TSTP Solution File: SWV844-1 by E---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1.00
% Problem : SWV844-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 05:32:17 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 1.64s 0.65s
% Output : CNFRefutation 1.64s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 9 ( 6 unt; 0 nHn; 9 RR)
% Number of literals : 12 ( 0 equ; 6 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 6 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 15 ( 15 usr; 9 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 3 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_conjecture_5,negated_conjecture,
( c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(v_G,c_Set_Oinsert(hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple_Otriple(t_b),hAPP(v_P,X1)),hAPP(v_c0,X1)),hAPP(v_Q,X1)),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_b),tc_bool)),tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_b)),t_b)
| ~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(v_G,c_Set_Oinsert(hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple_Otriple(t_b),hAPP(v_P_H,X1)),hAPP(v_c0,X1)),hAPP(v_Q_H,X1)),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_b),tc_bool)),tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_b)),t_b) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_5) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_4,negated_conjecture,
~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(v_G,c_Set_Oinsert(hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple_Otriple(t_b),hAPP(v_P,v_x)),hAPP(v_c0,v_x)),hAPP(v_Q,v_x)),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_b),tc_bool)),tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_b)),t_b),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_4) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_2,negated_conjecture,
c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(v_G,c_Set_Oinsert(hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple_Otriple(t_b),hAPP(v_P_H,v_x)),hAPP(v_c0,v_x)),hAPP(v_Q_H,v_x)),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_b),tc_bool)),tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_b)),t_b),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_2) ).
cnf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
( c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(v_G,c_Set_Oinsert(hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple_Otriple(t_b),hAPP(v_P,X1)),hAPP(v_c0,X1)),hAPP(v_Q,X1)),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_b),tc_bool)),tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_b)),t_b)
| ~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(v_G,c_Set_Oinsert(hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple_Otriple(t_b),hAPP(v_P_H,X1)),hAPP(v_c0,X1)),hAPP(v_Q_H,X1)),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_b),tc_bool)),tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_b)),t_b) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(v_G,c_Set_Oinsert(hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple_Otriple(t_b),hAPP(v_P,v_x)),hAPP(v_c0,v_x)),hAPP(v_Q,v_x)),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_b),tc_bool)),tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_b)),t_b),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
( c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(v_G,c_Set_Oinsert(hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple_Otriple(t_b),hAPP(v_P,X1)),hAPP(v_c0,X1)),hAPP(v_Q,X1)),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_b),tc_bool)),tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_b)),t_b)
| ~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(v_G,c_Set_Oinsert(hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple_Otriple(t_b),hAPP(v_P_H,X1)),hAPP(v_c0,X1)),hAPP(v_Q_H,X1)),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_b),tc_bool)),tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_b)),t_b) ),
c_0_3 ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(v_G,c_Set_Oinsert(hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple_Otriple(t_b),hAPP(v_P_H,v_x)),hAPP(v_c0,v_x)),hAPP(v_Q_H,v_x)),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_b),tc_bool)),tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_b)),t_b),
cls_conjecture_2 ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(v_G,c_Set_Oinsert(hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple_Otriple(t_b),hAPP(v_P,v_x)),hAPP(v_c0,v_x)),hAPP(v_Q,v_x)),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_b),tc_bool)),tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_b)),t_b),
c_0_4 ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]),c_0_7]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.02/0.10 % Problem : SWV844-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.02/0.10 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.10/0.31 % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.31 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.31 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.31 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.31 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.31 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.31 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.31 % DateTime : Sun May 19 07:46:38 EDT 2024
% 0.10/0.31 % CPUTime :
% 0.15/0.42 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.15/0.42 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 1.64/0.65 # Version: 3.1.0
% 1.64/0.65 # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 1.64/0.65 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.64/0.65 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 1.64/0.65 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.64/0.65 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.64/0.65 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 1.64/0.65 # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 15960 completed with status 0
% 1.64/0.65 # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 1.64/0.65 # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 1.64/0.65 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.64/0.65 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 1.64/0.65 # No SInE strategy applied
% 1.64/0.65 # Search class: FGHSM-SSLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 1.64/0.65 # Scheduled 13 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 1.64/0.65 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 113s (1) cores
% 1.64/0.65 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 1.64/0.65 # Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S4d with 113s (1) cores
% 1.64/0.65 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AI with 113s (1) cores
% 1.64/0.65 # Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_S5PRR_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 113s (1) cores
% 1.64/0.65 # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 15967 completed with status 0
% 1.64/0.65 # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 1.64/0.65 # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 1.64/0.65 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.64/0.65 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 1.64/0.65 # No SInE strategy applied
% 1.64/0.65 # Search class: FGHSM-SSLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 1.64/0.65 # Scheduled 13 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 1.64/0.65 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 113s (1) cores
% 1.64/0.65 # Preprocessing time : 0.015 s
% 1.64/0.65 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 1.64/0.65
% 1.64/0.65 # Proof found!
% 1.64/0.65 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 1.64/0.65 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.64/0.65 # Parsed axioms : 1042
% 1.64/0.65 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 1.64/0.65 # Initial clauses : 1042
% 1.64/0.65 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 1
% 1.64/0.65 # Initial clauses in saturation : 1041
% 1.64/0.65 # Processed clauses : 1281
% 1.64/0.65 # ...of these trivial : 23
% 1.64/0.65 # ...subsumed : 144
% 1.64/0.65 # ...remaining for further processing : 1114
% 1.64/0.65 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 6
% 1.64/0.65 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 1.64/0.65 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 1.64/0.65 # Backward-rewritten : 10
% 1.64/0.65 # Generated clauses : 294
% 1.64/0.65 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 161
% 1.64/0.65 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 1.64/0.65 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 5
% 1.64/0.65 # Paramodulations : 283
% 1.64/0.65 # Factorizations : 0
% 1.64/0.65 # NegExts : 0
% 1.64/0.65 # Equation resolutions : 11
% 1.64/0.65 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 1.64/0.65 # Total rewrite steps : 139
% 1.64/0.65 # ...of those cached : 56
% 1.64/0.65 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 1.64/0.65 # Propositional check models : 0
% 1.64/0.65 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 1.64/0.65 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 1.64/0.65 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 1.64/0.65 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 1.64/0.65 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 1.64/0.65 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 1.64/0.65 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 1.64/0.65 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 1.64/0.65 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 1.64/0.65 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 1.64/0.65 # Current number of processed clauses : 238
% 1.64/0.65 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 83
% 1.64/0.65 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 1.64/0.65 # Negative unit clauses : 12
% 1.64/0.65 # Non-unit-clauses : 143
% 1.64/0.65 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 787
% 1.64/0.65 # ...number of literals in the above : 1936
% 1.64/0.65 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 1.64/0.65 # Current number of archived clauses : 877
% 1.64/0.65 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 118206
% 1.64/0.65 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 71506
% 1.64/0.65 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 135
% 1.64/0.65 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1782
% 1.64/0.65 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 1.64/0.65 # BW rewrite match attempts : 847
% 1.64/0.65 # BW rewrite match successes : 79
% 1.64/0.65 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 1.64/0.65 # Condensation successes : 0
% 1.64/0.65 # Termbank termtop insertions : 65695
% 1.64/0.65 # Search garbage collected termcells : 1953
% 1.64/0.65
% 1.64/0.65 # -------------------------------------------------
% 1.64/0.65 # User time : 0.176 s
% 1.64/0.65 # System time : 0.007 s
% 1.64/0.65 # Total time : 0.183 s
% 1.64/0.65 # Maximum resident set size: 3892 pages
% 1.64/0.65
% 1.64/0.65 # -------------------------------------------------
% 1.64/0.65 # User time : 0.809 s
% 1.64/0.65 # System time : 0.034 s
% 1.64/0.65 # Total time : 0.844 s
% 1.64/0.65 # Maximum resident set size: 2564 pages
% 1.64/0.65 % E---3.1 exiting
% 1.64/0.65 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------