TSTP Solution File: SWV898-1 by E---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1.00
% Problem : SWV898-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 05:32:28 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.19s 0.51s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 9 ( 6 unt; 0 nHn; 6 RR)
% Number of literals : 12 ( 0 equ; 6 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 5 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 11 ( 11 usr; 5 con; 0-5 aty)
% Number of variables : 12 ( 3 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_conjecture_3,negated_conjecture,
~ c_Finite__Set_Ofinite(c_Set_Oimage(c_COMBB(c_Hoare__Mirabelle_OMGT,c_COMBB(c_Option_Othe(tc_Com_Ocom),c_Com_Obody,tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Com_Ocom),tc_Com_Ocom,tc_Com_Opname),tc_Com_Ocom,tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate),tc_Com_Opname),c_Map_Odom(c_Com_Obody,tc_Com_Opname,tc_Com_Ocom),tc_Com_Opname,tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate)),tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_3) ).
cnf(cls_finite__imageI_0,axiom,
( c_Finite__Set_Ofinite(c_Set_Oimage(X1,X2,X3,X4),X4)
| ~ c_Finite__Set_Ofinite(X2,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_finite__imageI_0) ).
cnf(cls_finite__dom__body_0,axiom,
c_Finite__Set_Ofinite(c_Map_Odom(c_Com_Obody,tc_Com_Opname,tc_Com_Ocom),tc_Com_Opname),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_finite__dom__body_0) ).
cnf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
~ c_Finite__Set_Ofinite(c_Set_Oimage(c_COMBB(c_Hoare__Mirabelle_OMGT,c_COMBB(c_Option_Othe(tc_Com_Ocom),c_Com_Obody,tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Com_Ocom),tc_Com_Ocom,tc_Com_Opname),tc_Com_Ocom,tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate),tc_Com_Opname),c_Map_Odom(c_Com_Obody,tc_Com_Opname,tc_Com_Ocom),tc_Com_Opname,tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate)),tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate)),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_4,plain,
( c_Finite__Set_Ofinite(c_Set_Oimage(X1,X2,X3,X4),X4)
| ~ c_Finite__Set_Ofinite(X2,X3) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_finite__imageI_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
~ c_Finite__Set_Ofinite(c_Set_Oimage(c_COMBB(c_Hoare__Mirabelle_OMGT,c_COMBB(c_Option_Othe(tc_Com_Ocom),c_Com_Obody,tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Com_Ocom),tc_Com_Ocom,tc_Com_Opname),tc_Com_Ocom,tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate),tc_Com_Opname),c_Map_Odom(c_Com_Obody,tc_Com_Opname,tc_Com_Ocom),tc_Com_Opname,tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate)),tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate)),
c_0_3 ).
cnf(c_0_6,plain,
( c_Finite__Set_Ofinite(c_Set_Oimage(X1,X2,X3,X4),X4)
| ~ c_Finite__Set_Ofinite(X2,X3) ),
c_0_4 ).
cnf(c_0_7,axiom,
c_Finite__Set_Ofinite(c_Map_Odom(c_Com_Obody,tc_Com_Opname,tc_Com_Ocom),tc_Com_Opname),
cls_finite__dom__body_0 ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]),c_0_7])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : SWV898-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.03/0.13 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Sun May 19 07:38:07 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.47 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.19/0.47 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.51 # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.19/0.51 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSLSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.19/0.51 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.51 # Starting G-N--_023_B07_F1_SP_PI_Q7_CS_SP_CO_S5PRR_S0Y1 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/0.51 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.51 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.51 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.51 # new_bool_1 with pid 8226 completed with status 0
% 0.19/0.51 # Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.19/0.51 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSLSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.19/0.51 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.51 # Starting G-N--_023_B07_F1_SP_PI_Q7_CS_SP_CO_S5PRR_S0Y1 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/0.51 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.51 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.51 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.19/0.51 # Search class: FGHSM-FSLS32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.19/0.51 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.19/0.51 # Starting G-E--_200_C45_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_CO_S5PRR_S0V with 150s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.51 # G-E--_200_C45_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_CO_S5PRR_S0V with pid 8228 completed with status 0
% 0.19/0.51 # Result found by G-E--_200_C45_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_CO_S5PRR_S0V
% 0.19/0.51 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSLSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.19/0.51 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.51 # Starting G-N--_023_B07_F1_SP_PI_Q7_CS_SP_CO_S5PRR_S0Y1 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/0.51 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.51 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.51 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.19/0.51 # Search class: FGHSM-FSLS32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.19/0.51 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.19/0.51 # Starting G-E--_200_C45_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_CO_S5PRR_S0V with 150s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.51 # Preprocessing time : 0.005 s
% 0.19/0.51
% 0.19/0.51 # Proof found!
% 0.19/0.51 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.19/0.51 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.52 # Parsed axioms : 626
% 0.19/0.52 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 353
% 0.19/0.52 # Initial clauses : 273
% 0.19/0.52 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.19/0.52 # Initial clauses in saturation : 273
% 0.19/0.52 # Processed clauses : 76
% 0.19/0.52 # ...of these trivial : 5
% 0.19/0.52 # ...subsumed : 7
% 0.19/0.52 # ...remaining for further processing : 64
% 0.19/0.52 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 3
% 0.19/0.52 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.19/0.52 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.19/0.52 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.19/0.52 # Generated clauses : 72
% 0.19/0.52 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 33
% 0.19/0.52 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.19/0.52 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.19/0.52 # Paramodulations : 66
% 0.19/0.52 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.19/0.52 # NegExts : 0
% 0.19/0.52 # Equation resolutions : 6
% 0.19/0.52 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.19/0.52 # Total rewrite steps : 25
% 0.19/0.52 # ...of those cached : 12
% 0.19/0.52 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.19/0.52 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.19/0.52 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.19/0.52 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.19/0.52 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.19/0.52 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.19/0.52 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.52 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.52 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.52 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.52 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.52 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.52 # Current number of processed clauses : 64
% 0.19/0.52 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 25
% 0.19/0.52 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.19/0.52 # Negative unit clauses : 4
% 0.19/0.52 # Non-unit-clauses : 35
% 0.19/0.52 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 230
% 0.19/0.52 # ...number of literals in the above : 458
% 0.19/0.52 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.19/0.52 # Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.19/0.52 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 140
% 0.19/0.52 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 132
% 0.19/0.52 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 4
% 0.19/0.52 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 5
% 0.19/0.52 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.19/0.52 # BW rewrite match attempts : 2
% 0.19/0.52 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.19/0.52 # Condensation attempts : 76
% 0.19/0.52 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.19/0.52 # Termbank termtop insertions : 11639
% 0.19/0.52 # Search garbage collected termcells : 1845
% 0.19/0.52
% 0.19/0.52 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.52 # User time : 0.013 s
% 0.19/0.52 # System time : 0.005 s
% 0.19/0.52 # Total time : 0.018 s
% 0.19/0.52 # Maximum resident set size: 2540 pages
% 0.19/0.52
% 0.19/0.52 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.52 # User time : 0.031 s
% 0.19/0.52 # System time : 0.008 s
% 0.19/0.52 # Total time : 0.038 s
% 0.19/0.52 # Maximum resident set size: 2156 pages
% 0.19/0.52 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.19/0.52 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------