TSTP Solution File: SWV943-1 by E---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1.00
% Problem : SWV943-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sat May 4 09:51:24 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.41s 0.60s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.41s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 8 ( 5 unt; 0 nHn; 6 RR)
% Number of literals : 11 ( 0 equ; 6 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 7 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-5 aty)
% Number of functors : 14 ( 14 usr; 8 con; 0-4 aty)
% Number of variables : 9 ( 4 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
( ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_TypeRel_Owiden(v_P,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))),X1),v_T____))
| ~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,c_Expr_Oexp_OBinOp(v_e_092_060_094isub_0621_H____,v_bop____,v_e_092_060_094isub_0622____,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.4Gm9YxpG0Q/E---3.1_13781.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
cnf(cls_widen__refl_0,axiom,
hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_TypeRel_Owiden(X1,X2),X3),X3)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.4Gm9YxpG0Q/E---3.1_13781.p',cls_widen__refl_0) ).
cnf(cls_CHAINED_0,axiom,
c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,c_Expr_Oexp_OBinOp(v_e_092_060_094isub_0621_H____,v_bop____,v_e_092_060_094isub_0622____,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),v_T____),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.4Gm9YxpG0Q/E---3.1_13781.p',cls_CHAINED_0) ).
cnf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
( ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_TypeRel_Owiden(v_P,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))),X1),v_T____))
| ~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,c_Expr_Oexp_OBinOp(v_e_092_060_094isub_0621_H____,v_bop____,v_e_092_060_094isub_0622____,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),X1) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
( ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_TypeRel_Owiden(v_P,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))),X1),v_T____))
| ~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,c_Expr_Oexp_OBinOp(v_e_092_060_094isub_0621_H____,v_bop____,v_e_092_060_094isub_0622____,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),X1) ),
c_0_3 ).
cnf(c_0_5,axiom,
hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_TypeRel_Owiden(X1,X2),X3),X3)),
cls_widen__refl_0 ).
cnf(c_0_6,axiom,
c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,c_Expr_Oexp_OBinOp(v_e_092_060_094isub_0621_H____,v_bop____,v_e_092_060_094isub_0622____,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),v_T____),
cls_CHAINED_0 ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_5]),c_0_6])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.15 % Problem : SWV943-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.11/0.17 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.17/0.38 % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.17/0.38 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.17/0.38 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.17/0.38 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.17/0.38 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.17/0.38 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.17/0.38 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.17/0.38 % DateTime : Fri May 3 16:57:53 EDT 2024
% 0.17/0.38 % CPUTime :
% 0.23/0.57 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.23/0.57 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.4Gm9YxpG0Q/E---3.1_13781.p
% 0.41/0.60 # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.41/0.60 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.41/0.60 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.41/0.60 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.41/0.60 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.41/0.60 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.41/0.60 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.41/0.60 # new_bool_3 with pid 13881 completed with status 0
% 0.41/0.60 # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.41/0.60 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.41/0.60 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.41/0.60 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.41/0.60 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.41/0.60 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.41/0.60 # Search class: FGHSF-FSLS32-DFFFFFNN
% 0.41/0.60 # partial match(1): FGHSF-FSLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 0.41/0.60 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.41/0.60 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.41/0.60 # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 13884 completed with status 0
% 0.41/0.60 # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.41/0.60 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.41/0.60 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.41/0.60 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.41/0.60 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.41/0.60 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.41/0.60 # Search class: FGHSF-FSLS32-DFFFFFNN
% 0.41/0.60 # partial match(1): FGHSF-FSLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 0.41/0.60 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.41/0.60 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.41/0.60 # Preprocessing time : 0.003 s
% 0.41/0.60 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.41/0.60
% 0.41/0.60 # Proof found!
% 0.41/0.60 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.41/0.60 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.41/0.60 # Parsed axioms : 383
% 0.41/0.60 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 89
% 0.41/0.60 # Initial clauses : 294
% 0.41/0.60 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.41/0.60 # Initial clauses in saturation : 294
% 0.41/0.60 # Processed clauses : 303
% 0.41/0.60 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.41/0.60 # ...subsumed : 107
% 0.41/0.60 # ...remaining for further processing : 196
% 0.41/0.60 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.41/0.60 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.41/0.60 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.41/0.60 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.41/0.60 # Generated clauses : 1
% 0.41/0.60 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.41/0.60 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.41/0.60 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.41/0.60 # Paramodulations : 1
% 0.41/0.60 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.41/0.60 # NegExts : 0
% 0.41/0.60 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.41/0.60 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.41/0.60 # Total rewrite steps : 3
% 0.41/0.60 # ...of those cached : 1
% 0.41/0.60 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.41/0.60 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.41/0.60 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.41/0.60 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.41/0.60 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.41/0.60 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.41/0.60 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.41/0.60 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.41/0.60 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.41/0.60 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.41/0.60 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.41/0.60 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.41/0.60 # Current number of processed clauses : 9
% 0.41/0.60 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 3
% 0.41/0.60 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.41/0.60 # Negative unit clauses : 5
% 0.41/0.60 # Non-unit-clauses : 1
% 0.41/0.60 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 178
% 0.41/0.60 # ...number of literals in the above : 303
% 0.41/0.60 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.41/0.60 # Current number of archived clauses : 187
% 0.41/0.60 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 3683
% 0.41/0.60 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2509
% 0.41/0.60 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.41/0.60 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2586
% 0.41/0.60 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.41/0.60 # BW rewrite match attempts : 1
% 0.41/0.60 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.41/0.60 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.41/0.60 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.41/0.60 # Termbank termtop insertions : 6224
% 0.41/0.60 # Search garbage collected termcells : 1163
% 0.41/0.60
% 0.41/0.60 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.41/0.60 # User time : 0.014 s
% 0.41/0.60 # System time : 0.004 s
% 0.41/0.60 # Total time : 0.018 s
% 0.41/0.60 # Maximum resident set size: 2356 pages
% 0.41/0.60
% 0.41/0.60 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.41/0.60 # User time : 0.025 s
% 0.41/0.60 # System time : 0.006 s
% 0.41/0.60 # Total time : 0.031 s
% 0.41/0.60 # Maximum resident set size: 1968 pages
% 0.41/0.60 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.41/0.61 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------