TSTP Solution File: SWV985-1 by Moca---0.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Moca---0.1
% Problem : SWV985-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : moca.sh %s
% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 20:48:36 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.22s 0.42s
% Output : Proof 0.22s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.14 % Problem : SWV985-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.08/0.14 % Command : moca.sh %s
% 0.15/0.36 % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.15/0.36 % DateTime : Tue Jun 14 18:03:29 EDT 2022
% 0.15/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.22/0.42 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.22/0.42 % SZS output start Proof
% 0.22/0.42 The input problem is unsatisfiable because
% 0.22/0.42
% 0.22/0.42 [1] the following set of Horn clauses is unsatisfiable:
% 0.22/0.42
% 0.22/0.42 c_COMBI(V_P, T_a) = V_P
% 0.22/0.42 c_TypeSafe__Mirabelle_Osconf(v_P, v_E, v_s_H)
% 0.22/0.42 c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P, c_State_Ohp(v_s_H), v_E, v_e_H, v_T____)
% 0.22/0.42 c_COMBI(v_P, t_a) = v_P
% 0.22/0.42 c_TypeSafe__Mirabelle_Osconf(v_P, v_E, v_s_H) ==> \bottom
% 0.22/0.42 c_fequal(V_x, V_x, T_a)
% 0.22/0.42 c_fequal(V_X, V_Y, T_a) ==> V_X = V_Y
% 0.22/0.42
% 0.22/0.42 This holds because
% 0.22/0.42
% 0.22/0.42 [2] the following E entails the following G (Claessen-Smallbone's transformation (2018)):
% 0.22/0.42
% 0.22/0.42 E:
% 0.22/0.42 c_COMBI(V_P, T_a) = V_P
% 0.22/0.42 c_COMBI(v_P, t_a) = v_P
% 0.22/0.42 c_TypeSafe__Mirabelle_Osconf(v_P, v_E, v_s_H) = true__
% 0.22/0.42 c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P, c_State_Ohp(v_s_H), v_E, v_e_H, v_T____) = true__
% 0.22/0.42 c_fequal(V_x, V_x, T_a) = true__
% 0.22/0.42 f1(c_TypeSafe__Mirabelle_Osconf(v_P, v_E, v_s_H)) = true__
% 0.22/0.42 f1(true__) = false__
% 0.22/0.42 f2(c_fequal(V_X, V_Y, T_a), V_X, V_Y) = V_Y
% 0.22/0.42 f2(true__, V_X, V_Y) = V_X
% 0.22/0.42 G:
% 0.22/0.42 true__ = false__
% 0.22/0.42
% 0.22/0.42 This holds because
% 0.22/0.42
% 0.22/0.42 [3] E entails the following ordered TRS and the lhs and rhs of G join by the TRS:
% 0.22/0.42
% 0.22/0.42
% 0.22/0.42 c_COMBI(V_P, T_a) -> V_P
% 0.22/0.42 c_TypeSafe__Mirabelle_Osconf(v_P, v_E, v_s_H) -> true__
% 0.22/0.42 c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P, c_State_Ohp(v_s_H), v_E, v_e_H, v_T____) -> true__
% 0.22/0.42 c_fequal(V_x, V_x, T_a) -> true__
% 0.22/0.42 f1(c_TypeSafe__Mirabelle_Osconf(v_P, v_E, v_s_H)) -> true__
% 0.22/0.42 f1(true__) -> false__
% 0.22/0.42 f2(c_fequal(V_X, V_Y, T_a), V_X, V_Y) -> V_Y
% 0.22/0.42 f2(true__, V_X, V_Y) -> V_X
% 0.22/0.42 false__ -> true__
% 0.22/0.42 with the LPO induced by
% 0.22/0.42 f2 > c_fequal > f1 > t_a > v_T____ > v_e_H > c_State_Ohp > c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt > v_s_H > v_E > v_P > c_TypeSafe__Mirabelle_Osconf > c_COMBI > false__ > true__
% 0.22/0.42
% 0.22/0.42 % SZS output end Proof
% 0.22/0.42
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------