TSTP Solution File: SWV712-1 by SNARK---20120808r022

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem  : SWV712-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run-snark %s %d

% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 21:35:46 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 1.36s 1.56s
% Output   : Refutation 1.36s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :    9 (   7 unt;   0 nHn;   5 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   11 (   6 equ;   4 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :   14 (   3 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   20 (  20 usr;   7 con; 0-5 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    8 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_Suc_Ohyps_0,axiom,
    ( c_FFT__Mirabelle_OIDFT(hAPP(hAPP(c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(tc_nat),c_Int_Onumber__class_Onumber__of(c_Int_OBit0(c_Int_OBit1(c_Int_OPls)),tc_nat)),v_ka____),X,Y) = hAPP(c_FFT__Mirabelle_OIFFT(v_ka____,X),Y)
    | ~ c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(Y,hAPP(hAPP(c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(tc_nat),c_Int_Onumber__class_Onumber__of(c_Int_OBit0(c_Int_OBit1(c_Int_OPls)),tc_nat)),v_ka____),tc_nat) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Suc_Ohyps_0) ).

cnf(cls_class__semiring_Osemiring__rules_I27_J_0,axiom,
    ( ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1(X)
    | hAPP(hAPP(c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(X),Y),hAPP(hAPP(c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(X),Y),Z)) = hAPP(hAPP(c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(X),Y),hAPP(c_Suc,Z)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_class__semiring_Osemiring__rules_I27_J_0) ).

cnf(cls_True_0,axiom,
    c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(v_i____,hAPP(hAPP(c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(tc_nat),c_Int_Onumber__class_Onumber__of(c_Int_OBit0(c_Int_OBit1(c_Int_OPls)),tc_nat)),v_ka____),tc_nat),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_True_0) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
    hAPP(hAPP(c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_FFT__Mirabelle_OIDFT(hAPP(hAPP(c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(tc_nat),c_Int_Onumber__class_Onumber__of(c_Int_OBit0(c_Int_OBit1(c_Int_OPls)),tc_nat)),v_ka____),c_COMBB(v_a____,hAPP(c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(tc_nat),c_Int_Onumber__class_Onumber__of(c_Int_OBit0(c_Int_OBit1(c_Int_OPls)),tc_nat)),tc_nat,tc_Complex_Ocomplex,tc_nat),v_i____)),hAPP(hAPP(c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),hAPP(hAPP(c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_HOL_Oinverse__class_Odivide(c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_FFT__Mirabelle_Oroot(hAPP(hAPP(c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(tc_nat),c_Int_Onumber__class_Onumber__of(c_Int_OBit0(c_Int_OBit1(c_Int_OPls)),tc_nat)),hAPP(hAPP(c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(tc_nat),c_Int_Onumber__class_Onumber__of(c_Int_OBit0(c_Int_OBit1(c_Int_OPls)),tc_nat)),v_ka____))),tc_Complex_Ocomplex)),v_i____)),c_FFT__Mirabelle_OIDFT(hAPP(hAPP(c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(tc_nat),c_Int_Onumber__class_Onumber__of(c_Int_OBit0(c_Int_OBit1(c_Int_OPls)),tc_nat)),v_ka____),c_COMBB(v_a____,c_COMBB(c_Suc,hAPP(c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(tc_nat),c_Int_Onumber__class_Onumber__of(c_Int_OBit0(c_Int_OBit1(c_Int_OPls)),tc_nat)),tc_nat,tc_nat,tc_nat),tc_nat,tc_Complex_Ocomplex,tc_nat),v_i____))) != hAPP(hAPP(c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),hAPP(c_FFT__Mirabelle_OIFFT(v_ka____,c_COMBB(v_a____,hAPP(c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(tc_nat),c_Int_Onumber__class_Onumber__of(c_Int_OBit0(c_Int_OBit1(c_Int_OPls)),tc_nat)),tc_nat,tc_Complex_Ocomplex,tc_nat)),v_i____)),hAPP(hAPP(c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),hAPP(hAPP(c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_HOL_Oinverse__class_Odivide(c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_FFT__Mirabelle_Oroot(hAPP(hAPP(c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(tc_nat),c_Int_Onumber__class_Onumber__of(c_Int_OBit0(c_Int_OBit1(c_Int_OPls)),tc_nat)),hAPP(hAPP(c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(tc_nat),c_Int_Onumber__class_Onumber__of(c_Int_OBit0(c_Int_OBit1(c_Int_OPls)),tc_nat)),v_ka____))),tc_Complex_Ocomplex)),v_i____)),hAPP(c_FFT__Mirabelle_OIFFT(v_ka____,c_COMBB(v_a____,c_COMBB(c_Suc,hAPP(c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(tc_nat),c_Int_Onumber__class_Onumber__of(c_Int_OBit0(c_Int_OBit1(c_Int_OPls)),tc_nat)),tc_nat,tc_nat,tc_nat),tc_nat,tc_Complex_Ocomplex,tc_nat)),v_i____))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).

cnf(clsarity_nat__Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1,axiom,
    class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1(tc_nat),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clsarity_nat__Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1) ).

cnf(1331,plain,
    hAPP(hAPP(c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(tc_nat),X),hAPP(hAPP(c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(tc_nat),X),Y)) = hAPP(hAPP(c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(tc_nat),X),hAPP(c_Suc,Y)),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_class__semiring_Osemiring__rules_I27_J_0,clsarity_nat__Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1]) ).

cnf(1332,plain,
    hAPP(hAPP(c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_FFT__Mirabelle_OIDFT(hAPP(hAPP(c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(tc_nat),c_Int_Onumber__class_Onumber__of(c_Int_OBit0(c_Int_OBit1(c_Int_OPls)),tc_nat)),v_ka____),c_COMBB(v_a____,hAPP(c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(tc_nat),c_Int_Onumber__class_Onumber__of(c_Int_OBit0(c_Int_OBit1(c_Int_OPls)),tc_nat)),tc_nat,tc_Complex_Ocomplex,tc_nat),v_i____)),hAPP(hAPP(c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),hAPP(hAPP(c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_HOL_Oinverse__class_Odivide(c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_FFT__Mirabelle_Oroot(hAPP(hAPP(c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(tc_nat),c_Int_Onumber__class_Onumber__of(c_Int_OBit0(c_Int_OBit1(c_Int_OPls)),tc_nat)),hAPP(c_Suc,v_ka____))),tc_Complex_Ocomplex)),v_i____)),c_FFT__Mirabelle_OIDFT(hAPP(hAPP(c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(tc_nat),c_Int_Onumber__class_Onumber__of(c_Int_OBit0(c_Int_OBit1(c_Int_OPls)),tc_nat)),v_ka____),c_COMBB(v_a____,c_COMBB(c_Suc,hAPP(c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(tc_nat),c_Int_Onumber__class_Onumber__of(c_Int_OBit0(c_Int_OBit1(c_Int_OPls)),tc_nat)),tc_nat,tc_nat,tc_nat),tc_nat,tc_Complex_Ocomplex,tc_nat),v_i____))) != hAPP(hAPP(c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),hAPP(c_FFT__Mirabelle_OIFFT(v_ka____,c_COMBB(v_a____,hAPP(c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(tc_nat),c_Int_Onumber__class_Onumber__of(c_Int_OBit0(c_Int_OBit1(c_Int_OPls)),tc_nat)),tc_nat,tc_Complex_Ocomplex,tc_nat)),v_i____)),hAPP(hAPP(c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),hAPP(hAPP(c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_HOL_Oinverse__class_Odivide(c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_FFT__Mirabelle_Oroot(hAPP(hAPP(c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(tc_nat),c_Int_Onumber__class_Onumber__of(c_Int_OBit0(c_Int_OBit1(c_Int_OPls)),tc_nat)),hAPP(c_Suc,v_ka____))),tc_Complex_Ocomplex)),v_i____)),hAPP(c_FFT__Mirabelle_OIFFT(v_ka____,c_COMBB(v_a____,c_COMBB(c_Suc,hAPP(c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(tc_nat),c_Int_Onumber__class_Onumber__of(c_Int_OBit0(c_Int_OBit1(c_Int_OPls)),tc_nat)),tc_nat,tc_nat,tc_nat),tc_nat,tc_Complex_Ocomplex,tc_nat)),v_i____))),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_0,1331,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(1721,plain,
    c_FFT__Mirabelle_OIDFT(hAPP(hAPP(c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(tc_nat),c_Int_Onumber__class_Onumber__of(c_Int_OBit0(c_Int_OBit1(c_Int_OPls)),tc_nat)),v_ka____),X,v_i____) = hAPP(c_FFT__Mirabelle_OIFFT(v_ka____,X),v_i____),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_Suc_Ohyps_0,cls_True_0]) ).

cnf(1722,plain,
    $false,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[1332,1721,theory(equality)]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.13  % Problem  : SWV712-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.08/0.14  % Command  : run-snark %s %d
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.14/0.36  % DateTime : Thu Jun 16 00:19:09 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.21/0.48  /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.21/0.49  * 
% 0.21/0.49  * 
% 0.21/0.50  #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.21/0.50  * 
% 0.21/0.50  SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.21/0.50  * 
% 0.21/0.50  ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.21/0.50   (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.21/0.50   (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.21/0.50   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.21/0.50   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.21/0.50   (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.21/0.50   (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.21/0.50   (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.21/0.50   (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.21/0.50   (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.21/0.50   (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.21/0.50   (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.21/0.50   (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.21/0.50  * 
% 0.21/0.50  "."
% 0.21/0.50  * 
% 0.21/0.50  ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-16T00:19:09
% 0.21/0.50  ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n012.cluster.edu at 2022-06-16T00:19:09
% 0.46/0.70  WARNING:
% 0.46/0.70     |class_OrderedGroup_Oab__semigroup__idem__mult| is a 1-ary relation that occurs only negatively; disabling rows that contain it.
% 0.46/0.70  WARNING:
% 0.46/0.70     |class_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__field| is a 1-ary relation that occurs only negatively; disabling rows that contain it.
% 0.46/0.70  WARNING:
% 0.46/0.70     |c_Fun_Oinj__on| is a 4-ary relation that occurs only positively; disabling rows that contain it.
% 0.46/0.70  WARNING:
% 0.46/0.70     |hBOOL| is a 1-ary relation that occurs only positively; disabling rows that contain it.
% 1.36/1.56  
% 1.36/1.56  
% 1.36/1.56  #||
% 1.36/1.56  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 1.36/1.56  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 1.36/1.56  ||#
% 1.36/1.56  
% 1.36/1.56  ; Summary of computation:
% 1.36/1.56  ;      5691 formulas have been input or derived (from 540 formulas).
% 1.36/1.56  ;      1722 (30%) were retained.  Of these,
% 1.36/1.56  ;          147 ( 9%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 1.36/1.56  ;         1575 (91%) are still being kept.
% 1.36/1.56  ; 
% 1.36/1.56  ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 1.36/1.56  ;     0.172  16%   Read assertion file          (1 call)
% 1.36/1.56  ;     0.015   1%   Assert                       (804 calls)
% 1.36/1.56  ;     0.156  15%   Process new row              (4,880 calls)
% 1.36/1.56  ;     0.139  13%   Resolution                   (1,078 calls)
% 1.36/1.56  ;     0.028   3%   Paramodulation               (539 calls)
% 1.36/1.56  ;     0.000   0%   Factoring                    (5 calls)
% 1.36/1.56  ;     0.032   3%   Condensing                   (2,305 calls)
% 1.36/1.56  ;     0.171  16%   Forward subsumption          (2,305 calls)
% 1.36/1.56  ;     0.039   4%   Backward subsumption         (994 calls)
% 1.36/1.56  ;     0.039   4%   Clause clause subsumption    (4,278 calls)
% 1.36/1.56  ;     0.157  15%   Forward simplification       (4,783 calls)
% 1.36/1.56  ;     0.020   2%   Backward simplification      (1,719 calls)
% 1.36/1.56  ;     0.046   4%   Ordering                     (12,164 calls)
% 1.36/1.56  ;     0.001   0%   Sortal reasoning             (32 calls)
% 1.36/1.56  ;     0.002   0%   Purity testing               (1 call)
% 1.36/1.56  ;     0.044   4%   Other
% 1.36/1.56  ;     1.061        Total
% 1.36/1.56  ;     1.064        Real time
% 1.36/1.56  ; 
% 1.36/1.56  ; Term-hash-array has 3,630 terms in all.
% 1.36/1.56  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 943 entries (943 at peak, 994 added, 51 deleted).
% 1.36/1.56  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 7,714 nodes (7,714 at peak, 8,295 added, 581 deleted).
% 1.36/1.56  ;  Retrieved 9,937 possibly forward subsuming rows in 2,305 calls.
% 1.36/1.56  ;  Retrieved 591 possibly backward subsumed rows in 994 calls.
% 1.36/1.56  ; Path-index has 3,387 entries (3,408 at peak, 3,689 added, 302 deleted).
% 1.36/1.56  ; Path-index has 4,684 nodes (4,923 at peak, 5,314 added, 630 deleted).
% 1.36/1.56  ; Trie-index has 3,387 entries (3,408 at peak, 3,689 added, 302 deleted).
% 1.36/1.56  ; Trie-index has 14,804 nodes (15,403 at peak, 17,263 added, 2,459 deleted).
% 1.36/1.56  ; Retrieved 13,665 generalization terms in 29,960 calls.
% 1.36/1.56  ; Retrieved 1,638 instance terms in 869 calls.
% 1.36/1.56  ; Retrieved 184,004 unifiable terms in 5,241 calls.
% 1.36/1.56  ; 
% 1.36/1.56  ; The agenda of rows to process has 4 entries:
% 1.36/1.56  ;     1 with value 47              1 with value 48               2 with value 64
% 1.36/1.56  ; The agenda of input rows to give has 22 entries:
% 1.36/1.56  ;     1 with value 45              1 with value 53               1 with value 60
% 1.36/1.56  ;     3 with value 46              2 with value 54               1 with value 64
% 1.36/1.56  ;     2 with value 49              1 with value 55               1 with value 67
% 1.36/1.56  ;     2 with value 50              4 with value 56               1 with value 71
% 1.36/1.56  ;     1 with value 52              1 with value 59
% 1.36/1.56  ; The agenda of rows to give has 1017 entries:
% 1.36/1.56  ;     1 with value (4 4)          21 with value (4 24)          24 with value (4 43)
% 1.36/1.56  ;     3 with value (4 6)          46 with value (4 25)          16 with value (4 44)
% 1.36/1.56  ;     7 with value (4 7)          28 with value (4 26)          11 with value (4 45)
% 1.36/1.56  ;     7 with value (4 8)          32 with value (4 27)           9 with value (4 46)
% 1.36/1.56  ;    12 with value (4 9)          29 with value (4 28)          11 with value (4 47)
% 1.36/1.56  ;    10 with value (4 10)         25 with value (4 29)           5 with value (4 48)
% 1.36/1.56  ;    16 with value (4 11)         46 with value (4 30)           5 with value (4 49)
% 1.36/1.56  ;    17 with value (4 12)         17 with value (4 31)           3 with value (4 50)
% 1.36/1.56  ;    15 with value (4 13)         37 with value (4 32)           3 with value (4 51)
% 1.36/1.56  ;    26 with value (4 14)         35 with value (4 33)           2 with value (4 53)
% 1.36/1.56  ;    22 with value (4 15)         20 with value (4 34)           3 with value (4 54)
% 1.36/1.56  ;    19 with value (4 16)         31 with value (4 35)           2 with value (4 55)
% 1.36/1.56  ;    17 with value (4 17)         30 with value (4 36)           2 with value (4 58)
% 1.36/1.56  ;    35 with value (4 18)         28 with value (4 37)           1 with value (4 59)
% 1.36/1.56  ;    30 with value (4 19)         26 with value (4 38)           2 with value (4 60)
% 1.36/1.56  ;    37 with value (4 20)         20 with value (4 39)           1 with value (4 61)
% 1.36/1.56  ;    43 with value (4 21)         24 with value (4 40)           1 with value (4 64)
% 1.36/1.56  ;    23 with value (4 22)         19 with value (4 41)           1 with value (4 66)
% 1.36/1.56  ;    46 with value (4 23)         15 with value (4 42)
% 1.36/1.56  Evaluation took:
% 1.36/1.56    1.065 seconds of real time
% 1.36/1.56    0.975051 seconds of user run time
% 1.36/1.56    0.090066 seconds of system run time
% 1.36/1.56    [Run times include 0.078 seconds GC run time.]
% 1.36/1.56    0 calls to %EVAL
% 1.36/1.56    0 page faults and
% 1.36/1.56    84,238,992 bytes consed.
% 1.36/1.56  :PROOF-FOUND
% 1.36/1.56  ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-16T00:19:10
% 1.36/1.56  :PROOF-FOUND
% 1.36/1.56  * 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------