TSTP Solution File: SWV860-1 by E---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1.00
% Problem : SWV860-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sat May 4 09:51:15 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.42s 0.65s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.42s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 12 ( 9 unt; 0 nHn; 12 RR)
% Number of literals : 15 ( 4 equ; 6 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-4 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 6 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 9 ( 3 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_evaln__elim__cases_I1_J_0,axiom,
( X1 = X2
| ~ c_Natural_Oevaln(c_Com_Ocom_OSKIP,X2,X3,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.Vh4yzPq9yW/E---3.1_8174.p',cls_evaln__elim__cases_I1_J_0) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_2,negated_conjecture,
~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(v_P,v_x),v_xb)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.Vh4yzPq9yW/E---3.1_8174.p',cls_conjecture_2) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_1,negated_conjecture,
c_Natural_Oevaln(c_Com_Ocom_OSKIP,v_xa,v_n,v_xb),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.Vh4yzPq9yW/E---3.1_8174.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(v_P,v_x),v_xa)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.Vh4yzPq9yW/E---3.1_8174.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
cnf(c_0_4,plain,
( X1 = X2
| ~ c_Natural_Oevaln(c_Com_Ocom_OSKIP,X2,X3,X1) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_evaln__elim__cases_I1_J_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(v_P,v_x),v_xb)),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,plain,
( X1 = X2
| ~ c_Natural_Oevaln(c_Com_Ocom_OSKIP,X2,X3,X1) ),
c_0_4 ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
c_Natural_Oevaln(c_Com_Ocom_OSKIP,v_xa,v_n,v_xb),
cls_conjecture_1 ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(v_P,v_x),v_xb)),
c_0_5 ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
v_xb = v_xa,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(v_P,v_x),v_xa)),
cls_conjecture_0 ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]),c_0_10])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.17 % Problem : SWV860-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.19/0.18 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.19/0.39 % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.19/0.39 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.19/0.39 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.19/0.39 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.19/0.39 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.19/0.39 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.19/0.39 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.19/0.39 % DateTime : Fri May 3 17:08:53 EDT 2024
% 0.19/0.39 % CPUTime :
% 0.25/0.56 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.25/0.56 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.Vh4yzPq9yW/E---3.1_8174.p
% 0.42/0.65 # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.42/0.65 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.42/0.65 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.42/0.65 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.42/0.65 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.42/0.65 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.42/0.65 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.42/0.65 # C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with pid 8252 completed with status 0
% 0.42/0.65 # Result found by C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr
% 0.42/0.65 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.42/0.65 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.42/0.65 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.42/0.65 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.42/0.65 # Search class: FGHSM-FSLM33-DFFFFFNN
% 0.42/0.65 # Scheduled 10 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.42/0.65 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S0S with 271s (1) cores
% 0.42/0.65 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 151s (1) cores
% 0.42/0.65 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with 136s (1) cores
% 0.42/0.65 # Starting G-E--_208_C09_12_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S070I with 136s (1) cores
% 0.42/0.65 # Starting G-E--_300_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.42/0.65 # G-E--_300_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with pid 8263 completed with status 0
% 0.42/0.65 # Result found by G-E--_300_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y
% 0.42/0.65 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.42/0.65 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.42/0.65 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.42/0.65 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.42/0.65 # Search class: FGHSM-FSLM33-DFFFFFNN
% 0.42/0.65 # Scheduled 10 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.42/0.65 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S0S with 271s (1) cores
% 0.42/0.65 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 151s (1) cores
% 0.42/0.65 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with 136s (1) cores
% 0.42/0.65 # Starting G-E--_208_C09_12_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S070I with 136s (1) cores
% 0.42/0.65 # Starting G-E--_300_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.42/0.65 # Preprocessing time : 0.007 s
% 0.42/0.65 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.42/0.65
% 0.42/0.65 # Proof found!
% 0.42/0.65 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.42/0.65 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.42/0.65 # Parsed axioms : 519
% 0.42/0.65 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.42/0.65 # Initial clauses : 519
% 0.42/0.65 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 2
% 0.42/0.65 # Initial clauses in saturation : 517
% 0.42/0.65 # Processed clauses : 558
% 0.42/0.65 # ...of these trivial : 17
% 0.42/0.65 # ...subsumed : 81
% 0.42/0.65 # ...remaining for further processing : 460
% 0.42/0.65 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 3
% 0.42/0.65 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.42/0.65 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.42/0.65 # Backward-rewritten : 8
% 0.42/0.65 # Generated clauses : 5
% 0.42/0.65 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 6
% 0.42/0.65 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.42/0.65 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.42/0.65 # Paramodulations : 2
% 0.42/0.65 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.42/0.65 # NegExts : 0
% 0.42/0.65 # Equation resolutions : 3
% 0.42/0.65 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.42/0.65 # Total rewrite steps : 168
% 0.42/0.65 # ...of those cached : 103
% 0.42/0.65 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.42/0.65 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.42/0.65 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.42/0.65 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.42/0.65 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.42/0.65 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.42/0.65 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.42/0.65 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.42/0.65 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.42/0.65 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.42/0.65 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.42/0.65 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.42/0.65 # Current number of processed clauses : 35
% 0.42/0.65 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 25
% 0.42/0.65 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.42/0.65 # Negative unit clauses : 8
% 0.42/0.65 # Non-unit-clauses : 2
% 0.42/0.65 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 379
% 0.42/0.65 # ...number of literals in the above : 756
% 0.42/0.65 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.42/0.65 # Current number of archived clauses : 424
% 0.42/0.65 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 19274
% 0.42/0.65 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 15010
% 0.42/0.65 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 40
% 0.42/0.65 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1022
% 0.42/0.65 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.42/0.65 # BW rewrite match attempts : 128
% 0.42/0.65 # BW rewrite match successes : 20
% 0.42/0.65 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.42/0.65 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.42/0.65 # Termbank termtop insertions : 18203
% 0.42/0.65 # Search garbage collected termcells : 921
% 0.42/0.65
% 0.42/0.65 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.42/0.65 # User time : 0.055 s
% 0.42/0.65 # System time : 0.004 s
% 0.42/0.65 # Total time : 0.059 s
% 0.42/0.65 # Maximum resident set size: 2764 pages
% 0.42/0.65
% 0.42/0.65 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.42/0.65 # User time : 0.223 s
% 0.42/0.65 # System time : 0.023 s
% 0.42/0.65 # Total time : 0.246 s
% 0.42/0.65 # Maximum resident set size: 2096 pages
% 0.42/0.65 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.42/0.65 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------