TSTP Solution File: SWV675-1 by E---3.1.00

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.1.00
% Problem  : SWV675-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sat May  4 09:50:51 EDT 2024

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.63s 0.87s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.63s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :    8 (   5 unt;   0 nHn;   6 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   11 (   0 equ;   6 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   2 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    8 (   2 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_not__less__eq__eq_1,axiom,
    ( ~ c_lessequals(X1,X2,tc_nat)
    | ~ c_lessequals(c_Suc(X2),X1,tc_nat) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.xz7VrprH3B/E---3.1_15280.p',cls_not__less__eq__eq_1) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
    c_lessequals(c_Suc(v_y),c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat),tc_nat),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.xz7VrprH3B/E---3.1_15280.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).

cnf(cls_le0_0,axiom,
    c_lessequals(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat),X1,tc_nat),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.xz7VrprH3B/E---3.1_15280.p',cls_le0_0) ).

cnf(c_0_3,plain,
    ( ~ c_lessequals(X1,X2,tc_nat)
    | ~ c_lessequals(c_Suc(X2),X1,tc_nat) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_not__less__eq__eq_1]) ).

cnf(c_0_4,plain,
    ( ~ c_lessequals(X1,X2,tc_nat)
    | ~ c_lessequals(c_Suc(X2),X1,tc_nat) ),
    c_0_3 ).

cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    c_lessequals(c_Suc(v_y),c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat),tc_nat),
    cls_conjecture_0 ).

cnf(c_0_6,axiom,
    c_lessequals(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat),X1,tc_nat),
    cls_le0_0 ).

cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_5]),c_0_6])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.13/0.26  % Problem    : SWV675-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.27/0.27  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.27/0.47  % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.27/0.47  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.27/0.47  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.27/0.47  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.27/0.47  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.27/0.47  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.27/0.47  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.27/0.47  % DateTime   : Fri May  3 16:52:53 EDT 2024
% 0.27/0.47  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.45/0.78  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.45/0.78  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.xz7VrprH3B/E---3.1_15280.p
% 0.63/0.87  # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.63/0.87  # Preprocessing class: FMLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.63/0.87  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.63/0.87  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S4d with 900s (3) cores
% 0.63/0.87  # Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.63/0.87  # Starting new_bool_1 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.63/0.87  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.63/0.87  # new_bool_3 with pid 15408 completed with status 0
% 0.63/0.87  # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.63/0.87  # Preprocessing class: FMLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.63/0.87  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.63/0.87  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S4d with 900s (3) cores
% 0.63/0.87  # Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.63/0.87  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.63/0.87  # Search class: FGHSM-FSLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.63/0.87  # Scheduled 12 strats onto 2 cores with 600 seconds (600 total)
% 0.63/0.87  # Starting G-E--_303_C18_F1_URBAN_S0Y with 50s (1) cores
% 0.63/0.87  # Starting new_bool_3 with 61s (1) cores
% 0.63/0.87  # G-E--_303_C18_F1_URBAN_S0Y with pid 15420 completed with status 0
% 0.63/0.87  # Result found by G-E--_303_C18_F1_URBAN_S0Y
% 0.63/0.87  # Preprocessing class: FMLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.63/0.87  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.63/0.87  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S4d with 900s (3) cores
% 0.63/0.87  # Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.63/0.87  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.63/0.87  # Search class: FGHSM-FSLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.63/0.87  # Scheduled 12 strats onto 2 cores with 600 seconds (600 total)
% 0.63/0.87  # Starting G-E--_303_C18_F1_URBAN_S0Y with 50s (1) cores
% 0.63/0.87  # Preprocessing time       : 0.027 s
% 0.63/0.87  
% 0.63/0.87  # Proof found!
% 0.63/0.87  # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.63/0.87  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.63/0.87  # Parsed axioms                        : 1389
% 0.63/0.87  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 634
% 0.63/0.87  # Initial clauses                      : 755
% 0.63/0.87  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.63/0.87  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 755
% 0.63/0.87  # Processed clauses                    : 49
% 0.63/0.87  # ...of these trivial                  : 3
% 0.63/0.87  # ...subsumed                          : 7
% 0.63/0.87  # ...remaining for further processing  : 39
% 0.63/0.87  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.63/0.87  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.63/0.87  # Backward-subsumed                    : 1
% 0.63/0.87  # Backward-rewritten                   : 1
% 0.63/0.87  # Generated clauses                    : 7
% 0.63/0.87  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 2
% 0.63/0.87  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.63/0.87  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.63/0.87  # Paramodulations                      : 6
% 0.63/0.87  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.63/0.87  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.63/0.87  # Equation resolutions                 : 1
% 0.63/0.87  # Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.63/0.87  # Total rewrite steps                  : 6
% 0.63/0.87  # ...of those cached                   : 0
% 0.63/0.87  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.63/0.87  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.63/0.87  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.63/0.87  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.63/0.87  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.63/0.87  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.63/0.87  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.63/0.87  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.63/0.87  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.63/0.87  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.63/0.87  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.63/0.87  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.63/0.87  # Current number of processed clauses  : 37
% 0.63/0.87  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 18
% 0.63/0.87  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.63/0.87  #    Negative unit clauses             : 7
% 0.63/0.87  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 12
% 0.63/0.87  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 707
% 0.63/0.87  # ...number of literals in the above   : 2474
% 0.63/0.87  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.63/0.87  # Current number of archived clauses   : 2
% 0.63/0.87  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 25
% 0.63/0.87  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 23
% 0.63/0.87  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 1
% 0.63/0.87  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 14
% 0.63/0.87  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.63/0.87  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 2
% 0.63/0.87  # BW rewrite match successes           : 1
% 0.63/0.87  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.63/0.87  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.63/0.87  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 34960
% 0.63/0.87  # Search garbage collected termcells   : 3748
% 0.63/0.87  
% 0.63/0.87  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.63/0.87  # User time                : 0.038 s
% 0.63/0.87  # System time              : 0.007 s
% 0.63/0.87  # Total time               : 0.045 s
% 0.63/0.87  # Maximum resident set size: 3756 pages
% 0.63/0.87  
% 0.63/0.87  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.63/0.87  # User time                : 0.108 s
% 0.63/0.87  # System time              : 0.010 s
% 0.63/0.87  # Total time               : 0.118 s
% 0.63/0.87  # Maximum resident set size: 2672 pages
% 0.63/0.87  % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.63/0.87  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------