TSTP Solution File: SWV431^2 by E---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1.00
% Problem : SWV431^2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.6.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 05:24:45 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.13s 0.39s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.13s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 9
% Number of leaves : 34
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 70 ( 37 unt; 21 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 163 ( 28 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 18 ( 3 avg)
% Number of connectives : 325 ( 40 ~; 43 |; 8 &; 214 @)
% ( 0 <=>; 20 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 17 ( 4 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 105 ( 105 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 23 ( 21 usr; 6 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 111 ( 60 ^ 51 !; 0 ?; 111 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(decl_28,type,
mnot: ( $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).
thf(decl_29,type,
mor: ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).
thf(decl_31,type,
mimpl: ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).
thf(decl_33,type,
mbox: ( $i > $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).
thf(decl_37,type,
mvalid: ( $i > $o ) > $o ).
thf(decl_41,type,
rel: $i > $i > $o ).
thf(decl_42,type,
icl_atom: ( $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).
thf(decl_43,type,
icl_princ: ( $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).
thf(decl_46,type,
icl_impl: ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).
thf(decl_49,type,
icl_says: ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).
thf(decl_50,type,
iclval: ( $i > $o ) > $o ).
thf(decl_51,type,
icl_impl_princ: ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).
thf(decl_52,type,
a: $i > $o ).
thf(decl_53,type,
b: $i > $o ).
thf(decl_54,type,
s: $i > $o ).
thf(decl_56,type,
esk2_2: ( $i > $o ) > $i > $i ).
thf(decl_57,type,
esk3_0: $i ).
thf(decl_58,type,
esk4_0: $i ).
thf(decl_59,type,
esk5_0: $i ).
thf(decl_60,type,
esk6_0: $i ).
thf(decl_61,type,
esk7_0: $i ).
thf(mimpl,axiom,
( mimpl
= ( ^ [X7: $i > $o,X8: $i > $o] : ( mor @ ( mnot @ X7 ) @ X8 ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL008^0.ax',mimpl) ).
thf(mnot,axiom,
( mnot
= ( ^ [X2: $i > $o,X3: $i] :
~ ( X2 @ X3 ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL008^0.ax',mnot) ).
thf(mor,axiom,
( mor
= ( ^ [X4: $i > $o,X5: $i > $o,X3: $i] :
( ( X4 @ X3 )
| ( X5 @ X3 ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL008^0.ax',mor) ).
thf(icl_atom,axiom,
( icl_atom
= ( ^ [X11: $i > $o] : ( mbox @ rel @ X11 ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWV008^0.ax',icl_atom) ).
thf(mbox,axiom,
( mbox
= ( ^ [X10: $i > $i > $o,X11: $i > $o,X1: $i] :
! [X12: $i] :
( ( X10 @ X1 @ X12 )
=> ( X11 @ X12 ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL008^0.ax',mbox) ).
thf(icl_impl,axiom,
( icl_impl
= ( ^ [X19: $i > $o,X20: $i > $o] : ( mbox @ rel @ ( mimpl @ X19 @ X20 ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWV008^0.ax',icl_impl) ).
thf(icl_says,axiom,
( icl_says
= ( ^ [X19: $i > $o,X21: $i > $o] : ( mbox @ rel @ ( mor @ X19 @ X21 ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWV008^0.ax',icl_says) ).
thf(icl_s4_valid,axiom,
( iclval
= ( ^ [X22: $i > $o] : ( mvalid @ X22 ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWV008^0.ax',icl_s4_valid) ).
thf(mvalid,axiom,
( mvalid
= ( ^ [X11: $i > $o] :
! [X15: $i] : ( X11 @ X15 ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL008^0.ax',mvalid) ).
thf(icl_impl_princ,axiom,
( icl_impl_princ
= ( ^ [X19: $i > $o,X20: $i > $o] : ( mbox @ rel @ ( mimpl @ X19 @ X20 ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWV008^2.ax',icl_impl_princ) ).
thf(icl_princ,axiom,
( icl_princ
= ( ^ [X11: $i > $o] : X11 ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWV008^0.ax',icl_princ) ).
thf(speaking_for,conjecture,
iclval @ ( icl_impl @ ( icl_impl_princ @ ( icl_princ @ a ) @ ( icl_princ @ b ) ) @ ( icl_impl @ ( icl_says @ ( icl_princ @ a ) @ ( icl_atom @ s ) ) @ ( icl_says @ ( icl_princ @ b ) @ ( icl_atom @ s ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',speaking_for) ).
thf(trans_axiom,axiom,
! [X20: $i > $o] : ( mvalid @ ( mimpl @ ( mbox @ rel @ X20 ) @ ( mbox @ rel @ ( mbox @ rel @ X20 ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWV008^1.ax',trans_axiom) ).
thf(c_0_13,plain,
( mimpl
= ( ^ [Z0: $i > $o,Z1: $i > $o,Z2: $i] :
( ~ ( Z0 @ Z2 )
| ( Z1 @ Z2 ) ) ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[mimpl]) ).
thf(c_0_14,plain,
( mnot
= ( ^ [Z0: $i > $o,Z1: $i] :
~ ( Z0 @ Z1 ) ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[mnot]) ).
thf(c_0_15,plain,
( mor
= ( ^ [Z0: $i > $o,Z1: $i > $o,Z2: $i] :
( ( Z0 @ Z2 )
| ( Z1 @ Z2 ) ) ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[mor]) ).
thf(c_0_16,plain,
( icl_atom
= ( ^ [Z0: $i > $o,Z1: $i] :
! [X25: $i] :
( ( rel @ Z1 @ X25 )
=> ( Z0 @ X25 ) ) ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[icl_atom]) ).
thf(c_0_17,plain,
( mbox
= ( ^ [Z0: $i > $i > $o,Z1: $i > $o,Z2: $i] :
! [X12: $i] :
( ( Z0 @ Z2 @ X12 )
=> ( Z1 @ X12 ) ) ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[mbox]) ).
thf(c_0_18,plain,
( icl_impl
= ( ^ [Z0: $i > $o,Z1: $i > $o,Z2: $i] :
! [X26: $i] :
( ( rel @ Z2 @ X26 )
=> ( ~ ( Z0 @ X26 )
| ( Z1 @ X26 ) ) ) ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[icl_impl]) ).
thf(c_0_19,plain,
( mimpl
= ( ^ [Z0: $i > $o,Z1: $i > $o,Z2: $i] :
( ~ ( Z0 @ Z2 )
| ( Z1 @ Z2 ) ) ) ),
inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]),c_0_15]) ).
thf(c_0_20,plain,
( icl_says
= ( ^ [Z0: $i > $o,Z1: $i > $o,Z2: $i] :
! [X27: $i] :
( ( rel @ Z2 @ X27 )
=> ( ( Z0 @ X27 )
| ( Z1 @ X27 ) ) ) ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[icl_says]) ).
thf(c_0_21,plain,
( iclval
= ( ^ [Z0: $i > $o] :
! [X28: $i] : ( Z0 @ X28 ) ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[icl_s4_valid]) ).
thf(c_0_22,plain,
( mvalid
= ( ^ [Z0: $i > $o] :
! [X15: $i] : ( Z0 @ X15 ) ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[mvalid]) ).
thf(c_0_23,plain,
( icl_impl_princ
= ( ^ [Z0: $i > $o,Z1: $i > $o,Z2: $i] :
! [X29: $i] :
( ( rel @ Z2 @ X29 )
=> ( ~ ( Z0 @ X29 )
| ( Z1 @ X29 ) ) ) ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[icl_impl_princ]) ).
thf(c_0_24,plain,
( icl_atom
= ( ^ [Z0: $i > $o,Z1: $i] :
! [X25: $i] :
( ( rel @ Z1 @ X25 )
=> ( Z0 @ X25 ) ) ) ),
inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).
thf(c_0_25,plain,
( icl_princ
= ( ^ [Z0: $i > $o] : Z0 ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[icl_princ]) ).
thf(c_0_26,plain,
( icl_impl
= ( ^ [Z0: $i > $o,Z1: $i > $o,Z2: $i] :
! [X26: $i] :
( ( rel @ Z2 @ X26 )
=> ( ~ ( Z0 @ X26 )
| ( Z1 @ X26 ) ) ) ) ),
inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]),c_0_17]) ).
thf(c_0_27,plain,
( icl_says
= ( ^ [Z0: $i > $o,Z1: $i > $o,Z2: $i] :
! [X27: $i] :
( ( rel @ Z2 @ X27 )
=> ( ( Z0 @ X27 )
| ( Z1 @ X27 ) ) ) ) ),
inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_15]),c_0_17]) ).
thf(c_0_28,plain,
( iclval
= ( ^ [Z0: $i > $o] :
! [X28: $i] : ( Z0 @ X28 ) ) ),
inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]) ).
thf(c_0_29,plain,
( icl_impl_princ
= ( ^ [Z0: $i > $o,Z1: $i > $o,Z2: $i] :
! [X29: $i] :
( ( rel @ Z2 @ X29 )
=> ( ~ ( Z0 @ X29 )
| ( Z1 @ X29 ) ) ) ) ),
inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_19]),c_0_17]) ).
thf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X43: $i,X42: $i] :
( ( rel @ X43 @ X42 )
=> ( ~ ! [X36: $i] :
( ( rel @ X42 @ X36 )
=> ( ~ ( a @ X36 )
| ( b @ X36 ) ) )
| ! [X41: $i] :
( ( rel @ X42 @ X41 )
=> ( ~ ! [X38: $i] :
( ( rel @ X41 @ X38 )
=> ( ( a @ X38 )
| ! [X37: $i] :
( ( rel @ X38 @ X37 )
=> ( s @ X37 ) ) ) )
| ! [X40: $i] :
( ( rel @ X41 @ X40 )
=> ( ( b @ X40 )
| ! [X39: $i] :
( ( rel @ X40 @ X39 )
=> ( s @ X39 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[speaking_for]),c_0_24]),c_0_25]),c_0_26]),c_0_27]),c_0_28]),c_0_29])]) ).
thf(c_0_31,plain,
! [X20: $i > $o,X35: $i] :
( ~ ! [X32: $i] :
( ( rel @ X35 @ X32 )
=> ( X20 @ X32 ) )
| ! [X34: $i] :
( ( rel @ X35 @ X34 )
=> ! [X33: $i] :
( ( rel @ X34 @ X33 )
=> ( X20 @ X33 ) ) ) ),
inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[trans_axiom,c_0_19]),c_0_17]),c_0_22]) ).
thf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
! [X54: $i,X56: $i,X57: $i] :
( ( rel @ esk3_0 @ esk4_0 )
& ( ~ ( rel @ esk4_0 @ X54 )
| ~ ( a @ X54 )
| ( b @ X54 ) )
& ( rel @ esk4_0 @ esk5_0 )
& ( ~ ( rel @ esk5_0 @ X56 )
| ( a @ X56 )
| ~ ( rel @ X56 @ X57 )
| ( s @ X57 ) )
& ( rel @ esk5_0 @ esk6_0 )
& ~ ( b @ esk6_0 )
& ( rel @ esk6_0 @ esk7_0 )
& ~ ( s @ esk7_0 ) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_30])])])])]) ).
thf(c_0_33,plain,
! [X47: $i > $o,X48: $i,X50: $i,X51: $i] :
( ( ( rel @ X48 @ ( esk2_2 @ X47 @ X48 ) )
| ~ ( rel @ X48 @ X50 )
| ~ ( rel @ X50 @ X51 )
| ( X47 @ X51 ) )
& ( ~ ( X47 @ ( esk2_2 @ X47 @ X48 ) )
| ~ ( rel @ X48 @ X50 )
| ~ ( rel @ X50 @ X51 )
| ( X47 @ X51 ) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_31])])])])])]) ).
thf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
! [X1: $i,X3: $i] :
( ( a @ X1 )
| ( s @ X3 )
| ~ ( rel @ esk5_0 @ X1 )
| ~ ( rel @ X1 @ X3 ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_32]) ).
thf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
rel @ esk6_0 @ esk7_0,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_32]) ).
thf(c_0_36,negated_conjecture,
rel @ esk5_0 @ esk6_0,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_32]) ).
thf(c_0_37,negated_conjecture,
~ ( s @ esk7_0 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_32]) ).
thf(c_0_38,plain,
! [X1: $i,X2: $i > $o,X3: $i,X12: $i] :
( ( X2 @ X12 )
| ~ ( X2 @ ( esk2_2 @ X2 @ X1 ) )
| ~ ( rel @ X1 @ X3 )
| ~ ( rel @ X3 @ X12 ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_33]) ).
thf(c_0_39,plain,
! [X1: $i,X2: $i > $o,X3: $i,X12: $i] :
( ( rel @ X1 @ ( esk2_2 @ X2 @ X1 ) )
| ( X2 @ X12 )
| ~ ( rel @ X1 @ X3 )
| ~ ( rel @ X3 @ X12 ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_33]) ).
thf(c_0_40,negated_conjecture,
! [X1: $i] :
( ( b @ X1 )
| ~ ( rel @ esk4_0 @ X1 )
| ~ ( a @ X1 ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_32]) ).
thf(c_0_41,negated_conjecture,
a @ esk6_0,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_35]),c_0_36])]),c_0_37]) ).
thf(c_0_42,negated_conjecture,
~ ( b @ esk6_0 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_32]) ).
thf(c_0_43,negated_conjecture,
! [X2: $i > $o,X1: $i] :
( ( X2 @ esk6_0 )
| ~ ( X2 @ ( esk2_2 @ X2 @ X1 ) )
| ~ ( rel @ X1 @ esk5_0 ) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_38,c_0_36]) ).
thf(c_0_44,negated_conjecture,
! [X2: $i > $o,X1: $i] :
( ( rel @ X1 @ ( esk2_2 @ X2 @ X1 ) )
| ( X2 @ esk6_0 )
| ~ ( rel @ X1 @ esk5_0 ) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_39,c_0_36]) ).
thf(c_0_45,negated_conjecture,
~ ( rel @ esk4_0 @ esk6_0 ),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_40,c_0_41]),c_0_42]) ).
thf(c_0_46,negated_conjecture,
! [X1: $i] :
( ( rel @ X1 @ esk6_0 )
| ~ ( rel @ X1 @ esk5_0 ) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_43,c_0_44]) ).
thf(c_0_47,negated_conjecture,
rel @ esk4_0 @ esk5_0,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_32]) ).
thf(c_0_48,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_45,c_0_46]),c_0_47])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.02/0.08 % Problem : SWV431^2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.6.0.
% 0.02/0.09 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.09/0.28 % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.28 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.28 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.28 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.09/0.28 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.09/0.28 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.28 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.09/0.28 % DateTime : Sun May 19 07:31:53 EDT 2024
% 0.09/0.28 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.37 Running higher-order theorem proving
% 0.13/0.37 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.39 # Version: 3.1.0-ho
% 0.13/0.39 # Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSSMLSNHSN.
% 0.13/0.39 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.13/0.39 # Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.13/0.39 # Starting post_as_ho3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.39 # Starting post_as_ho11 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.39 # Starting full_lambda_8 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.39 # full_lambda_8 with pid 8350 completed with status 0
% 0.13/0.39 # Result found by full_lambda_8
% 0.13/0.39 # Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSSMLSNHSN.
% 0.13/0.39 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.13/0.39 # Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.13/0.39 # Starting post_as_ho3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.39 # Starting post_as_ho11 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.39 # Starting full_lambda_8 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.39 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.13/0.39 # Search class: HGUNF-FFSS22-SHSSMSBN
% 0.13/0.39 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.13/0.39 # Starting new_ho_10 with 163s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.39 # new_ho_10 with pid 8352 completed with status 0
% 0.13/0.39 # Result found by new_ho_10
% 0.13/0.39 # Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSSMLSNHSN.
% 0.13/0.39 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.13/0.39 # Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.13/0.39 # Starting post_as_ho3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.39 # Starting post_as_ho11 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.39 # Starting full_lambda_8 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.39 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.13/0.39 # Search class: HGUNF-FFSS22-SHSSMSBN
% 0.13/0.39 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.13/0.39 # Starting new_ho_10 with 163s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.39 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.13/0.39 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.13/0.39
% 0.13/0.39 # Proof found!
% 0.13/0.39 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.13/0.39 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.13/0.39 # Parsed axioms : 62
% 0.13/0.39 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.13/0.39 # Initial clauses : 46
% 0.13/0.39 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 34
% 0.13/0.39 # Initial clauses in saturation : 12
% 0.13/0.39 # Processed clauses : 54
% 0.13/0.39 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.13/0.39 # ...subsumed : 1
% 0.13/0.39 # ...remaining for further processing : 53
% 0.13/0.39 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.13/0.39 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.13/0.39 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.13/0.39 # Backward-rewritten : 1
% 0.13/0.39 # Generated clauses : 111
% 0.13/0.39 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 90
% 0.13/0.39 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.13/0.39 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.13/0.39 # Paramodulations : 111
% 0.13/0.39 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.13/0.39 # NegExts : 0
% 0.13/0.39 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.13/0.39 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.13/0.39 # Total rewrite steps : 14
% 0.13/0.39 # ...of those cached : 7
% 0.13/0.39 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.13/0.39 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.13/0.39 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.13/0.39 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.13/0.39 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.13/0.39 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.13/0.39 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.13/0.39 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.13/0.39 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.13/0.39 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.13/0.39 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.13/0.39 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.13/0.39 # Current number of processed clauses : 40
% 0.13/0.39 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 6
% 0.13/0.39 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.13/0.39 # Negative unit clauses : 3
% 0.13/0.39 # Non-unit-clauses : 31
% 0.13/0.39 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 60
% 0.13/0.39 # ...number of literals in the above : 235
% 0.13/0.39 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.13/0.39 # Current number of archived clauses : 13
% 0.13/0.39 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 126
% 0.13/0.39 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 103
% 0.13/0.39 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 1
% 0.13/0.39 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 6
% 0.13/0.39 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.13/0.39 # BW rewrite match attempts : 17
% 0.13/0.39 # BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 0.13/0.39 # Condensation attempts : 54
% 0.13/0.39 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.13/0.39 # Termbank termtop insertions : 4476
% 0.13/0.39 # Search garbage collected termcells : 798
% 0.13/0.39
% 0.13/0.39 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.13/0.39 # User time : 0.007 s
% 0.13/0.39 # System time : 0.001 s
% 0.13/0.39 # Total time : 0.008 s
% 0.13/0.39 # Maximum resident set size: 1896 pages
% 0.13/0.39
% 0.13/0.39 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.13/0.39 # User time : 0.009 s
% 0.13/0.39 # System time : 0.001 s
% 0.13/0.39 # Total time : 0.010 s
% 0.13/0.39 # Maximum resident set size: 1784 pages
% 0.13/0.39 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.13/0.39 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------