TSTP Solution File: SWV781-1 by E-SAT---3.1.00

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.1.00
% Problem  : SWV781-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 05:42:24 EDT 2024

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.21s 0.53s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.21s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :    8 (   8 unt;   0 nHn;   4 RR)
%            Number of literals    :    8 (   2 equ;   3 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    9 (   9 usr;   5 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    8 (   4 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_lessequals(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,c_List_OtakeWhile(v_P,c_List_Olist_ONil(tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent)),c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,c_List_Olist_ONil(tc_Event_Oevent)),tc_fun(tc_Message_Omsg,tc_bool)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).

cnf(cls_takeWhile_Osimps_I1_J_0,axiom,
    c_List_OtakeWhile(X1,c_List_Olist_ONil(X2),X2) = c_List_Olist_ONil(X2),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_takeWhile_Osimps_I1_J_0) ).

cnf(cls_subset__refl_0,axiom,
    c_lessequals(X1,X1,tc_fun(X2,tc_bool)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_subset__refl_0) ).

cnf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_lessequals(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,c_List_OtakeWhile(v_P,c_List_Olist_ONil(tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent)),c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,c_List_Olist_ONil(tc_Event_Oevent)),tc_fun(tc_Message_Omsg,tc_bool)),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_0]) ).

cnf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_lessequals(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,c_List_OtakeWhile(v_P,c_List_Olist_ONil(tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent)),c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,c_List_Olist_ONil(tc_Event_Oevent)),tc_fun(tc_Message_Omsg,tc_bool)),
    c_0_3 ).

cnf(c_0_5,axiom,
    c_List_OtakeWhile(X1,c_List_Olist_ONil(X2),X2) = c_List_Olist_ONil(X2),
    cls_takeWhile_Osimps_I1_J_0 ).

cnf(c_0_6,axiom,
    c_lessequals(X1,X1,tc_fun(X2,tc_bool)),
    cls_subset__refl_0 ).

cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_5]),c_0_6])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.13  % Problem    : SWV781-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.13/0.14  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.14/0.36  % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.14/0.36  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.14/0.36  % DateTime   : Sun May 19 06:34:08 EDT 2024
% 0.21/0.36  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.21/0.48  Running first-order model finding
% 0.21/0.48  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.21/0.53  # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.21/0.53  # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.53  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.53  # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.53  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.53  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.53  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.53  # new_bool_3 with pid 27666 completed with status 0
% 0.21/0.53  # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.21/0.53  # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.53  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.53  # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.53  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.53  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.21/0.53  # Search class: FGHSM-FSLF32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.21/0.53  # partial match(1): FGHSM-FSLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.21/0.53  # Scheduled 12 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.21/0.53  # Starting G-E--_303_C18_F1_URBAN_S0Y with 25s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.53  # G-E--_303_C18_F1_URBAN_S0Y with pid 27669 completed with status 0
% 0.21/0.53  # Result found by G-E--_303_C18_F1_URBAN_S0Y
% 0.21/0.53  # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.53  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.53  # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.53  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.53  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.21/0.53  # Search class: FGHSM-FSLF32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.21/0.53  # partial match(1): FGHSM-FSLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.21/0.53  # Scheduled 12 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.21/0.53  # Starting G-E--_303_C18_F1_URBAN_S0Y with 25s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.53  # Preprocessing time       : 0.015 s
% 0.21/0.53  
% 0.21/0.53  # Proof found!
% 0.21/0.53  # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.21/0.53  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.21/0.53  # Parsed axioms                        : 545
% 0.21/0.53  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 262
% 0.21/0.53  # Initial clauses                      : 283
% 0.21/0.53  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 1
% 0.21/0.53  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 282
% 0.21/0.53  # Processed clauses                    : 33
% 0.21/0.53  # ...of these trivial                  : 1
% 0.21/0.53  # ...subsumed                          : 6
% 0.21/0.53  # ...remaining for further processing  : 26
% 0.21/0.53  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.21/0.53  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.21/0.53  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.21/0.53  # Backward-rewritten                   : 1
% 0.21/0.53  # Generated clauses                    : 14
% 0.21/0.53  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 1
% 0.21/0.53  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.21/0.53  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.21/0.53  # Paramodulations                      : 13
% 0.21/0.53  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.21/0.53  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.21/0.53  # Equation resolutions                 : 1
% 0.21/0.53  # Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.21/0.53  # Total rewrite steps                  : 14
% 0.21/0.53  # ...of those cached                   : 4
% 0.21/0.53  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.21/0.53  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.21/0.53  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.21/0.53  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.21/0.53  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.21/0.53  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.21/0.53  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.21/0.53  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.21/0.53  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.21/0.53  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.21/0.53  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.21/0.53  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.21/0.53  # Current number of processed clauses  : 25
% 0.21/0.53  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 13
% 0.21/0.53  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.21/0.53  #    Negative unit clauses             : 6
% 0.21/0.53  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 6
% 0.21/0.53  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 250
% 0.21/0.53  # ...number of literals in the above   : 474
% 0.21/0.53  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.21/0.53  # Current number of archived clauses   : 1
% 0.21/0.53  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 3
% 0.21/0.53  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2
% 0.21/0.53  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.21/0.53  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 17
% 0.21/0.53  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.21/0.53  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 2
% 0.21/0.53  # BW rewrite match successes           : 1
% 0.21/0.53  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.21/0.53  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.21/0.53  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 8324
% 0.21/0.53  # Search garbage collected termcells   : 1491
% 0.21/0.53  
% 0.21/0.53  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.53  # User time                : 0.019 s
% 0.21/0.53  # System time              : 0.008 s
% 0.21/0.53  # Total time               : 0.027 s
% 0.21/0.53  # Maximum resident set size: 2544 pages
% 0.21/0.53  
% 0.21/0.53  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.53  # User time                : 0.029 s
% 0.21/0.53  # System time              : 0.013 s
% 0.21/0.53  # Total time               : 0.042 s
% 0.21/0.53  # Maximum resident set size: 2096 pages
% 0.21/0.53  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------