TSTP Solution File: SWV573-1 by SNARK---20120808r022
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem : SWV573-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run-snark %s %d
% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 21:35:19 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.77s 0.96s
% Output : Refutation 0.77s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 9 ( 9 unt; 0 nHn; 4 RR)
% Number of literals : 9 ( 8 equ; 2 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 0 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 9 ( 9 usr; 4 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 5 ( 2 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_complex__Re__i_0,axiom,
c_Complex_ORe(c_Complex_Oii) = c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_RealDef_Oreal),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_complex__Re__i_0) ).
cnf(cls_complex__surj_0,axiom,
c_Complex_Ocomplex_OComplex(c_Complex_ORe(X),c_Complex_OIm(X)) = X,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_complex__surj_0) ).
cnf(cls_complex__Im__of__nat_0,axiom,
c_Complex_OIm(c_Nat_Osemiring__1__class_Oof__nat(X,tc_Complex_Ocomplex)) = c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_RealDef_Oreal),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_complex__Im__of__nat_0) ).
cnf(1023,plain,
c_Complex_OIm(c_Nat_Osemiring__1__class_Oof__nat(X,tc_Complex_Ocomplex)) = c_Complex_ORe(c_Complex_Oii),
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[cls_complex__Im__of__nat_0,cls_complex__Re__i_0,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(cls_complex__Re__of__nat_0,axiom,
c_Complex_ORe(c_Nat_Osemiring__1__class_Oof__nat(X,tc_Complex_Ocomplex)) = c_Nat_Osemiring__1__class_Oof__nat(X,tc_RealDef_Oreal),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_complex__Re__of__nat_0) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
c_Nat_Osemiring__1__class_Oof__nat(v_n,tc_Complex_Ocomplex) != c_Complex_Ocomplex_OComplex(c_Nat_Osemiring__1__class_Oof__nat(v_n,tc_RealDef_Oreal),c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_RealDef_Oreal)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
cnf(1029,plain,
c_Nat_Osemiring__1__class_Oof__nat(v_n,tc_Complex_Ocomplex) != c_Complex_Ocomplex_OComplex(c_Complex_ORe(c_Nat_Osemiring__1__class_Oof__nat(v_n,tc_Complex_Ocomplex)),c_Complex_ORe(c_Complex_Oii)),
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_0,cls_complex__Re__i_0,cls_complex__Re__of__nat_0,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(1281,plain,
c_Complex_Ocomplex_OComplex(c_Complex_ORe(c_Nat_Osemiring__1__class_Oof__nat(X,tc_Complex_Ocomplex)),c_Complex_ORe(c_Complex_Oii)) = c_Nat_Osemiring__1__class_Oof__nat(X,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[cls_complex__surj_0,1023,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(1282,plain,
$false,
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[1029,1281,theory(equality)]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.13/0.13 % Problem : SWV573-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.13/0.14 % Command : run-snark %s %d
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Thu Jun 16 05:30:26 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.48 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.49 *
% 0.20/0.49 *
% 0.20/0.50 #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.20/0.50 *
% 0.20/0.50 SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.20/0.50 *
% 0.20/0.50 ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.20/0.50 (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.20/0.50 (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.20/0.50 (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.20/0.50 (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.20/0.50 (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.20/0.50 (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.20/0.50 (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.20/0.50 (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.20/0.50 (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.20/0.50 (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.20/0.50 (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.20/0.50 (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.20/0.50 *
% 0.20/0.50 "."
% 0.20/0.50 *
% 0.20/0.50 ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-16T05:30:26
% 0.20/0.50 ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n006.cluster.edu at 2022-06-16T05:30:26
% 0.59/0.78 WARNING:
% 0.59/0.78 |class_Lattices_Oboolean__algebra| is a 1-ary relation that occurs only negatively; disabling rows that contain it.
% 0.59/0.78 WARNING:
% 0.59/0.78 |class_OrderedGroup_Oab__semigroup__idem__mult| is a 1-ary relation that occurs only negatively; disabling rows that contain it.
% 0.77/0.96
% 0.77/0.96
% 0.77/0.96 #||
% 0.77/0.96 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.77/0.96 % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.77/0.97 ||#
% 0.77/0.97
% 0.77/0.97 ; Summary of computation:
% 0.77/0.97 ; 1528 formulas have been input or derived (from 249 formulas).
% 0.77/0.97 ; 1282 (84%) were retained. Of these,
% 0.77/0.97 ; 229 (18%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 0.77/0.97 ; 1053 (82%) are still being kept.
% 0.77/0.97 ;
% 0.77/0.97 ; Run time in seconds:
% 0.77/0.97 ; 0.231 50% Read assertion file (1 call)
% 0.77/0.97 ; 0.030 6% Assert (1,264 calls)
% 0.77/0.97 ; 0.066 14% Process new row (1,380 calls)
% 0.77/0.97 ; 0.002 0% Resolution (496 calls)
% 0.77/0.97 ; 0.002 0% Paramodulation (248 calls)
% 0.77/0.97 ; 0.000 0% Factoring (1 call)
% 0.77/0.97 ; 0.024 5% Condensing (1,013 calls)
% 0.77/0.97 ; 0.016 3% Forward subsumption (1,013 calls)
% 0.77/0.97 ; 0.021 5% Backward subsumption (865 calls)
% 0.77/0.97 ; 0.006 1% Clause clause subsumption (1,319 calls)
% 0.77/0.97 ; 0.028 6% Forward simplification (1,376 calls)
% 0.77/0.97 ; 0.001 0% Backward simplification (1,152 calls)
% 0.77/0.97 ; 0.001 0% Ordering (214 calls)
% 0.77/0.97 ; 0.000 0% Sortal reasoning (32 calls)
% 0.77/0.97 ; 0.003 1% Purity testing (1 call)
% 0.77/0.97 ; 0.035 8% Other
% 0.77/0.97 ; 0.466 Total
% 0.77/0.97 ; 0.467 Real time
% 0.77/0.97 ;
% 0.77/0.97 ; Term-hash-array has 1,658 terms in all.
% 0.77/0.97 ; Feature-vector-row-index has 783 entries (783 at peak, 865 added, 82 deleted).
% 0.77/0.97 ; Feature-vector-row-index has 2,529 nodes (2,529 at peak, 3,011 added, 482 deleted).
% 0.77/0.97 ; Retrieved 1,108 possibly forward subsuming rows in 1,013 calls.
% 0.77/0.97 ; Retrieved 980 possibly backward subsumed rows in 865 calls.
% 0.77/0.97 ; Path-index has 1,527 entries (1,531 at peak, 1,702 added, 175 deleted).
% 0.77/0.97 ; Path-index has 4,609 nodes (4,614 at peak, 4,767 added, 158 deleted).
% 0.77/0.97 ; Trie-index has 1,527 entries (1,531 at peak, 1,702 added, 175 deleted).
% 0.77/0.97 ; Trie-index has 5,578 nodes (5,595 at peak, 6,110 added, 532 deleted).
% 0.77/0.97 ; Retrieved 331 generalization terms in 4,581 calls.
% 0.77/0.97 ; Retrieved 359 instance terms in 291 calls.
% 0.77/0.97 ; Retrieved 6,991 unifiable terms in 1,106 calls.
% 0.77/0.97 ;
% 0.77/0.97 ; The agenda of input rows to give has 794 entries:
% 0.77/0.97 ; 3 with value 10 10 with value 23 10 with value 36
% 0.77/0.97 ; 15 with value 11 47 with value 24 6 with value 37
% 0.77/0.97 ; 12 with value 12 40 with value 25 17 with value 38
% 0.77/0.97 ; 63 with value 13 8 with value 26 17 with value 39
% 0.77/0.97 ; 39 with value 14 84 with value 27 9 with value 40
% 0.77/0.97 ; 39 with value 15 10 with value 28 3 with value 42
% 0.77/0.97 ; 24 with value 16 16 with value 29 5 with value 43
% 0.77/0.97 ; 35 with value 17 28 with value 30 1 with value 44
% 0.77/0.97 ; 53 with value 18 8 with value 31 1 with value 45
% 0.77/0.97 ; 45 with value 19 4 with value 32 2 with value 46
% 0.77/0.97 ; 38 with value 20 5 with value 33 1 with value 47
% 0.77/0.97 ; 45 with value 21 9 with value 34 1 with value 52
% 0.77/0.97 ; 36 with value 22 5 with value 35
% 0.77/0.97 ; The agenda of rows to give has 10 entries:
% 0.77/0.97 ; 4 with value (4 6) 1 with value (4 9) 1 with value (4 16)
% 0.77/0.97 ; 3 with value (4 8) 1 with value (4 14)
% 0.77/0.97 Evaluation took:
% 0.77/0.97 0.467 seconds of real time
% 0.77/0.97 0.449505 seconds of user run time
% 0.77/0.97 0.018047 seconds of system run time
% 0.77/0.97 [Run times include 0.018 seconds GC run time.]
% 0.77/0.97 0 calls to %EVAL
% 0.77/0.97 0 page faults and
% 0.77/0.97 30,708,416 bytes consed.
% 0.77/0.97 :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.77/0.97 ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-16T05:30:27
% 0.77/0.97 :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.77/0.97 *
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------