TSTP Solution File: SWV961-1 by E---3.1.00

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.1.00
% Problem  : SWV961-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sat May  4 09:51:26 EDT 2024

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.57s 0.87s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.57s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   12 (   8 unt;   0 nHn;  12 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   19 (   0 equ;  11 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   3 usr;   2 prp; 0-5 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   12 (  12 usr;   6 con; 0-5 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    4 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_that_0,axiom,
    ( v_thesis____
    | ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_TypeRel_Owiden(v_P,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))),X1),v_T_092_060_094isub_0622____))
    | ~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,v_e_092_060_094isub_0622_H____,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.UtLazYACEv/E---3.1_12978.p',cls_that_0) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
    ~ v_thesis____,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.UtLazYACEv/E---3.1_12978.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).

cnf(cls_CHAINED_0,axiom,
    c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,v_e_092_060_094isub_0622_H____,v_sko__CHAINED__1(v_E____,v_P,v_T_092_060_094isub_0622____,v_e_092_060_094isub_0622_H____,v_h_Ha____)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.UtLazYACEv/E---3.1_12978.p',cls_CHAINED_0) ).

cnf(cls_CHAINED_1,axiom,
    hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_TypeRel_Owiden(v_P,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))),v_sko__CHAINED__1(v_E____,v_P,v_T_092_060_094isub_0622____,v_e_092_060_094isub_0622_H____,v_h_Ha____)),v_T_092_060_094isub_0622____)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.UtLazYACEv/E---3.1_12978.p',cls_CHAINED_1) ).

cnf(c_0_4,plain,
    ( v_thesis____
    | ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_TypeRel_Owiden(v_P,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))),X1),v_T_092_060_094isub_0622____))
    | ~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,v_e_092_060_094isub_0622_H____,X1) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_that_0]) ).

cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    ~ v_thesis____,
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_0]) ).

cnf(c_0_6,plain,
    ( v_thesis____
    | ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_TypeRel_Owiden(v_P,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))),X1),v_T_092_060_094isub_0622____))
    | ~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,v_e_092_060_094isub_0622_H____,X1) ),
    c_0_4 ).

cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    ~ v_thesis____,
    c_0_5 ).

cnf(c_0_8,plain,
    ( ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_TypeRel_Owiden(v_P,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))),X1),v_T_092_060_094isub_0622____))
    | ~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,v_e_092_060_094isub_0622_H____,X1) ),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,axiom,
    c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,v_e_092_060_094isub_0622_H____,v_sko__CHAINED__1(v_E____,v_P,v_T_092_060_094isub_0622____,v_e_092_060_094isub_0622_H____,v_h_Ha____)),
    cls_CHAINED_0 ).

cnf(c_0_10,axiom,
    hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_TypeRel_Owiden(v_P,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))),v_sko__CHAINED__1(v_E____,v_P,v_T_092_060_094isub_0622____,v_e_092_060_094isub_0622_H____,v_h_Ha____)),v_T_092_060_094isub_0622____)),
    cls_CHAINED_1 ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]),c_0_10])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.24  % Problem    : SWV961-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.11/0.26  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.26/0.47  % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.26/0.47  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.26/0.47  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.26/0.47  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.26/0.47  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.26/0.47  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.26/0.47  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.26/0.47  % DateTime   : Fri May  3 16:39:23 EDT 2024
% 0.26/0.47  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.55/0.72  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.55/0.72  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.UtLazYACEv/E---3.1_12978.p
% 0.57/0.87  # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.57/0.87  # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.57/0.87  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.57/0.87  # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.57/0.87  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.57/0.87  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.57/0.87  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.57/0.87  # C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with pid 13057 completed with status 0
% 0.57/0.87  # Result found by C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr
% 0.57/0.87  # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.57/0.87  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.57/0.87  # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.57/0.87  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.57/0.87  # Search class: FGUSM-FSLM33-DFFFFFNN
% 0.57/0.87  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.57/0.87  # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 675s (1) cores
% 0.57/0.87  # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 151s (1) cores
% 0.57/0.87  # Starting new_bool_3 with 169s (1) cores
% 0.57/0.87  # Starting new_bool_1 with 169s (1) cores
% 0.57/0.87  # Starting sh5l with 169s (1) cores
% 0.57/0.87  # C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with pid 13065 completed with status 0
% 0.57/0.87  # Result found by C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr
% 0.57/0.87  # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.57/0.87  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.57/0.87  # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.57/0.87  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.57/0.87  # Search class: FGUSM-FSLM33-DFFFFFNN
% 0.57/0.87  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.57/0.87  # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 675s (1) cores
% 0.57/0.87  # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 151s (1) cores
% 0.57/0.87  # Preprocessing time       : 0.011 s
% 0.57/0.87  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.57/0.87  
% 0.57/0.87  # Proof found!
% 0.57/0.87  # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.57/0.87  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.57/0.87  # Parsed axioms                        : 546
% 0.57/0.87  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.57/0.87  # Initial clauses                      : 546
% 0.57/0.87  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 2
% 0.57/0.87  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 544
% 0.57/0.87  # Processed clauses                    : 938
% 0.57/0.87  # ...of these trivial                  : 11
% 0.57/0.87  # ...subsumed                          : 165
% 0.57/0.87  # ...remaining for further processing  : 762
% 0.57/0.87  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 4
% 0.57/0.87  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.57/0.87  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.57/0.87  # Backward-rewritten                   : 4
% 0.57/0.87  # Generated clauses                    : 401
% 0.57/0.87  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 295
% 0.57/0.87  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.57/0.87  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.57/0.87  # Paramodulations                      : 349
% 0.57/0.87  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.57/0.87  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.57/0.87  # Equation resolutions                 : 52
% 0.57/0.87  # Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.57/0.87  # Total rewrite steps                  : 79
% 0.57/0.87  # ...of those cached                   : 31
% 0.57/0.87  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.57/0.87  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.57/0.87  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.57/0.87  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.57/0.87  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.57/0.87  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.57/0.87  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.57/0.87  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.57/0.87  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.57/0.87  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.57/0.87  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.57/0.87  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.57/0.87  # Current number of processed clauses  : 329
% 0.57/0.87  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 62
% 0.57/0.87  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 2
% 0.57/0.87  #    Negative unit clauses             : 102
% 0.57/0.87  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 163
% 0.57/0.87  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 325
% 0.57/0.87  # ...number of literals in the above   : 787
% 0.57/0.87  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.57/0.87  # Current number of archived clauses   : 434
% 0.57/0.87  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 62865
% 0.57/0.87  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 34851
% 0.57/0.87  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 50
% 0.57/0.87  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 7278
% 0.57/0.87  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 28
% 0.57/0.87  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 303
% 0.57/0.87  # BW rewrite match successes           : 5
% 0.57/0.87  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.57/0.87  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.57/0.87  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 77240
% 0.57/0.87  # Search garbage collected termcells   : 1286
% 0.57/0.87  
% 0.57/0.87  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.57/0.87  # User time                : 0.079 s
% 0.57/0.87  # System time              : 0.010 s
% 0.57/0.87  # Total time               : 0.089 s
% 0.57/0.87  # Maximum resident set size: 2936 pages
% 0.57/0.87  
% 0.57/0.87  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.57/0.87  # User time                : 0.372 s
% 0.57/0.87  # System time              : 0.024 s
% 0.57/0.87  # Total time               : 0.396 s
% 0.57/0.87  # Maximum resident set size: 2144 pages
% 0.57/0.87  % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.57/0.87  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------