TSTP Solution File: SWV860-1 by E-SAT---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1.00
% Problem : SWV860-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 05:42:38 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.37s 0.58s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.37s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 12 ( 9 unt; 0 nHn; 12 RR)
% Number of literals : 15 ( 4 equ; 6 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-4 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 6 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 9 ( 3 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_evaln__elim__cases_I1_J_0,axiom,
( X1 = X2
| ~ c_Natural_Oevaln(c_Com_Ocom_OSKIP,X2,X3,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_evaln__elim__cases_I1_J_0) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_2,negated_conjecture,
~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(v_P,v_x),v_xb)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_2) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_1,negated_conjecture,
c_Natural_Oevaln(c_Com_Ocom_OSKIP,v_xa,v_n,v_xb),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(v_P,v_x),v_xa)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
cnf(c_0_4,plain,
( X1 = X2
| ~ c_Natural_Oevaln(c_Com_Ocom_OSKIP,X2,X3,X1) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_evaln__elim__cases_I1_J_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(v_P,v_x),v_xb)),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,plain,
( X1 = X2
| ~ c_Natural_Oevaln(c_Com_Ocom_OSKIP,X2,X3,X1) ),
c_0_4 ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
c_Natural_Oevaln(c_Com_Ocom_OSKIP,v_xa,v_n,v_xb),
cls_conjecture_1 ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(v_P,v_x),v_xb)),
c_0_5 ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
v_xb = v_xa,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(v_P,v_x),v_xa)),
cls_conjecture_0 ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]),c_0_10])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.11 % Problem : SWV860-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.07/0.12 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Sun May 19 09:03:08 EDT 2024
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.49 Running first-order model finding
% 0.20/0.49 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.37/0.58 # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.37/0.58 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.37/0.58 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.37/0.58 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.37/0.58 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.37/0.58 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.37/0.58 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.37/0.58 # C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with pid 13840 completed with status 0
% 0.37/0.58 # Result found by C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr
% 0.37/0.58 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.37/0.58 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.37/0.58 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.37/0.58 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.37/0.58 # Search class: FGHSM-FSLM33-DFFFFFNN
% 0.37/0.58 # Scheduled 10 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.37/0.58 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S0S with 271s (1) cores
% 0.37/0.58 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 151s (1) cores
% 0.37/0.58 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with 136s (1) cores
% 0.37/0.58 # Starting G-E--_208_C09_12_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S070I with 136s (1) cores
% 0.37/0.58 # Starting G-E--_300_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.37/0.58 # C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with pid 13848 completed with status 0
% 0.37/0.58 # Result found by C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr
% 0.37/0.58 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.37/0.58 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.37/0.58 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.37/0.58 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.37/0.58 # Search class: FGHSM-FSLM33-DFFFFFNN
% 0.37/0.58 # Scheduled 10 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.37/0.58 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S0S with 271s (1) cores
% 0.37/0.58 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 151s (1) cores
% 0.37/0.58 # Preprocessing time : 0.007 s
% 0.37/0.58 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.37/0.58
% 0.37/0.58 # Proof found!
% 0.37/0.58 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.37/0.58 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.37/0.58 # Parsed axioms : 519
% 0.37/0.58 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.37/0.58 # Initial clauses : 519
% 0.37/0.58 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 2
% 0.37/0.58 # Initial clauses in saturation : 517
% 0.37/0.58 # Processed clauses : 568
% 0.37/0.58 # ...of these trivial : 17
% 0.37/0.58 # ...subsumed : 81
% 0.37/0.58 # ...remaining for further processing : 470
% 0.37/0.58 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 3
% 0.37/0.58 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.37/0.58 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.37/0.58 # Backward-rewritten : 9
% 0.37/0.58 # Generated clauses : 5
% 0.37/0.58 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 7
% 0.37/0.58 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.37/0.58 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.37/0.58 # Paramodulations : 2
% 0.37/0.58 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.37/0.58 # NegExts : 0
% 0.37/0.58 # Equation resolutions : 3
% 0.37/0.58 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.37/0.58 # Total rewrite steps : 163
% 0.37/0.58 # ...of those cached : 99
% 0.37/0.58 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.37/0.58 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.37/0.58 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.37/0.58 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.37/0.58 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.37/0.58 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.37/0.58 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.37/0.58 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.37/0.58 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.37/0.58 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.37/0.58 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.37/0.58 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.37/0.58 # Current number of processed clauses : 44
% 0.37/0.58 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 27
% 0.37/0.58 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.37/0.58 # Negative unit clauses : 14
% 0.37/0.58 # Non-unit-clauses : 3
% 0.37/0.58 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 370
% 0.37/0.58 # ...number of literals in the above : 746
% 0.37/0.58 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.37/0.58 # Current number of archived clauses : 425
% 0.37/0.58 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 21048
% 0.37/0.58 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 15835
% 0.37/0.58 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 40
% 0.37/0.58 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 946
% 0.37/0.58 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.37/0.58 # BW rewrite match attempts : 174
% 0.37/0.58 # BW rewrite match successes : 28
% 0.37/0.58 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.37/0.58 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.37/0.58 # Termbank termtop insertions : 18248
% 0.37/0.58 # Search garbage collected termcells : 921
% 0.37/0.58
% 0.37/0.58 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.37/0.58 # User time : 0.052 s
% 0.37/0.58 # System time : 0.008 s
% 0.37/0.58 # Total time : 0.059 s
% 0.37/0.58 # Maximum resident set size: 2752 pages
% 0.37/0.58
% 0.37/0.58 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.37/0.58 # User time : 0.225 s
% 0.37/0.58 # System time : 0.029 s
% 0.37/0.58 # Total time : 0.253 s
% 0.37/0.58 # Maximum resident set size: 2088 pages
% 0.37/0.58 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------