TSTP Solution File: SWV447^1 by Leo-III-SAT---1.7.12

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Leo-III-SAT---1.7.12
% Problem  : SWV447^1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.7.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_Leo-III %s %d

% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 05:51:52 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 3.46s 1.95s
% Output   : Refutation 3.62s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   21 (  16 unt;   4 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   18 (  17 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  108 (   8   ~;   1   |;   0   &;  99   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   3 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   14 (  14   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :    6 (   4 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   29 (   7   ^  22   !;   0   ?;  29   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(nil_type,type,
    nil: $i ).

thf(cons_type,type,
    cons: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(map_type,type,
    map: ( $i > $i ) > $i > $i ).

thf(sk1_type,type,
    sk1: $i ).

thf(4,axiom,
    ! [A: $i > $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
      ( ( map @ A @ ( cons @ B @ C ) )
      = ( cons @ ( A @ B ) @ ( map @ A @ C ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax2) ).

thf(11,plain,
    ! [A: $i > $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
      ( ( map @ A @ ( cons @ B @ C ) )
      = ( cons @ ( A @ B ) @ ( map @ A @ C ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[4]) ).

thf(12,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i > $i] :
      ( ( map @ A @ ( cons @ B @ C ) )
      = ( cons @ ( A @ B ) @ ( map @ A @ C ) ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[11]) ).

thf(13,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i > $i] :
      ( ( map @ A @ ( cons @ B @ C ) )
      = ( cons @ ( A @ B ) @ ( map @ A @ C ) ) ),
    inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[12]) ).

thf(1,conjecture,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( map
        @ ^ [B: $i] : B
        @ ( cons @ A @ nil ) )
      = ( cons @ A @ nil ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',test) ).

thf(2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [A: $i] :
        ( ( map
          @ ^ [B: $i] : B
          @ ( cons @ A @ nil ) )
        = ( cons @ A @ nil ) ),
    inference(neg_conjecture,[status(cth)],[1]) ).

thf(5,plain,
    ~ ! [A: $i] :
        ( ( map
          @ ^ [B: $i] : B
          @ ( cons @ A @ nil ) )
        = ( cons @ A @ nil ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).

thf(6,plain,
    ( ( map
      @ ^ [A: $i] : A
      @ ( cons @ sk1 @ nil ) )
   != ( cons @ sk1 @ nil ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[5]) ).

thf(7,plain,
    ( ( map
      @ ^ [A: $i] : A
      @ ( cons @ sk1 @ nil ) )
   != ( cons @ sk1 @ nil ) ),
    inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[6]) ).

thf(18,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i > $i] :
      ( ( ( cons @ ( A @ B ) @ ( map @ A @ C ) )
       != ( cons @ sk1 @ nil ) )
      | ( ( map @ A @ ( cons @ B @ C ) )
       != ( map
          @ ^ [D: $i] : D
          @ ( cons @ sk1 @ nil ) ) ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[13,7]) ).

thf(19,plain,
    ( ( cons @ sk1
      @ ( map
        @ ^ [A: $i] : A
        @ nil ) )
   != ( cons @ sk1 @ nil ) ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[18:[bind(A,$thf( ^ [D: $i] : D )),bind(B,$thf( sk1 )),bind(C,$thf( nil ))]]) ).

thf(3,axiom,
    ! [A: $i > $i] :
      ( ( map @ A @ nil )
      = nil ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax1) ).

thf(8,plain,
    ! [A: $i > $i] :
      ( ( map @ A @ nil )
      = nil ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[3]) ).

thf(9,plain,
    ! [A: $i > $i] :
      ( ( map @ A @ nil )
      = nil ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[8]) ).

thf(10,plain,
    ! [A: $i > $i] :
      ( ( map @ A @ nil )
      = nil ),
    inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[9]) ).

thf(60,plain,
    ( ( cons @ sk1 @ nil )
   != ( cons @ sk1 @ nil ) ),
    inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[19,10]) ).

thf(61,plain,
    $false,
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[60]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.13  % Problem  : SWV447^1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.7.0.
% 0.15/0.17  % Command  : run_Leo-III %s %d
% 0.17/0.38  % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.17/0.38  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.17/0.38  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.17/0.38  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.17/0.38  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.17/0.38  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.17/0.38  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.17/0.38  % DateTime : Sun May 19 06:33:24 EDT 2024
% 0.17/0.38  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.99/0.89  % [INFO] 	 Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... 
% 1.24/1.00  % [INFO] 	 Parsing done (106ms). 
% 1.24/1.01  % [INFO] 	 Running in sequential loop mode. 
% 1.63/1.23  % [INFO] 	 nitpick registered as external prover. 
% 1.63/1.24  % [INFO] 	 Scanning for conjecture ... 
% 1.80/1.29  % [INFO] 	 Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 2 axioms. Running axiom selection ... 
% 1.95/1.31  % [INFO] 	 Axiom selection finished. Selected 2 axioms (removed 0 axioms). 
% 1.95/1.32  % [INFO] 	 Problem is higher-order (TPTP THF). 
% 1.95/1.32  % [INFO] 	 Type checking passed. 
% 1.95/1.32  % [CONFIG] 	 Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>.  Searching for refutation ... 
% 3.46/1.95  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
% 3.46/1.95  % Time passed: 1403ms (effective reasoning time: 937ms)
% 3.46/1.95  % Solved by strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>
% 3.46/1.95  % Axioms used in derivation (2): ax2, ax1
% 3.46/1.95  % No. of inferences in proof: 17
% 3.46/1.95  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 1403 ms resp. 937 ms w/o parsing
% 3.62/1.99  % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.62/1.99  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------