TSTP Solution File: SWV594-1 by E-SAT---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1.00
% Problem : SWV594-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 05:41:50 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.18s 0.56s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.18s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 13 ( 10 unt; 0 nHn; 13 RR)
% Number of literals : 19 ( 2 equ; 9 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 3 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 6 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_sin__gt__zero__pi_0,axiom,
( c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_RealDef_Oreal),c_Transcendental_Osin(X1),tc_RealDef_Oreal)
| ~ c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(X1,c_Transcendental_Opi,tc_RealDef_Oreal)
| ~ c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_RealDef_Oreal),X1,tc_RealDef_Oreal) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_sin__gt__zero__pi_0) ).
cnf(cls_real__less__def_1,axiom,
~ c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(X1,X1,tc_RealDef_Oreal),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_real__less__def_1) ).
cnf(cls_CHAINED_0,axiom,
c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(v_x,c_Transcendental_Opi,tc_RealDef_Oreal),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_CHAINED_0) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
c_Transcendental_Osin(v_x) = c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_RealDef_Oreal),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
cnf(cls_0_0,axiom,
c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_RealDef_Oreal),v_x,tc_RealDef_Oreal),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_0_0) ).
cnf(c_0_5,plain,
( c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_RealDef_Oreal),c_Transcendental_Osin(X1),tc_RealDef_Oreal)
| ~ c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(X1,c_Transcendental_Opi,tc_RealDef_Oreal)
| ~ c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_RealDef_Oreal),X1,tc_RealDef_Oreal) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_sin__gt__zero__pi_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,plain,
~ c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(X1,X1,tc_RealDef_Oreal),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_real__less__def_1]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
( c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_RealDef_Oreal),c_Transcendental_Osin(X1),tc_RealDef_Oreal)
| ~ c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(X1,c_Transcendental_Opi,tc_RealDef_Oreal)
| ~ c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_RealDef_Oreal),X1,tc_RealDef_Oreal) ),
c_0_5 ).
cnf(c_0_8,axiom,
c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(v_x,c_Transcendental_Opi,tc_RealDef_Oreal),
cls_CHAINED_0 ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
c_Transcendental_Osin(v_x) = c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_RealDef_Oreal),
cls_conjecture_0 ).
cnf(c_0_10,axiom,
c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_RealDef_Oreal),v_x,tc_RealDef_Oreal),
cls_0_0 ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
~ c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(X1,X1,tc_RealDef_Oreal),
c_0_6 ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]),c_0_9]),c_0_10])]),c_0_11]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : SWV594-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.12/0.13 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Sun May 19 09:20:52 EDT 2024
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.48 Running first-order model finding
% 0.18/0.48 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/0.56 # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.18/0.56 # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.18/0.56 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.18/0.56 # Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_S4c with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.18/0.56 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.56 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.56 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.56 # new_bool_3 with pid 23530 completed with status 0
% 0.18/0.56 # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.18/0.56 # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.18/0.56 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.18/0.56 # Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_S4c with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.18/0.56 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.56 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.18/0.56 # Search class: FGUSM-FSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.18/0.56 # partial match(1): FGHSM-FSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.18/0.56 # Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.18/0.56 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S4d with 135s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.56 # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S4d with pid 23534 completed with status 0
% 0.18/0.56 # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S4d
% 0.18/0.56 # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.18/0.56 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.18/0.56 # Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_S4c with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.18/0.56 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.56 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.18/0.56 # Search class: FGUSM-FSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.18/0.56 # partial match(1): FGHSM-FSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.18/0.56 # Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.18/0.56 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S4d with 135s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.56 # Preprocessing time : 0.004 s
% 0.18/0.56 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.18/0.56
% 0.18/0.56 # Proof found!
% 0.18/0.56 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.18/0.56 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.18/0.56 # Parsed axioms : 1205
% 0.18/0.56 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 1049
% 0.18/0.56 # Initial clauses : 156
% 0.18/0.56 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.18/0.56 # Initial clauses in saturation : 156
% 0.18/0.56 # Processed clauses : 303
% 0.18/0.56 # ...of these trivial : 7
% 0.18/0.56 # ...subsumed : 59
% 0.18/0.56 # ...remaining for further processing : 237
% 0.18/0.56 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.18/0.56 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.18/0.56 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.18/0.56 # Backward-rewritten : 2
% 0.18/0.56 # Generated clauses : 296
% 0.18/0.56 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 228
% 0.18/0.56 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.18/0.56 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.18/0.56 # Paramodulations : 292
% 0.18/0.56 # Factorizations : 2
% 0.18/0.56 # NegExts : 0
% 0.18/0.56 # Equation resolutions : 2
% 0.18/0.56 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.18/0.56 # Total rewrite steps : 164
% 0.18/0.56 # ...of those cached : 108
% 0.18/0.56 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.18/0.56 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.18/0.56 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.18/0.56 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.18/0.56 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.18/0.56 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.18/0.56 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.18/0.56 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.18/0.56 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.18/0.56 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.18/0.56 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.18/0.56 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.18/0.56 # Current number of processed clauses : 89
% 0.18/0.56 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 43
% 0.18/0.56 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 1
% 0.18/0.56 # Negative unit clauses : 15
% 0.18/0.56 # Non-unit-clauses : 30
% 0.18/0.56 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 225
% 0.18/0.56 # ...number of literals in the above : 729
% 0.18/0.56 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.18/0.56 # Current number of archived clauses : 148
% 0.18/0.56 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1370
% 0.18/0.56 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 219
% 0.18/0.56 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 8
% 0.18/0.56 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 18
% 0.18/0.56 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.18/0.56 # BW rewrite match attempts : 36
% 0.18/0.56 # BW rewrite match successes : 32
% 0.18/0.56 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.18/0.56 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.18/0.56 # Termbank termtop insertions : 23076
% 0.18/0.56 # Search garbage collected termcells : 3963
% 0.18/0.56
% 0.18/0.56 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.18/0.56 # User time : 0.027 s
% 0.18/0.56 # System time : 0.006 s
% 0.18/0.56 # Total time : 0.034 s
% 0.18/0.56 # Maximum resident set size: 2912 pages
% 0.18/0.56
% 0.18/0.56 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.18/0.56 # User time : 0.067 s
% 0.18/0.56 # System time : 0.011 s
% 0.18/0.56 # Total time : 0.077 s
% 0.18/0.56 # Maximum resident set size: 2524 pages
% 0.18/0.56 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------