TSTP Solution File: SWV918-1 by E---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1.00
% Problem : SWV918-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sat May 4 09:51:21 EDT 2024
% Result : Satisfiable 0.21s 0.50s
% Output : Saturation 0.21s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named c_0_9)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( c_Exceptions_Opreallocated(X1)
| ~ c_Conform_Ohconf(X2,X1,X3) ),
c_0_8,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_12,axiom,
c_Conform_Ohconf(v_P,v_ha____,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))),
cls_hconf_0,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( X1 = X2
| ~ c_fequal(X1,X2,X3) ),
c_0_9,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
~ c_Conform_Ohconf(v_P,v_h_Ha____,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))),
c_0_10,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_15,axiom,
v_h_Ha____ = c_Fun_Ofun__upd(v_ha____,v_a____,c_Option_Ooption_OSome(c_Pair(v_C____,c_Objects_Oinit__fields(v_FDTs____),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval))),tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval)))),tc_nat,tc_Option_Ooption(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval))))),
cls_CHAINED_0,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_16,axiom,
c_Conform_Ooconf(v_P,v_ha____,c_Pair(v_C____,c_Objects_Oinit__fields(v_FDTs____),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval))),tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))),
cls_CHAINED_0_01,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_17,axiom,
hAPP(v_ha____,v_a____) = c_Option_Ooption_ONone(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval)))),
cls_CHAINED_0_02,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
c_Exceptions_Opreallocated(v_ha____),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_19,axiom,
c_fequal(X1,X1,X2),
cls_ATP__Linkup_Oequal__imp__fequal_0,
[final] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13 % Problem : SWV918-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.07/0.14 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Fri May 3 16:47:38 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.49 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.21/0.49 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.BlPdtmu7MS/E---3.1_4507.p
% 0.21/0.50 # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.21/0.50 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.50 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.50 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.50 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50 # G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with pid 4588 completed with status 1
% 0.21/0.50 # Result found by G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI
% 0.21/0.50 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.50 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.50 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.50 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.21/0.50 # Search class: FHUSF-FFSS32-DFFFFFNN
% 0.21/0.50 # partial match(1): FHUSF-FFSS31-DFFFFFNN
% 0.21/0.50 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.21/0.50 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 811s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 151s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50 # Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50 # Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50 # Starting sh5l with 136s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50 # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 4592 completed with status 1
% 0.21/0.50 # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.21/0.50 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.50 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.50 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.50 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.21/0.50 # Search class: FHUSF-FFSS32-DFFFFFNN
% 0.21/0.50 # partial match(1): FHUSF-FFSS31-DFFFFFNN
% 0.21/0.50 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.21/0.50 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 811s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.21/0.50 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.21/0.50
% 0.21/0.50 # No proof found!
% 0.21/0.50 # SZS status Satisfiable
% 0.21/0.50 # SZS output start Saturation
% See solution above
% 0.21/0.50 # Parsed axioms : 10
% 0.21/0.50 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Initial clauses : 10
% 0.21/0.50 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 2
% 0.21/0.50 # Initial clauses in saturation : 8
% 0.21/0.50 # Processed clauses : 17
% 0.21/0.50 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # ...remaining for further processing : 17
% 0.21/0.50 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Generated clauses : 1
% 0.21/0.50 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 1
% 0.21/0.50 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Paramodulations : 1
% 0.21/0.50 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # NegExts : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Total rewrite steps : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # ...of those cached : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.50 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.50 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.50 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.50 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.50 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.50 # Current number of processed clauses : 9
% 0.21/0.50 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 6
% 0.21/0.50 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.21/0.50 # Non-unit-clauses : 2
% 0.21/0.50 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.21/0.50 # ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Current number of archived clauses : 9
% 0.21/0.50 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 2
% 0.21/0.50 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2
% 0.21/0.50 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # BW rewrite match attempts : 1
% 0.21/0.50 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Termbank termtop insertions : 294
% 0.21/0.50 # Search garbage collected termcells : 8
% 0.21/0.50
% 0.21/0.50 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.50 # User time : 0.003 s
% 0.21/0.50 # System time : 0.003 s
% 0.21/0.50 # Total time : 0.005 s
% 0.21/0.50 # Maximum resident set size: 1688 pages
% 0.21/0.50
% 0.21/0.50 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.50 # User time : 0.009 s
% 0.21/0.50 # System time : 0.012 s
% 0.21/0.50 # Total time : 0.020 s
% 0.21/0.50 # Maximum resident set size: 1708 pages
% 0.21/0.50 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.21/0.50 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------