TSTP Solution File: SWV889-1 by E---3.1.00

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.1.00
% Problem  : SWV889-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sat May  4 09:51:18 EDT 2024

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.56s 0.64s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.56s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :    9 (   6 unt;   0 nHn;   9 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   12 (   0 equ;   6 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    9 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_asm_0,axiom,
    ( c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(X1,X2,X3)
    | ~ c_lessequals(X2,X1,tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(X3),tc_bool)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.oR4UXznRbB/E---3.1_4697.p',cls_asm_0) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_4,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(v_G,v_ts,tc_Com_Ostate),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.oR4UXznRbB/E---3.1_4697.p',cls_conjecture_4) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_3,negated_conjecture,
    c_lessequals(v_ts,v_G,tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate),tc_bool)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.oR4UXznRbB/E---3.1_4697.p',cls_conjecture_3) ).

cnf(c_0_3,plain,
    ( c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(X1,X2,X3)
    | ~ c_lessequals(X2,X1,tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(X3),tc_bool)) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_asm_0]) ).

cnf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(v_G,v_ts,tc_Com_Ostate),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_5,plain,
    ( c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(X1,X2,X3)
    | ~ c_lessequals(X2,X1,tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(X3),tc_bool)) ),
    c_0_3 ).

cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    c_lessequals(v_ts,v_G,tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate),tc_bool)),
    cls_conjecture_3 ).

cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(v_G,v_ts,tc_Com_Ostate),
    c_0_4 ).

cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]),c_0_7]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.18  % Problem    : SWV889-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.12/0.19  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.21/0.41  % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.21/0.41  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.21/0.41  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.21/0.41  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.21/0.41  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.21/0.41  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.21/0.41  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.21/0.41  % DateTime   : Fri May  3 17:02:23 EDT 2024
% 0.21/0.41  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.42/0.60  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.42/0.60  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.oR4UXznRbB/E---3.1_4697.p
% 0.56/0.64  # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.56/0.64  # Preprocessing class: FSLSSLSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.56/0.64  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.56/0.64  # Starting G-N--_023_B07_F1_SP_PI_Q7_CS_SP_CO_S5PRR_S0Y1 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.56/0.64  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.56/0.64  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.56/0.64  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.56/0.64  # new_bool_3 with pid 4779 completed with status 0
% 0.56/0.64  # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.56/0.64  # Preprocessing class: FSLSSLSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.56/0.64  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.56/0.64  # Starting G-N--_023_B07_F1_SP_PI_Q7_CS_SP_CO_S5PRR_S0Y1 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.56/0.64  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.56/0.64  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.56/0.64  # Search class: FGHSM-FSLS32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.56/0.64  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.56/0.64  # Starting G-E--_200_C45_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_CO_S5PRR_S0V with 150s (1) cores
% 0.56/0.64  # G-E--_200_C45_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_CO_S5PRR_S0V with pid 4782 completed with status 0
% 0.56/0.64  # Result found by G-E--_200_C45_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_CO_S5PRR_S0V
% 0.56/0.64  # Preprocessing class: FSLSSLSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.56/0.64  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.56/0.64  # Starting G-N--_023_B07_F1_SP_PI_Q7_CS_SP_CO_S5PRR_S0Y1 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.56/0.64  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.56/0.64  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.56/0.64  # Search class: FGHSM-FSLS32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.56/0.64  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.56/0.64  # Starting G-E--_200_C45_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_CO_S5PRR_S0V with 150s (1) cores
% 0.56/0.64  # Preprocessing time       : 0.004 s
% 0.56/0.64  
% 0.56/0.64  # Proof found!
% 0.56/0.64  # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.56/0.64  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.56/0.64  # Parsed axioms                        : 643
% 0.56/0.64  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 408
% 0.56/0.64  # Initial clauses                      : 235
% 0.56/0.64  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.56/0.64  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 235
% 0.56/0.64  # Processed clauses                    : 56
% 0.56/0.64  # ...of these trivial                  : 2
% 0.56/0.64  # ...subsumed                          : 14
% 0.56/0.64  # ...remaining for further processing  : 40
% 0.56/0.64  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.56/0.64  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.56/0.64  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.56/0.64  # Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.56/0.64  # Generated clauses                    : 7
% 0.56/0.64  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.56/0.64  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.56/0.64  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.56/0.64  # Paramodulations                      : 6
% 0.56/0.64  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.56/0.64  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.56/0.64  # Equation resolutions                 : 1
% 0.56/0.64  # Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.56/0.64  # Total rewrite steps                  : 2
% 0.56/0.64  # ...of those cached                   : 0
% 0.56/0.64  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.56/0.64  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.56/0.64  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.56/0.64  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.56/0.64  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.56/0.64  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.56/0.64  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.56/0.64  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.56/0.64  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.56/0.64  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.56/0.64  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.56/0.64  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.56/0.64  # Current number of processed clauses  : 40
% 0.56/0.64  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 10
% 0.56/0.64  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.56/0.64  #    Negative unit clauses             : 19
% 0.56/0.64  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 11
% 0.56/0.64  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 179
% 0.56/0.64  # ...number of literals in the above   : 362
% 0.56/0.64  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.56/0.64  # Current number of archived clauses   : 0
% 0.56/0.64  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 17
% 0.56/0.64  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 17
% 0.56/0.64  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.56/0.64  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 33
% 0.56/0.64  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.56/0.64  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 1
% 0.56/0.64  # BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 0.56/0.64  # Condensation attempts                : 56
% 0.56/0.64  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.56/0.64  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 9397
% 0.56/0.64  # Search garbage collected termcells   : 1762
% 0.56/0.64  
% 0.56/0.64  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.56/0.64  # User time                : 0.007 s
% 0.56/0.64  # System time              : 0.007 s
% 0.56/0.64  # Total time               : 0.015 s
% 0.56/0.64  # Maximum resident set size: 2420 pages
% 0.56/0.64  
% 0.56/0.64  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.56/0.64  # User time                : 0.022 s
% 0.56/0.64  # System time              : 0.011 s
% 0.56/0.64  # Total time               : 0.033 s
% 0.56/0.64  # Maximum resident set size: 2128 pages
% 0.56/0.64  % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.56/0.64  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------