TSTP Solution File: SWV962-1 by E---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1.00
% Problem : SWV962-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sat May 4 09:51:26 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.23s 0.59s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.23s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 15 ( 9 unt; 1 nHn; 13 RR)
% Number of literals : 22 ( 5 equ; 10 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 7 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-5 aty)
% Number of functors : 19 ( 19 usr; 12 con; 0-5 aty)
% Number of variables : 33 ( 25 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
( ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_TypeRel_Owiden(v_P,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))),X1),v_T____))
| ~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,c_Expr_Oexp_OFAss(c_Expr_Oexp_OVal(v_v____,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),v_F____,v_D____,v_e_092_060_094isub_0622_H____,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.NZGBXmMRM2/E---3.1_22764.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
cnf(cls_WTrt__elim__cases_I8_J_0,axiom,
( X1 = c_Type_Oty_OVoid
| X1 = c_Type_Oty_OVoid
| ~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(X2,X3,X4,c_Expr_Oexp_OFAss(X5,X6,X7,X8,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.NZGBXmMRM2/E---3.1_22764.p',cls_WTrt__elim__cases_I8_J_0) ).
cnf(cls_widen__refl_0,axiom,
hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_TypeRel_Owiden(X1,X2),X3),X3)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.NZGBXmMRM2/E---3.1_22764.p',cls_widen__refl_0) ).
cnf(cls_wt_0,axiom,
c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_ha____,v_E____,c_Expr_Oexp_OFAss(c_Expr_Oexp_OVal(v_v____,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),v_F____,v_D____,v_e_092_060_094isub_0622____,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),v_T____),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.NZGBXmMRM2/E---3.1_22764.p',cls_wt_0) ).
cnf(cls_CHAINED_0,axiom,
c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,c_Expr_Oexp_OFAss(c_Expr_Oexp_OVal(v_v____,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),v_F____,v_D____,v_e_092_060_094isub_0622_H____,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),c_Type_Oty_OVoid),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.NZGBXmMRM2/E---3.1_22764.p',cls_CHAINED_0) ).
cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
( ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_TypeRel_Owiden(v_P,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))),X1),v_T____))
| ~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,c_Expr_Oexp_OFAss(c_Expr_Oexp_OVal(v_v____,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),v_F____,v_D____,v_e_092_060_094isub_0622_H____,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),X1) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,plain,
( X1 = c_Type_Oty_OVoid
| ~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(X2,X3,X4,c_Expr_Oexp_OFAss(X5,X6,X7,X8,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),X1) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_WTrt__elim__cases_I8_J_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
( ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_TypeRel_Owiden(v_P,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))),X1),v_T____))
| ~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,c_Expr_Oexp_OFAss(c_Expr_Oexp_OVal(v_v____,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),v_F____,v_D____,v_e_092_060_094isub_0622_H____,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),X1) ),
c_0_5 ).
cnf(c_0_8,axiom,
hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_TypeRel_Owiden(X1,X2),X3),X3)),
cls_widen__refl_0 ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( X1 = c_Type_Oty_OVoid
| ~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(X2,X3,X4,c_Expr_Oexp_OFAss(X5,X6,X7,X8,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),X1) ),
c_0_6 ).
cnf(c_0_10,axiom,
c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_ha____,v_E____,c_Expr_Oexp_OFAss(c_Expr_Oexp_OVal(v_v____,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),v_F____,v_D____,v_e_092_060_094isub_0622____,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),v_T____),
cls_wt_0 ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,c_Expr_Oexp_OFAss(c_Expr_Oexp_OVal(v_v____,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),v_F____,v_D____,v_e_092_060_094isub_0622_H____,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),v_T____),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
v_T____ = c_Type_Oty_OVoid,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,axiom,
c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,c_Expr_Oexp_OFAss(c_Expr_Oexp_OVal(v_v____,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),v_F____,v_D____,v_e_092_060_094isub_0622_H____,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),c_Type_Oty_OVoid),
cls_CHAINED_0 ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]),c_0_13])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.16 % Problem : SWV962-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.08/0.17 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.16/0.39 % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.39 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.39 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.39 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.16/0.39 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.16/0.39 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.16/0.39 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.16/0.39 % DateTime : Fri May 3 16:49:08 EDT 2024
% 0.16/0.39 % CPUTime :
% 0.23/0.55 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.23/0.55 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.NZGBXmMRM2/E---3.1_22764.p
% 0.23/0.59 # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.23/0.59 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.23/0.59 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.23/0.59 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.23/0.59 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.59 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.59 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.59 # new_bool_3 with pid 22843 completed with status 0
% 0.23/0.59 # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.23/0.59 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.23/0.59 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.23/0.59 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.23/0.59 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.59 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.23/0.59 # Search class: FGHSS-FFLM33-DFFFFFNN
% 0.23/0.59 # partial match(1): FGHSM-FFLM33-DFFFFFNN
% 0.23/0.59 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.23/0.59 # Starting new_ho_10 with 55s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.59 # new_ho_10 with pid 22852 completed with status 0
% 0.23/0.59 # Result found by new_ho_10
% 0.23/0.59 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.23/0.59 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.23/0.59 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.23/0.59 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.59 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.23/0.59 # Search class: FGHSS-FFLM33-DFFFFFNN
% 0.23/0.59 # partial match(1): FGHSM-FFLM33-DFFFFFNN
% 0.23/0.59 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.23/0.59 # Starting new_ho_10 with 55s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.59 # Preprocessing time : 0.002 s
% 0.23/0.59 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.23/0.59
% 0.23/0.59 # Proof found!
% 0.23/0.59 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.23/0.59 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.23/0.59 # Parsed axioms : 407
% 0.23/0.59 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 113
% 0.23/0.59 # Initial clauses : 294
% 0.23/0.59 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.23/0.59 # Initial clauses in saturation : 294
% 0.23/0.59 # Processed clauses : 430
% 0.23/0.59 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.23/0.59 # ...subsumed : 113
% 0.23/0.59 # ...remaining for further processing : 317
% 0.23/0.59 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.23/0.59 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.23/0.59 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.23/0.59 # Backward-rewritten : 2
% 0.23/0.59 # Generated clauses : 16
% 0.23/0.59 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 2
% 0.23/0.59 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.23/0.59 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.23/0.59 # Paramodulations : 3
% 0.23/0.59 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.23/0.59 # NegExts : 0
% 0.23/0.59 # Equation resolutions : 13
% 0.23/0.59 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.23/0.59 # Total rewrite steps : 4
% 0.23/0.59 # ...of those cached : 1
% 0.23/0.59 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.23/0.59 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.23/0.59 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.23/0.59 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.23/0.59 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.23/0.59 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.23/0.59 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.59 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.59 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.59 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.59 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.59 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.59 # Current number of processed clauses : 134
% 0.23/0.59 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 11
% 0.23/0.59 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.23/0.59 # Negative unit clauses : 106
% 0.23/0.59 # Non-unit-clauses : 17
% 0.23/0.59 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 47
% 0.23/0.59 # ...number of literals in the above : 121
% 0.23/0.59 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.23/0.59 # Current number of archived clauses : 183
% 0.23/0.59 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1977
% 0.23/0.59 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 810
% 0.23/0.59 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 2
% 0.23/0.59 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2280
% 0.23/0.59 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.23/0.59 # BW rewrite match attempts : 19
% 0.23/0.59 # BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 0.23/0.59 # Condensation attempts : 430
% 0.23/0.59 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.23/0.59 # Termbank termtop insertions : 7192
% 0.23/0.59 # Search garbage collected termcells : 1269
% 0.23/0.59
% 0.23/0.59 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.23/0.59 # User time : 0.016 s
% 0.23/0.59 # System time : 0.005 s
% 0.23/0.59 # Total time : 0.021 s
% 0.23/0.59 # Maximum resident set size: 2384 pages
% 0.23/0.59
% 0.23/0.59 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.23/0.59 # User time : 0.023 s
% 0.23/0.59 # System time : 0.007 s
% 0.23/0.59 # Total time : 0.030 s
% 0.23/0.59 # Maximum resident set size: 1992 pages
% 0.23/0.59 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.23/0.59 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------