TSTP Solution File: SWV456+1 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : SWV456+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 21:38:43 EDT 2022
% Result : Unknown 50.97s 51.14s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.13 % Problem : SWV456+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.03/0.14 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Thu Jun 16 00:55:29 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.22/0.38 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.22/0.38 The process was started by sandbox2 on n013.cluster.edu,
% 0.22/0.38 Thu Jun 16 00:55:29 2022
% 0.22/0.38 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 22045.
% 0.22/0.38
% 0.22/0.38 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.22/0.38 set(auto).
% 0.22/0.38 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.22/0.38 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.22/0.38 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.22/0.38 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.22/0.38 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.22/0.38 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.22/0.38 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.22/0.38 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.22/0.38 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.22/0.38 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.22/0.38 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.22/0.38 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.22/0.38 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.22/0.38 clear(print_given).
% 0.22/0.38
% 0.22/0.38 formula_list(usable).
% 0.22/0.38
% 0.22/0.38 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=7.
% 0.22/0.38
% 0.22/0.38 This ia a non-Horn set with equality. The strategy will be
% 0.22/0.38 Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.22/0.38 unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.22/0.38 clauses in usable.
% 0.22/0.38
% 0.22/0.38 dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.22/0.38 dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.22/0.38 dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.22/0.38 dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.22/0.38 dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.22/0.38 dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.22/0.38 dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.22/0.38 dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.22/0.38 dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.22/0.38 dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.22/0.38 dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.22/0.38 dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.22/0.38 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.22/0.38 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.22/0.38 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.22/0.38
% 0.22/0.38 ------------> process usable:
% 0.22/0.38 Following clause subsumed by 79 during input processing: 0 [] {-} leq(A,s(B))|A!=s(B).
% 0.22/0.38 Following clause subsumed by 16 during input processing: 0 [copy,108,flip.1] {-} m_Ack(A,B)!=m_Halt(C).
% 0.22/0.38 Following clause subsumed by 17 during input processing: 0 [copy,109,flip.1] {-} m_Ack(A,B)!=m_Down(C).
% 0.22/0.38 Following clause subsumed by 18 during input processing: 0 [copy,110,flip.1] {-} m_Ack(A,B)!=m_NotNorm(C).
% 0.22/0.38 Following clause subsumed by 19 during input processing: 0 [copy,111,flip.1] {-} m_Ack(A,B)!=m_Ldr(C).
% 0.22/0.38 Following clause subsumed by 20 during input processing: 0 [copy,112,flip.1] {-} m_Ack(A,B)!=m_NormQ(C).
% 0.22/0.38 Following clause subsumed by 21 during input processing: 0 [copy,113,flip.1] {-} m_NotNorm(A)!=m_Halt(B).
% 0.22/0.38 Following clause subsumed by 22 during input processing: 0 [copy,114,flip.1] {-} m_Down(A)!=m_Halt(B).
% 0.22/0.38 Following clause subsumed by 23 during input processing: 0 [copy,115,flip.1] {-} m_Down(A)!=m_Ldr(B).
% 0.22/0.38 Following clause subsumed by 24 during input processing: 0 [copy,116,flip.1] {-} m_Down(A)!=m_NotNorm(B).
% 0.22/0.38 Following clause subsumed by 25 during input processing: 0 [copy,117,flip.1] {-} m_Down(A)!=m_NormQ(B).
% 0.22/0.38 Following clause subsumed by 26 during input processing: 0 [copy,118,flip.1] {-} m_NormQ(A)!=m_Halt(B).
% 0.22/0.38 Following clause subsumed by 27 during input processing: 0 [copy,119,flip.1] {-} m_Ldr(A)!=m_Halt(B).
% 0.22/0.38 Following clause subsumed by 28 during input processing: 0 [copy,120,flip.1] {-} m_Ldr(A)!=m_NormQ(B).
% 0.22/0.38 Following clause subsumed by 29 during input processing: 0 [copy,121,flip.1] {-} m_Ldr(A)!=m_NotNorm(B).
% 0.22/0.38 Following clause subsumed by 30 during input processing: 0 [copy,122,flip.1] {-} m_NormQ(A)!=m_NotNorm(B).
% 0.22/0.38
% 0.22/0.38 ------------> process sos:
% 0.22/0.38 Following clause subsumed by 152 during input processing: 0 [demod,144] {-} ordered(cons(A,q_nil)).
% 0.22/0.38 153 back subsumes 124.
% 0.22/0.38 153 back subsumes 123.
% 0.22/0.38 Following clause subsumed by 182 during input processing: 0 [copy,182,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.22/0.38 182 back subsumes 126.
% 0.22/0.38 182 back subsumes 125.
% 0.22/0.38
% 0.22/0.38 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.22/0.46
% 0.22/0.46
% 0.22/0.46 Failed to model usable list: disabling FINDER
% 0.22/0.46
% 0.22/0.46
% 0.22/0.46
% 0.22/0.46 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.22/0.46
% 0.22/0.46 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.22/0.46 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.22/0.46 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.22/0.46 number of clauses in intial UL: 103
% 0.22/0.46 number of clauses initially in problem: 152
% 0.22/0.46 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 67
% 0.22/0.46 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 73
% 0.22/0.46 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 99
% 0.22/0.46 absolute distinct symbol count: 49
% 0.22/0.46 distinct predicate count: 6
% 0.22/0.46 distinct function count: 20
% 0.22/0.46 distinct constant count: 23
% 0.22/0.46
% 0.22/0.46 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.22/0.46
% 0.22/0.46
% 0.22/0.46
% 0.22/0.46 =========== start of search ===========
% 0.77/0.95
% 0.77/0.95
% 0.77/0.95 Changing weight limit from 60 to 43.
% 0.77/0.95
% 0.77/0.95 Resetting weight limit to 43 after 110 givens.
% 0.77/0.95
% 0.91/1.08
% 0.91/1.08
% 0.91/1.08 Changing weight limit from 43 to 25.
% 0.91/1.08
% 0.91/1.08 Resetting weight limit to 25 after 115 givens.
% 0.91/1.08
% 0.97/1.14
% 0.97/1.14
% 0.97/1.14 Changing weight limit from 25 to 22.
% 0.97/1.14
% 0.97/1.14 Resetting weight limit to 22 after 120 givens.
% 0.97/1.14
% 1.01/1.20
% 1.01/1.20
% 1.01/1.20 Changing weight limit from 22 to 20.
% 1.01/1.20
% 1.01/1.20 Resetting weight limit to 20 after 125 givens.
% 1.01/1.20
% 1.09/1.29
% 1.09/1.29
% 1.09/1.29 Changing weight limit from 20 to 19.
% 1.09/1.29
% 1.09/1.29 Resetting weight limit to 19 after 130 givens.
% 1.09/1.29
% 1.20/1.41
% 1.20/1.41
% 1.20/1.41 Changing weight limit from 19 to 18.
% 1.20/1.41
% 1.20/1.41 Resetting weight limit to 18 after 145 givens.
% 1.20/1.41
% 1.27/1.46
% 1.27/1.46
% 1.27/1.46 Changing weight limit from 18 to 17.
% 1.27/1.46
% 1.27/1.46 Resetting weight limit to 17 after 150 givens.
% 1.27/1.46
% 1.37/1.55
% 1.37/1.55
% 1.37/1.55 Changing weight limit from 17 to 16.
% 1.37/1.55
% 1.37/1.55 Resetting weight limit to 16 after 170 givens.
% 1.37/1.55
% 1.39/1.59
% 1.39/1.59
% 1.39/1.59 Changing weight limit from 16 to 15.
% 1.39/1.59
% 1.39/1.59 Resetting weight limit to 15 after 180 givens.
% 1.39/1.59
% 1.51/1.68
% 1.51/1.68
% 1.51/1.68 Changing weight limit from 15 to 14.
% 1.51/1.68
% 1.51/1.68 Resetting weight limit to 14 after 185 givens.
% 1.51/1.68
% 1.65/1.84
% 1.65/1.84
% 1.65/1.84 Changing weight limit from 14 to 13.
% 1.65/1.84
% 1.65/1.84 Resetting weight limit to 13 after 200 givens.
% 1.65/1.84
% 1.99/2.18
% 1.99/2.18
% 1.99/2.18 Changing weight limit from 13 to 12.
% 1.99/2.18
% 1.99/2.18 Resetting weight limit to 12 after 245 givens.
% 1.99/2.18
% 2.89/3.14
% 2.89/3.14
% 2.89/3.14 Changing weight limit from 12 to 11.
% 2.89/3.14
% 2.89/3.14 Modelling stopped after 300 given clauses and 0.00 seconds
% 2.89/3.14
% 2.89/3.14
% 2.89/3.14 Resetting weight limit to 11 after 405 givens.
% 2.89/3.14
% 3.81/4.01
% 3.81/4.01
% 3.81/4.01 Changing weight limit from 11 to 10.
% 3.81/4.01
% 3.81/4.01 Resetting weight limit to 10 after 620 givens.
% 3.81/4.01
% 49.14/49.34
% 49.14/49.34
% 49.14/49.34 Changing weight limit from 10 to 11.
% 49.14/49.34
% 49.14/49.34 Resetting weight limit to 11 after 6435 givens.
% 49.14/49.34
% 50.97/51.14 last(cons(A,cons($c3,B)))=last(cons($c3,B)).
% 50.97/51.14
% 50.97/51.14 ------------- memory usage ------------
% 50.97/51.14 377 mallocs of 32700 bytes each, 12039.0 K.
% 50.97/51.14 type (bytes each) gets frees in use avail bytes
% 50.97/51.14 sym_ent ( 304) 195 0 195 0 57.9 K
% 50.97/51.14 term ( 32) 155561324 155526163 35161 1000 1130.0 K
% 50.97/51.14 rel ( 40) 121554557 121492430 62127 1551 2487.4 K
% 50.97/51.14 term_ptr ( 16) 795245 587319 207926 4876 3325.0 K
% 50.97/51.14 formula_ptr_2 ( 56) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 50.97/51.14 fpa_head ( 24) 16271 8326 7945 70 187.9 K
% 50.97/51.14 fpa_tree ( 56) 4544447 4544447 0 1927 105.4 K
% 50.97/51.14 context (1288) 24372979 24372979 0 7 8.8 K
% 50.97/51.14 trail ( 24) 28701746 28701746 0 14 0.3 K
% 50.97/51.14 imd_tree ( 32) 155 52 103 24 4.0 K
% 50.97/51.14 imd_pos (4024) 1829042 1829042 0 4 15.7 K
% 50.97/51.14 is_tree ( 24) 23420 15208 8212 464 203.3 K
% 50.97/51.14 is_pos (2424) 203528150 203528150 0 6 14.2 K
% 50.97/51.14 fsub_pos ( 16) 26172626 26172626 0 1 0.0 K
% 50.97/51.14 literal ( 32) 33468017 33437452 30565 710 977.3 K
% 50.97/51.14 clause ( 88) 8629531 8616348 13183 318 1160.2 K
% 50.97/51.14 list ( 272) 78 71 7 2 2.4 K
% 50.97/51.14 clash_nd ( 80) 114338 114338 0 5 0.4 K
% 50.97/51.14 clause_ptr ( 16) 32875 19794 13081 316 209.3 K
% 50.97/51.14 int_ptr ( 16) 40810112 40695897 114215 3112 1833.2 K
% 50.97/51.14 ci_ptr ( 24) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 50.97/51.14 link_node ( 120) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 50.97/51.14 ans_lit_node( 24) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 50.97/51.14 formula_box( 168) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 50.97/51.14 formula( 40) 758 758 0 464 18.1 K
% 50.97/51.14 formula_ptr( 16) 68 68 0 68 1.1 K
% 50.97/51.14 cl_attribute( 24) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 50.97/51.14
% 50.97/51.14 ********** is_delete, can't find end.
% 50.97/51.14 k demod time 0.00
% 50.97/51.14 back subsume 0.00
% 50.97/51.14 factor time 0.00
% 50.97/51.14 FINDER time 0.00
% 50.97/51.14 unindex time 0.00
% 50.97/51.14
% 50.97/51.14 Forward subsumption counts, subsumer:number_subsumed.
% 50.97/51.14 1:0 2:0 3:8 4:0 5:2 6:0 7:3 8:0 9:2 10:0
% 50.97/51.14 11:3 12:0 13:2 14:0 15:3 16:1 17:1 18:1 19:1 20:1
% 50.97/51.14 21:2 22:14 23:3 24:3 25:3 26:2 27:2 28:2 29:2 30:2
% 50.97/51.14 31:281 32:1 33:278 34:0 35:279 36:0 37:279 38:0 39:282 40:1
% 50.97/51.14 41:272 42:272 43:2 44:8 45:0 46:286 47:0 48:6 49:1582 50:0
% 50.97/51.14 51:29 52:280 53:0 54:18 55:17 56:0 57:0 58:1 59:1 60:149
% 50.97/51.14 61:0 62:0 63:2 64:0 65:0 66:0 67:142 68:0 69:0 70:2
% 50.97/51.14 71:0 72:0 73:0 74:0 75:0 76:2 77:2 78:279 79:11 80:35
% 50.97/51.14 81:9 82:0 83:0 84:0 85:0 86:3 87:9 88:23 89:3 90:3
% 50.97/51.14 91:0 92:0 93:0 94:8 95:0 96:0 97:5 98:0 99:0
% 50.97/51.14 All others: 270708.
% 50.97/51.14
% 50.97/51.14 ********** ABNORMAL END **********
% 50.97/51.14
% 50.97/51.14 ********** is_delete, can't find end.
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------