TSTP Solution File: SWV592-1 by E-SAT---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1.00
% Problem : SWV592-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sat May 4 09:59:05 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.15s 0.56s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.15s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 10
% Number of leaves : 8
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 34 ( 31 unt; 0 nHn; 10 RR)
% Number of literals : 37 ( 36 equ; 9 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 0 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 8 ( 8 usr; 3 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 34 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_real__add__eq__0__iff_1,axiom,
c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(X1,c_HOL_Ouminus__class_Ouminus(X1,tc_RealDef_Oreal),tc_RealDef_Oreal) = c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_RealDef_Oreal),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.ZYS0Y94i7z/E---3.1_27674.p',cls_real__add__eq__0__iff_1) ).
cnf(cls_real__diff__def_0,axiom,
c_HOL_Ominus__class_Ominus(X1,X2,tc_RealDef_Oreal) = c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(X1,c_HOL_Ouminus__class_Ouminus(X2,tc_RealDef_Oreal),tc_RealDef_Oreal),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.ZYS0Y94i7z/E---3.1_27674.p',cls_real__diff__def_0) ).
cnf(cls_real__add__eq__0__iff_0,axiom,
( X2 = c_HOL_Ouminus__class_Ouminus(X1,tc_RealDef_Oreal)
| c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(X1,X2,tc_RealDef_Oreal) != c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_RealDef_Oreal) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.ZYS0Y94i7z/E---3.1_27674.p',cls_real__add__eq__0__iff_0) ).
cnf(cls_eq__diff__eq_H_0,axiom,
X1 = c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(c_HOL_Ominus__class_Ominus(X1,X2,tc_RealDef_Oreal),X2,tc_RealDef_Oreal),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.ZYS0Y94i7z/E---3.1_27674.p',cls_eq__diff__eq_H_0) ).
cnf(cls_sin__periodic__pi_0,axiom,
c_Transcendental_Osin(c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(X1,c_Transcendental_Opi,tc_RealDef_Oreal)) = c_HOL_Ouminus__class_Ouminus(c_Transcendental_Osin(X1),tc_RealDef_Oreal),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.ZYS0Y94i7z/E---3.1_27674.p',cls_sin__periodic__pi_0) ).
cnf(cls_sin__minus_0,axiom,
c_Transcendental_Osin(c_HOL_Ouminus__class_Ouminus(X1,tc_RealDef_Oreal)) = c_HOL_Ouminus__class_Ouminus(c_Transcendental_Osin(X1),tc_RealDef_Oreal),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.ZYS0Y94i7z/E---3.1_27674.p',cls_sin__minus_0) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
c_Transcendental_Osin(c_HOL_Ominus__class_Ominus(v_x,c_Transcendental_Opi,tc_RealDef_Oreal)) != c_HOL_Ouminus__class_Ouminus(c_Transcendental_Osin(v_x),tc_RealDef_Oreal),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.ZYS0Y94i7z/E---3.1_27674.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
cnf(cls_sin__periodic__pi2_0,axiom,
c_Transcendental_Osin(c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(c_Transcendental_Opi,X1,tc_RealDef_Oreal)) = c_HOL_Ouminus__class_Ouminus(c_Transcendental_Osin(X1),tc_RealDef_Oreal),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.ZYS0Y94i7z/E---3.1_27674.p',cls_sin__periodic__pi2_0) ).
cnf(c_0_8,axiom,
c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(X1,c_HOL_Ouminus__class_Ouminus(X1,tc_RealDef_Oreal),tc_RealDef_Oreal) = c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_RealDef_Oreal),
cls_real__add__eq__0__iff_1 ).
cnf(c_0_9,axiom,
c_HOL_Ominus__class_Ominus(X1,X2,tc_RealDef_Oreal) = c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(X1,c_HOL_Ouminus__class_Ouminus(X2,tc_RealDef_Oreal),tc_RealDef_Oreal),
cls_real__diff__def_0 ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( X2 = c_HOL_Ouminus__class_Ouminus(X1,tc_RealDef_Oreal)
| c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(X1,X2,tc_RealDef_Oreal) != c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_RealDef_Oreal) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_real__add__eq__0__iff_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,axiom,
X1 = c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(c_HOL_Ominus__class_Ominus(X1,X2,tc_RealDef_Oreal),X2,tc_RealDef_Oreal),
cls_eq__diff__eq_H_0 ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
c_HOL_Ominus__class_Ominus(X1,X1,tc_RealDef_Oreal) = c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_RealDef_Oreal),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( X2 = c_HOL_Ouminus__class_Ouminus(X1,tc_RealDef_Oreal)
| c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(X1,X2,tc_RealDef_Oreal) != c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_RealDef_Oreal) ),
c_0_10 ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_RealDef_Oreal),X1,tc_RealDef_Oreal) = X1,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,axiom,
c_Transcendental_Osin(c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(X1,c_Transcendental_Opi,tc_RealDef_Oreal)) = c_HOL_Ouminus__class_Ouminus(c_Transcendental_Osin(X1),tc_RealDef_Oreal),
cls_sin__periodic__pi_0 ).
cnf(c_0_16,axiom,
c_Transcendental_Osin(c_HOL_Ouminus__class_Ouminus(X1,tc_RealDef_Oreal)) = c_HOL_Ouminus__class_Ouminus(c_Transcendental_Osin(X1),tc_RealDef_Oreal),
cls_sin__minus_0 ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
c_HOL_Ouminus__class_Ouminus(c_HOL_Ominus__class_Ominus(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_RealDef_Oreal),X1,tc_RealDef_Oreal),tc_RealDef_Oreal) = X1,
inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_11])]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
c_HOL_Ominus__class_Ominus(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_RealDef_Oreal),X1,tc_RealDef_Oreal) = c_HOL_Ouminus__class_Ouminus(X1,tc_RealDef_Oreal),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
c_Transcendental_Osin(c_HOL_Ominus__class_Ominus(v_x,c_Transcendental_Opi,tc_RealDef_Oreal)) != c_HOL_Ouminus__class_Ouminus(c_Transcendental_Osin(v_x),tc_RealDef_Oreal),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
c_Transcendental_Osin(c_HOL_Ouminus__class_Ouminus(X1,tc_RealDef_Oreal)) = c_Transcendental_Osin(c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(X1,c_Transcendental_Opi,tc_RealDef_Oreal)),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
c_HOL_Ouminus__class_Ouminus(c_HOL_Ouminus__class_Ouminus(X1,tc_RealDef_Oreal),tc_RealDef_Oreal) = X1,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,axiom,
c_Transcendental_Osin(c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(c_Transcendental_Opi,X1,tc_RealDef_Oreal)) = c_HOL_Ouminus__class_Ouminus(c_Transcendental_Osin(X1),tc_RealDef_Oreal),
cls_sin__periodic__pi2_0 ).
cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
c_Transcendental_Osin(c_HOL_Ominus__class_Ominus(v_x,c_Transcendental_Opi,tc_RealDef_Oreal)) != c_HOL_Ouminus__class_Ouminus(c_Transcendental_Osin(v_x),tc_RealDef_Oreal),
c_0_19 ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
c_Transcendental_Osin(c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(c_HOL_Ouminus__class_Ouminus(X1,tc_RealDef_Oreal),c_Transcendental_Opi,tc_RealDef_Oreal)) = c_Transcendental_Osin(X1),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
c_Transcendental_Osin(c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(X1,c_Transcendental_Opi,tc_RealDef_Oreal)) = c_Transcendental_Osin(c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(c_Transcendental_Opi,X1,tc_RealDef_Oreal)),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_16]),c_0_20]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
c_Transcendental_Osin(c_HOL_Ominus__class_Ominus(v_x,c_Transcendental_Opi,tc_RealDef_Oreal)) != c_Transcendental_Osin(c_HOL_Ouminus__class_Ouminus(v_x,tc_RealDef_Oreal)),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,plain,
c_HOL_Ouminus__class_Ouminus(c_Transcendental_Osin(X1),tc_RealDef_Oreal) = c_Transcendental_Osin(c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(X1,c_Transcendental_Opi,tc_RealDef_Oreal)),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_20]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,plain,
c_Transcendental_Osin(c_HOL_Ominus__class_Ominus(c_Transcendental_Opi,X1,tc_RealDef_Oreal)) = c_Transcendental_Osin(X1),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]),c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
c_Transcendental_Osin(c_HOL_Ominus__class_Ominus(v_x,c_Transcendental_Opi,tc_RealDef_Oreal)) != c_Transcendental_Osin(c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(v_x,c_Transcendental_Opi,tc_RealDef_Oreal)),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_20]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,plain,
c_Transcendental_Osin(c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(c_Transcendental_Opi,c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(X1,c_Transcendental_Opi,tc_RealDef_Oreal),tc_RealDef_Oreal)) = c_Transcendental_Osin(X1),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_20]),c_0_27]),c_0_25]),c_0_9]),c_0_28]),c_0_25]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
c_Transcendental_Osin(c_HOL_Ominus__class_Ominus(v_x,c_Transcendental_Opi,tc_RealDef_Oreal)) != c_Transcendental_Osin(c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(c_Transcendental_Opi,v_x,tc_RealDef_Oreal)),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_25]) ).
cnf(c_0_32,plain,
c_Transcendental_Osin(c_HOL_Ominus__class_Ominus(X1,c_Transcendental_Opi,tc_RealDef_Oreal)) = c_Transcendental_Osin(c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(c_Transcendental_Opi,X1,tc_RealDef_Oreal)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_32])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.10 % Problem : SWV592-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.00/0.10 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.10/0.30 % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.30 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.30 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.30 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.30 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.30 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.30 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.30 % DateTime : Fri May 3 17:02:53 EDT 2024
% 0.10/0.30 % CPUTime :
% 0.15/0.48 Running first-order model finding
% 0.15/0.48 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.ZYS0Y94i7z/E---3.1_27674.p
% 0.15/0.56 # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.15/0.56 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.56 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.56 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.56 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.56 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.56 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.56 # new_bool_1 with pid 27753 completed with status 0
% 0.15/0.56 # Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.15/0.56 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.56 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.56 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.56 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.56 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.56 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.15/0.56 # Search class: FGUSM-FFMS32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.56 # partial match(1): FGUSF-FFMS32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.56 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.15/0.56 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.56 # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 27755 completed with status 0
% 0.15/0.56 # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.15/0.56 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.56 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.56 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.56 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.56 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.56 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.15/0.56 # Search class: FGUSM-FFMS32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.56 # partial match(1): FGUSF-FFMS32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.56 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.15/0.56 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.56 # Preprocessing time : 0.003 s
% 0.15/0.56 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.15/0.56
% 0.15/0.56 # Proof found!
% 0.15/0.56 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.15/0.56 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.15/0.56 # Parsed axioms : 924
% 0.15/0.56 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 850
% 0.15/0.56 # Initial clauses : 74
% 0.15/0.56 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.15/0.56 # Initial clauses in saturation : 74
% 0.15/0.56 # Processed clauses : 488
% 0.15/0.56 # ...of these trivial : 7
% 0.15/0.56 # ...subsumed : 217
% 0.15/0.56 # ...remaining for further processing : 264
% 0.15/0.56 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 4
% 0.15/0.56 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.15/0.56 # Backward-subsumed : 2
% 0.15/0.56 # Backward-rewritten : 43
% 0.15/0.56 # Generated clauses : 2638
% 0.15/0.56 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 1639
% 0.15/0.56 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.15/0.56 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.15/0.56 # Paramodulations : 2630
% 0.15/0.56 # Factorizations : 2
% 0.15/0.56 # NegExts : 0
% 0.15/0.56 # Equation resolutions : 6
% 0.15/0.56 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.15/0.56 # Total rewrite steps : 3534
% 0.15/0.56 # ...of those cached : 3415
% 0.15/0.56 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.15/0.56 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.15/0.56 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.15/0.56 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.15/0.56 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.15/0.56 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.15/0.56 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.56 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.56 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.56 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.56 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.56 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.56 # Current number of processed clauses : 145
% 0.15/0.56 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 44
% 0.15/0.56 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 3
% 0.15/0.56 # Negative unit clauses : 6
% 0.15/0.56 # Non-unit-clauses : 92
% 0.15/0.56 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 1271
% 0.15/0.56 # ...number of literals in the above : 2652
% 0.15/0.56 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.15/0.56 # Current number of archived clauses : 119
% 0.15/0.56 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 2122
% 0.15/0.56 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1783
% 0.15/0.56 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 112
% 0.15/0.56 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 89
% 0.15/0.56 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.15/0.56 # BW rewrite match attempts : 68
% 0.15/0.56 # BW rewrite match successes : 53
% 0.15/0.56 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.15/0.56 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.15/0.56 # Termbank termtop insertions : 64347
% 0.15/0.56 # Search garbage collected termcells : 3062
% 0.15/0.56
% 0.15/0.56 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.56 # User time : 0.041 s
% 0.15/0.56 # System time : 0.005 s
% 0.15/0.56 # Total time : 0.046 s
% 0.15/0.56 # Maximum resident set size: 2604 pages
% 0.15/0.56
% 0.15/0.56 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.56 # User time : 0.065 s
% 0.15/0.56 # System time : 0.008 s
% 0.15/0.56 # Total time : 0.073 s
% 0.15/0.56 # Maximum resident set size: 2344 pages
% 0.15/0.56 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------