TSTP Solution File: SWV781-1 by E---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1.00
% Problem : SWV781-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 05:31:59 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.19s 0.52s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 8 ( 8 unt; 0 nHn; 4 RR)
% Number of literals : 8 ( 2 equ; 3 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 9 ( 9 usr; 5 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 8 ( 4 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
~ c_lessequals(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,c_List_OtakeWhile(v_P,c_List_Olist_ONil(tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent)),c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,c_List_Olist_ONil(tc_Event_Oevent)),tc_fun(tc_Message_Omsg,tc_bool)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
cnf(cls_takeWhile_Osimps_I1_J_0,axiom,
c_List_OtakeWhile(X1,c_List_Olist_ONil(X2),X2) = c_List_Olist_ONil(X2),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_takeWhile_Osimps_I1_J_0) ).
cnf(cls_subset__refl_0,axiom,
c_lessequals(X1,X1,tc_fun(X2,tc_bool)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_subset__refl_0) ).
cnf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
~ c_lessequals(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,c_List_OtakeWhile(v_P,c_List_Olist_ONil(tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent)),c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,c_List_Olist_ONil(tc_Event_Oevent)),tc_fun(tc_Message_Omsg,tc_bool)),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
~ c_lessequals(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,c_List_OtakeWhile(v_P,c_List_Olist_ONil(tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent)),c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,c_List_Olist_ONil(tc_Event_Oevent)),tc_fun(tc_Message_Omsg,tc_bool)),
c_0_3 ).
cnf(c_0_5,axiom,
c_List_OtakeWhile(X1,c_List_Olist_ONil(X2),X2) = c_List_Olist_ONil(X2),
cls_takeWhile_Osimps_I1_J_0 ).
cnf(c_0_6,axiom,
c_lessequals(X1,X1,tc_fun(X2,tc_bool)),
cls_subset__refl_0 ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_5]),c_0_6])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12 % Problem : SWV781-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.11/0.13 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Sun May 19 06:34:07 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.47 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.19/0.47 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.52 # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.19/0.52 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.19/0.52 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.52 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/0.52 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.52 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.52 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.52 # new_bool_1 with pid 28221 completed with status 0
% 0.19/0.52 # Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.19/0.52 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.19/0.52 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.52 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/0.52 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.52 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.52 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.19/0.52 # Search class: FGHSM-FSLF32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.19/0.52 # partial match(1): FGHSM-FSLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.19/0.52 # Scheduled 12 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.19/0.52 # Starting G-E--_303_C18_F1_URBAN_S0Y with 25s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.52 # G-E--_303_C18_F1_URBAN_S0Y with pid 28224 completed with status 0
% 0.19/0.52 # Result found by G-E--_303_C18_F1_URBAN_S0Y
% 0.19/0.52 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.19/0.52 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.52 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/0.52 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.52 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.52 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.19/0.52 # Search class: FGHSM-FSLF32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.19/0.52 # partial match(1): FGHSM-FSLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.19/0.52 # Scheduled 12 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.19/0.52 # Starting G-E--_303_C18_F1_URBAN_S0Y with 25s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.52 # Preprocessing time : 0.015 s
% 0.19/0.52
% 0.19/0.52 # Proof found!
% 0.19/0.52 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.19/0.52 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.52 # Parsed axioms : 545
% 0.19/0.52 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 262
% 0.19/0.52 # Initial clauses : 283
% 0.19/0.52 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 1
% 0.19/0.52 # Initial clauses in saturation : 282
% 0.19/0.52 # Processed clauses : 33
% 0.19/0.52 # ...of these trivial : 1
% 0.19/0.52 # ...subsumed : 6
% 0.19/0.52 # ...remaining for further processing : 26
% 0.19/0.52 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.19/0.52 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.19/0.52 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.19/0.52 # Backward-rewritten : 1
% 0.19/0.52 # Generated clauses : 14
% 0.19/0.52 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 1
% 0.19/0.52 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.19/0.52 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.19/0.52 # Paramodulations : 13
% 0.19/0.52 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.19/0.52 # NegExts : 0
% 0.19/0.52 # Equation resolutions : 1
% 0.19/0.52 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.19/0.52 # Total rewrite steps : 14
% 0.19/0.52 # ...of those cached : 4
% 0.19/0.52 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.19/0.52 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.19/0.52 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.19/0.52 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.19/0.52 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.19/0.52 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.19/0.52 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.52 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.52 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.52 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.52 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.52 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.52 # Current number of processed clauses : 25
% 0.19/0.52 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 13
% 0.19/0.52 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.19/0.52 # Negative unit clauses : 6
% 0.19/0.52 # Non-unit-clauses : 6
% 0.19/0.52 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 250
% 0.19/0.52 # ...number of literals in the above : 474
% 0.19/0.52 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.19/0.52 # Current number of archived clauses : 1
% 0.19/0.52 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 3
% 0.19/0.52 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2
% 0.19/0.52 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.19/0.52 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 17
% 0.19/0.52 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.19/0.52 # BW rewrite match attempts : 2
% 0.19/0.52 # BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 0.19/0.52 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.19/0.52 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.19/0.52 # Termbank termtop insertions : 8324
% 0.19/0.52 # Search garbage collected termcells : 1491
% 0.19/0.52
% 0.19/0.52 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.52 # User time : 0.019 s
% 0.19/0.52 # System time : 0.007 s
% 0.19/0.52 # Total time : 0.026 s
% 0.19/0.52 # Maximum resident set size: 2540 pages
% 0.19/0.52
% 0.19/0.52 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.52 # User time : 0.032 s
% 0.19/0.52 # System time : 0.010 s
% 0.19/0.52 # Total time : 0.042 s
% 0.19/0.52 # Maximum resident set size: 2100 pages
% 0.19/0.52 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.19/0.52 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------