TSTP Solution File: SWV746-1 by SNARK---20120808r022
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem : SWV746-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run-snark %s %d
% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 21:35:53 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 1.99s 2.16s
% Output : Refutation 1.99s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 15
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 26 ( 18 unt; 1 nHn; 22 RR)
% Number of literals : 37 ( 10 equ; 16 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 10 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 29 ( 29 usr; 15 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 40 ( 13 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_set__subset__Cons_0,axiom,
c_lessequals(c_List_Oset(X,Y),c_List_Oset(c_List_Olist_OCons(Z,X,Y),Y),tc_fun(Y,tc_bool)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_set__subset__Cons_0) ).
cnf(cls_subset__iff_0,axiom,
( hBOOL(c_in(X,Y,Z))
| ~ hBOOL(c_in(X,U,Z))
| ~ c_lessequals(U,Y,tc_fun(Z,tc_bool)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_subset__iff_0) ).
cnf(cls_knows__Notes_0,axiom,
c_Event_Oknows(X,c_List_Olist_OCons(c_Event_Oevent_ONotes(X,Y),Z,tc_Event_Oevent)) = c_Set_Oinsert(Y,c_Event_Oknows(X,Z),tc_Message_Omsg),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_knows__Notes_0) ).
cnf(cls_knows__Says_0,axiom,
c_Event_Oknows(X,c_List_Olist_OCons(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(X,Y,Z),U,tc_Event_Oevent)) = c_Set_Oinsert(Z,c_Event_Oknows(X,U),tc_Message_Omsg),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_knows__Says_0) ).
cnf(283,plain,
c_Event_Oknows(X,c_List_Olist_OCons(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(X,Y,Z),U,tc_Event_Oevent)) = c_Event_Oknows(X,c_List_Olist_OCons(c_Event_Oevent_ONotes(X,Z),U,tc_Event_Oevent)),
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[cls_knows__Says_0,cls_knows__Notes_0,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(cls_Fake__analz__eq_0,axiom,
( c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(c_Set_Oinsert(X,Y,tc_Message_Omsg))) = c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(Y))
| ~ hBOOL(c_in(X,c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(Y)),tc_Message_Omsg)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Fake__analz__eq_0) ).
cnf(cls_event_Osimps_I1_J_0,axiom,
( c_Event_Oevent_OSays(X,Y,Z) != c_Event_Oevent_OSays(U,V,W)
| X = U ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_event_Osimps_I1_J_0) ).
cnf(cls_Key__synth_0,axiom,
( hBOOL(c_in(hAPP(c_Message_Omsg_OKey,X),Y,tc_Message_Omsg))
| ~ hBOOL(c_in(hAPP(c_Message_Omsg_OKey,X),c_Message_Osynth(Y),tc_Message_Omsg)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Key__synth_0) ).
cnf(cls_agent_Osimps_I4_J_0,axiom,
c_Message_Oagent_OServer != c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_agent_Osimps_I4_J_0) ).
cnf(cls_set__ConsD_0,axiom,
( hBOOL(c_in(X,c_List_Oset(Y,Z),Z))
| X = U
| ~ hBOOL(c_in(X,c_List_Oset(c_List_Olist_OCons(U,Y,Z),Z),Z)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_set__ConsD_0) ).
cnf(cls_synth_OInj_0,axiom,
( hBOOL(c_in(X,c_Message_Osynth(Y),tc_Message_Omsg))
| ~ hBOOL(c_in(X,Y,tc_Message_Omsg)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_synth_OInj_0) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_3,negated_conjecture,
hBOOL(c_in(v_X,c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf))),tc_Message_Omsg)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_3) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_4,negated_conjecture,
hBOOL(c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(c_Message_Oagent_OServer,v_A,c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(hAPP(c_Public_OshrK,v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(hAPP(c_Message_Omsg_OKey,v_K),c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(hAPP(c_Public_OshrK,v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(hAPP(c_Message_Omsg_OKey,v_K),c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A)))))))),c_List_Oset(c_List_Olist_OCons(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_Ba,v_X),v_evsf,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_4) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_5,negated_conjecture,
~ hBOOL(c_in(c_Event_Oevent_ONotes(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X,hAPP(c_Message_Omsg_OKey,v_K)))),c_List_Oset(c_List_Olist_OCons(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_Ba,v_X),v_evsf,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_5) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_6,negated_conjecture,
hBOOL(c_in(hAPP(c_Message_Omsg_OKey,v_K),c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,c_List_Olist_OCons(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_Ba,v_X),v_evsf,tc_Event_Oevent))),tc_Message_Omsg)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_6) ).
cnf(456,plain,
hBOOL(c_in(hAPP(c_Message_Omsg_OKey,v_K),c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,c_List_Olist_OCons(c_Event_Oevent_ONotes(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_X),v_evsf,tc_Event_Oevent))),tc_Message_Omsg)),
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_6,283,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_7,negated_conjecture,
( ~ hBOOL(c_in(hAPP(c_Message_Omsg_OKey,v_K),c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf)),tc_Message_Omsg))
| hBOOL(c_in(c_Event_Oevent_ONotes(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_x,hAPP(c_Message_Omsg_OKey,v_K)))),c_List_Oset(v_evsf,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent))
| ~ hBOOL(c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(c_Message_Oagent_OServer,v_A,c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(hAPP(c_Public_OshrK,v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(hAPP(c_Message_Omsg_OKey,v_K),c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(hAPP(c_Public_OshrK,v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(hAPP(c_Message_Omsg_OKey,v_K),c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A)))))))),c_List_Oset(v_evsf,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_7) ).
cnf(995,plain,
c_Event_Oevent_OSays(c_Message_Oagent_OServer,X,Y) != c_Event_Oevent_OSays(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,Z,U),
inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_event_Osimps_I1_J_0,cls_agent_Osimps_I4_J_0]) ).
cnf(1818,plain,
hBOOL(c_in(hAPP(c_Message_Omsg_OKey,v_K),c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,c_List_Olist_OCons(c_Event_Oevent_ONotes(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_X),v_evsf,tc_Event_Oevent)))),tc_Message_Omsg)),
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_synth_OInj_0,456]) ).
cnf(2156,plain,
c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,c_List_Olist_OCons(c_Event_Oevent_ONotes(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_X),v_evsf,tc_Event_Oevent)))) = c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf))),
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_Fake__analz__eq_0,cls_conjecture_3]),cls_knows__Notes_0,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(2157,plain,
hBOOL(c_in(hAPP(c_Message_Omsg_OKey,v_K),c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf))),tc_Message_Omsg)),
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[1818,2156,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(2343,plain,
~ hBOOL(c_in(c_Event_Oevent_ONotes(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X,hAPP(c_Message_Omsg_OKey,v_K)))),c_List_Oset(v_evsf,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent)),
inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_subset__iff_0,cls_conjecture_5,cls_set__subset__Cons_0]) ).
cnf(2344,plain,
( ~ hBOOL(c_in(hAPP(c_Message_Omsg_OKey,v_K),c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf)),tc_Message_Omsg))
| ~ hBOOL(c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(c_Message_Oagent_OServer,v_A,c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(hAPP(c_Public_OshrK,v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(hAPP(c_Message_Omsg_OKey,v_K),c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(hAPP(c_Public_OshrK,v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(hAPP(c_Message_Omsg_OKey,v_K),c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A)))))))),c_List_Oset(v_evsf,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent)) ),
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_7,2343]) ).
cnf(3669,plain,
hBOOL(c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(c_Message_Oagent_OServer,v_A,c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(hAPP(c_Public_OshrK,v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(hAPP(c_Message_Omsg_OKey,v_K),c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(hAPP(c_Public_OshrK,v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(hAPP(c_Message_Omsg_OKey,v_K),c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A)))))))),c_List_Oset(v_evsf,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent)),
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_set__ConsD_0,cls_conjecture_4]),995]) ).
cnf(3670,plain,
~ hBOOL(c_in(hAPP(c_Message_Omsg_OKey,v_K),c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf)),tc_Message_Omsg)),
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[2344,3669]) ).
cnf(3676,plain,
$false,
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_Key__synth_0,3670]),2157]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : SWV746-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.03/0.13 % Command : run-snark %s %d
% 0.13/0.33 % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Wed Jun 15 07:34:10 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.45 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.46 *
% 0.19/0.46 *
% 0.19/0.47 #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.19/0.47 *
% 0.19/0.47 SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.19/0.47 *
% 0.19/0.47 ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.19/0.47 (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.19/0.47 (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.19/0.47 (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.19/0.47 (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.19/0.47 (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.19/0.47 (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.19/0.47 (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.19/0.47 (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.19/0.47 (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.19/0.47 (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.19/0.47 (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.19/0.47 (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.19/0.47 *
% 0.19/0.47 "."
% 0.19/0.47 *
% 0.19/0.47 ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-15T07:34:10
% 0.19/0.47 ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n007.cluster.edu at 2022-06-15T07:34:10
% 0.39/0.61 WARNING:
% 0.39/0.61 |class_OrderedGroup_Ogroup__add| is a 1-ary relation that occurs only negatively; disabling rows that contain it.
% 0.39/0.61 WARNING:
% 0.39/0.61 |class_OrderedGroup_Opordered__ab__group__add| is a 1-ary relation that occurs only negatively; disabling rows that contain it.
% 1.99/2.16
% 1.99/2.16
% 1.99/2.16 #||
% 1.99/2.16 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 1.99/2.16 % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 1.99/2.16 ||#
% 1.99/2.16
% 1.99/2.16 ; Summary of computation:
% 1.99/2.16 ; 8564 formulas have been input or derived (from 401 formulas).
% 1.99/2.16 ; 3676 (43%) were retained. Of these,
% 1.99/2.16 ; 193 ( 5%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 1.99/2.16 ; 3483 (95%) are still being kept.
% 1.99/2.16 ;
% 1.99/2.16 ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 1.99/2.16 ; 0.116 7% Read assertion file (1 call)
% 1.99/2.16 ; 0.010 1% Assert (557 calls)
% 1.99/2.16 ; 0.411 24% Process new row (7,848 calls)
% 1.99/2.16 ; 0.177 10% Resolution (800 calls)
% 1.99/2.16 ; 0.038 2% Paramodulation (400 calls)
% 1.99/2.16 ; 0.001 0% Factoring (5 calls)
% 1.99/2.16 ; 0.014 1% Condensing (1,270 calls)
% 1.99/2.16 ; 0.187 11% Forward subsumption (1,270 calls)
% 1.99/2.16 ; 0.033 2% Backward subsumption (876 calls)
% 1.99/2.16 ; 0.012 1% Clause clause subsumption (1,629 calls)
% 1.99/2.16 ; 0.298 18% Forward simplification (7,671 calls)
% 1.99/2.16 ; 0.062 4% Backward simplification (3,653 calls)
% 1.99/2.16 ; 0.278 16% Ordering (38,817 calls)
% 1.99/2.16 ; 0.001 0% Sortal reasoning (32 calls)
% 1.99/2.16 ; 0.001 0% Purity testing (1 call)
% 1.99/2.16 ; 0.049 3% Other
% 1.99/2.16 ; 1.688 Total
% 1.99/2.16 ; 1.692 Real time
% 1.99/2.16 ;
% 1.99/2.16 ; Term-hash-array has 10,452 terms in all.
% 1.99/2.16 ; Feature-vector-row-index has 841 entries (842 at peak, 876 added, 35 deleted).
% 1.99/2.16 ; Feature-vector-row-index has 13,087 nodes (13,129 at peak, 13,816 added, 729 deleted).
% 1.99/2.16 ; Retrieved 2,180 possibly forward subsuming rows in 1,270 calls.
% 1.99/2.16 ; Retrieved 327 possibly backward subsumed rows in 876 calls.
% 1.99/2.16 ; Path-index has 10,072 entries (10,072 at peak, 10,631 added, 559 deleted).
% 1.99/2.16 ; Path-index has 26,591 nodes (26,591 at peak, 27,378 added, 787 deleted).
% 1.99/2.16 ; Trie-index has 10,072 entries (10,072 at peak, 10,631 added, 559 deleted).
% 1.99/2.16 ; Trie-index has 66,824 nodes (66,824 at peak, 72,016 added, 5,192 deleted).
% 1.99/2.16 ; Retrieved 48,948 generalization terms in 38,040 calls.
% 1.99/2.16 ; Retrieved 6,836 instance terms in 3,196 calls.
% 1.99/2.16 ; Retrieved 142,972 unifiable terms in 5,314 calls.
% 1.99/2.16 ;
% 1.99/2.16 ; The agenda of rows to process has 15 entries:
% 1.99/2.16 ; 1 with value 18 4 with value 21 2 with value 24
% 1.99/2.16 ; 2 with value 19 1 with value 23 1 with value 26
% 1.99/2.16 ; 4 with value 20
% 1.99/2.16 ; The agenda of input rows to give has 33 entries:
% 1.99/2.16 ; 1 with value 48 1 with value 65 1 with value 78
% 1.99/2.16 ; 1 with value 49 1 with value 68 2 with value 84
% 1.99/2.16 ; 3 with value 50 1 with value 69 1 with value 85
% 1.99/2.16 ; 1 with value 54 1 with value 70 1 with value 89
% 1.99/2.16 ; 1 with value 55 1 with value 72 2 with value 91
% 1.99/2.16 ; 1 with value 58 5 with value 75 1 with value 95
% 1.99/2.16 ; 1 with value 60 1 with value 76 1 with value 96
% 1.99/2.16 ; 1 with value 61 1 with value 77 1 with value 98
% 1.99/2.16 ; 1 with value 64
% 1.99/2.16 ; The agenda of rows to give has 3056 entries:
% 1.99/2.16 ; 7 with value (4 6) 57 with value (4 35) 1 with value (4 64)
% 1.99/2.16 ; 21 with value (4 7) 61 with value (4 36) 3 with value (4 65)
% 1.99/2.16 ; 13 with value (4 8) 64 with value (4 37) 11 with value (4 66)
% 1.99/2.16 ; 5 with value (4 9) 34 with value (4 38) 6 with value (4 67)
% 1.99/2.16 ; 50 with value (4 10) 56 with value (4 39) 4 with value (4 68)
% 1.99/2.16 ; 19 with value (4 11) 37 with value (4 40) 4 with value (4 69)
% 1.99/2.16 ; 78 with value (4 12) 39 with value (4 41) 3 with value (4 71)
% 1.99/2.16 ; 58 with value (4 13) 36 with value (4 42) 3 with value (4 72)
% 1.99/2.16 ; 148 with value (4 14) 49 with value (4 43) 2 with value (4 75)
% 1.99/2.16 ; 101 with value (4 15) 35 with value (4 44) 2 with value (4 76)
% 1.99/2.16 ; 131 with value (4 16) 36 with value (4 45) 3 with value (4 77)
% 1.99/2.16 ; 124 with value (4 17) 15 with value (4 46) 4 with value (4 78)
% 1.99/2.16 ; 123 with value (4 18) 25 with value (4 47) 1 with value (4 79)
% 1.99/2.16 ; 95 with value (4 19) 26 with value (4 48) 3 with value (4 80)
% 1.99/2.16 ; 126 with value (4 20) 17 with value (4 49) 1 with value (4 82)
% 1.99/2.16 ; 106 with value (4 21) 22 with value (4 50) 2 with value (4 83)
% 1.99/2.16 ; 93 with value (4 22) 12 with value (4 51) 5 with value (4 85)
% 1.99/2.16 ; 111 with value (4 23) 17 with value (4 52) 2 with value (4 86)
% 1.99/2.16 ; 81 with value (4 24) 19 with value (4 53) 3 with value (4 87)
% 1.99/2.16 ; 96 with value (4 25) 18 with value (4 54) 1 with value (4 88)
% 1.99/2.16 ; 66 with value (4 26) 5 with value (4 55) 2 with value (4 90)
% 1.99/2.16 ; 91 with value (4 27) 14 with value (4 56) 2 with value (4 93)
% 1.99/2.16 ; 75 with value (4 28) 10 with value (4 57) 1 with value (4 96)
% 1.99/2.16 ; 94 with value (4 29) 2 with value (4 58) 1 with value (4 97)
% 1.99/2.16 ; 81 with value (4 30) 10 with value (4 59) 1 with value (4 98)
% 1.99/2.16 ; 58 with value (4 31) 4 with value (4 60) 1 with value (4 99)
% 1.99/2.16 ; 65 with value (4 32) 3 with value (4 61) 1 with value (4 100)
% 1.99/2.16 ; 72 with value (4 33) 4 with value (4 62) 1 with value (4 108)
% 1.99/2.16 ; 65 with value (4 34) 1 with value (4 63) 1 with value (4 131)
% 1.99/2.16 Evaluation took:
% 1.99/2.16 1.693 seconds of real time
% 1.99/2.16 1.564305 seconds of user run time
% 1.99/2.16 0.129031 seconds of system run time
% 1.99/2.16 [Run times include 0.227 seconds GC run time.]
% 1.99/2.16 0 calls to %EVAL
% 1.99/2.16 0 page faults and
% 1.99/2.16 133,471,720 bytes consed.
% 1.99/2.16 :PROOF-FOUND
% 1.99/2.16 ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-15T07:34:12
% 1.99/2.16 :PROOF-FOUND
% 1.99/2.16 *
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------