TSTP Solution File: SWV818-1 by CSE---1.6
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CSE---1.6
% Problem : SWV818-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 21:35:21 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.20s 0.60s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.20s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.12 % Problem : SWV818-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.10/0.12 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Tue Aug 29 05:55:04 EDT 2023
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.55 start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.59 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.59 % File :CSE---1.6
% 0.20/0.59 % Problem :theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.59 % Transform :cnf
% 0.20/0.59 % Format :tptp:raw
% 0.20/0.59 % Command :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.20/0.59
% 0.20/0.59 % Result :Theorem 0.000000s
% 0.20/0.59 % Output :CNFRefutation 0.000000s
% 0.20/0.59 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.60 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.60 % File : SWV818-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.20/0.60 % Domain : Software Verification
% 0.20/0.60 % Problem : Hoare logic with procedures 114_1
% 0.20/0.60 % Version : Especial.
% 0.20/0.60 % English : Completeness is taken relative to completeness of the underlying
% 0.20/0.60 % logic. Two versions of completeness proof: nested single recursion
% 0.20/0.60 % and simultaneous recursion in call rule.
% 0.20/0.60
% 0.20/0.60 % Refs : [Nip10] Nipkow (2010), Email to Geoff Sutcliffe
% 0.20/0.60 % : [BN10] Boehme & Nipkow (2010), Sledgehammer: Judgement Day
% 0.20/0.60 % Source : [Nip10]
% 0.20/0.60 % Names : Hoare-114_1 [Nip10]
% 0.20/0.60
% 0.20/0.60 % Status : Unsatisfiable
% 0.20/0.60 % Rating : 0.00 v7.4.0, 0.04 v7.3.0, 0.00 v6.4.0, 0.05 v6.3.0, 0.06 v6.2.0, 0.07 v6.1.0, 0.06 v6.0.0, 0.10 v5.5.0, 0.05 v5.4.0, 0.07 v5.3.0, 0.08 v5.2.0, 0.07 v4.1.0
% 0.20/0.60 % Syntax : Number of clauses : 4 ( 4 unt; 0 nHn; 2 RR)
% 0.20/0.60 % Number of literals : 4 ( 4 equ; 1 neg)
% 0.20/0.60 % Maximal clause size : 1 ( 1 avg)
% 0.20/0.60 % Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% 0.20/0.60 % Number of predicates : 1 ( 0 usr; 0 prp; 2-2 aty)
% 0.20/0.60 % Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 5 con; 0-3 aty)
% 0.20/0.60 % Number of variables : 4 ( 3 sgn)
% 0.20/0.60 % SPC : CNF_UNS_RFO_PEQ_UEQ
% 0.20/0.60
% 0.20/0.60 % Comments :
% 0.20/0.60 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.60 cnf(cls_tracing__def_0,axiom,
% 0.20/0.60 c_Code__Evaluation_Otracing(V_s,V_x,T_a) = V_x ).
% 0.20/0.60
% 0.20/0.60 cnf(cls_tracing__def__raw_0,axiom,
% 0.20/0.60 c_Code__Evaluation_Otracing(v_s,v_x,t_a) = v_x ).
% 0.20/0.60
% 0.20/0.60 cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
% 0.20/0.60 v_s != v_t ).
% 0.20/0.60
% 0.20/0.60 cnf(cls_conjecture_1,negated_conjecture,
% 0.20/0.60 V_s = v_ta ).
% 0.20/0.60
% 0.20/0.60 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.60 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.60 % Proof found
% 0.20/0.60 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.60 % SZS output start Proof
% 0.20/0.60 %ClaNum:5(EqnAxiom:3)
% 0.20/0.60 %VarNum:1(SingletonVarNum:1)
% 0.20/0.60 %MaxLitNum:1
% 0.20/0.60 %MaxfuncDepth:0
% 0.20/0.60 %SharedTerms:4
% 0.20/0.60 %goalClause: 4 5
% 0.20/0.60 %singleGoalClaCount:2
% 0.20/0.60 [5]~E(a2,a3)
% 0.20/0.60 [4]E(x41,a1)
% 0.20/0.60 %EqnAxiom
% 0.20/0.60 [1]E(x11,x11)
% 0.20/0.60 [2]E(x22,x21)+~E(x21,x22)
% 0.20/0.60 [3]E(x31,x33)+~E(x31,x32)+~E(x32,x33)
% 0.20/0.60
% 0.20/0.60 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.60 cnf(7,plain,
% 0.20/0.60 (~E(a2,a1)),
% 0.20/0.60 inference(scs_inference,[],[4,5,2,3])).
% 0.20/0.60 cnf(8,plain,
% 0.20/0.60 ($false),
% 0.20/0.60 inference(scs_inference,[],[4,7]),
% 0.20/0.60 ['proof']).
% 0.20/0.60 % SZS output end Proof
% 0.20/0.60 % Total time :0.000000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------