            ( hBOOL(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_Nat_Onat,X46),X5))
           => hBOOL(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(X9,hAPP(X8,X5))),X45)) )
       => c_SEQ_OBseq(X9,X8) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_BseqI2_H) ).

fof(help_c__COMBB__1,axiom,
    ! [X114,X115,X80,X38,X9,X34] : hAPP(c_COMBB(X34,X9,X38,X80,X115),X114) = hAPP(X80,hAPP(X115,X114)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',help_c__COMBB__1) ).

fof(fact_real__norm__def,axiom,
    ! [X23] : c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(tc_RealDef_Oreal,X23) = c_Groups_Oabs__class_Oabs(tc_RealDef_Oreal,X23),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_real__norm__def) ).

fof(fact_th,axiom,
    ! [X5] : hBOOL(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,c_Groups_Oabs__class_Oabs(tc_RealDef_Oreal,hAPP(c_Complex_OIm,hAPP(v_s,X5)))),hAPP(hAPP(c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_RealDef_Oreal),v_r),c_Groups_Oone__class_Oone(tc_RealDef_Oreal)))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_th) ).

fof(arity_RealDef__Oreal__RealVector_Oreal__normed__vector,axiom,
    class_RealVector_Oreal__normed__vector(tc_RealDef_Oreal),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',arity_RealDef__Oreal__RealVector_Oreal__normed__vector) ).

fof(fact_complex__Im__i,axiom,
    hAPP(c_Complex_OIm,c_Complex_Oii) = c_Groups_Oone__class_Oone(tc_RealDef_Oreal),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_complex__Im__i) ).

fof(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_SEQ_OBseq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,c_COMBB(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,tc_RealDef_Oreal,tc_Nat_Onat,c_Complex_OIm,c_COMBB(tc_Nat_Onat,tc_Complex_Ocomplex,tc_Nat_Onat,v_s,c_COMBB(tc_Nat_Onat,tc_Nat_Onat,tc_Nat_Onat,v_f____,v_ga____)))),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conj_0])]) ).

fof(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_SEQ_OBseq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,c_COMBB(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,tc_RealDef_Oreal,tc_Nat_Onat,c_Complex_OIm,c_COMBB(tc_Nat_Onat,tc_Complex_Ocomplex,tc_Nat_Onat,v_s,c_COMBB(tc_Nat_Onat,tc_Nat_Onat,tc_Nat_Onat,v_f____,v_ga____)))),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

fof(c_0_9,plain,
    ! [X660,X661,X662,X663] :
      ( ( hBOOL(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_Nat_Onat,X662),esk18_4(X660,X661,X662,X663)))
        | c_SEQ_OBseq(X663,X661)
        | ~ class_RealVector_Oreal__normed__vector(X663) )
      & ( ~ hBOOL(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(X663,hAPP(X661,esk18_4(X660,X661,X662,X663)))),X660))
        | c_SEQ_OBseq(X663,X661)
        | ~ class_RealVector_Oreal__normed__vector(X663) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[fact_BseqI2_H])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_10,plain,
    ! [X2846,X2847,X2848,X2849,X2850,X2851] : hAPP(c_COMBB(X2851,X2850,X2849,X2848,X2847),X2846) = hAPP(X2848,hAPP(X2847,X2846)),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[help_c__COMBB__1]) ).

fof(c_0_11,plain,
    ! [X204] : c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(tc_RealDef_Oreal,X204) = c_Groups_Oabs__class_Oabs(tc_RealDef_Oreal,X204),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[fact_real__norm__def]) ).

fof(c_0_12,plain,
    ! [X132] : hBOOL(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,c_Groups_Oabs__class_Oabs(tc_RealDef_Oreal,hAPP(c_Complex_OIm,hAPP(v_s,X132)))),hAPP(hAPP(c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_RealDef_Oreal),v_r),c_Groups_Oone__class_Oone(tc_RealDef_Oreal)))),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[fact_th]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_SEQ_OBseq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,c_COMBB(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,tc_RealDef_Oreal,tc_Nat_Onat,c_Complex_OIm,c_COMBB(tc_Nat_Onat,tc_Complex_Ocomplex,tc_Nat_Onat,v_s,c_COMBB(tc_Nat_Onat,tc_Nat_Onat,tc_Nat_Onat,v_f____,v_ga____)))),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( c_SEQ_OBseq(X1,X2)
    | ~ hBOOL(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(X1,hAPP(X2,esk18_4(X3,X2,X4,X1)))),X3))
    | ~ class_RealVector_Oreal__normed__vector(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    class_RealVector_Oreal__normed__vector(tc_RealDef_Oreal),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[arity_RealDef__Oreal__RealVector_Oreal__normed__vector]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    hAPP(c_COMBB(X1,X2,X3,X4,X5),X6) = hAPP(X4,hAPP(X5,X6)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(tc_RealDef_Oreal,X1) = c_Groups_Oabs__class_Oabs(tc_RealDef_Oreal,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    hBOOL(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,c_Groups_Oabs__class_Oabs(tc_RealDef_Oreal,hAPP(c_Complex_OIm,hAPP(v_s,X1)))),hAPP(hAPP(c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_RealDef_Oreal),v_r),c_Groups_Oone__class_Oone(tc_RealDef_Oreal)))),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    hAPP(c_Complex_OIm,c_Complex_Oii) = c_Groups_Oone__class_Oone(tc_RealDef_Oreal),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[fact_complex__Im__i]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    ~ hBOOL(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,c_Groups_Oabs__class_Oabs(tc_RealDef_Oreal,hAPP(c_Complex_OIm,hAPP(v_s,hAPP(v_f____,hAPP(v_ga____,esk18_4(X1,c_COMBB(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,tc_RealDef_Oreal,tc_Nat_Onat,c_Complex_OIm,c_COMBB(tc_Nat_Onat,tc_Complex_Ocomplex,tc_Nat_Onat,v_s,c_COMBB(tc_Nat_Onat,tc_Nat_Onat,tc_Nat_Onat,v_f____,v_ga____))),X2,tc_RealDef_Oreal))))))),X1)),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]),c_0_15]),c_0_16]),c_0_16]),c_0_16]),c_0_17])]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    hBOOL(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,c_Groups_Oabs__class_Oabs(tc_RealDef_Oreal,hAPP(c_Complex_OIm,hAPP(v_s,X1)))),hAPP(hAPP(c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_RealDef_Oreal),v_r),hAPP(c_Complex_OIm,c_Complex_Oii)))),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12  % Problem    : SWW206+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.11/0.13  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime   : Sat May 18 19:37:23 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.20/0.48  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.20/0.48  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 29.46/4.28  # Version: 3.1.0
% 29.46/4.28  # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 29.46/4.28  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 29.46/4.28  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 29.46/4.28  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 29.46/4.28  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 29.46/4.28  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 29.46/4.28  # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 27534 completed with status 0
% 29.46/4.28  # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 29.46/4.28  # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 29.46/4.28  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 29.46/4.28  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 29.46/4.28  # No SInE strategy applied
% 29.46/4.28  # Search class: FGHSM-SSLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 29.46/4.28  # Scheduled 13 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 29.46/4.28  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 113s (1) cores
% 29.46/4.28  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 29.46/4.28  # Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S4d with 113s (1) cores
% 29.46/4.28  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AI with 113s (1) cores
% 29.46/4.28  # Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_S5PRR_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 113s (1) cores
% 29.46/4.28  # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AI with pid 27588 completed with status 0
% 29.46/4.28  # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AI
% 29.46/4.28  # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 29.46/4.28  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 29.46/4.28  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 29.46/4.28  # No SInE strategy applied
% 29.46/4.28  # Search class: FGHSM-SSLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 29.46/4.28  # Scheduled 13 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 29.46/4.28  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 113s (1) cores
% 29.46/4.28  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 29.46/4.28  # Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S4d with 113s (1) cores
% 29.46/4.28  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AI with 113s (1) cores
% 29.46/4.28  # Preprocessing time       : 0.025 s
% 29.46/4.28  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 29.46/4.28  
% 29.46/4.28  # Proof found!
% 29.46/4.28  # SZS status Theorem
% 29.46/4.28  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 29.46/4.28  # Parsed axioms                        : 1272
% 29.46/4.28  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 29.46/4.28  # Initial clauses                      : 1666
% 29.46/4.28  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 47
% 29.46/4.28  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 1619
% 29.46/4.28  # Processed clauses                    : 23205
% 29.46/4.28  # ...of these trivial                  : 455
% 29.46/4.28  # ...subsumed                          : 13575
% 29.46/4.28  # ...remaining for further processing  : 9175
% 29.46/4.28  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 1962
% 29.46/4.28  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 29.46/4.28  # Backward-subsumed                    : 136
% 29.46/4.28  # Backward-rewritten                   : 225
% 29.46/4.28  # Generated clauses                    : 193883
% 29.46/4.28  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 181652
% 29.46/4.28  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 29.46/4.28  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 7
% 29.46/4.28  # Paramodulations                      : 191830
% 29.46/4.28  # Factorizations                       : 18
% 29.46/4.28  # NegExts                              : 0
% 29.46/4.28  # Equation resolutions                 : 2047
% 29.46/4.28  # Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 29.46/4.28  # Total rewrite steps                  : 62699
% 29.46/4.28  # ...of those cached                   : 54827
% 29.46/4.28  # Propositional unsat checks           : 1
% 29.46/4.28  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 29.46/4.28  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 29.46/4.28  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 29.46/4.28  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 29.46/4.28  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 29.46/4.28  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 29.46/4.28  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.040
% 29.46/4.28  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.026
% 29.46/4.28  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 29.46/4.28  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 29.46/4.28  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 29.46/4.28  # Current number of processed clauses  : 7338
% 29.46/4.28  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 1239
% 29.46/4.28  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 22
% 29.46/4.28  #    Negative unit clauses             : 1616
% 29.46/4.28  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 4461
% 29.46/4.28  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 160967
% 29.46/4.28  # ...number of literals in the above   : 314413
% 29.46/4.28  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 29.46/4.28  # Current number of archived clauses   : 1719
% 29.46/4.28  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1176961
% 29.46/4.28  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 940019
% 29.46/4.28  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 4647
% 29.46/4.28  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 414258
% 29.46/4.28  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 29.46/4.28  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 35120
% 29.46/4.28  # BW rewrite match successes           : 591
% 29.46/4.28  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 29.46/4.28  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 29.46/4.28  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 3885531
% 29.46/4.28  # Search garbage collected termcells   : 19096
% 29.46/4.28  
% 29.46/4.28  # -------------------------------------------------
% 29.46/4.28  # User time                : 3.518 s
% 29.46/4.28  # System time              : 0.133 s
% 29.46/4.28  # Total time               : 3.651 s
% 29.46/4.28  # Maximum resident set size: 8808 pages
% 29.46/4.28  
% 29.46/4.28  # -------------------------------------------------
% 29.46/4.28  # User time                : 17.338 s
% 29.46/4.28  # System time              : 0.644 s
% 29.46/4.28  # Total time               : 17.982 s
% 29.46/4.28  # Maximum resident set size: 3212 pages
% 29.46/4.28  % E---3.1 exiting
% 29.46/4.28  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------