TSTP Solution File: SWV733-1 by E-SAT---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1.00
% Problem : SWV733-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sat May 4 09:59:19 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 1.50s 0.68s
% Output : CNFRefutation 1.50s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 18 ( 11 unt; 0 nHn; 16 RR)
% Number of literals : 28 ( 2 equ; 13 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 16 ( 16 usr; 8 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 26 ( 3 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_parts__cut_0,axiom,
( c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(c_Lattices_Oupper__semilattice__class_Osup(X2,X3,tc_fun(tc_Message_Omsg,tc_bool))),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(X4,c_Message_Oparts(X3),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(c_Set_Oinsert(X4,X2,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.Ea1tcMEgxb/E---3.1_7990.p',cls_parts__cut_0) ).
cnf(cls_parts_OBody_0,axiom,
( c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(X3,X1),c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.Ea1tcMEgxb/E---3.1_7990.p',cls_parts_OBody_0) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_4,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(hAPP(c_Message_Omsg_OKey,v_K),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs)),tc_Message_Omsg),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.Ea1tcMEgxb/E---3.1_7990.p',cls_conjecture_4) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_3,negated_conjecture,
c_in(hAPP(c_Message_Omsg_OKey,v_K),c_Message_Oparts(c_Set_Oinsert(v_X,c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Message_Omsg,tc_bool)),tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.Ea1tcMEgxb/E---3.1_7990.p',cls_conjecture_3) ).
cnf(cls_Un__empty__left_0,axiom,
c_Lattices_Oupper__semilattice__class_Osup(c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(X1,tc_bool)),X2,tc_fun(X1,tc_bool)) = X2,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.Ea1tcMEgxb/E---3.1_7990.p',cls_Un__empty__left_0) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_2,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(v_KAB,v_X),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs)),tc_Message_Omsg),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.Ea1tcMEgxb/E---3.1_7990.p',cls_conjecture_2) ).
cnf(c_0_6,plain,
( c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(c_Lattices_Oupper__semilattice__class_Osup(X2,X3,tc_fun(tc_Message_Omsg,tc_bool))),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(X4,c_Message_Oparts(X3),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(c_Set_Oinsert(X4,X2,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_parts__cut_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
( c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(X3,X1),c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_parts_OBody_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(hAPP(c_Message_Omsg_OKey,v_K),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs)),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(c_Lattices_Oupper__semilattice__class_Osup(X2,X3,tc_fun(tc_Message_Omsg,tc_bool))),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(X4,c_Message_Oparts(X3),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(c_Set_Oinsert(X4,X2,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
c_0_6 ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
c_in(hAPP(c_Message_Omsg_OKey,v_K),c_Message_Oparts(c_Set_Oinsert(v_X,c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Message_Omsg,tc_bool)),tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg),
cls_conjecture_3 ).
cnf(c_0_11,axiom,
c_Lattices_Oupper__semilattice__class_Osup(c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(X1,tc_bool)),X2,tc_fun(X1,tc_bool)) = X2,
cls_Un__empty__left_0 ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
( c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(X3,X1),c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
c_0_7 ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(v_KAB,v_X),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs)),tc_Message_Omsg),
cls_conjecture_2 ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(hAPP(c_Message_Omsg_OKey,v_K),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs)),tc_Message_Omsg),
c_0_8 ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
( c_in(hAPP(c_Message_Omsg_OKey,v_K),c_Message_Oparts(X1),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(v_X,c_Message_Oparts(X1),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]),c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
c_in(v_X,c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs)),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]),c_0_16])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.02/0.09 % Problem : SWV733-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.02/0.10 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.10/0.30 % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.30 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.30 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.30 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.30 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.30 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.30 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.30 % DateTime : Fri May 3 16:52:53 EDT 2024
% 0.10/0.30 % CPUTime :
% 0.15/0.46 Running first-order model finding
% 0.15/0.46 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.Ea1tcMEgxb/E---3.1_7990.p
% 1.50/0.68 # Version: 3.1.0
% 1.50/0.68 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 1.50/0.68 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.50/0.68 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 1.50/0.68 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.50/0.68 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.50/0.68 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 1.50/0.68 # new_bool_3 with pid 8068 completed with status 0
% 1.50/0.68 # Result found by new_bool_3
% 1.50/0.68 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 1.50/0.68 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.50/0.68 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 1.50/0.68 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.50/0.68 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 1.50/0.68 # Search class: FGHSM-FSLM31-DFFFFFNN
% 1.50/0.68 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 1.50/0.68 # Starting G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 1.50/0.68 # G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 8071 completed with status 0
% 1.50/0.68 # Result found by G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 1.50/0.68 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 1.50/0.68 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.50/0.68 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 1.50/0.68 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.50/0.68 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 1.50/0.68 # Search class: FGHSM-FSLM31-DFFFFFNN
% 1.50/0.68 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 1.50/0.68 # Starting G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 1.50/0.68 # Preprocessing time : 0.006 s
% 1.50/0.68 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 1.50/0.68
% 1.50/0.68 # Proof found!
% 1.50/0.68 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 1.50/0.68 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.50/0.68 # Parsed axioms : 748
% 1.50/0.68 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 251
% 1.50/0.68 # Initial clauses : 497
% 1.50/0.68 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 1.50/0.68 # Initial clauses in saturation : 497
% 1.50/0.68 # Processed clauses : 2702
% 1.50/0.68 # ...of these trivial : 45
% 1.50/0.68 # ...subsumed : 1588
% 1.50/0.68 # ...remaining for further processing : 1069
% 1.50/0.68 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 37
% 1.50/0.68 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 1.50/0.68 # Backward-subsumed : 132
% 1.50/0.68 # Backward-rewritten : 36
% 1.50/0.68 # Generated clauses : 9418
% 1.50/0.68 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 7759
% 1.50/0.68 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 1.50/0.68 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 1.50/0.68 # Paramodulations : 9359
% 1.50/0.68 # Factorizations : 0
% 1.50/0.68 # NegExts : 0
% 1.50/0.68 # Equation resolutions : 59
% 1.50/0.68 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 1.50/0.68 # Total rewrite steps : 6200
% 1.50/0.68 # ...of those cached : 4880
% 1.50/0.68 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 1.50/0.68 # Propositional check models : 0
% 1.50/0.68 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 1.50/0.68 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 1.50/0.68 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 1.50/0.68 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 1.50/0.68 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 1.50/0.68 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 1.50/0.68 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 1.50/0.68 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 1.50/0.68 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 1.50/0.68 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 1.50/0.68 # Current number of processed clauses : 518
% 1.50/0.68 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 182
% 1.50/0.68 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 7
% 1.50/0.68 # Negative unit clauses : 111
% 1.50/0.68 # Non-unit-clauses : 218
% 1.50/0.68 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 5742
% 1.50/0.68 # ...number of literals in the above : 9750
% 1.50/0.68 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 1.50/0.68 # Current number of archived clauses : 551
% 1.50/0.68 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 30508
% 1.50/0.68 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 16829
% 1.50/0.68 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 384
% 1.50/0.68 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 3177
% 1.50/0.68 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 1.50/0.68 # BW rewrite match attempts : 309
% 1.50/0.68 # BW rewrite match successes : 208
% 1.50/0.68 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 1.50/0.68 # Condensation successes : 0
% 1.50/0.68 # Termbank termtop insertions : 173792
% 1.50/0.68 # Search garbage collected termcells : 1746
% 1.50/0.68
% 1.50/0.68 # -------------------------------------------------
% 1.50/0.68 # User time : 0.183 s
% 1.50/0.68 # System time : 0.010 s
% 1.50/0.68 # Total time : 0.193 s
% 1.50/0.68 # Maximum resident set size: 2904 pages
% 1.50/0.68
% 1.50/0.68 # -------------------------------------------------
% 1.50/0.68 # User time : 0.200 s
% 1.50/0.68 # System time : 0.011 s
% 1.50/0.68 # Total time : 0.211 s
% 1.50/0.68 # Maximum resident set size: 2280 pages
% 1.50/0.68 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------