TSTP Solution File: SWV864-1 by CSE_E---1.5

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE_E---1.5
% Problem  : SWV864-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s

% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 21:48:26 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.20s 0.58s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.20s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :   25
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   35 (   6 unt;  20 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   28 (  18 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   24 (  11   ~;  13   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   28 (  10   >;  18   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   2 prp; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   17 (  17 usr;   9 con; 0-5 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   22 (   5 sgn;   0   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(decl_22,type,
    c_Fun_Oid: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(decl_23,type,
    c_Com_Ocom_OSKIP: $i ).

tff(decl_24,type,
    c_Natural_Oevaln: ( $i * $i * $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(decl_25,type,
    c_Natural_Osko__Natural__Xevalc__elim__cases__4__1: ( $i * $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(decl_26,type,
    c_Natural_Oevalc: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(decl_27,type,
    c_Com_Ocom_OSemi: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(decl_28,type,
    c_Natural_Osko__Natural__Xeval__eq__1__1: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(decl_29,type,
    c_Natural_Osko__Natural__Xevaln__elim__cases__4__1: ( $i * $i * $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(decl_30,type,
    c_Natural_Osko__Natural__Xevalc__evaln__1__1: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(decl_31,type,
    v_x: $i ).

tff(decl_32,type,
    t_a: $i ).

tff(decl_33,type,
    v_sko__Hoare__Mirabelle__Xstate__not__singleton__def__raw__1: $i ).

tff(decl_34,type,
    v_sko__Hoare__Mirabelle__Xstate__not__singleton__def__raw__2: $i ).

tff(decl_35,type,
    c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ostate__not__singleton: $o ).

tff(decl_36,type,
    v_sko__Hoare__Mirabelle__Xsingle__stateE__1: $i > $i ).

tff(decl_37,type,
    v_sko__Hoare__Mirabelle__Xstate__not__singleton__def__1: $i ).

tff(decl_38,type,
    v_sko__Hoare__Mirabelle__Xstate__not__singleton__def__2: $i ).

tff(decl_39,type,
    v_c: $i ).

tff(decl_40,type,
    v_xa: $i ).

tff(decl_41,type,
    v_xb: $i > $i ).

cnf(cls_com__det_0,axiom,
    ( X1 = X2
    | ~ c_Natural_Oevalc(X3,X4,X1)
    | ~ c_Natural_Oevalc(X3,X4,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_com__det_0) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_2,negated_conjecture,
    ( X1 = v_xa
    | c_Natural_Oevalc(v_c,v_x,v_xb(X1)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_2) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_3,negated_conjecture,
    ( X1 = v_xa
    | X1 != v_xb(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_3) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_1,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_Natural_Oevalc(v_c,v_x,v_xa),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).

cnf(cls_com_Osimps_I12_J_0,axiom,
    c_Com_Ocom_OSKIP != c_Com_Ocom_OSemi(X1,X2),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_com_Osimps_I12_J_0) ).

cnf(c_0_5,axiom,
    ( X1 = X2
    | ~ c_Natural_Oevalc(X3,X4,X1)
    | ~ c_Natural_Oevalc(X3,X4,X2) ),
    cls_com__det_0 ).

cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ( X1 = v_xa
    | c_Natural_Oevalc(v_c,v_x,v_xb(X1)) ),
    cls_conjecture_2 ).

cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    ( X1 = v_xb(X2)
    | X2 = v_xa
    | ~ c_Natural_Oevalc(v_c,v_x,X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    ( X1 = v_xa
    | X1 != v_xb(X1) ),
    cls_conjecture_3 ).

cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    ( v_xb(X1) = v_xb(X2)
    | X1 = v_xa
    | X2 = v_xa ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    ( v_xb(X1) = v_xa
    | X1 = v_xa ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9])]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_Natural_Oevalc(v_c,v_x,v_xa),
    cls_conjecture_1 ).

cnf(c_0_12,axiom,
    c_Com_Ocom_OSKIP != c_Com_Ocom_OSemi(X1,X2),
    cls_com_Osimps_I12_J_0 ).

cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    X1 = v_xa,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_10]),c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]),c_0_13])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem    : SWV864-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.00/0.13  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime   : Tue Aug 29 06:58:10 EDT 2023
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.57  start to proof: theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.58  % Version  : CSE_E---1.5
% 0.20/0.58  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.58  % Proof found
% 0.20/0.58  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.58  % SZS output start Proof
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.59  % Total time : 0.006000 s
% 0.20/0.59  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.20/0.59  % Total time : 0.009000 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------