TSTP Solution File: SWV674-1 by E---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1.00
% Problem : SWV674-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 05:31:28 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 2.14s 0.69s
% Output : CNFRefutation 2.14s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 8
% Number of leaves : 9
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 33 ( 14 unt; 3 nHn; 20 RR)
% Number of literals : 55 ( 26 equ; 30 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 10 ( 10 usr; 4 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 32 ( 5 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_class__semiring_Opwr__0_0,axiom,
( c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(X2,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat),X1) = c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(X1)
| ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_class__semiring_Opwr__0_0) ).
cnf(clsrel_Ring__and__Field_Ofield_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1,axiom,
( class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1(X1)
| ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Ofield(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clsrel_Ring__and__Field_Ofield_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_1,negated_conjecture,
c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(c_HOL_Oinverse__class_Oinverse(v_a,t_a),c_HOL_Ominus__class_Ominus(v_x,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat),tc_nat),t_a) != c_HOL_Oinverse__class_Odivide(c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(v_a,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat),t_a),c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(v_a,v_x,t_a),t_a),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).
cnf(cls_minus__nat_Odiff__0_0,axiom,
c_HOL_Ominus__class_Ominus(X1,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat),tc_nat) = X1,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_minus__nat_Odiff__0_0) ).
cnf(tfree_tcs,negated_conjecture,
class_Ring__and__Field_Ofield(t_a),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',tfree_tcs) ).
cnf(cls_inverse__eq__divide_0,axiom,
( c_HOL_Oinverse__class_Oinverse(X2,X1) = c_HOL_Oinverse__class_Odivide(c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(X1),X2,X1)
| ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Ofield(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_inverse__eq__divide_0) ).
cnf(cls_nz_0,axiom,
( ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Ofield(t_a)
| v_a != c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(t_a) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_nz_0) ).
cnf(cls_nonzero__power__inverse_0,axiom,
( c_HOL_Oinverse__class_Oinverse(c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(X2,X3,X1),X1) = c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(c_HOL_Oinverse__class_Oinverse(X2,X1),X3,X1)
| X2 = c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(X1)
| ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Odivision__ring(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_nonzero__power__inverse_0) ).
cnf(clsrel_Ring__and__Field_Ofield_Ring__and__Field_Odivision__ring,axiom,
( class_Ring__and__Field_Odivision__ring(X1)
| ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Ofield(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clsrel_Ring__and__Field_Ofield_Ring__and__Field_Odivision__ring) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(X2,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat),X1) = c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(X1)
| ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1(X1) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_class__semiring_Opwr__0_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1(X1)
| ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Ofield(X1) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[clsrel_Ring__and__Field_Ofield_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(c_HOL_Oinverse__class_Oinverse(v_a,t_a),c_HOL_Ominus__class_Ominus(v_x,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat),tc_nat),t_a) != c_HOL_Oinverse__class_Odivide(c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(v_a,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat),t_a),c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(v_a,v_x,t_a),t_a),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_1]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
( c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(X2,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat),X1) = c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(X1)
| ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1(X1) ),
c_0_9 ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1(X1)
| ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Ofield(X1) ),
c_0_10 ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(c_HOL_Oinverse__class_Oinverse(v_a,t_a),c_HOL_Ominus__class_Ominus(v_x,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat),tc_nat),t_a) != c_HOL_Oinverse__class_Odivide(c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(v_a,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat),t_a),c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(v_a,v_x,t_a),t_a),
c_0_11 ).
cnf(c_0_15,axiom,
c_HOL_Ominus__class_Ominus(X1,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat),tc_nat) = X1,
cls_minus__nat_Odiff__0_0 ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
( c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(X1,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat),X2) = c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(X2)
| ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Ofield(X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
class_Ring__and__Field_Ofield(t_a),
tfree_tcs ).
cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
c_HOL_Oinverse__class_Odivide(c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(v_a,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat),t_a),c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(v_a,v_x,t_a),t_a) != c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(c_HOL_Oinverse__class_Oinverse(v_a,t_a),v_x,t_a),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(X1,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat),t_a) = c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(t_a),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
( c_HOL_Oinverse__class_Oinverse(X2,X1) = c_HOL_Oinverse__class_Odivide(c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(X1),X2,X1)
| ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Ofield(X1) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_inverse__eq__divide_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
( ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Ofield(t_a)
| v_a != c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(t_a) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_nz_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
c_HOL_Oinverse__class_Odivide(c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(t_a),c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(v_a,v_x,t_a),t_a) != c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(c_HOL_Oinverse__class_Oinverse(v_a,t_a),v_x,t_a),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
( c_HOL_Oinverse__class_Oinverse(X2,X1) = c_HOL_Oinverse__class_Odivide(c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(X1),X2,X1)
| ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Ofield(X1) ),
c_0_20 ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
( c_HOL_Oinverse__class_Oinverse(c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(X2,X3,X1),X1) = c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(c_HOL_Oinverse__class_Oinverse(X2,X1),X3,X1)
| X2 = c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(X1)
| ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Odivision__ring(X1) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_nonzero__power__inverse_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
( ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Ofield(t_a)
| v_a != c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(t_a) ),
c_0_21 ).
cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
c_HOL_Oinverse__class_Oinverse(c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(v_a,v_x,t_a),t_a) != c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(c_HOL_Oinverse__class_Oinverse(v_a,t_a),v_x,t_a),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]),c_0_17])]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,plain,
( c_HOL_Oinverse__class_Oinverse(c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(X2,X3,X1),X1) = c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(c_HOL_Oinverse__class_Oinverse(X2,X1),X3,X1)
| X2 = c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(X1)
| ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Odivision__ring(X1) ),
c_0_24 ).
cnf(c_0_28,plain,
c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(t_a) != v_a,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_17])]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,plain,
( class_Ring__and__Field_Odivision__ring(X1)
| ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Ofield(X1) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[clsrel_Ring__and__Field_Ofield_Ring__and__Field_Odivision__ring]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
~ class_Ring__and__Field_Odivision__ring(t_a),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]),c_0_28]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,plain,
( class_Ring__and__Field_Odivision__ring(X1)
| ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Ofield(X1) ),
c_0_29 ).
cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_31]),c_0_17])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.06 % Problem : SWV674-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.04/0.07 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.06/0.25 % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.06/0.25 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.06/0.25 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.06/0.25 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.06/0.25 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.06/0.25 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.06/0.25 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.06/0.25 % DateTime : Sun May 19 08:58:37 EDT 2024
% 0.06/0.26 % CPUTime :
% 0.10/0.36 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.10/0.36 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 2.14/0.69 # Version: 3.1.0
% 2.14/0.69 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 2.14/0.69 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 2.14/0.69 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 2.14/0.69 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 2.14/0.69 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 2.14/0.69 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 2.14/0.69 # G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with pid 8441 completed with status 0
% 2.14/0.69 # Result found by G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S
% 2.14/0.69 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 2.14/0.69 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 2.14/0.69 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 2.14/0.69 # No SInE strategy applied
% 2.14/0.69 # Search class: FGHSM-FSLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 2.14/0.69 # Scheduled 12 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 2.14/0.69 # Starting G-E--_303_C18_F1_URBAN_S0Y with 123s (1) cores
% 2.14/0.69 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 151s (1) cores
% 2.14/0.69 # Starting U----_100_C09_12_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_ND_S04AN with 123s (1) cores
% 2.14/0.69 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S032N with 123s (1) cores
% 2.14/0.69 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S0i with 123s (1) cores
% 2.14/0.69 # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S032N with pid 8451 completed with status 0
% 2.14/0.69 # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S032N
% 2.14/0.69 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 2.14/0.69 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 2.14/0.69 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 2.14/0.69 # No SInE strategy applied
% 2.14/0.69 # Search class: FGHSM-FSLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 2.14/0.69 # Scheduled 12 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 2.14/0.69 # Starting G-E--_303_C18_F1_URBAN_S0Y with 123s (1) cores
% 2.14/0.69 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 151s (1) cores
% 2.14/0.69 # Starting U----_100_C09_12_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_ND_S04AN with 123s (1) cores
% 2.14/0.69 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S032N with 123s (1) cores
% 2.14/0.69 # Preprocessing time : 0.010 s
% 2.14/0.69 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 2.14/0.69
% 2.14/0.69 # Proof found!
% 2.14/0.69 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 2.14/0.69 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 2.14/0.69 # Parsed axioms : 685
% 2.14/0.69 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 2.14/0.69 # Initial clauses : 685
% 2.14/0.69 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 2.14/0.69 # Initial clauses in saturation : 685
% 2.14/0.69 # Processed clauses : 1608
% 2.14/0.69 # ...of these trivial : 29
% 2.14/0.69 # ...subsumed : 515
% 2.14/0.69 # ...remaining for further processing : 1064
% 2.14/0.69 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 16
% 2.14/0.69 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 2.14/0.69 # Backward-subsumed : 7
% 2.14/0.69 # Backward-rewritten : 5
% 2.14/0.69 # Generated clauses : 8188
% 2.14/0.69 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 7009
% 2.14/0.69 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 2.14/0.69 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 4
% 2.14/0.69 # Paramodulations : 8167
% 2.14/0.69 # Factorizations : 4
% 2.14/0.69 # NegExts : 0
% 2.14/0.69 # Equation resolutions : 17
% 2.14/0.69 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 2.14/0.69 # Total rewrite steps : 2588
% 2.14/0.69 # ...of those cached : 2391
% 2.14/0.69 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 2.14/0.69 # Propositional check models : 0
% 2.14/0.69 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 2.14/0.69 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 2.14/0.69 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 2.14/0.69 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 2.14/0.69 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 2.14/0.69 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 2.14/0.69 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 2.14/0.69 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 2.14/0.69 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 2.14/0.69 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 2.14/0.69 # Current number of processed clauses : 571
% 2.14/0.69 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 81
% 2.14/0.69 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 2
% 2.14/0.69 # Negative unit clauses : 16
% 2.14/0.69 # Non-unit-clauses : 472
% 2.14/0.69 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 6567
% 2.14/0.69 # ...number of literals in the above : 34724
% 2.14/0.69 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 2.14/0.69 # Current number of archived clauses : 493
% 2.14/0.69 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 122692
% 2.14/0.69 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 34800
% 2.14/0.69 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 340
% 2.14/0.69 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1402
% 2.14/0.69 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 2.14/0.69 # BW rewrite match attempts : 228
% 2.14/0.69 # BW rewrite match successes : 4
% 2.14/0.69 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 2.14/0.69 # Condensation successes : 0
% 2.14/0.69 # Termbank termtop insertions : 184503
% 2.14/0.69 # Search garbage collected termcells : 1834
% 2.14/0.69
% 2.14/0.69 # -------------------------------------------------
% 2.14/0.69 # User time : 0.274 s
% 2.14/0.69 # System time : 0.016 s
% 2.14/0.69 # Total time : 0.289 s
% 2.14/0.69 # Maximum resident set size: 3220 pages
% 2.14/0.69
% 2.14/0.69 # -------------------------------------------------
% 2.14/0.69 # User time : 1.346 s
% 2.14/0.69 # System time : 0.056 s
% 2.14/0.69 # Total time : 1.402 s
% 2.14/0.69 # Maximum resident set size: 2196 pages
% 2.14/0.69 % E---3.1 exiting
% 2.14/0.69 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------