TSTP Solution File: SWV550-1.004 by Bliksem---1.12
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Bliksem---1.12
% Problem : SWV550-1.004 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : bliksem %s
% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 0s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 16:26:35 EDT 2022
% Result : Timeout 300.06s 300.43s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.12 % Problem : SWV550-1.004 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.08/0.13 % Command : bliksem %s
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Tue Jun 14 19:25:22 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 87.93/88.28 *** allocated 10000 integers for termspace/termends
% 87.93/88.28 *** allocated 10000 integers for clauses
% 87.93/88.28 *** allocated 10000 integers for justifications
% 87.93/88.28 Bliksem 1.12
% 87.93/88.28
% 87.93/88.28
% 87.93/88.28 Automatic Strategy Selection
% 87.93/88.28
% 87.93/88.28 Clauses:
% 87.93/88.28 [
% 87.93/88.28 [ =( select( store( X, Y, Z ), Y ), Z ) ],
% 87.93/88.28 [ =( X, Y ), =( select( store( Z, X, T ), Y ), select( Z, Y ) ) ],
% 87.93/88.28 [ =( store( store( store( store( a1, i1, select( a2, i1 ) ), i2, select(
% 87.93/88.28 store( a2, i1, select( a1, i1 ) ), i2 ) ), i3, select( store( store( a2,
% 87.93/88.28 i1, select( a1, i1 ) ), i2, select( store( a1, i1, select( a2, i1 ) ), i2
% 87.93/88.28 ) ), i3 ) ), i1, select( store( store( store( a2, i1, select( a1, i1 ) )
% 87.93/88.28 , i2, select( store( a1, i1, select( a2, i1 ) ), i2 ) ), i3, select(
% 87.93/88.28 store( store( a1, i1, select( a2, i1 ) ), i2, select( store( a2, i1,
% 87.93/88.28 select( a1, i1 ) ), i2 ) ), i3 ) ), i4 ) ), store( store( store( store(
% 87.93/88.28 a2, i1, select( a1, i1 ) ), i2, select( store( a1, i1, select( a2, i1 ) )
% 87.93/88.28 , i2 ) ), i3, select( store( store( a1, i1, select( a2, i1 ) ), i2,
% 87.93/88.28 select( store( a2, i1, select( a1, i1 ) ), i2 ) ), i3 ) ), i4, select(
% 87.93/88.28 store( store( store( a1, i1, select( a2, i1 ) ), i2, select( store( a2,
% 87.93/88.28 i1, select( a1, i1 ) ), i2 ) ), i3, select( store( store( a2, i1, select(
% 87.93/88.28 a1, i1 ) ), i2, select( store( a1, i1, select( a2, i1 ) ), i2 ) ), i3 ) )
% 87.93/88.28 , i4 ) ) ) ],
% 87.93/88.28 [ ~( =( a1, a2 ) ) ]
% 87.93/88.28 ] .
% 87.93/88.28
% 87.93/88.28
% 87.93/88.28 percentage equality = 1.000000, percentage horn = 0.750000
% 87.93/88.28 This is a pure equality problem
% 87.93/88.28
% 87.93/88.28
% 87.93/88.28
% 87.93/88.28 Options Used:
% 87.93/88.28
% 87.93/88.28 useres = 1
% 87.93/88.28 useparamod = 1
% 87.93/88.28 useeqrefl = 1
% 87.93/88.28 useeqfact = 1
% 87.93/88.28 usefactor = 1
% 87.93/88.28 usesimpsplitting = 0
% 87.93/88.28 usesimpdemod = 5
% 87.93/88.28 usesimpres = 3
% 87.93/88.28
% 87.93/88.28 resimpinuse = 1000
% 87.93/88.28 resimpclauses = 20000
% 87.93/88.28 substype = eqrewr
% 87.93/88.28 backwardsubs = 1
% 87.93/88.28 selectoldest = 5
% 87.93/88.28
% 87.93/88.28 litorderings [0] = split
% 87.93/88.28 litorderings [1] = extend the termordering, first sorting on arguments
% 87.93/88.28
% 87.93/88.28 termordering = kbo
% 87.93/88.28
% 87.93/88.28 litapriori = 0
% 87.93/88.28 termapriori = 1
% 87.93/88.28 litaposteriori = 0
% 87.93/88.28 termaposteriori = 0
% 87.93/88.28 demodaposteriori = 0
% 87.93/88.28 ordereqreflfact = 0
% 87.93/88.28
% 87.93/88.28 litselect = negord
% 87.93/88.28
% 87.93/88.28 maxweight = 15
% 87.93/88.28 maxdepth = 30000
% 87.93/88.28 maxlength = 115
% 87.93/88.28 maxnrvars = 195
% 87.93/88.28 excuselevel = 1
% 87.93/88.28 increasemaxweight = 1
% 87.93/88.28
% 87.93/88.28 maxselected = 10000000
% 87.93/88.28 maxnrclauses = 10000000
% 87.93/88.28
% 87.93/88.28 showgenerated = 0
% 87.93/88.28 showkept = 0
% 87.93/88.28 showselected = 0
% 87.93/88.28 showdeleted = 0
% 87.93/88.28 showresimp = 1
% 87.93/88.28 showstatus = 2000
% 87.93/88.28
% 87.93/88.28 prologoutput = 1
% 87.93/88.28 nrgoals = 5000000
% 87.93/88.28 totalproof = 1
% 87.93/88.28
% 87.93/88.28 Symbols occurring in the translation:
% 87.93/88.28
% 87.93/88.28 {} [0, 0] (w:1, o:2, a:1, s:1, b:0),
% 87.93/88.28 . [1, 2] (w:1, o:24, a:1, s:1, b:0),
% 87.93/88.28 ! [4, 1] (w:0, o:19, a:1, s:1, b:0),
% 87.93/88.28 = [13, 2] (w:1, o:0, a:0, s:1, b:0),
% 87.93/88.28 ==> [14, 2] (w:1, o:0, a:0, s:1, b:0),
% 87.93/88.28 store [42, 3] (w:1, o:50, a:1, s:1, b:0),
% 87.93/88.28 select [43, 2] (w:1, o:49, a:1, s:1, b:0),
% 87.93/88.28 a1 [45, 0] (w:1, o:13, a:1, s:1, b:0),
% 87.93/88.28 i1 [46, 0] (w:1, o:14, a:1, s:1, b:0),
% 87.93/88.28 a2 [47, 0] (w:1, o:15, a:1, s:1, b:0),
% 87.93/88.28 i2 [48, 0] (w:1, o:16, a:1, s:1, b:0),
% 87.93/88.28 i3 [49, 0] (w:1, o:17, a:1, s:1, b:0),
% 87.93/88.28 i4 [50, 0] (w:1, o:18, a:1, s:1, b:0).
% 87.93/88.28
% 87.93/88.28
% 87.93/88.28 Starting Search:
% 87.93/88.28
% 87.93/88.28 Resimplifying inuse:
% 87.93/88.28 Done
% 87.93/88.28
% 87.93/88.28 Failed to find proof!
% 87.93/88.28 maxweight = 15
% 87.93/88.28 maxnrclauses = 10000000
% 87.93/88.28 Generated: 64101
% 87.93/88.28 Kept: 55
% 87.93/88.28
% 87.93/88.28
% 87.93/88.28 The strategy used was not complete!
% 87.93/88.28
% 87.93/88.28 Increased maxweight to 16
% 87.93/88.28
% 87.93/88.28 Starting Search:
% 87.93/88.28
% 87.93/88.28 Resimplifying inuse:
% 87.93/88.28 Done
% 87.93/88.28
% 87.93/88.28 Failed to find proof!
% 87.93/88.28 maxweight = 16
% 87.93/88.28 maxnrclauses = 10000000
% 87.93/88.28 Generated: 64101
% 87.93/88.28 Kept: 55
% 87.93/88.28
% 87.93/88.28
% 87.93/88.28 The strategy used was not complete!
% 87.93/88.28
% 87.93/88.28 Increased maxweight to 17
% 87.93/88.28
% 87.93/88.28 Starting Search:
% 87.93/88.28
% 87.93/88.28 Resimplifying inuse:
% 87.93/88.28 Done
% 87.93/88.28
% 87.93/88.28 Failed to find proof!
% 87.93/88.28 maxweight = 17
% 87.93/88.28 maxnrclauses = 10000000
% 87.93/88.28 Generated: 64101
% 87.93/88.28 Kept: 55
% 87.93/88.28
% 87.93/88.28
% 87.93/88.28 The strategy used was not complete!
% 87.93/88.28
% 87.93/88.28 Increased maxweight to 18
% 87.93/88.28
% 87.93/88.28 Starting Search:
% 87.93/88.28
% 87.93/88.28 Resimplifying inuse:
% 87.93/88.28 Done
% 87.93/88.28
% 87.93/88.28 Failed to find proof!
% 87.93/88.28 maxweight = 18
% 87.93/88.28 maxnrclauses = 10000000
% 87.93/88.28 Generated: 64359
% 87.93/88.28 Kept: 56
% 87.93/88.28
% 87.93/88.28
% 87.93/88.28 The strategy used was not complete!
% 87.93/88.28
% 87.93/88.28 Increased maxweight to 19
% 87.93/88.28
% 87.93/88.28 Starting Search:
% 87.93/88.28
% 87.93/88.28 Resimplifying inuse:
% 87.93/88.28 Done
% 87.93/88.28
% 87.93/88.28 Failed to find proof!
% 87.93/88.28 maxweight = 19
% 87.93/88.28 maxnrclauses = 10000000
% 87.93/88.28 Generated: 64448
% 87.93/88.28 Kept: 57
% 87.93/88.28
% 87.93/88.28
% 87.93/88.28 The strategy used was not complete!
% 87.93/88.28
% 87.93/88.28 Increased maxweight to 20
% 87.93/88.28
% 87.93/88.28 Starting Search:
% 87.93/88.28
% 87.93/88.28 Resimplifying Cputime limit exceeded (core dumped)
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------