TSTP Solution File: SWV844-1 by E-SAT---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1.00
% Problem : SWV844-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sat May 4 09:59:36 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.44s 0.81s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.44s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 9 ( 6 unt; 0 nHn; 9 RR)
% Number of literals : 12 ( 0 equ; 6 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 6 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 15 ( 15 usr; 9 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 3 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_conjecture_5,negated_conjecture,
( c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(v_G,c_Set_Oinsert(hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple_Otriple(t_b),hAPP(v_P,X1)),hAPP(v_c0,X1)),hAPP(v_Q,X1)),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_b),tc_bool)),tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_b)),t_b)
| ~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(v_G,c_Set_Oinsert(hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple_Otriple(t_b),hAPP(v_P_H,X1)),hAPP(v_c0,X1)),hAPP(v_Q_H,X1)),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_b),tc_bool)),tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_b)),t_b) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.rcge6Suaqr/E---3.1_10069.p',cls_conjecture_5) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_4,negated_conjecture,
~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(v_G,c_Set_Oinsert(hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple_Otriple(t_b),hAPP(v_P,v_x)),hAPP(v_c0,v_x)),hAPP(v_Q,v_x)),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_b),tc_bool)),tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_b)),t_b),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.rcge6Suaqr/E---3.1_10069.p',cls_conjecture_4) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_2,negated_conjecture,
c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(v_G,c_Set_Oinsert(hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple_Otriple(t_b),hAPP(v_P_H,v_x)),hAPP(v_c0,v_x)),hAPP(v_Q_H,v_x)),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_b),tc_bool)),tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_b)),t_b),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.rcge6Suaqr/E---3.1_10069.p',cls_conjecture_2) ).
cnf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
( c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(v_G,c_Set_Oinsert(hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple_Otriple(t_b),hAPP(v_P,X1)),hAPP(v_c0,X1)),hAPP(v_Q,X1)),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_b),tc_bool)),tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_b)),t_b)
| ~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(v_G,c_Set_Oinsert(hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple_Otriple(t_b),hAPP(v_P_H,X1)),hAPP(v_c0,X1)),hAPP(v_Q_H,X1)),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_b),tc_bool)),tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_b)),t_b) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(v_G,c_Set_Oinsert(hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple_Otriple(t_b),hAPP(v_P,v_x)),hAPP(v_c0,v_x)),hAPP(v_Q,v_x)),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_b),tc_bool)),tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_b)),t_b),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
( c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(v_G,c_Set_Oinsert(hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple_Otriple(t_b),hAPP(v_P,X1)),hAPP(v_c0,X1)),hAPP(v_Q,X1)),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_b),tc_bool)),tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_b)),t_b)
| ~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(v_G,c_Set_Oinsert(hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple_Otriple(t_b),hAPP(v_P_H,X1)),hAPP(v_c0,X1)),hAPP(v_Q_H,X1)),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_b),tc_bool)),tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_b)),t_b) ),
c_0_3 ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(v_G,c_Set_Oinsert(hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple_Otriple(t_b),hAPP(v_P_H,v_x)),hAPP(v_c0,v_x)),hAPP(v_Q_H,v_x)),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_b),tc_bool)),tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_b)),t_b),
cls_conjecture_2 ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(v_G,c_Set_Oinsert(hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple_Otriple(t_b),hAPP(v_P,v_x)),hAPP(v_c0,v_x)),hAPP(v_Q,v_x)),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_b),tc_bool)),tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_b)),t_b),
c_0_4 ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]),c_0_7]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : SWV844-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.03/0.14 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Fri May 3 16:51:08 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.38/0.61 Running first-order model finding
% 0.38/0.61 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.rcge6Suaqr/E---3.1_10069.p
% 0.44/0.81 # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.44/0.81 # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.44/0.81 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.44/0.81 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.44/0.81 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.44/0.81 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.44/0.81 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.44/0.81 # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 10148 completed with status 0
% 0.44/0.81 # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.44/0.81 # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.44/0.81 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.44/0.81 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.44/0.81 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.44/0.81 # Search class: FGHSM-SSLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 0.44/0.81 # Scheduled 13 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.44/0.81 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 113s (1) cores
% 0.44/0.81 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.44/0.81 # Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S4d with 113s (1) cores
% 0.44/0.81 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AI with 113s (1) cores
% 0.44/0.81 # Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_S5PRR_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 113s (1) cores
% 0.44/0.81 # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 10163 completed with status 0
% 0.44/0.81 # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.44/0.81 # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.44/0.81 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.44/0.81 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.44/0.81 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.44/0.81 # Search class: FGHSM-SSLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 0.44/0.81 # Scheduled 13 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.44/0.81 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 113s (1) cores
% 0.44/0.81 # Preprocessing time : 0.017 s
% 0.44/0.81 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.44/0.81
% 0.44/0.81 # Proof found!
% 0.44/0.81 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.44/0.81 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.44/0.81 # Parsed axioms : 1042
% 0.44/0.81 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.44/0.81 # Initial clauses : 1042
% 0.44/0.81 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 1
% 0.44/0.81 # Initial clauses in saturation : 1041
% 0.44/0.81 # Processed clauses : 1281
% 0.44/0.81 # ...of these trivial : 23
% 0.44/0.81 # ...subsumed : 144
% 0.44/0.81 # ...remaining for further processing : 1114
% 0.44/0.81 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 6
% 0.44/0.81 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.44/0.81 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.44/0.81 # Backward-rewritten : 10
% 0.44/0.81 # Generated clauses : 294
% 0.44/0.81 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 161
% 0.44/0.81 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.44/0.81 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 5
% 0.44/0.81 # Paramodulations : 283
% 0.44/0.81 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.44/0.81 # NegExts : 0
% 0.44/0.81 # Equation resolutions : 11
% 0.44/0.81 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.44/0.81 # Total rewrite steps : 139
% 0.44/0.81 # ...of those cached : 56
% 0.44/0.81 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.44/0.81 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.44/0.81 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.44/0.81 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.44/0.81 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.44/0.81 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.44/0.81 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.44/0.81 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.44/0.81 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.44/0.81 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.44/0.81 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.44/0.81 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.44/0.81 # Current number of processed clauses : 238
% 0.44/0.81 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 83
% 0.44/0.81 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.44/0.81 # Negative unit clauses : 12
% 0.44/0.81 # Non-unit-clauses : 143
% 0.44/0.81 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 787
% 0.44/0.81 # ...number of literals in the above : 1936
% 0.44/0.81 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.44/0.81 # Current number of archived clauses : 877
% 0.44/0.81 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 118206
% 0.44/0.81 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 71506
% 0.44/0.81 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 135
% 0.44/0.81 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1782
% 0.44/0.81 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.44/0.81 # BW rewrite match attempts : 847
% 0.44/0.81 # BW rewrite match successes : 79
% 0.44/0.81 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.44/0.81 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.44/0.81 # Termbank termtop insertions : 65695
% 0.44/0.81 # Search garbage collected termcells : 1953
% 0.44/0.81
% 0.44/0.81 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.44/0.81 # User time : 0.147 s
% 0.44/0.81 # System time : 0.008 s
% 0.44/0.81 # Total time : 0.155 s
% 0.44/0.81 # Maximum resident set size: 3908 pages
% 0.44/0.81
% 0.44/0.81 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.44/0.81 # User time : 0.654 s
% 0.44/0.81 # System time : 0.032 s
% 0.44/0.81 # Total time : 0.686 s
% 0.44/0.81 # Maximum resident set size: 2580 pages
% 0.44/0.81 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------