TSTP Solution File: SWV721-1 by E---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1.00
% Problem : SWV721-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 05:31:38 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.13s 0.40s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.13s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 9
% Number of leaves : 9
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 34 ( 14 unt; 0 nHn; 28 RR)
% Number of literals : 54 ( 2 equ; 23 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 7 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 18 ( 18 usr; 11 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 63 ( 21 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_mem__def_0,axiom,
( hBOOL(hAPP(X1,X2))
| ~ c_in(X2,X1,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_mem__def_0) ).
cnf(cls_mem__def_1,axiom,
( c_in(X1,X2,X3)
| ~ hBOOL(hAPP(X2,X1)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_mem__def_1) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(v_S,v_A,c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(v_KA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_N,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_B,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_K,v_X))))),c_List_Oset(v_evs,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
cnf(cls_parts_OBody_0,axiom,
( c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(X3,X1),c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_parts_OBody_0) ).
cnf(cls_parts_OInj_0,axiom,
( c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(X1,X2,tc_Message_Omsg) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_parts_OInj_0) ).
cnf(cls_Says__imp__spies_0,axiom,
( c_in(X1,c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,X2),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(X3,X4,X1),c_List_Oset(X2,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Says__imp__spies_0) ).
cnf(cls_parts_OSnd_0,axiom,
( c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X3,X1),c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_parts_OSnd_0) ).
cnf(cls_parts__idem_0,axiom,
c_Message_Oparts(c_Message_Oparts(X1)) = c_Message_Oparts(X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_parts__idem_0) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_1,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(v_X,c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs)),tc_Message_Omsg),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( hBOOL(hAPP(X1,X2))
| ~ c_in(X2,X1,X3) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_mem__def_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( c_in(X1,X2,X3)
| ~ hBOOL(hAPP(X2,X1)) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_mem__def_1]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( hBOOL(hAPP(X1,X2))
| ~ c_in(X2,X1,X3) ),
c_0_9 ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(v_S,v_A,c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(v_KA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_N,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_B,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_K,v_X))))),c_List_Oset(v_evs,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent),
cls_conjecture_0 ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(X3,X1),c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_parts_OBody_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
( c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(X1,X2,tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_parts_OInj_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( c_in(X1,c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,X2),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(X3,X4,X1),c_List_Oset(X2,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_Says__imp__spies_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
( c_in(X1,X2,X3)
| ~ hBOOL(hAPP(X2,X1)) ),
c_0_10 ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
hBOOL(hAPP(c_List_Oset(v_evs,tc_Event_Oevent),c_Event_Oevent_OSays(v_S,v_A,c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(v_KA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_N,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_B,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_K,v_X))))))),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
( c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X3,X1),c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_parts_OSnd_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
( c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(X3,X1),c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
c_0_13 ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
( c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(X1,X2,tc_Message_Omsg) ),
c_0_14 ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
( c_in(X1,c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,X2),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(X3,X4,X1),c_List_Oset(X2,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent) ),
c_0_15 ).
cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(v_S,v_A,c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(v_KA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_N,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_B,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_K,v_X))))),c_List_Oset(v_evs,tc_Event_Oevent),X1),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
( c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X3,X1),c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
c_0_18 ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
( c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(X3,X1),X2,tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(v_KA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_N,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_B,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_K,v_X)))),c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
( c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X3,X1),X2,tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_20]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_N,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_B,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_K,v_X))),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs)),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,axiom,
c_Message_Oparts(c_Message_Oparts(X1)) = c_Message_Oparts(X1),
cls_parts__idem_0 ).
cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_B,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_K,v_X)),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs)),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]),c_0_28]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(v_X,c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs)),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_1]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_K,v_X),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs)),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_29]),c_0_28]) ).
cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(v_X,c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs)),tc_Message_Omsg),
c_0_30 ).
cnf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_31]),c_0_28]),c_0_32]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.08 % Problem : SWV721-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.00/0.09 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.09/0.28 % Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.28 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.28 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.28 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.09/0.28 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.09/0.28 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.28 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.09/0.28 % DateTime : Sun May 19 07:06:37 EDT 2024
% 0.09/0.28 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.36 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.13/0.36 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.40 # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.13/0.40 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.13/0.40 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.13/0.40 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.13/0.40 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.40 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.40 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.40 # new_bool_3 with pid 6069 completed with status 0
% 0.13/0.40 # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.13/0.40 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.13/0.40 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.13/0.40 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.13/0.40 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.40 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.13/0.40 # Search class: FGHSM-FSLS31-DFFFFFNN
% 0.13/0.40 # partial match(1): FGHSM-FSLM31-DFFFFFNN
% 0.13/0.40 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.13/0.40 # Starting G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.40 # G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 6072 completed with status 0
% 0.13/0.40 # Result found by G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.13/0.40 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.13/0.40 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.13/0.40 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.13/0.40 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.40 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.13/0.40 # Search class: FGHSM-FSLS31-DFFFFFNN
% 0.13/0.40 # partial match(1): FGHSM-FSLM31-DFFFFFNN
% 0.13/0.40 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.13/0.40 # Starting G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.40 # Preprocessing time : 0.003 s
% 0.13/0.40 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.13/0.40
% 0.13/0.40 # Proof found!
% 0.13/0.40 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.13/0.40 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.13/0.40 # Parsed axioms : 442
% 0.13/0.40 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 189
% 0.13/0.40 # Initial clauses : 253
% 0.13/0.40 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.13/0.40 # Initial clauses in saturation : 253
% 0.13/0.40 # Processed clauses : 456
% 0.13/0.40 # ...of these trivial : 40
% 0.13/0.40 # ...subsumed : 71
% 0.13/0.40 # ...remaining for further processing : 345
% 0.13/0.40 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 5
% 0.13/0.40 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.13/0.40 # Backward-subsumed : 1
% 0.13/0.40 # Backward-rewritten : 7
% 0.13/0.40 # Generated clauses : 583
% 0.13/0.40 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 426
% 0.13/0.40 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.13/0.40 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.13/0.40 # Paramodulations : 563
% 0.13/0.40 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.13/0.40 # NegExts : 0
% 0.13/0.40 # Equation resolutions : 20
% 0.13/0.40 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.13/0.40 # Total rewrite steps : 216
% 0.13/0.40 # ...of those cached : 96
% 0.13/0.40 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.13/0.40 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.13/0.40 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.13/0.40 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.13/0.40 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.13/0.40 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.13/0.40 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.13/0.40 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.13/0.40 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.13/0.40 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.13/0.40 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.13/0.40 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.13/0.40 # Current number of processed clauses : 149
% 0.13/0.40 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 58
% 0.13/0.40 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.13/0.40 # Negative unit clauses : 13
% 0.13/0.40 # Non-unit-clauses : 78
% 0.13/0.40 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 409
% 0.13/0.40 # ...number of literals in the above : 745
% 0.13/0.40 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.13/0.40 # Current number of archived clauses : 196
% 0.13/0.40 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 5056
% 0.13/0.40 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 4867
% 0.13/0.40 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 43
% 0.13/0.40 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 83
% 0.13/0.40 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.13/0.40 # BW rewrite match attempts : 40
% 0.13/0.40 # BW rewrite match successes : 29
% 0.13/0.40 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.13/0.40 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.13/0.40 # Termbank termtop insertions : 17962
% 0.13/0.40 # Search garbage collected termcells : 1199
% 0.13/0.40
% 0.13/0.40 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.13/0.40 # User time : 0.023 s
% 0.13/0.40 # System time : 0.003 s
% 0.13/0.40 # Total time : 0.026 s
% 0.13/0.40 # Maximum resident set size: 2448 pages
% 0.13/0.40
% 0.13/0.40 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.13/0.40 # User time : 0.030 s
% 0.13/0.40 # System time : 0.003 s
% 0.13/0.40 # Total time : 0.034 s
% 0.13/0.40 # Maximum resident set size: 2032 pages
% 0.13/0.40 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.13/0.40 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------