TSTP Solution File: SWV966-1 by iProver---3.9
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : iProver---3.9
% Problem : SWV966-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri May 3 03:20:26 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 3.78s 1.16s
% Output : CNFRefutation 3.78s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named definition)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_335,plain,
( ~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrts(X0,X1,X2,X3,X4)
| ~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(X0,X1,X2,X5,c_Type_Oty_ONT)
| c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(X0,X1,X2,c_Expr_Oexp_OCall(X5,X6,X3,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),X7) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_WTrtCallNT_0) ).
cnf(c_360,plain,
hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_TypeRel_Owiden(X0,X1),X2),X2)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_widen__refl_0) ).
cnf(c_383,plain,
c_WellTypeRT_OWTrts(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,v_esa____,v_Ts____),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_CHAINED_0) ).
cnf(c_384,plain,
c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,v_e_Ha____,c_Type_Oty_ONT),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_CHAINED_0_01) ).
cnf(c_385,negated_conjecture,
( ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_TypeRel_Owiden(v_P,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))),X0),v_T____))
| ~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,c_Expr_Oexp_OCall(v_e_Ha____,v_M____,v_esa____,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),X0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
cnf(c_3857,plain,
tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar) = sP0_iProver_def,
definition ).
cnf(c_3858,plain,
tc_List_Olist(sP0_iProver_def) = sP1_iProver_def,
definition ).
cnf(c_3859,plain,
tc_Expr_Oexp(sP0_iProver_def) = sP2_iProver_def,
definition ).
cnf(c_3860,plain,
tc_prod(sP1_iProver_def,sP2_iProver_def) = sP3_iProver_def,
definition ).
cnf(c_3861,plain,
c_TypeRel_Owiden(v_P,sP3_iProver_def) = sP4_iProver_def,
definition ).
cnf(c_3862,plain,
c_Expr_Oexp_OCall(v_e_Ha____,v_M____,v_esa____,sP0_iProver_def) = sP5_iProver_def,
definition ).
cnf(c_3863,negated_conjecture,
( ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(sP4_iProver_def,X0),v_T____))
| ~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,sP5_iProver_def,X0) ),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_385,c_3862,c_3859,c_3857,c_3858,c_3860,c_3861]) ).
cnf(c_6414,plain,
hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(sP4_iProver_def,X0),X0)),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_3861,c_360]) ).
cnf(c_6416,plain,
~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,sP5_iProver_def,v_T____),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_6414,c_3863]) ).
cnf(c_7153,plain,
( ~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrts(X0,X1,X2,X3,X4)
| ~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(X0,X1,X2,X5,c_Type_Oty_ONT)
| c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(X0,X1,X2,c_Expr_Oexp_OCall(X5,X6,X3,sP0_iProver_def),X7) ),
inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_335,c_3857]) ).
cnf(c_7161,plain,
( ~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,X0,c_Type_Oty_ONT)
| c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,c_Expr_Oexp_OCall(X0,X1,v_esa____,sP0_iProver_def),X2) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_383,c_7153]) ).
cnf(c_7362,plain,
( ~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,v_e_Ha____,c_Type_Oty_ONT)
| c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,sP5_iProver_def,X0) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_3862,c_7161]) ).
cnf(c_7367,plain,
c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,sP5_iProver_def,X0),
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_7362,c_384]) ).
cnf(c_7379,plain,
$false,
inference(backward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_6416,c_7367]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.12 % Problem : SWV966-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.13/0.13 % Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% 0.14/0.34 % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34 % DateTime : Fri May 3 00:25:31 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.47 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.21/0.47 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/run_problem --schedule fof_schedule --heuristic_context casc_unsat --no_cores 8 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 3.78/1.16 % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 3.78/1.16 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 3.78/1.16
% 3.78/1.16 %---------------- iProver v3.9 (pre CASC 2024/SMT-COMP 2024) ----------------%
% 3.78/1.16
% 3.78/1.16 ------ iProver source info
% 3.78/1.16
% 3.78/1.16 git: date: 2024-05-02 19:28:25 +0000
% 3.78/1.16 git: sha1: a33b5eb135c74074ba803943bb12f2ebd971352f
% 3.78/1.16 git: non_committed_changes: false
% 3.78/1.16
% 3.78/1.16 ------ Parsing...successful
% 3.78/1.16
% 3.78/1.16
% 3.78/1.16
% 3.78/1.16 ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 0 sf_s rm: 35 0s sf_e pe_s pe:1:0s pe_e sup_sim: 0 sf_s rm: 5 0s sf_e pe_s pe_e
% 3.78/1.16
% 3.78/1.16 ------ Preprocessing... gs_s sp: 0 0s gs_e snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e
% 3.78/1.16
% 3.78/1.16 ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e
% 3.78/1.16 ------ Proving...
% 3.78/1.16 ------ Problem Properties
% 3.78/1.16
% 3.78/1.16
% 3.78/1.16 clauses 206
% 3.78/1.16 conjectures 1
% 3.78/1.16 EPR 13
% 3.78/1.16 Horn 202
% 3.78/1.16 unary 138
% 3.78/1.16 binary 51
% 3.78/1.16 lits 305
% 3.78/1.16 lits eq 205
% 3.78/1.16 fd_pure 0
% 3.78/1.16 fd_pseudo 0
% 3.78/1.16 fd_cond 0
% 3.78/1.16 fd_pseudo_cond 40
% 3.78/1.16 AC symbols 0
% 3.78/1.16
% 3.78/1.16 ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on
% 3.78/1.16
% 3.78/1.16 ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 3.78/1.16
% 3.78/1.16
% 3.78/1.16 ------
% 3.78/1.16 Current options:
% 3.78/1.16 ------
% 3.78/1.16
% 3.78/1.16
% 3.78/1.16
% 3.78/1.16
% 3.78/1.16 ------ Proving...
% 3.78/1.16
% 3.78/1.16
% 3.78/1.16 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 3.78/1.16
% 3.78/1.16 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.78/1.16
% 3.78/1.16
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------