TSTP Solution File: SWV592-1 by SNARK---20120808r022
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem : SWV592-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run-snark %s %d
% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 21:35:23 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.61s 0.86s
% Output : Refutation 0.61s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 12 ( 10 unt; 0 nHn; 5 RR)
% Number of literals : 15 ( 11 equ; 5 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 3 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 12 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_eq__diff__eq_H_0,axiom,
X = c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(c_HOL_Ominus__class_Ominus(X,Y,tc_RealDef_Oreal),Y,tc_RealDef_Oreal),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_eq__diff__eq_H_0) ).
cnf(cls_sin__periodic__pi_0,axiom,
c_Transcendental_Osin(c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(X,c_Transcendental_Opi,tc_RealDef_Oreal)) = c_HOL_Ouminus__class_Ouminus(c_Transcendental_Osin(X),tc_RealDef_Oreal),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_sin__periodic__pi_0) ).
cnf(cls_sin__minus_0,axiom,
c_Transcendental_Osin(c_HOL_Ouminus__class_Ouminus(X,tc_RealDef_Oreal)) = c_HOL_Ouminus__class_Ouminus(c_Transcendental_Osin(X),tc_RealDef_Oreal),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_sin__minus_0) ).
cnf(cls_neg__equal__iff__equal_0,axiom,
( ~ class_OrderedGroup_Ogroup__add(X)
| c_HOL_Ouminus__class_Ouminus(Y,X) != c_HOL_Ouminus__class_Ouminus(Z,X)
| Y = Z ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_neg__equal__iff__equal_0) ).
cnf(cls_minus__equation__iff_1,axiom,
( ~ class_OrderedGroup_Ogroup__add(X)
| c_HOL_Ouminus__class_Ouminus(c_HOL_Ouminus__class_Ouminus(Y,X),X) = Y ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_minus__equation__iff_1) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
c_Transcendental_Osin(c_HOL_Ominus__class_Ominus(v_x,c_Transcendental_Opi,tc_RealDef_Oreal)) != c_HOL_Ouminus__class_Ouminus(c_Transcendental_Osin(v_x),tc_RealDef_Oreal),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
cnf(728,plain,
c_Transcendental_Osin(c_HOL_Ominus__class_Ominus(v_x,c_Transcendental_Opi,tc_RealDef_Oreal)) != c_Transcendental_Osin(c_HOL_Ouminus__class_Ouminus(v_x,tc_RealDef_Oreal)),
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_0,cls_sin__minus_0,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(clsarity_RealDef__Oreal__OrderedGroup_Ogroup__add,axiom,
class_OrderedGroup_Ogroup__add(tc_RealDef_Oreal),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clsarity_RealDef__Oreal__OrderedGroup_Ogroup__add) ).
cnf(792,plain,
c_Transcendental_Osin(c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(X,c_Transcendental_Opi,tc_RealDef_Oreal)) = c_Transcendental_Osin(c_HOL_Ouminus__class_Ouminus(X,tc_RealDef_Oreal)),
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[cls_sin__periodic__pi_0,cls_sin__minus_0,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(855,plain,
c_HOL_Ouminus__class_Ouminus(c_HOL_Ouminus__class_Ouminus(X,tc_RealDef_Oreal),tc_RealDef_Oreal) = X,
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_minus__equation__iff_1,clsarity_RealDef__Oreal__OrderedGroup_Ogroup__add]) ).
cnf(858,plain,
c_Transcendental_Osin(X) = c_Transcendental_Osin(c_HOL_Ouminus__class_Ouminus(c_HOL_Ominus__class_Ominus(X,c_Transcendental_Opi,tc_RealDef_Oreal),tc_RealDef_Oreal)),
inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[792,cls_eq__diff__eq_H_0,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(947,plain,
$false,
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_neg__equal__iff__equal_0,clsarity_RealDef__Oreal__OrderedGroup_Ogroup__add,728]),855,858,cls_sin__minus_0,theory(equality)]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12 % Problem : SWV592-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.11/0.13 % Command : run-snark %s %d
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Wed Jun 15 19:13:56 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.46 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.47 *
% 0.20/0.47 *
% 0.20/0.48 #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.20/0.48 *
% 0.20/0.48 SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.20/0.48 *
% 0.20/0.48 ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.20/0.48 (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.20/0.48 (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.20/0.48 (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.20/0.48 (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.20/0.48 (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.20/0.48 (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.20/0.48 (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.20/0.48 (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.20/0.48 (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.20/0.48 (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.20/0.48 (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.20/0.48 (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.20/0.48 *
% 0.20/0.48 "."
% 0.20/0.48 *
% 0.20/0.48 ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-15T19:13:56
% 0.20/0.48 ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n006.cluster.edu at 2022-06-15T19:13:56
% 0.48/0.69 WARNING:
% 0.48/0.69 |class_Lattices_Oboolean__algebra| is a 1-ary relation that occurs only negatively; disabling rows that contain it.
% 0.48/0.69 WARNING:
% 0.48/0.69 |class_Divides_Oring__div| is a 1-ary relation that occurs only negatively; disabling rows that contain it.
% 0.48/0.69 WARNING:
% 0.48/0.69 |class_OrderedGroup_Oab__semigroup__idem__mult| is a 1-ary relation that occurs only negatively; disabling rows that contain it.
% 0.48/0.69 WARNING:
% 0.48/0.69 |class_Divides_Osemiring__div| is a 1-ary relation that occurs only negatively; disabling rows that contain it.
% 0.61/0.86
% 0.61/0.86
% 0.61/0.86 #||
% 0.61/0.86 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.61/0.86 % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.61/0.86 ||#
% 0.61/0.86
% 0.61/0.86 ; Summary of computation:
% 0.61/0.86 ; 1478 formulas have been input or derived (from 237 formulas).
% 0.61/0.86 ; 947 (64%) were retained. Of these,
% 0.61/0.86 ; 36 ( 4%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 0.61/0.86 ; 911 (96%) are still being kept.
% 0.61/0.86 ;
% 0.61/0.86 ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 0.61/0.86 ; 0.182 48% Read assertion file (1 call)
% 0.61/0.86 ; 0.019 5% Assert (924 calls)
% 0.61/0.86 ; 0.054 14% Process new row (1,297 calls)
% 0.61/0.86 ; 0.013 3% Resolution (472 calls)
% 0.61/0.86 ; 0.002 1% Paramodulation (236 calls)
% 0.61/0.86 ; 0.000 0% Factoring (2 calls)
% 0.61/0.86 ; 0.016 4% Condensing (835 calls)
% 0.61/0.86 ; 0.012 3% Forward subsumption (835 calls)
% 0.61/0.86 ; 0.018 5% Backward subsumption (718 calls)
% 0.61/0.86 ; 0.009 2% Clause clause subsumption (1,064 calls)
% 0.61/0.86 ; 0.019 5% Forward simplification (1,256 calls)
% 0.61/0.86 ; 0.004 1% Backward simplification (945 calls)
% 0.61/0.86 ; 0.001 0% Ordering (514 calls)
% 0.61/0.86 ; 0.002 1% Sortal reasoning (32 calls)
% 0.61/0.86 ; 0.002 1% Purity testing (1 call)
% 0.61/0.86 ; 0.030 8% Other
% 0.61/0.86 ; 0.383 Total
% 0.61/0.86 ; 0.385 Real time
% 0.61/0.86 ;
% 0.61/0.86 ; Term-hash-array has 1,365 terms in all.
% 0.61/0.86 ; Feature-vector-row-index has 705 entries (705 at peak, 718 added, 13 deleted).
% 0.61/0.86 ; Feature-vector-row-index has 2,088 nodes (2,088 at peak, 2,156 added, 68 deleted).
% 0.71/0.86 ; Retrieved 812 possibly forward subsuming rows in 835 calls.
% 0.71/0.86 ; Retrieved 630 possibly backward subsumed rows in 718 calls.
% 0.71/0.86 ; Path-index has 1,328 entries (1,328 at peak, 1,392 added, 64 deleted).
% 0.71/0.86 ; Path-index has 4,362 nodes (4,362 at peak, 4,456 added, 94 deleted).
% 0.71/0.86 ; Trie-index has 1,328 entries (1,328 at peak, 1,392 added, 64 deleted).
% 0.71/0.86 ; Trie-index has 5,294 nodes (5,294 at peak, 5,578 added, 284 deleted).
% 0.71/0.86 ; Retrieved 490 generalization terms in 3,072 calls.
% 0.71/0.86 ; Retrieved 335 instance terms in 228 calls.
% 0.71/0.86 ; Retrieved 19,711 unifiable terms in 1,304 calls.
% 0.71/0.86 ;
% 0.71/0.86 ; The agenda of rows to process has 8 entries:
% 0.71/0.86 ; 8 with value 21
% 0.71/0.86 ; The agenda of input rows to give has 541 entries:
% 0.71/0.86 ; 42 with value 17 77 with value 27 8 with value 37
% 0.71/0.86 ; 52 with value 18 7 with value 28 17 with value 38
% 0.71/0.86 ; 45 with value 19 3 with value 29 17 with value 39
% 0.71/0.86 ; 35 with value 20 27 with value 30 9 with value 40
% 0.71/0.86 ; 42 with value 21 5 with value 31 3 with value 42
% 0.71/0.86 ; 24 with value 22 3 with value 32 1 with value 44
% 0.71/0.86 ; 5 with value 23 2 with value 33 1 with value 45
% 0.71/0.86 ; 54 with value 24 5 with value 34 2 with value 46
% 0.71/0.86 ; 27 with value 25 6 with value 35 2 with value 47
% 0.71/0.86 ; 10 with value 26 9 with value 36 1 with value 52
% 0.71/0.86 ; The agenda of rows to give has 134 entries:
% 0.71/0.86 ; 1 with value (4 6) 11 with value (4 13) 8 with value (4 19)
% 0.71/0.86 ; 5 with value (4 8) 12 with value (4 14) 1 with value (4 20)
% 0.71/0.86 ; 10 with value (4 9) 7 with value (4 15) 1 with value (4 21)
% 0.71/0.86 ; 11 with value (4 10) 8 with value (4 16) 1 with value (4 22)
% 0.71/0.86 ; 19 with value (4 11) 6 with value (4 17) 2 with value (4 24)
% 0.71/0.86 ; 12 with value (4 12) 18 with value (4 18) 1 with value (4 30)
% 0.71/0.86 Evaluation took:
% 0.71/0.86 0.385 seconds of real time
% 0.71/0.86 0.364827 seconds of user run time
% 0.71/0.86 0.020089 seconds of system run time
% 0.71/0.86 [Run times include 0.006 seconds GC run time.]
% 0.71/0.86 0 calls to %EVAL
% 0.71/0.86 0 page faults and
% 0.71/0.86 24,763,672 bytes consed.
% 0.71/0.86 :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.71/0.86 ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-15T19:13:56
% 0.71/0.86 :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.71/0.86 *
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------